Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be shocked that not even one y4 child knew the meaning of the word velvet?

646 replies

Utterlybananas333 · 01/01/2026 17:09

My sister is a teacher in a South London primary school, she is a year four teacher of around 30 8 to 9-year-olds. She was recently describing her disbelief over the fact that not a single child knew what velvet meant? There were some crazy guesses, and lots of children who thought it was cake (probably relating to red velvet). Is it just the fact that children and adults don't talk anymore? That nobody reads anymore? Or even watches educational TV programs? Would your child know?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
BogRollBOGOF · 02/01/2026 22:22

scalt · 02/01/2026 20:29

Try the long list of colours in the song from Joseph and the amazing technicolour dreamcoat, which includes fawn.

would children know what all the colours look like? Ochre, russet, mauve?

I've just asked my teenager and he's passed with flying colours... he even rushed to fetch a Warhammer box to show me T'au Ochre Grin

He's doing surprisingly well on the textiles for someone with sensory issues, and he did know that he hates the feel of velvet.

ToadRage · 02/01/2026 22:27

I certainly knew what velvet was at that age, one of best fancy outfits back then was a satin mini skirt with a velvet blouse. Maybe they/their parents don't wear velvet. I don't think it's really dated but it does to be more luxury than cotton or nylon. Being London it may be a not very well off area and can't afford or have any occsion to wear velvet.

Lockdownsceptic · 02/01/2026 23:03

oustedbymymate · 01/01/2026 17:19

My friend is an English secondary school teacher in city comp. Teaching Christmas carol charles dickens and took a turnip in the show the kids as they didn’t know what one was. 15 years old

Not really surprising as I often have difficulty finding them in supermarkets. It was touch and go whether I’d get my neeps and tatties this new year.

FFSToEverythingSince2020 · 02/01/2026 23:07

Just thought this was amusing - MN is featuring an ad from Cotswold Company that has velvet cushions. Photo attached.

To be shocked that not even one y4 child knew the meaning of the word velvet?
Lockdownsceptic · 02/01/2026 23:11

mrsjoyfulprizeforraffiawork · 02/01/2026 12:10

A swede is indeed a type of turnip but it is not every kind of turnip. It is large, with orange coloured flesh inside. Where I live, the term turnips was and is used describe the generally smaller, pale fleshed ones, big or small. (ancient Londoner).

Turnips and swedes taste very different to each other. They are also different colours. Turnips have white flesh, swedes have yellow.

Chinsupmeloves · 02/01/2026 23:29

Unless we, as parents, teach our DC things like this, of course they will unlikely know. The same with anything, at an early age we learn so much vocabualary from our family.

Before the IT age I knew most capital cities at primary age, just from a simple turnaround by hand map, also important events through encyclopedias.

Now, it's all so different and the focus on what they enjoy to a prolonged stage.

It does also does come from parents' own knowledge, beliefs, what they've got from education.

As educators we are often in disbelief at the lack of basic knowledge children have, so before being able to get on with the curriculum we have to do and are accounted for, we have to take so many steps back to teach foundation vocabulary before we even start.

No judgement, especially for none English speaking DC with different lifestyles, but teachers have the pressure of a quick whip through of the basics to then be judged by outcome of results.

Of course there are adjustments made but trying to enable every child to achieve their best means so many modifications and personal stepping in to help with this, it's just hard! Xxx

mrpenny · 03/01/2026 00:41

Supergirl1958 · 01/01/2026 19:15

So much of our curriculum and teaching is now focussed around explicit teaching of vocabulary! It’s scary we have to do all of this and teach everything from basic skills to the same things we had to 20 years plus ago (the length of time I’ve been in teaching) and yet we are expected to produce a higher standard than ever before! The education system is in dire need of an overhaul, and that’s without all of the added extras like behaviour and entitled parents!!

I’ve been teaching for over forty years. What’s scary about teaching vocabulary????? It’s always been our job. Bizarre comment

HelloDenise · 03/01/2026 01:22

Daisymay8 · 01/01/2026 17:20

Different generations -I’m 70 -does everyone know what gabardine or cavalry twill is?

I know a song called Give Me Back My Gabardine Mac, It's No Good To You.

