I think that statement was written by Nicola. I think bits of it are embellished. I can't begin to imagine what this dancing 'on' her son means and why 'Posh' would do such a thing. She can laugh at herself but she does always remain classy.
No doubt the Beckham children's childhoods were quite controlled.
Victoria has always been image conscious. D&V have surrounded themselves with advisors on image and PR over the years. The brand is more important than D's alleged infidelities.
But when all is said and done, D&V have always come across well. I am 55 and have never read anything alluding to them treating staff badly or just not being dedicated, friendly people. I watched the Ali G interview yesterday to remind myself of how warm and self-deprecating they can both be.
I think they slept-walked into the whole family brand dynamic. I don't think they had (or could have had) the foresight to see that it might damage their children. They were born at the dawn of social media.
Brooklyn Beckham is 26 years old and could have distanced himself from his parents a long time before he met his now wife if he really wanted to. And what exactly have his siblings done? I suspect the Peltz family are not very nice people but they are very powerful.
I don't think D&V will put out a statement and if they do, it will just be about their love for their children.
I feel very sorry for them. As a parent, it must be heart breaking. I think and hope that ultimately they will reconcile with their eldest son.