Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Welfare spending to rise by £73.2bn to £406.2bn

1000 replies

topicalaffair · 23/01/2026 14:25

Over the next five years, the OBR is forecasting that UK welfare spending will rise by £73.2bn to £406.2bn.

How does everyone feel about this? I’m livid because I pay lots of tax. I don’t mind paying tax to maintain a civilised society - but this? This is surely taking the piss and will result in weaker and weaker services as the amount of £ available reduces day by day.

YANBU - it’s totally deranged. The every growing uk population can’t function effectively on such a benefits for all basis.

YABU - this welfare spending bill is truly representative of need.

Welfare spending to rise by £73.2bn to £406.2bn
OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
UserFront242 · 24/01/2026 23:12

RomeoRivers · 24/01/2026 22:35

An agreement between doctors and the person’s next of kin. I think it is fair to assume that most people have good intentions and want the best for those they love.

Yet someone on this very thread has decided the disabled child of another poster does not have a good quality of life.

MeouwKing · 24/01/2026 23:15

Playingvideogames · 23/01/2026 14:56

No out of work benefits for under 25s.

Benefits destroy lives. I see it time and time again at work.

Person leaves school.
They get a part time, low paid job for a few years. Eventually leave or get sacked.
Sign on. They’re living with family so the £500 a month is just pocket money.
Spend it all on takeaways, vapes, weed and rubbish. Spend all day in bed gaming or hanging out with other unemployed mates.
After a few years of this all work ethic and energy is gone, replaced by laziness and low level addiction.
Due to low level addiction and never doing anything remotely healthy, they develop MH ‘issues’, get a diagnosis, and hop on to ESA or PIP. More money for rubbish.
After 10+ years, they’re completely unemployable, their brains are addled, they barely know what day of the week it is. Ricocheting from one ‘support service’ to another. They have kids, who also ‘need support’ as they’re neglected.

What would’ve happened had we not given the benefits to start with?

Edited

Recently, someone told that weed was now 10 quid a gram. You aren't going to get much weed out of 400 quid a month.

RomeoRivers · 24/01/2026 23:16

Kirbert2 · 24/01/2026 22:39

That already happens in many cases. Do you mean it should happen further?

My son wasn't expected to survive initially and I repeatedly had conversations with doctors about quality of life and how if they believed we were getting to the point where they believed he would have no quality of life then further and much more difficult conversations would have to happen.

Yes it should happen further.

My 93yo granny was kept alive, bed bound, incontinent with dementia for several years more than she should have been.

My best friend, 36, dementia, incontinent, nonverbal, frequently sedated, should not be kept alive simply because the rest of her body is intact.

@UserFront242 that was me, based on a hypothetical child that did not belong to the poster, but they stated that such children do exist.

UserFront242 · 24/01/2026 23:18

Kingscallops · 24/01/2026 22:44

A benefit that's been earned.

You are naive to think that all pensioners have "paid in" for all their life.
I said upthread about my grandmother who worked a few years as a teen, and never worked again. For her generation, women leaving the workforce once they got married was normal. She did that, had kids, then became a full time carer for my grandfather. He died when she was a pensioner.

UserFront242 · 24/01/2026 23:19

Countingcro · 24/01/2026 23:08

You have neatly outlined the problem here.

they don’t have any extra expenses, and doesn’t need the cash and yet you think they should be claiming??? 🤯 this money reduces the public services budgets. Them claiming would be totally immoral, which is why they don’t!

PIP is not awarded based on expenses.

BeverleyBrooks · 24/01/2026 23:25

UserFront242 · 24/01/2026 23:19

PIP is not awarded based on expenses.

Yes but it’s supposed to help with the extra costs of having a disability. If you don’t have any extra costs then why claim it?

UserFront242 · 24/01/2026 23:26

BeverleyBrooks · 24/01/2026 23:25

Yes but it’s supposed to help with the extra costs of having a disability. If you don’t have any extra costs then why claim it?

Again, it is not based on extra costs. So how can you claim it based on extra costs? You make no sense.

Kirbert2 · 24/01/2026 23:36

RomeoRivers · 24/01/2026 23:16

Yes it should happen further.

My 93yo granny was kept alive, bed bound, incontinent with dementia for several years more than she should have been.

My best friend, 36, dementia, incontinent, nonverbal, frequently sedated, should not be kept alive simply because the rest of her body is intact.

@UserFront242 that was me, based on a hypothetical child that did not belong to the poster, but they stated that such children do exist.

Some people would probably say the same about my son who is incontinent amongst other medical issues.

They would be wrong.

Kingscallops · 24/01/2026 23:44

UserFront242 · 24/01/2026 23:18

You are naive to think that all pensioners have "paid in" for all their life.
I said upthread about my grandmother who worked a few years as a teen, and never worked again. For her generation, women leaving the workforce once they got married was normal. She did that, had kids, then became a full time carer for my grandfather. He died when she was a pensioner.

Now, You get the amount proportionate to the contributions you have made. I retired early and will therefore face a shortfall. My choice.