MayIDestroyYou · 03/01/2026 03:02

ChampagneLassie · 02/01/2026 20:30

I don’t think this is shocking. Times change. In 42 and my thanks to internet and TV my kids are exposed to LOADS more animals. I only learnt about sloths in my 30s but my 3.5 yr old knows about them now and many other exotic creatures that I simply wasn’t exposed to via TV books or anything. I only really knew about the most common ones (ie the big 5).

I really don’t think children needed to wait for the Internet to learn about animals.

Way back in my 1960s childhood my parents ensured we had a huge illustrated book on the animal world. Plus others on birds, the natural world, astronomy. As well as illustrated dictionaries and a complete set of the Children’s Britannica (an encyclopaedia covering history, geography, literature, science, and more general knowledge than you could shake a stick at).

And the beauty of books, in contrast to Google, was that they included information you were not actively seeking out, rather than only providing you with the specific thing you asked for. In a bookish household, or one with at least access to a library, it was really easy to be well informed as a 20th century child.

imabitjealousandembarassed · 03/01/2026 06:13

This thread proves the problem we have with general knowledge, reading comprehension and common sense

Differentforgirls · 03/01/2026 07:14

MusicMakesItAllBetter · 02/01/2026 21:21

Well, I was going to say on their sleeves but preferred on a tissue/toilet roll/kitchen roll/serviette.

Never heard paper hanky in my life!

Are you very young? Could be a Scottish thing.

Sadworld23 · 03/01/2026 07:26

Hrft but this is the dress a 3 Yr old relative had for Christmas. She loved it and it looked gorgeous
share.google/zTfRZTUy3nIYC2U4l

Daisymay8 · 03/01/2026 07:38

Sartre · 02/01/2026 08:39

I’m an English Lit academic and really unbothered by all of the points I have read here. Turnips are pretty much never eaten nowadays, the only way I’d expect a child to know what one was is through The Enormous Turnip. As for velvet, it isn’t a common fabric nowadays.

This doesn’t prove much, only that children haven’t been exposed to archaic vegetables.

You must be a very English English Lit Academic -in Scotland haggis, neeps (translation turnips in English), and tatties is eaten annually on Burns Night Jan25th (that’s Robert Burns the famous Scottish poet).
Good turnips are harder to find these days, I think because they were left in the ground to get big and round and sweet through the winter but now are harvested earlier to prepare for a new crop.

ChampagneLassie · 03/01/2026 08:55

MayIDestroyYou · 03/01/2026 03:02

I really don’t think children needed to wait for the Internet to learn about animals.

Way back in my 1960s childhood my parents ensured we had a huge illustrated book on the animal world. Plus others on birds, the natural world, astronomy. As well as illustrated dictionaries and a complete set of the Children’s Britannica (an encyclopaedia covering history, geography, literature, science, and more general knowledge than you could shake a stick at).

And the beauty of books, in contrast to Google, was that they included information you were not actively seeking out, rather than only providing you with the specific thing you asked for. In a bookish household, or one with at least access to a library, it was really easy to be well informed as a 20th century child.

Silly me, as a toddler I should have been finding these books and reading them to myself 🙄not everyone has parents who do this sort of thing. Some kids grow up in houses where most of entertainment is the telly and when I was a kid it was quite limited. I think now there is so much more that everyone can aceess

MusicMakesItAllBetter · 03/01/2026 09:06

Differentforgirls · 03/01/2026 07:14

Are you very young? Could be a Scottish thing.

Lol I'm 48... 🤷🏼‍♂️

wasieverreallyhere · 03/01/2026 09:07

PrincessofWells · 01/01/2026 17:17

I do!

Me too

sashh · 03/01/2026 09:57

Little girls don't wear ribbons anymore do they?

In the 1970s every little girl had their hair in ribbons and you would have velvet, satin, embroidered even organza mesh with satin 'stripes'.

Can I just muddy the water, velvet is a type of tenderising mainly used in Chinese cooking.

eastegg · 03/01/2026 10:03

Daisymay8 · 01/01/2026 17:20

Different generations -I’m 70 -does everyone know what gabardine or cavalry twill is?

I’m 51 and I have known gabardine since 7 as it was part of my school uniform! It was used as a noun for our coat ie ‘you’re not wearing your gabardine’. Virtually never heard it since though!

