Reform wants women barefoot and pregnant

[Sweetiedarling7]

Reform candidate Matt Goodwin wants women to have children early in life and introduce extra taxes as punishment for anyone who chooses not to have children.

Misogyny in plain sight.

How long till they ban abortion too?

Women voting Reform may want to consider if they are turkeys voting for christmas.

Yes, I thought the list looked a bit light but didn’t think I could be bothered with searching for more wrongdoing… 😔

Agree re pensions but we should keep worries about care in proportion.

Less than 3% of older people (65+) live in care homes, and about 4.5% receive publicly funded long term care (either at home or care homes). That still needs to be funded but we needn’t catastrophise just yet I don’t think.

source https://www.kingsfund.org.uk/insight-and-analysis/data-and-charts/key-facts-figures-adult-social-care

I think Farage has stated in the recent past that he supported lifting the two child benefit cap but that it should not be paid to anyone not born on this country.

I can see why female Labour front benchers are so blind to child sex abuse now.
There is still this insistence that it there is not a problem with Labour and child sex abuse? Labour Peer Lord Glasman spoke about it himself on Sky News recently.

You didn't acknowledge that both Conservative and LibDem list was small compared to the very long Labour list for recent allegations investigated by the Police and convictions and instead focused on providing a list which I'll respond to below.

It is clear this idea that paedophiles exist equally everywhere isn't true. They are the most motivated people and live their lives entirely creating opportunity and mixing with people that will not expose their predilictions.

My search was for "recent scandal child sex abuse in .... party" produced the results I posted.

Your list
Jack Denny:
Background: Denny is an ex-police sergeant and prison officer. Professionally, he is identified as a criminologist and an advocate for prison law and human rights.
He was removed via internal vetting by Reform after being put forward as a candidate for Leeds and it was found out he had convictions and on the sex register. But he's gone, nowhere to hide and no political party covering for him, didn't get promoted by Starmer and McSweeney as a suitable candidate for an MP - see Dan Norris scandal (current and recent resignation/criminal proceedings).

Stephen Hartley: "praised a known abuser" - that was Jimmy Savile. He wasn't arrested and no police investigation as it was a Twitter post. Following his suspension, Reform UK withdrew all support for his candidacy and confirmed he was no longer a party member. Hartley stated he thought the suspension was "fair enough" and mentioned he had "forgotten" to disclose his X (formerly Twitter) account during the party's vetting process. You do recall that Starmer was head of CPS and has said that no evidence passed his desk regarding Savile so he couldn't be held responsible for not proceeding with any of the claims brought forward by Savile victims or the grooming gangs for that matter during his tenure.

Jason Rutter - can't find anything about who he is or your claim so could you provide a link for that?

Aaron Knight - this is 2016 so wouldn't have shown up under my search of "recent". Yes he was an abuser and I expect all party vetting is now 100% better than back in 2016, so I don't think Labour have any excuse for the number of very "recent" convictions and allegations which is what my original list was highlighting. UKIP not Reform, not recent, so the search didn't provide the name, but not relevant to my assertions that Labour have a CURRENT sex abuse problem and are currently in power which should be shocking, but apparently let's dig out something from 2016 and not Reform.

I can't see any link between Anthony Styles and Reform at all.

I think the sheer numbers of recent convictions connected to child sex abuse connected to Labour indicate a problem. Females on the left insist it is equally divided amongst "all men". Not true. If it's true for you, then you really need a new circle of friends, partners and associates.

My search was for "recent" scandals of child sexual abuse. We should now expect better vetting of all policitians surely? But your list seems to be rather desperately trying to pin something from UKIP in 2016 to Reform today. Reform's vetting suspending those which are not suitable seems a good and robust policy. All parties should be adopting shouldn't they?

Seriously, maybe Labour could do some backwards vetting of the people it seems to have welcomed in without the appropriate vetting seeing as some are the heights of power by Starmer ie. Dan Norris very recently.

