Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be depressed that lockdown would happen again tomorrow if there was another new disease

816 replies

Pavementworrier · 05/01/2026 07:35

We talk about all the things that are worse "since the pandemic"but government prep is based on all the same mad nonsense that caused the worsening

Grim

OP posts:
Swiftie1878 · 11/03/2026 21:49

No-one is going to lockdown ever again. Once burned…

LBFseBrom · 11/03/2026 23:05

I'm still isolating. Is it over?

Amabo · 11/03/2026 23:22

So you’re depressed about something that hasn’t happened and might never happen?

Shades of just looking for something, anything, to get pissed off about.

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 04:27

Binus · 11/03/2026 16:03

Your concerns are your business. My point was that shops and schools being closed doesn't mean people don't mix or that the transmission rate can't be a problem. Which is why lockdown probably isn't possible if enough people don't want to do it. I don't tend to engage with whether people show concern for others behaving in a particular way or not, because it wouldn't have any impact on the general picture.

Enough people will want to do it.

Binus · 12/03/2026 06:32

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 04:27

Enough people will want to do it.

Total guesswork. You're not even trying to take into account whether the next pandemic will scare people enough to be willing to voluntarily limit their behaviour, or so much that order breaks down. These are quite basic points. Lots of things were in place with covid that aren't in any way pandemic guarantees.

mellongoose · 12/03/2026 06:40

All those people who say they wouldn’t comply, what if the next virus targets children and is more aggressive? What then?

I think most sensible people deal with the facts in front of them.

We are still feeling the effects of lockdowns and they must be a last resort.

I am particularly angry with the teaching unions for ensuring children from neglectful and dangerous families were trapped at home because teachers needed ventilation. I hope that never happens again.

Bikenutz · 12/03/2026 06:42

Infectious diseases don’t care about your feelings 😂.

Bikenutz · 12/03/2026 06:45

You can ignore any restrictions, of course, but the outcome depends on how infectious and how severe the disease is - the effects could be worse than locking down.

Binus · 12/03/2026 06:47

mellongoose · 12/03/2026 06:40

All those people who say they wouldn’t comply, what if the next virus targets children and is more aggressive? What then?

I think most sensible people deal with the facts in front of them.

We are still feeling the effects of lockdowns and they must be a last resort.

I am particularly angry with the teaching unions for ensuring children from neglectful and dangerous families were trapped at home because teachers needed ventilation. I hope that never happens again.

If it targets children and is much more aggressive, the assumption that lockdown would actually be possible needs to be questioned. Because it requires a substantial number of people still being willing to leave the house and work in often low paid jobs.

During covid, we never got close to a situation where the working age population was too scared to turn up to jobs in food transport, petrol stations, bus driving and the like. There is no guarantee the next one would be like that.

bringthewashingin · 12/03/2026 06:47

TheTruthHurtsSometimes · 05/01/2026 07:55

I loved lockdown

Me too! I’d comply in a heartbeat!!

Binus · 12/03/2026 06:53

Bikenutz · 12/03/2026 06:45

You can ignore any restrictions, of course, but the outcome depends on how infectious and how severe the disease is - the effects could be worse than locking down.

Of course, but that doesn't mean it's not one of the possibilities on the table. Would lockdown be the least worst option is not the same question as would the public support it. If the public don't want to do it then it won't happen. Hence all the behaviour nudging.

Works the other way too. It's theoretically possible the next pandemic would be one where locking down caused more problems than it solved, but we still do it anyway because its what people demand. I don't think that could happen for a long time yet, but who's to say how people will feel in a few decades?

Peachii · 12/03/2026 08:22

Petrolitis · 11/03/2026 21:36

Exactly if people were bleeding from their eyes and anuses all the 'oh im too important to follow rules' brigade would be inside sharpish.

Well, yeah. If we had the worst case scenario then people would comply. That’s not really comparable to COVID where a not insignificant number of people had mild symptoms or were asymptomatic.