Never heard of cavalry twill, but know that twill relates to fabric.

C152 · 03/01/2026 10:06

MayIDestroyYou · 02/01/2026 21:16

It’s year 4, not 4 year olds, @C152.

So they’d be 8, or 9 years old.

Ah, sorry; I totally misread that!

eastegg · 03/01/2026 10:12

I think everyone talking about the prevalence or otherwise of velvet, or turnips, or whatever, are missing the point, or rather that is the point.

Books expose you to things outside day to day life. If an 8/9 year old reads plenty, they’ll come across velvet. It’s a beautifully descriptive, adjectival word as well as a literal thing which may or may not be in the child’s world.

That’s the point OP was making wasn’t it? That it denotes a lack of reading. Now I wouldn’t expect the whole class to know it, but back in my day there would be at least a handful of avid readers who would.

Watchoutfortheslowaraf · 03/01/2026 10:14

eastegg · 03/01/2026 10:12

I think everyone talking about the prevalence or otherwise of velvet, or turnips, or whatever, are missing the point, or rather that is the point.

Books expose you to things outside day to day life. If an 8/9 year old reads plenty, they’ll come across velvet. It’s a beautifully descriptive, adjectival word as well as a literal thing which may or may not be in the child’s world.

That’s the point OP was making wasn’t it? That it denotes a lack of reading. Now I wouldn’t expect the whole class to know it, but back in my day there would be at least a handful of avid readers who would.

My daughter is an avid reader but prefers modern books. Therefore hasn’t come across the word velvet in any way other than a red velvet cake. Not knowing one word does not necessarily mean all the children do not read.

Sharptonguedwoman · 03/01/2026 10:23

FreedomForFree · 01/01/2026 17:55

My children wouldn't know what a DFS advert is never mind be able to identify the fabric of a sofa from an image in one😂

The consume via YouTube, Instagram, netlix etc none of which are showing those kind of adverts.

I'm pretty well read but I've only heard of the Velvetine Rabbit because of the Friends episode, I assumed it was an American book, is it popular here? You see, we all have things we haven't heard of

Velveteen Rabbit is British, children's classic, 1921. Bookworm here. I know of it but have never read it.

Snakebite61 · 03/01/2026 11:20

Utterlybananas333 · 01/01/2026 17:09

My sister is a teacher in a South London primary school, she is a year four teacher of around 30 8 to 9-year-olds. She was recently describing her disbelief over the fact that not a single child knew what velvet meant? There were some crazy guesses, and lots of children who thought it was cake (probably relating to red velvet). Is it just the fact that children and adults don't talk anymore? That nobody reads anymore? Or even watches educational TV programs? Would your child know?

It's modern life. I bet they could teach you a thing or two about computers. I hope you get my gist.

GETTINGLIKEMYMOTHER · 03/01/2026 11:27

oustedbymymate · 01/01/2026 17:19

My friend is an English secondary school teacher in city comp. Teaching Christmas carol charles dickens and took a turnip in the show the kids as they didn’t know what one was. 15 years old

I can’t help wondering how many MNers ever buy or cook turnips!

They go very nicely in a vegetable soup or lamb stew, but hardly a very popular vegetable in the U.K. nowadays. Shame, because it’s locally grown, seasonal, and keeps very well, even just a half in the salad drawer.

I read not long ago that until fairly recently they were pretty much shunned in France, since during WW2 turnips were one of the few foods left to them by the invading Nazis. But lately I’ve seen plenty in French supermarkets.

TheKeatingFive · 03/01/2026 11:31

eastegg · 03/01/2026 10:12

I think everyone talking about the prevalence or otherwise of velvet, or turnips, or whatever, are missing the point, or rather that is the point.

Books expose you to things outside day to day life. If an 8/9 year old reads plenty, they’ll come across velvet. It’s a beautifully descriptive, adjectival word as well as a literal thing which may or may not be in the child’s world.

That’s the point OP was making wasn’t it? That it denotes a lack of reading. Now I wouldn’t expect the whole class to know it, but back in my day there would be at least a handful of avid readers who would.

I don't think it denotes lack of reading at all. If you think of the type of books 8/9 year olds are exposed to nowadays, particularly boys, velvet is unlikely to feature very prominently.

Swipe left for the next trending thread