UserFront242 · 24/01/2026 23:45

Kingscallops · 24/01/2026 23:44

Now, You get the amount proportionate to the contributions you have made. I retired early and will therefore face a shortfall. My choice.

She got Pension Credit.

Coco1379 · 25/01/2026 00:00

Anyone can become disabled in the blink of an eye. Some people through no fault of their own are unable to get jobs paying no better than minimum wage -which is not a living wage, and have those wages topped up by Universal Credit. This can happen to graduates as well as older people who have been made redundant. Contary to your thinking this is not a subsidy to rhe worker, it is subsidising the business owner and incentivising them to continue to pay low wages, Before you argue the business cannot afford higher wages, any business in this position is not a viable entity.

In spite of what you read in the ‘Daily Fail’ benefits are not generous and it is extremely difficult to get PIP payments. People with mobility allowances do not get expensive cars ‘for free’ - those who are awarded the highest benefits can have the benefit paid directly to a motability scheme and if the car they want is more expensive than standard they pay the difference out of their own pockets.
Some people on waiting lists for operations that would relieve a condition that is preventing them from working. Many disabled people would love to work but find employers are not willing to make the reasonable adjustments that would be necessary to enable them to work.

So if you found yourself in one of those unfortunate positions would you not claim because the welfare bill is so high? Better still imagine yourself in a position to receive benefits and spend a month living on the amount ‘the law says you need to live on’.

Ownedbykitties · 25/01/2026 00:07

State pension may well be classed as a benefit but it is not the same as other benefits. People have to pay decades worth of contributions into it in order to claim it at a retirement age set by the government. If you have not worked and paid in for the years needed, you will get a pro rata amount. If you have never worked or pain contributions you will get pension credit and with that a raft of other benefits not available to people who have worked for decades and paid into the system. You can only be a pound over the required amount to claim pension credit and you do not have access to all the other benefits you get of you haven't worked. Also, many state pensions are not the full amount, especially for women. For baby boomers, there was no provision if you were a sahm or worked for " pin money". So their NI contributions were lacking and not made up as I believe they are now. Our state pension is one of the lowest in Europe. If you want to reduce and not fight for it because you have not reached that life stage yet, there really will be nothing there for you if you do reach the age where you could claim it. Also please remember that many pensions are taxed. It is true that as a country we are becoming less healthy and more and more people are unwilling to take personal responsibility for their health and the cost to the NHS is going to balloon. We now hear that being obese is completely out of people's control because it is an illness that we can't do anything about. When I look back at photos taken in the 60's the number of overweight people are noticeable by their absence. The amount spent on "fat jabs" is mind blowing and apparently now it is known that as soon as you stop them, the weight piles back on bringing all the illnesses which will mean people will be off work on sickness benefits in huge numbers. This medication was not long ago hailed as a saviour of the NHS because Type 2 diabetes was going to be the cause of the collapse of the NHS.

Nikii83 · 25/01/2026 00:09

Sofasurf · 24/01/2026 22:17

Hello, please can you tell me where you have got this from? I have never seen figures showing this so would be interested to see them.

Unfortunately I do not have the exact figures because the rent payments come out of different allocated pots of funding. You would need to know exact funding and spend for the dwp and local authorities

housing costs are paid in the following way

housing benefit - covers pensioner rent, temporary accommodation rents (sky high as can be hotels etc) specified accommodation for those who need care and support as part of their rent (private companies can charge the earth but offer little support)

housing costs element - universal credit rent payments for working age customers

then there is the dhp fund or the soon to be called crisis and resilience fund to help people with moving costs/ deposits and rent top ups as lha doesn’t come close to covering the rents.

Maisey1991 · 25/01/2026 00:14

We’ve got an aging population, and people on low incomes in work are also claiming benefits due to low incomes not covering costs, we also have an increase in mental health and physical disabilities who are also getting older and will need support. I have sat in PIP assessments with patients and can tell you people are having to basically dance a fecking jig with no legs to get disability benefits. Privatisation of the care homes is adding to this cost too, when pensioners money runs out the councils have to pay for their care which is in the thousands per week for very low quality care in a lot of cases unfortunately. You can be angry but appreciate this is thanks to years of austerity and underfunding and privatisation.

mumatlast14 · 25/01/2026 00:38

RomeoRivers · 24/01/2026 23:16

Yes it should happen further.

My 93yo granny was kept alive, bed bound, incontinent with dementia for several years more than she should have been.

My best friend, 36, dementia, incontinent, nonverbal, frequently sedated, should not be kept alive simply because the rest of her body is intact.

@UserFront242 that was me, based on a hypothetical child that did not belong to the poster, but they stated that such children do exist.

They already do. So many have had blanket DNRs placed on them unknowingly simply because they are disabled, have Downs Syndrome or are autistic. Because someone has decided their lives are not worth living/saving. It's immoral and illegal.

