The government have responded to the petition. Full text here:
”The Government recognises the strength of public concern about the performance of water companies, including pollution incidents, infrastructure failures, and the need for stronger environmental protection. We are clear that standards must improve and that water companies must be held fully to account.
Some campaigners have called for nationalisation of the water industry or a move to not for profit public ownership. However, the Government does not believe that nationalisation is the answer. The reality is that it would take many years to unpick the current ownership model, would be extremely complex, and would likely result in prolonged legal challenges, with years spent in the courts rather than fixing the problems people rightly care about.
During that period, billions of pounds of vital private investment needed to repair leaking pipes, upgrade infrastructure, and improve environmental performance would be put at risk or delayed. Nationalisation would also create a significant hole in the public finances, diverting funding away from key public priorities such as hospitals and schools, without delivering faster or better outcomes for customers or the environment.
Independent analysis by the Independent Water Commission found no evidence that ownership models—whether public or private—determine performance. What matters is strong regulation, effective enforcement, and sustained investment. That is why the Government is focused on reforming how the sector is regulated, rather than pursuing disruptive and costly structural change.
This is why we are delivering the most far reaching overhaul of water regulation in a generation. Through the Water White Paper, we are strengthening the powers of regulators, introducing tougher oversight, enabling no notice inspections, and taking a prevention first approach to pollution. We are also increasing accountability by banning bonuses for senior executives when performance falls short, introducing swift and automatic penalties for pollution incidents, and creating new criminal sanctions for those who obstruct investigations. Nationalisation is not the answer—tougher regulation is—and we are giving regulators the teeth they need to act quickly and decisively.
The Water White Paper is also clear that where a water company proposes a transition to a different ownership model, such as a not for profit structure, the new regulator will assess whether this should go ahead and ensure that the interests of customers are properly protected and reflected in any decision.
The Government remains focused on ensuring water companies meet the high standards the public expects, invest in resilient infrastructure, protect bill payers, and restore the environment for future generations—delivering real improvements without the delay, disruption, and cost that nationalisation would bring.
Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs”