Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Divorce - disabled child- Advice please?

166 replies

SENSummer · 29/12/2025 13:28

My marriage of seven years has ended this Christmas. My decision but STBXH has been emotionally checked out, difficult and distant for years so we’ve been on the verge a few times. It’s definitely over now.

I’ve held it together thus far because we have two small children. 4yo DD and 5yo DS who is extremely high needs ASD, profound learning disabilities, ADHD, non verbal, PICA and also massive for his age. Wears 9-10 clothes and weighs 35kg about 2/3 my size already. He is very difficult to care for. Honestly it’s horrendous he’s destructive and violent and just shrieks constantly whilst destroying everything he touches.

I’m scared they will make me take him and be resident parent. I don’t want to be. I can’t win against him in a fight anymore and all of his basic care needs are a physical fight. I also can’t deadlift him off the floor, which is a lot of what parenting him requires.

STBXH has been working long hours as a doctor throughout our marriage but does physically help with DS when he is here. He is much bigger and stronger than me and can still just about overpower DS when needed although worries he will hurt him. He has been deeply depressed for a long time and any periods spent alone with DS send this through the roof.

DS is in a specialist school with 1:1 care and has a small social service package. We have appealed multiple times for more or for him to be put into care as we just can’t manage him. We keep putting up bigger and bigger gates/locks around the house but he climbs them/breaks them and nothing can stop him.

I was forced out of work to be his carer even though I never wanted to leave work. I’ve done everything for DS for years fighting for all the medical/therapy/council help and his socialist school place but nothing made a difference. I’m scared for mine and DD’s safety and future if we end up in a house just us and DS. I cannot manage him or meet his needs and trying has such a detrimental impact on DD.

I don’t want to be his resident parent but I know that DH won’t want to either. He says he won’t be able to work which is true but that’s the situation I’ve been in for years so I don’t think he’s entitled to carry on like normal once we are divorced and I’m not his support act anymore. I worry what will happen and that they will make me have DS. I’ve spoke to social services and they said they don’t know what will happen.

I would of course share custody and if DH did have DS I would give him plenty of respite. I highly doubt the same would happen if I become resident parent.

if you’ve been through this please help!

OP posts:
Red125 · 30/12/2025 21:45

I didn't mean any offence. I have two ND children myself. I personally would find it inhumane to have to look after children with a level of need that meant I could do almost nothing else or even ever get a full night's sleep, and think that people in that position should be afforded support to have the option not to do that. I'm on your side here.

SleeplessInWherever · 30/12/2025 21:45

ThePieceHall · 30/12/2025 21:19

Oh, for goodness sake, how petty and pedantic. This is why we get nowhere in the disability world because there’s always the martyr doing the whole ‘I’m going to take offence at every word they say’ routine. Jeez! Have you nothing better to take offence at? Like your local authority? The government? Society? I’m happy to accompany you screaming into the void. The poster did/said nothing wrong.

Sorry, who are you ranting at?

I’m not screaming into any void. Society, the government and the LA did not make our son high needs, they’re not the cause of his aggression, and whilst they absolutely could provide better support, they are not responsible for his actual needs.

Raising your own children for as long as you possibly, safely, can is not “inhumane.” It is not unreasonable to expect me to cater for my son’s (very complex) needs until I cannot any longer for either health, safety or emotional reasons - I’m his mother, it’s the basic expectation.

Red125 · 30/12/2025 21:47

SleeplessInWherever · 30/12/2025 21:45

Sorry, who are you ranting at?

I’m not screaming into any void. Society, the government and the LA did not make our son high needs, they’re not the cause of his aggression, and whilst they absolutely could provide better support, they are not responsible for his actual needs.

Raising your own children for as long as you possibly, safely, can is not “inhumane.” It is not unreasonable to expect me to cater for my son’s (very complex) needs until I cannot any longer for either health, safety or emotional reasons - I’m his mother, it’s the basic expectation.

At what point would you say it's beyond a basic expectation?

SleeplessInWherever · 30/12/2025 21:48

Red125 · 30/12/2025 21:45

I didn't mean any offence. I have two ND children myself. I personally would find it inhumane to have to look after children with a level of need that meant I could do almost nothing else or even ever get a full night's sleep, and think that people in that position should be afforded support to have the option not to do that. I'm on your side here.

Thanks.

I do raise a child that allows for very little outside of doing so, and who has suffered from extreme sleep deprivation for all 9 of his years. Which means so have we.

I agree that an option to not do that should be available for those who want/need it, but also that it should be an absolute last resort. Language like inhumane does “get my back up,” because those of us have children with such high needs don’t always like the assumption they’re a burden.

SleeplessInWherever · 30/12/2025 21:53

Red125 · 30/12/2025 21:47

At what point would you say it's beyond a basic expectation?

When I’m no longer able to keep my child safe, and/or well.

I am less concerned about myself, but that’s absolutely my prerogative and I accept that.

