It’s not disingenuous, I was trying to get a feel for whether you think he is a victim of a smear campaign or if you’re aware that 25+ women are unlikely to all have made false sexual assault allegations against a billionaire likely with the best lawyers in the world on his side, but you support him being leader of the free world anyway.
It’s clear from your answers (even with talks of grey areas which I’m well aware exist) that you support him regardless of the knowledge as an intelligent person that it’s hugely unlikely they are all lying.
I think it’s good to shine a light on the fact that many who support him simply don’t care that he is likely to have at minimum sexually assaulted women. On top of being a convicted felon. It’s childish to accuse me of ‘black and white’ thinking and imply I’m being idealistic by having an issue with this.
I don’t think it’s idealistic to believe that in a country with hundreds of millions of citizens, there could and should be a better person for the most powerful job on the planet than a convicted felon with a decades long history of sexual assault and rape allegations.
That’s not simplistic or idealistic. It’s a pretty low bar all things considered.
And if Biden / Harris were convicted felons and Trump wasn’t, I can’t imagine how many times Trump and his supporters would have used this in their campaign. You really think Trump wouldn’t have said that made Biden / Harris unsuitable in principle if he himself wasn’t a convicted felon? You really think you wouldn’t yourself use it as another bullet point in the list of reasons you don’t believe Biden / Harris were suitable? Come on now.