Kingscallops · 25/01/2026 00:42

Maisey1991 · 25/01/2026 00:14

We’ve got an aging population, and people on low incomes in work are also claiming benefits due to low incomes not covering costs, we also have an increase in mental health and physical disabilities who are also getting older and will need support. I have sat in PIP assessments with patients and can tell you people are having to basically dance a fecking jig with no legs to get disability benefits. Privatisation of the care homes is adding to this cost too, when pensioners money runs out the councils have to pay for their care which is in the thousands per week for very low quality care in a lot of cases unfortunately. You can be angry but appreciate this is thanks to years of austerity and underfunding and privatisation.

Fancy people getting old eh.

UserFront242 · 25/01/2026 00:42

mumatlast14 · 25/01/2026 00:38

They already do. So many have had blanket DNRs placed on them unknowingly simply because they are disabled, have Downs Syndrome or are autistic. Because someone has decided their lives are not worth living/saving. It's immoral and illegal.

Yes, this happened during Covid.

Maisey1991 · 25/01/2026 00:57

Kingscallops · 25/01/2026 00:42

Fancy people getting old eh.

I’m saying the welfare bill rising is inevitable? I’m not complaining about people getting old - just stating facts of where some of that money is going! Greedy care home owners who don’t give the care our elderly that they should for example

WaryCrow · 25/01/2026 01:33

OonaStubbs · 24/01/2026 18:58

At the end of the day, economic reality has to set in and people will have to fend for themselves instead of relying on "the government" (ie working people) to fund their lives.

Are they going to give us the land that was stolen from us in Enclosure or the modern equivalent, buy-to-let times back?? Are they going to start distributing the resources of this island to all those who contribute by work instead of keeping it for a very very few descendants of the Conqueror’s allies?? Are they going to look the other way while individuals start to take it back by force, which is de facto happening via rural crime? Does robbery come under ‘fending for themselves’? Does doing drugs and being part of armed gangs? Does, in fact, playing the benefit system for all its worth not count as ‘fending for themselves’ in a time when there are not enough jobs to go round and few of those pay the cost of living and no e are worth the effort now demanded we put into them??

You might want to think about exactly what you mean by ‘fending for themselves’, in an island of 70 million people that can support maybe 40 million. Think you’re the natural survivor surrounded by armed men do you?

mumatlast14 · 25/01/2026 01:56

UserFront242 · 25/01/2026 00:42

Yes, this happened during Covid.

Sadly still happening. Its disgusting.

'Repugnant': Do-not-resuscitate orders being given to learning disabled people without consent | ITV News https://share.google/U7el2p9p4q3bLgu6h

Meteorite87 · 25/01/2026 02:26

Thewonderfuleveryday · 23/01/2026 18:23

charl "Stay at home benefit mums should be organised to work in creches providing childcare for working parents." That's asking for massive trouble.

I only want people who are keen and qualified looking after my kids thank you very much.

Unless safeguarding was being ignored, DBS checks would be required for every claimant involved in that. Those checks are not free.

Separately, unpaid carers save the government many thousands of pounds more than the cost of their subsistence allowance.

Snakebite61 · 25/01/2026 06:38

topicalaffair · 23/01/2026 14:25

Over the next five years, the OBR is forecasting that UK welfare spending will rise by £73.2bn to £406.2bn.

How does everyone feel about this? I’m livid because I pay lots of tax. I don’t mind paying tax to maintain a civilised society - but this? This is surely taking the piss and will result in weaker and weaker services as the amount of £ available reduces day by day.

YANBU - it’s totally deranged. The every growing uk population can’t function effectively on such a benefits for all basis.

YABU - this welfare spending bill is truly representative of need.

Do your homework. Check if it's true.

Boomer55 · 25/01/2026 06:55

nannygoat50 · 24/01/2026 18:11

And pensioners have paid in for years and deserve the meagre pension. It’s the scrounges who have never worked but know how to work the system and all the people allowed into this country and given benefits !!!!

This. 👍

38thparallel · 25/01/2026 07:03

So many have had blanket DNRs placed on them unknowingly simply because they are disabled, have Downs Syndrome or are autistic. Because someone has decided their lives are not worth living/saving. It's immoral and illegal.

@mumatlast14 Who is placing these blanket DNRs on disabled people? If it’s illegal why hasn’t the person/people responsible been reported?

TigerRag · 25/01/2026 07:08

RomeoRivers · 24/01/2026 20:28

Sorry I don’t know how to tag everyone that replied to my question.

To the person with parental responsibility- that makes sense and I understand.

To the person who said all the money would go on the paid carer and therefore they would have nothing to live on, you also said the allowance was so small, so presumably working would still give you more money?

Then finally, those talking about coming home from work to take over the caring duties, getting up multiple times in the night, then going to work then next day…. How is that any different to working parents? They come home from work, takeover caring duties, up multiple times in the night and still go to work the next day… should the government start paying all of them to stay at home because they must be exhausted too..?

My friend has a 14 year old. She has to constantly check on her to ensure she hasn't died of SUDEP / is still breathing.

14 year olds aren't in generally in nappies and are able to communicate, feed themselves, walk, etc. My friends 14 year can't do those things

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.