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 08:52

Binus · 12/03/2026 06:32

Total guesswork. You're not even trying to take into account whether the next pandemic will scare people enough to be willing to voluntarily limit their behaviour, or so much that order breaks down. These are quite basic points. Lots of things were in place with covid that aren't in any way pandemic guarantees.

I am assuming that there would only be a lock down if the virus was dangerous enough to scare most people.

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 08:59

Peachii · 12/03/2026 08:22

Well, yeah. If we had the worst case scenario then people would comply. That’s not really comparable to COVID where a not insignificant number of people had mild symptoms or were asymptomatic.

It was unusual for a virus to be so much milder in children than adults. The infection was quite severe with the first strain in many people over the age of about 45.

Binus · 12/03/2026 09:01

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 08:52

I am assuming that there would only be a lock down if the virus was dangerous enough to scare most people.

The best way to describe it is the Goldilocks analogy. A virus would need to be scary enough for people to voluntarily accept restrictions, but also not so scary that the people who stack the shelves, drive the buses, maintain the water supplies and so on would stop coming to work. We can't actually assume that any future virus would hit this sweet spot. People often tend to assume order, rules and enforcement... these things would not be a given.

Stressedoutmummyof3 · 12/03/2026 09:08

Would they actually lockdown again? They shouldn't have done it last time and the economy is in such an awful state I don't think it will happen again.
What is the actual likelihood of something like Covid happening again? Most of the reason it was such a shit show was because it was a once in a lifetime emergency that no-one knew how to handle.
People won't comply, especially those in power so what would be the point?

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 09:20

Binus · 12/03/2026 09:01

The best way to describe it is the Goldilocks analogy. A virus would need to be scary enough for people to voluntarily accept restrictions, but also not so scary that the people who stack the shelves, drive the buses, maintain the water supplies and so on would stop coming to work. We can't actually assume that any future virus would hit this sweet spot. People often tend to assume order, rules and enforcement... these things would not be a given.

They would need proper PPE. We didn't have that last time.

Binus · 12/03/2026 09:32

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 09:20

They would need proper PPE. We didn't have that last time.

They would. It was shameful how bad the PPE was last time. But it doesn't follow either that petrol station workers, Tesco drivers and the like would get it, or that enough of them would be willing to go to work even if they did. If a virus is bad enough to scare people into wanting lockdown, it could also be bad enough to scare people into not providing the things others need to lock down.

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 09:33

Binus · 12/03/2026 09:32

They would. It was shameful how bad the PPE was last time. But it doesn't follow either that petrol station workers, Tesco drivers and the like would get it, or that enough of them would be willing to go to work even if they did. If a virus is bad enough to scare people into wanting lockdown, it could also be bad enough to scare people into not providing the things others need to lock down.

Why does it not follow that they could have PPE? There is no reason why they couldn't.

Binus · 12/03/2026 09:48

Pikachu150 · 12/03/2026 09:33

Why does it not follow that they could have PPE? There is no reason why they couldn't.

I said it doesn't follow that they would have PPE. There is no reason why they couldn't, which doesn't mean they would.

We also need to consider the possibility that lots of them won't risk it regardless.

LostittoBostik · 12/03/2026 10:03

Dolphinnoises · 05/01/2026 07:45

Oh for God’s sake, grow up. Lockdown was awful and had awful down sides, and we had the politicians we elected who were exactly the clowns we all knew they were, and utterly unsuited to the task.

But we didn’t know we would find a vaccine, or that it would be as effective - we were realistically hoping for 50% effectiveness, and on the first strain it was 94% effective, but as it was a coronavirus it did what they all do and evolved.

Everything we are suffering from - the hit to the economy, the trauma of loss and illness-based bodily damage / after-effects - it was all caused by the disaster which is a pandemic. It’s like arguing that we won’t put up with our house falling down next time there is an earthquake.

Ask anyone who worked in a hospital during Covid if we could skip masks and lockdown next time. We can’t. The other thing we can’t avoid - making mistakes. Hindsight is 20:20 but these are insanely difficult choices.