Dan Norris the Labour MP that Starmer was highly supportive of in fact ignored calls to investigate Norris' bullying reported back in April 2025 by a charity.

Norris then went on to be arreseted for rape and abduction and historical child sex abuse. Weird that no vetting picked any of that up by Labour? Really, don't you think? He was put forward as the Labour candidate and known well by Starmer and McSweeney and vetting showed he would make a great MP and he won that seat at the last general election. That's what I mean by "recent".

https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/4ff570a687c4abb1

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/czx48gq0y77o

I provided Lib Dems and Conservatives and you didn't note how much shorter and noticebaly longer Labour's list was.

I can't imagine being so upset by a blog discussing demographics 18 months ago that a whole thread of imaginay scenarios when all of the cases listed in my post are NOW and ongoing.

What about all the current real problems within this government. Deleting court records? They've now given up on cancelling those elections so maybe someone can push Starmer off his perch and discuss Nick Brown as a catylst for change and then commit to restrospectively vet everyone in Labour as clearly the vetting to date has been questionable.

I can't understand all the excuses people are making and then coming up with a made up story that the idea (idea, remember) via the tax system providing support for parents while children are growing up is dystopian. No, you're living now under this current government in a dystopian horror story.

Children can change gender at school etc the list is endless. I really don't think Labour are the party for children and women. The words are there but the facts are very, very different.

https://www.thetimes.com/uk/politics/article/school-children-change-gender-trans-2p0xsm892?gaa_at=eafs&gaa_n=AWEtsqfeCueClvFNHcI0KP1SmUcI4Ko1BlHUSJUep6jvCayV6pcV_OFUynEoR33T0LA%3D&gaa_ts=69934abc&gaa_sig=VA96Qp0WHP5H7MPh4tGC2rev5loJtn8iA3Nn9MgZXhdnK5RYRw3zFcAK5YMGjXbbvDDY3xqu8sWfEkCOYrQWgw%3D%3D

Farage has said a great deal of things he has either dropped or rowed back on.

Initially, he wanted the cap lifted, no restrictions, then, a few months later, once he saw which way the public mood was heading he rushed out in front to shout "only payable to British Born parents"

So how would that work for a couple where only one parent born in UK or where, after a separation, the claimant is the parent born overseas?

He really is a clown

Children can change gender at school etc the list is endless. I really don't think Labour are the party for children and women. The words are there but the facts are very, very different

Labour are abiding by the Cass review report, widely welcomed at the time, on MN no less!

If Stephen wishes to be called Stephanie, is supported by parents and comes to school dressed as a girl, what would you do? send him home? deny him an education?

The legally binding guidance will have already prevented "Stephanie" from using the girls changing rooms or toilets.

People are always going to need help. Even if you’re an spritely senior one fall can see catastrophic consequences to your standard of living.

I’m definitely not reading all that. In my defence I got to para 3 but I just don’t want to read your theories on paedophiles, even if they were on topic. I’ll blank any further posts from you so don’t feel any compulsion to reply.

You went to the trouble of providing a list and posted it to me, I did not address you other than in response to your post to me.

To save you the trouble I provided information that showed your list and the effort you went to in researching unrelated people to Reform was a waste of time. So you'd have saved both our times not providing a list with incorrect and unrelated info, lol.

Head in sand paedophiles are equally distributed and Labour are great and Reform are evil. Ironically women denying that Labour has a problem with paedophiles continues until they notice that not all men are willing to have mates who are paedophiles or cover for paedophiles in general or indeed be a convicted one themself.

Plenty of women are happy to shout at hotels alongside domestic abusers

That seems to be the case.

Is a childless woman supposed to drag a man off the street and demand impregnation? Will reform set up up artificial insemination centres for those who require it?

I admit to being bitter, particularly when I see the 'worth' argument.

I spent 40 yrs teaching other people's children. I didn't marry until I was 34 and had three miscarriages, one precipitated by being punched in the stomach by someone else's teenage son.