Only when I am unable to meet his needs and keep him safe from himself, would I say I’d hit capacity.

Arran2024 · 30/12/2025 22:21

It's inhumane when parents are desperate for support and there is nothing available. I got good support for my daughter born in 1998. Things are very different now. The cuts are having a big impact on parents, who used to get a lot more access to services like respite.

Red125 · 30/12/2025 22:24

SleeplessInWherever · 30/12/2025 21:48

Thanks.

I do raise a child that allows for very little outside of doing so, and who has suffered from extreme sleep deprivation for all 9 of his years. Which means so have we.

I agree that an option to not do that should be available for those who want/need it, but also that it should be an absolute last resort. Language like inhumane does “get my back up,” because those of us have children with such high needs don’t always like the assumption they’re a burden.

That makes sense, I'll think about my wording more carefully next time.

BananaramaNananana · 30/12/2025 23:05

MamainWonderland · 29/12/2025 15:24

This is excellent advice.

We have an 11 year old son with a similar profile, and we are in the process of looking at residential schooling because his special school is no longer able to manage and we have an older daughter who is really struggling with seeing me be subject to violence so regularly. He also needs so much support with medical care, personal care and life skills that we/school are unable to provide.

In order to get funding for a residential place, you need agreement from both social care (home is not coping) AND education (school also say they can’t meet needs). This really leaves you with two options: school can meet need and social care then seek a foster home/children’s home placement, or school agree they can’t meet need and residential schools become an option. Foster families are not generally equipped to deal with very complex learning disabilities (we were initially put forward for family-based short breaks for respite and the coordinator laughed her head off at the idea that she had a suitable family waiting to help - he was eventually given respite at a Barbados facility which is BRILLIANT).

I have to say though, this process is not quick - just the assessment and working through “brokerage” once everyone agrees the plan has taken over a year for us. You need to find the right place - somewhere that you can travel to easily - somewhere that feels right for your child. A number of residential schools have rejected us because his needs are so complex - and one or two have me the total creeps when visiting and I wouldn’t have boarded a budgie with them, much less my most vulnerable and loved person on earth.

All that said, please don’t despair. Has he been assessed by a LDCAMHS challenging behaviour specialist? We were referred into that pathway and got a fast track to a psychiatrist who prescribed meds to take the edge off his extreme anxiety (which was causing a lot of his violent outbursts). It hasn’t been a miracle, but it has enabled us/him to cope while we get a lot of other things in place.

We were initially offered 2 nights per month of respite. It was remarkable how quickly that increased to five nights when we started discussions about residential schooling. You’d be surprised what the local authority keeps up its sleeve for “emergencies” - we’ve had to be at breaking point a number of times before services have magically appeared. Five nights has made a huge difference. Fight for it - get your MP involved if you have to!

A few other things to consider: your son’s behaviour may change a little if your husband moves out. Children with complex disabilities have a remarkable ability to “sense the mood” and often their behaviour matches. We saw a significant change in our son when he had a change of teacher - a huge improvement. He is also still very small - his communication will be very limited and violence is often the way they communicate in lieu of words or other strategies - it may not always be like this.

My DH and I have somehow managed to remain together on this journey (helps that we had 15 years together before having children - met on our gap year), but it is brutal on a marriage. I am so sorry that you are in this position. If you ever want to talk to someone who is a bit further along the same pathway, please just message me. It is impossible to understand the enormity of caring for such a complex child unless you’ve done it yourself. Here if you need an ear/shoulder. Xx

Thank you! That's really helpful @MamainWonderland . It might get to this although hope not.

To OP I thought we might be at this stage at 5/6 but thankfully ds did not continue to grow in size & strength and we split which seemed to help enormously. No black eyes since the split and only a bit of kicking/punching and pinching. Not so much in the last year so not curling up on floor for a kicking which would happen. Anger still there but with different techniques much much better so more verbal assault and some throwing objects/pushing and more stuff broken than people broken. It's so difficult and people really don't understand when you explain school, family/social situations and the danger to both child and other family members.

I hope you find a residential placement which sounds as if it would make you all far far happier. Flowers

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 31/12/2025 09:31

I didn’t find parents need agreement from education and social services to get a residential placement. Social Services can be useless. We did win the tribunal on educational grounds; but the chair said before the hearing started, the medical evidence was almost overwhelming and the LA was going to have an uphill job to persuade them otherwise! (Our barrister told us the LA’s solicitor’s heart was not in it. He wound the chair up to boiling point) There was no discussion about social care and how we were coping or not.

We got an independent social worker’s report for the tribunal. She pointed out that SS was only focussed on DD1 and her disability. As soon as I went out of the room, DD2 became a carer to DD1. SS had apparently never noticed DD2 was painfully slim - with the appearance of someone with an eating disorder. (This is because she had been in the early stages of an eating disorder, after DD1 had been indecently assaulted in the classroom by a boy. DD2 had had a year’s treatment from CAMHS. Eventually she was referred to a dietitian to gain weight)

DD2 said to me, around that time, that when SWs came to the house, not one ever asked her how she was! There was never any “whole family approach” by them.

The educational psychologist also commented in her report that DD1’s needs were beyond the resources of most families.

The SEND tribunal accepted all our witnesses arguments, and ordered education to name the school, as recommended by the leading neurologists at Gt Ormond St and Queen Sq, as the only school that could meet her medical needs. I do not know what makes LA officers, who are jumped up pen pushers, think they are qualified to ignore consultants on medical needs (and I’ve heard this has come up in other tribunals) and why a court is going to think they are qualified to do so?

Education and SS did agree on joint funding though, but that was between them.

I’d say when the whole family is being woken up every hour of the night, and suffering post traumatic stress, that is beyond the basic expectation of parents. (Especially when a consultant physician at the the local hospital says they don’t have the expertise to look after DC, because of their medical condition)

OP - ask SS for a whole family assessment.

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 31/12/2025 09:55

I haven’t read “Working Together” for years, because DD1 and DD2 are adults and come under the Care Act 2014 now, but the blurb here on gov.uk does refer to a “whole family focus”

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children2

“Working Together” is partly about child protection, and partly about the procedures for social care assessments of disabled children. While there can be an overlap, I don’t know what bright spark decided to amalgamate what should be two different assessment frameworks into one book, thereby confusing and frightening parents of disabled children, who should be under SS Children with Disability Teams? Read the relevant parts, OP of “Working Together” on disabled children social care assessments.

SS will probably try to focus on DC’s needs, but emphasise to them, they need to consider you, DH and the sibling just as much, in a whole family approach. I never know why SS ignore their safeguarding duties to the sibling? Well I do - it’s about saving money, but I don’t see how it fits in with their professional responsibilities?

Working together to safeguard children

Statutory guidance on multi-agency working to help, support and protect children.

https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/working-together-to-safeguard-children--2

firstofallimadelight · 31/12/2025 10:33

SENSummer · 29/12/2025 13:38

‘There’s no places in residential anywhere’
‘He’s too young for residential care it would have to be foster care at his are but due to his physical size we won’t find foster carers willing or able to deal with him’
‘you would have to apply to even be allowed to complete a white rose form to have him placed and they will without doubt reject you based on his age and your circumstances’

I know someone who fought for their dd to get a residential place, she became pregnant so said she was at risk and so was baby (which was true) It took years though, initially he was in a placement about two hours away. Then they said they couldn’t meet need and then he was in an air bnb with two carers round the clock for about two years before they got a space in a home about an hour away.

BlueandWhitePorcelain · 31/12/2025 11:06

SENSummer · 29/12/2025 13:38

‘There’s no places in residential anywhere’
‘He’s too young for residential care it would have to be foster care at his are but due to his physical size we won’t find foster carers willing or able to deal with him’
‘you would have to apply to even be allowed to complete a white rose form to have him placed and they will without doubt reject you based on his age and your circumstances’

I have no skin in this, having no connection or personal experience of Priors Court, but I have been aware of its existence for 25 years.

Speak to them OP:

https://www.priorscourt.org.uk/

According to their website, they take children from age 5.

I believe my own LA must use Priors Court, because DD1’s last social worker talked about it to me it favourable terms. (He had been very senior in our SS)

Also, there is the NAS school Radlett Lodge. I know nothing about it, other than I am aware of its existence:

https://www.autism.org.uk/our-schools/radlett-lodge

It also goes from age 5. There is nothing to lose, by talking to them!

Prior's Court - autism education and care charity

Prior's Court is a charity providing education and residential care for autistic young people age 5-25 with complex needs, through a school and young adult provision in Berkshire

https://www.priorscourt.org.uk

Tinsles · 31/12/2025 11:35

OP, i am glad you are getting advice and sympathy.
No judgement here at all as your situation sounds horrendous.
In your situation I would do whatever you can to save your daughter and her future by doing whatever you need to do so that your son goes to residential care permanently.
I am so sorry.
These stories are really heartbreaking to read.

ittakes2 · 31/12/2025 13:56

I’m sorry it sounds very difficult. I think you should ask Mumsnet to move your thread to the Sen boards as I am sure you’ll find sympathetic parents who have experienced similar and have some great advice.

Playingvideogames · 31/12/2025 17:14

It sounds like relying on the authorities is all but hopeless in these scenarios.

I follow an Instagram account where a couple with 2 profoundly autistic teen sons live across the road from one another. It sounds mad but could you live next door to each other so even if he’s home at 6pm, he can basically be forced to take DS (by you walking him round and knocking on the door!).

I feel like if he settles down somewhere a few miles from you it’ll be far easier for him to shirk his responsibilities, pretend he’s ’still at work’ etc

I feel quite outraged on your behalf actually.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page