For years we knew we were overdue a global pandemic - the expectation was that they were a one-in-a-hundred-year event but so many factors change - global travel and deforestation on one hand, the facts of novel illnesses on the other - incubation periods, how it spreads. We aren’t in control of everything.

Edited

The only sensible post on here 👏🏼

Mama2many73 · 12/03/2026 10:18

People did die severely ill and painful deaths.
Yes mental health did suffer esp for our children (had ou foster children and DH is a y6 teacher).
We do NOT know how many people would have died, we have conjecture, but it did save lives as well.
Of it were deemed necessary again would I follow it? Yes, but I think as a people , worldwide, we would demand much science to prove it necessary.

Rosscameasdoody · 12/03/2026 10:52

Stressedoutmummyof3 · 12/03/2026 09:08

Would they actually lockdown again? They shouldn't have done it last time and the economy is in such an awful state I don't think it will happen again.
What is the actual likelihood of something like Covid happening again? Most of the reason it was such a shit show was because it was a once in a lifetime emergency that no-one knew how to handle.
People won't comply, especially those in power so what would be the point?

The chances of something like Covid happening again ? You mean another global pandemic ? The chances currently are about 2-3% annually, which translates into roughly 50-60%. Modern society has made it a much more likely scenario than it once was, so considering it a once in a lifetime emergency is burying your head in the sand.

Science considers it a ‘when’ not ‘if’ scenario with a high likelihood of future outbreaks due to things like increased interaction between humans, livestock and wildlife - so more potential for viruses jumping species. Environmental changes such as deforestation and climate change play their part in expanding areas where disease can thrive. And let’s not forget global connectivity - international travel allows viruses to spread worldwide in a very short space of time.

The next one will initially bring the very same uncertainties as Covid but so far we’re not learning the lessons, so it’s likely the next pandemic will be a similar shit show to the last one. I also think it’s naive to suggest that people wouldn’t follow rules. If the disease were severe enough with the ability to spread rapidly I think the lockdown rules would be enforced much more stringently. I think now that Covid is with us as ‘routine’ illness we tend to forget the fear it instilled at the start. It was an unknown quantity, there was no cure and no vaccine - with no guarantee of one. That same fear factor will be what drives people to comply when it comes to the next outbreak.

nomas · 12/03/2026 10:54

Chiaseedling · 05/01/2026 07:44

agree, people wouldn’t comply. I still maintain it ruined my DC’s mental health (and a lot if their peers’/friends’ MH too). We got through it as adults mentally but after catching it in 2022 my digestive health has never been the same.

We got through it as adults mentally but after catching it in 2022 my digestive health has never been the same.

Isn't that more reason to comply?

nomas · 12/03/2026 10:55

Rosscameasdoody · 12/03/2026 10:52

The chances of something like Covid happening again ? You mean another global pandemic ? The chances currently are about 2-3% annually, which translates into roughly 50-60%. Modern society has made it a much more likely scenario than it once was, so considering it a once in a lifetime emergency is burying your head in the sand.

Science considers it a ‘when’ not ‘if’ scenario with a high likelihood of future outbreaks due to things like increased interaction between humans, livestock and wildlife - so more potential for viruses jumping species. Environmental changes such as deforestation and climate change play their part in expanding areas where disease can thrive. And let’s not forget global connectivity - international travel allows viruses to spread worldwide in a very short space of time.

The next one will initially bring the very same uncertainties as Covid but so far we’re not learning the lessons, so it’s likely the next pandemic will be a similar shit show to the last one. I also think it’s naive to suggest that people wouldn’t follow rules. If the disease were severe enough with the ability to spread rapidly I think the lockdown rules would be enforced much more stringently. I think now that Covid is with us as ‘routine’ illness we tend to forget the fear it instilled at the start. It was an unknown quantity, there was no cure and no vaccine - with no guarantee of one. That same fear factor will be what drives people to comply when it comes to the next outbreak.

Edited

Covid likely originated in a Chinese and American joint run lab though. You can't give a percentage likelihood for stupidity and immorality.