Again, what are women supposed to do - beg someone for a sperm sample?

Oh god don’t give some of these people ideas…

I can't decide whether we're heading for Brave New World or The Handmaid's Tale.

Fortunately I don’t think either. Reform are punching above their weight but I believe that will calm down - partly because the government and the Tories realise pandering to them is losing them votes. Labour in two directions. I think G and D will be close but let’s see.

"Head in Sand" that's where we are, don't worry about future imaginary horror stories. We are living in it now.

It is worrying how matter of fact some women on the left seem about all the recent Labour convictions and arrests. It really isn't equally spread amongst all parties and if you think that, then do better research.

The list someone posted with random unconnected names to try to link to Reform had amongst them a man that tweeted 10 years ago about Jimmy Savile as if was comparable to convicted child sex offender connected to this current Labour government. Lol. Bizarre.

I can't imagine going to the trouble of forming a list of names to see if something might stick and then saying not interested when proved wrong. Huh? Not interested in the objective truth? No, as it interferes with tales of maginary Gilead. Weird. The present is the problem and this current government are the problem. Labour voters being so tribal that they cannot accept objective truth.

The Labour list is long...objectively long and using the argument that you can find a couple of paedophiles in other parties overall, still shows that Labour is a very safe harbour, particularly as Starmer and McSweeney must take the blame for Dan Norris. Norris is a mate and what sort of vetting took place to end up with Norris being arrested within a year of becoming an MP?

Oh we’ve been in Brave New World for a while now. Labour/the Left are dragging us rapidly towards 1984 though. Are people still convinced by the “Left=nice” thing? How much Soma have some people had???

We're heading towards all the dystopias at once: the billionaire hell led by techno-fascists is plunging us into Brave New World (not the Left that is about trying to impose regulations and taxes on the fuckers), 1984 thanks to widespread surveillance technology, Handmaids Tale courtesy of Christo- fascists who can't stomach that feminism has made real inroads, Fahrenheit 451 (oh yes, the book burners are alive and well) thanks to all these guys, and a bit of Blade Runner for good measure thanks to advances in automation and AI.
Good times.

This. I do admire people optimistic enough to want children at this time. The push to increase the birth rate is not for the benefit of these future children though - it is to prop up a corrupt system with cheap labour for the techno-fascists.

labour are losing votes for pandering to reform I agree, those votes are going to greens. However, tories have lost their votes due to their governance during the last few years. The truth is change needs to happen and unfortunately labour have shown themselves to not only be to far left but also to be totalitarian & dictatorship in their approach. yet the tories have already proven they won’t sort it like or loath Labour many of the things they’ve doubled down on has occurred from the tories. Non criminal hate crime was already implemented it just got exasperated through Labour. Which I don’t get why we aren’t in uproar about. To say something on social media to have the police knock your door as it caused offence. Do people not realise that’s the punishment. The stress and embarrassment to have the police at your door because you upset Roger on Facebook.

You mean the social media posts inciting violence and to burn down hotels with people inside?

Non criminal hate crime was already implemented it just got exasperated through Labour.

How do you work that out?

You've missed one, Lionel Shriver's Mania.

Everyone's equal !

I think calling for people to be killed on FB, X etc is little more than "upsetting Roger"

Surely you know that Govts cannot and do not control the courts or how people plead.

Dictatorships don't back down repeatedly in the face of opposition and Labours problem is that they are not "left" enough, every time i hear a Labour minister speak, i shut my eyes and easily imagine its a Tory minister - its just a series of excuses and inaction.

So whilst i don't agree with your workings, you re right that Reform are the winners in all of this.

No it isn't.

It's to ensure that the country stays as recognisably British as possible.

Numbers of potential workers in the world are not currently an issue and won't be until health improvements stop increasing life expectancy in deprived areas.

The push for British babies is to stop us needing to import workers from other cultures.