Best Amazon Prime Day deals: Mumsnet favourites

Best Amazon Prime Day deals:
Mumsnet favourites

Shop now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Should we move to an open borders system?

125 replies

JonesTown · 30/01/2026 16:55

Spain announced this week that it will allow half a million immigrants who arrived illegally to stay in the country. In the US, many on the left are calling for all immigration enforcement and deportations to be halted.

Here, the Greens support a world without borders and oppose action to prevent small boat crossings to the U.K.

Should we move to an open borders system where anyone who wants to is allowed to come to the U.K. and stay permanently?

Spain approves decree to regularise half a million undocumented migrants

Move affecting those who have been in Spain five months or more runs counter to anti-migration policies across Europe

https://www.theguardian.com/world/2026/jan/27/spain-decree-regularise-undocumented-migrants

OP posts:
dizzydizzydizzy · 30/01/2026 22:55

NotAnotherScarf · 30/01/2026 22:37

Then why do we get ivory coast "refugees" when the first language of the ivory coast is french.
Over a billion people speak English...so we should let them all live here?
Theres an established community of Indian people here so everyone from India....7 billion should be allowed here.

Youre talking shite and you know it, I tell you what, I know of a poor Nigerian man who needs a sponsor, he's 29 and a student with a wife and 4 kids, can he come and stay with you?

I was giving examples of reasons why migrants might want to come to the UK, not reasons why we should let them in the UK. They are two entirely separate questions.

You sound very heated.

Thecows · 30/01/2026 22:57

Op - thoughts? Thought not

Hoardasurass · 30/01/2026 22:58

JonesTown · 30/01/2026 17:01

@Raquelos

Personally I am pro-immigration, so long as it is done in a legal and organised way.

I don't think we should be encouraging people to risk their lives coming illegally and those who do shouldn't be allowed to stay here.

But thats not open borders.
Open borders means anyone and everyone is free to move here at will from anywhere.
You really should learn about a subject before starting a thread prompting something that you don't actually agree with otherwise it makes you look like an idiot

NotAnotherScarf · 30/01/2026 23:00

dizzydizzydizzy · 30/01/2026 22:55

I was giving examples of reasons why migrants might want to come to the UK, not reasons why we should let them in the UK. They are two entirely separate questions.

You sound very heated.

Because I come from a background where most of us had little education or qualifications, where immigration suppressed wages for 20 years. Where social housing is at a premium and many are excluded. Where the primary school I went two now has to deal with kids unable to speak English when they start, despite being born in England

Plus those are the trite excuses brought out to justify mass migration to the UK and they need to be shut down.

Jamesblonde2 · 30/01/2026 23:15

Wonder what % of those illegals in Spain are men. High 90% I bet.

TooBigForMyBoots · 30/01/2026 23:58

No.

Additup · 31/01/2026 00:06

No, open borders would be the end of our (already struggling) welfare state.

Vivi0 · 31/01/2026 00:16

stargirl27 · 30/01/2026 17:14

We know nothing of the background of strangers who were born here either.

What are you talking about?

We have records of prior criminal convictions for people born here. We have medical records for people born here. We can submit a Clare’s Law request for people born here. We have the sex offenders register for people born here.

The relevant authorities very much do know the background of people born here, and we screen them for, for example, jobs as appropriate.

KTheGrey · 31/01/2026 08:24

JonesTown · 30/01/2026 17:08

Immigration NGOs in the U.K. have called for the detention and deportation of those who arrived illegally on small boats to be stopped. They say it traumatises and harms these individuals.

Bad news for you - by the time you have reached the UK on a small boat you are probably traumatised already.

Leaving your homeland, let alone wandering through half a dozen more countries as many have done, is unsettling at the very least. In addition, there are many countries it seems perfectly sensible to leave for many reasons. However, I notice that Iran (for example) is in the middle of a fairly serious uprising and I would suggest that it would be far more sensible for us to support freedom of conscience and religion in countries that seek it than to decide to turn a blind eye and then accommodate entire oppressed populations.

MissAustenMadeAQuilt · 31/01/2026 08:41

HouseWoe · 30/01/2026 17:27

Why not? It's already happening anyway! No one who comes in illegally is deported, free to do whatever to whomever. See the Sudanese asylum seeker who murdered a young mother in today's press: no mention of deportation yet weren't we 'promised ' this not so long ago? May as well just get on with it and officially throw open the border, and resign ourselves to the inevitable. It would at least stop a lot of fat cat human rights lawyers getting even richer.

I agree with you about the lawyers getting rich!

There was a case a little while ago where an asylum seeker was awarded what looked like a huge amount but on slightly closer inspection, it transpired that the lawyer got most of it as fees.

I do think that these lawyers-the equivalent of ambulance chasers-are a blight.

Here is how I would fix it.

I would eliminate-totally and absolutely-legal aid for asylum seekers and refugees.

The lawyer could of course take on a case if they chose, on the strict understanding that they would not be receiving one penny from the public purse for doing so.

I'm not Mystic Meg but I foresee that if this simple policy-no legal aid, no not even expenses-were followed there would be a sharp fall in asylum seekers managing to delay their removal from this country.

Maddy70 · 31/01/2026 09:18

Spain aren't having open borders but they recognize that there are many people living hete under the radar (I know 3 Brits that I stayed post Brexit ) so can only work cash in hand jobs. This move my Sinai is to recognize that there are lots here illegal, can't access health care etc and aren't paying tax.
It's only open for three months , so its basically an amnesty that gives people legal residency so they can work legally and add money to the economy instead of the black market. Makes absolute sense

JonesTown · 31/01/2026 11:03

@randomchap

The greens are against deporting those here illegally, don't want to stop channel crossings and support vague 'safe and legal routes'.

That is an open border policy.

OP posts:
kirinm · 31/01/2026 11:13

Assume this is a purposely goady thread so all the anti-immigrants and reform voters get to froth a bit.

MinestroneMacaroni · 31/01/2026 11:43

kirinm · 31/01/2026 11:13

Assume this is a purposely goady thread so all the anti-immigrants and reform voters get to froth a bit.

Edited

This attitude is exactly why people are turning away from the traditional parties. Instead of listening and understanding that people may have a different point of view that is legitimate based on their life experiences, they are written off as frothing bigots.

JonesTown · 31/01/2026 13:24

kirinm · 31/01/2026 11:13

Assume this is a purposely goady thread so all the anti-immigrants and reform voters get to froth a bit.

Edited

Do you support open borders?

OP posts:
KellySeveride · 31/01/2026 13:33

Fundamentally- yes I believe in open borders.

Rationally - it cannot work because of different governments, different religions, different cultures. It would only work if the whole world was run the same way, same access to healthcare across the world, same moral beliefs, same attitudes to disability, sex, age, race etc. it cannot work because there are vast differences in these beliefs.

JonesTown · 31/01/2026 14:01

Interesting to see a film that celebrates protesters in Glasgow who prevented a raid to remove illegal immigrants being given an award.

www.bbc.co.uk/news/articles/cdx47nrqgy5o

OP posts:
MaloryJones · 31/01/2026 14:06

Oh The Guardian ! Say No More!!

blacksax · 31/01/2026 14:19

We should always take in refugees, but having open borders for economic migrants would be a monumental challenge. People all over the world learn English as a second language, and if they are leaving their home country for whatever reason, it it is likely that they would choose to go to a country where they can at least get by in the language.

But where would they all live? What jobs would they do? How could we accommodate a huge increase in the numbers of people who need education, healthcare and other public services? The system is already unable to cope. Nobody wants to pay more tax.

There would come a point when it becomes untenable. What then?

Mindbogglingx · 31/01/2026 14:49

Yes why not let everyone in starmer fannying around in Japan while UK is falling apart.
Its not getting better its getting worse.
When WW3 hits maybe some will start to listen.

Antiquerosegold · 31/01/2026 15:08

If you are feeling brave OP get yourself on GB news. They like a heated debate.

I'll get the popcorn.

Poetnojo · 31/01/2026 18:13

bozzabollix · 30/01/2026 18:04

Yes, mainly because I’m sick of reading comments made by Reform fanatics on social media. It’d cause most of them to explode in fury and the problem would be solved for me.

Problem solved? I think you would then have much bigger problems 😂

EasternStandard · 31/01/2026 18:15

Poetnojo · 31/01/2026 18:13

Problem solved? I think you would then have much bigger problems 😂

Yep

EasternStandard · 31/01/2026 18:19

randomchap · 30/01/2026 20:18

The green party's position is more nuanced than that

https://migration.greenparty.org.uk/policy-open-borders/

"Spokespeople for the Green Party, including Carla Denyer and Adrian Ramsay, are sometimes asked by journalists about the statement “The Green Party wants to see a world without borders” at the start of our migration policy (MG100). This is sometimes misinterpreted as suggesting that we advocate immediately removing all border controls.
This is not the case.
The agreed migration policy (MG100) in full actually states:
The Green Party wants to see a world without borders, until this happens the Green Party will implement a fair and humane system of managed immigration where people can move if they wish to do so.
The first part relates to a vision of the future, we look to unions such as the EU Schengen area, the United States and closer to home with the common travel area between the UK and Ireland and concludes that the free movement of people in these areas is desirable, useful and seems a quite normal way of existing for citizens of those countries.
"

Shocking that a thread about immigration contains factual inaccuracies

Shouldn’t this be updated now they have a new leader. What’s Polanski’s take on borders?

WaryCrow · 31/01/2026 18:39

No. This island is already full, the economy has crashed, and it is by some measures the most nature depleted country in the world. Certainly one of.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread