Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think the UK should have a National Food Service again? (Like we basically had in WW2)

215 replies

Staybymw · 05/12/2025 05:49

During WW2 and for years after, the UK did have a kind of National Food Service.
The government controlled prices, ran bakeries, managed rationing, guaranteed flour/milk supplies, and kept basic staples affordable so people didn’t starve. It wasn’t fancy, but it worked.

So with the cost of living crisis now, rising food prices, food banks everywhere, and benefits going up because families literally can’t afford groceries… why don’t we bring back a modern version?

I’m not talking about anything complicated.
I mean basic, no-frills staples produced not for profit:

  • bread
  • rice
  • pasta
  • tinned tomatoes
  • flour
  • oats
  • basic cooking oil
  • tinned veg / beans

All stuff we can grow or easily manufacture in the UK.

If the government owned the land, the factories, and the distribution, they could:

  • create thousands of jobs ( more people paying tax)
  • stabilise food prices
  • make sure no one goes hungry
  • massively reduce the need for benefits to keep rising
  • put pressure on supermarkets to stop hiking prices

Other countries already do versions of this:

France controls wheat prices
Japan buys rice from farmers and sells it back at stable prices
Egypt subsidises bread for millions
India has state-run ration shops
Brazil provides government food baskets
Saudi Arabia subsidises milk, flour, staples through state industry

It’s not a wild idea lots of countries see food as a strategic, essential service.

A National Food Service would mean:

  • no shareholders to pay
  • no profit margin
  • steady UK jobs
  • cheaper food
  • more secure supply chains
  • less reliance on private companies
  • more tax revenue from the workers it employs

It could help families massively.
Especially those who are working but still struggling, or whose benefits are swallowed by food prices.

Given everything going on, food inflation, child poverty, constant arguments about increasing benefits, would a simple, not-for-profit national food range actually save money in the long run?

OP posts:
Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 09:38

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 09:32

How much subsidising to people need? Benefits, on top of benefits on top of benefits.

How about just teaching people to stand on their own two feet?

They can though can’t they? They don’t need government canteens or government potatoes. It’s just this weird obsession with controlling what people eat.

5128gap · 05/12/2025 09:38

Bambamhoohoo · 05/12/2025 09:28

I love the “figures will need to be modelled” as if that’s ever going to happen 😂

as mentioned numerous times these products don’t produce billions in profits for none producers. They are loss leaders or return tiny margins. Supermarkets can offer basics at such a low price because every margin is squeezed including their own (they’re not making profit on milk!)

you could argue they should simply be more expensive but that’s an entirely different solution to a national food service supplying basics

I'm well aware it's never going to happen. I'm not a fool. I'm saying that before any of us can claim this will be cheaper or more expensive we would need to see the figures. Without them we are all simply making uniformed declarations about cost to support views driven by our ideologies rather than from any detailed knowledge or understanding of the economics.

RedToothBrush · 05/12/2025 09:43

Can you imagine the uproar of we stopped benefits and gave people food instead.

People would have to cook and wouldn't get treats.

This would cause riots. Like genuinely. People don't riot over many things but food is one of them.

Plus one of the issues food banks identify is the number of people who don't have the means to cook. Either through fuel shortage (potatoes take a long time and lots of energy to cook), a lack of equipment (everything from tin openers, to pans, to those living in b&b's only having access to a kettle and microwave at most) and obviously a lack of skill.

It's even more depressing to think about than it simply being about a lack of money.

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 09:44

I wouldn't trust the government to run a more efficient operation than the supermarkets. We already have very cheap food. It would be better to swap benefit payments into food vouchers to prevent temptation for those who can't manage their own money,.

RedToothBrush · 05/12/2025 09:49

Staybymw · 05/12/2025 06:38

I’ve used some of those basic items. The rice is inedible, you cannot cook it without it being mushy, I have tried everything. That rice is made from broken grains. The lentils is that for tinned lentils because dried lentils cost more and those are the ones that can make a meal. I haven’t seen a big bag of potatoes for £1. Cheapest I’ve seen is £1.20 and that’s if they are in stock. The other stuff yes I’ve seen and used them and they were fine.

My point is that if there were staple items that were not for profit and price guaranteed by the government then there would always be a food safety net. Food poverty could be greatly reduced.

I love this.

"We should have cheap subsidised food in this country"

Someone points out the food that is available OP disputes it saying "but that's shit quality and I can't use it".

Which illustrates part of the point and problem.

What makes you think you'd get better quality food under a government scheme. That's nuts! And if you are saying those products are unusable, what do you think other people will say?!!!!.

50p tinned lentils are absolutely perfect and easy to use btw. I have no bloody idea why you are moaning at that one.

RedTagAlan · 05/12/2025 09:53

Driftingawaynow · 05/12/2025 08:21

the Chinese communist party has actually lifted 800 million people out of poverty over four decades.

by the way, what are you talking about with your net zero comment? Are you a climate change skeptic?

Off on a tangent here, but no. They really haven't.

What the CPC done back in 2011 or so, after XI declared " we will eradicate poverty", they just redefined what it is.

They set the poverty level at 6.3 RMB per day in 2011. Far lower than the world bank definition. They also do not state if this is per person, or per household. And they never raised or revised that definition.

GentleOlive · 05/12/2025 09:55

RedTagAlan · 05/12/2025 09:00

Healthcare. The UK NHS is a lot cheaper than likes of the US where it's near all private.

And as I mentioned in my post, rail. Specifically rail infrastructure ( in the UK anyway)

Pretty much every nation has a mixed economy. It's just the ratio of private to state owned that varies.

I don't think there is a country anywhere that operates a 100% capitalist system.

As a really strange example of the UKs weird hybrid system, how about Sizewell C power station. A mix between the UK government and French company EDF. EDF is state owned by the French guv, But in this case it's acting more like a private company. It will be making a profit from the UK consumer.

Sizewell C Nuclear Power Station, England, UK (power-technology.com)

In my simple way of thinking, I reckon it would be better if such projects were just done 100% UK state owned.

Sorry for the somewhat gish galloping reply,

NHS results are there for all to see. Numbers are massaged, deaths from lack of diagnosis and primary care hidden. It’s not an example to be proud of.

RedTagAlan · 05/12/2025 10:09

GentleOlive · 05/12/2025 09:55

NHS results are there for all to see. Numbers are massaged, deaths from lack of diagnosis and primary care hidden. It’s not an example to be proud of.

Ahh right. So you are going down the path of all data is fake. That's usually a good conversation killer.

I will say tho, there is not really much in the UK that can be called 100% subsidy (or benefit free).I reckon the concept of pure capitalism is just as impossible as pure communism.

AuldWeegie · 05/12/2025 10:09

Like a pp, My dad was a teenager in Glasgow during the war, grew very tall, and was always hungry. My grandson is the same height, and has the typical teenage hollow legs. The portions at school dinners are tiny, cost a lot, and I basically I wouldn’t trust the government to feed anyone adequately beyond a very basic quantity of calories.

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 10:16

Meadowfinch · 05/12/2025 07:05

Food is not expensive and few people know how to cook basic food stuffs. I can make a decent meal with protein, veg and carbs for under £1 and in less than 15 mins, yet the takeaways are full.

What country do you live in ? Food is very expensive in the UK . A tin of pulses costs around a pound and if you are talking of boiling dried ones then add in the gas/electricity to that. You can't eat lentils every day. Fruit and vegetables are vastly overpriced. Carrots are now 69p a bag in Tesco - my nearest shop. I do not have the time ,nor a car to go and shop cheaper.

RedTagAlan · 05/12/2025 10:23

AuldWeegie · 05/12/2025 10:09

Like a pp, My dad was a teenager in Glasgow during the war, grew very tall, and was always hungry. My grandson is the same height, and has the typical teenage hollow legs. The portions at school dinners are tiny, cost a lot, and I basically I wouldn’t trust the government to feed anyone adequately beyond a very basic quantity of calories.

"During the war" is pretty important here.

Is your Grandson as hungry as your dad was ?

ThisMintSwan · 05/12/2025 10:50

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 10:16

What country do you live in ? Food is very expensive in the UK . A tin of pulses costs around a pound and if you are talking of boiling dried ones then add in the gas/electricity to that. You can't eat lentils every day. Fruit and vegetables are vastly overpriced. Carrots are now 69p a bag in Tesco - my nearest shop. I do not have the time ,nor a car to go and shop cheaper.

Food is very cheap in the UK. Exactly how much cheaper do you think a bag of carrots could possibly be?

Bumblebee72 · 05/12/2025 10:51

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 10:16

What country do you live in ? Food is very expensive in the UK . A tin of pulses costs around a pound and if you are talking of boiling dried ones then add in the gas/electricity to that. You can't eat lentils every day. Fruit and vegetables are vastly overpriced. Carrots are now 69p a bag in Tesco - my nearest shop. I do not have the time ,nor a car to go and shop cheaper.

It's really not. Food is cheap in the UK. We have highly competitive supermarkets which screw farmers and drive down prices. If anything fruit and veg are under priced and we should be paying more.

Go to a French supermarket - the quality is much higher but so are the prices. Brits focus on cheap over good.

ThisMintSwan · 05/12/2025 11:00

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 10:16

What country do you live in ? Food is very expensive in the UK . A tin of pulses costs around a pound and if you are talking of boiling dried ones then add in the gas/electricity to that. You can't eat lentils every day. Fruit and vegetables are vastly overpriced. Carrots are now 69p a bag in Tesco - my nearest shop. I do not have the time ,nor a car to go and shop cheaper.

Baked beans, kidney beans, botlotti beans, pinto beans, cannelleni beans, haricot beans, black eyed beans, black beans, green lentils, chickpeas. All under a £ at Tesco. No you don't have to eat lentils every day, but pulses are cheap, balanced and versatile - nothing wrong with eating them regularly.

nightmarepickle2025 · 05/12/2025 11:01

Have you seen how good the government - any government - are at running things?

you’re really asking for communism and that’s not really worked too well when tried before

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 11:01

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 09:32

How much subsidising to people need? Benefits, on top of benefits on top of benefits.

How about just teaching people to stand on their own two feet?

I’m disabled. I can’t stand on my own two feet.

there are days I can’t prep my
own food - most days I struggle.

what would you suggest for me?

WhitegreeNcandle · 05/12/2025 11:05

Farmer here. There are already good steady jobs in Ag -
no one wants them as they involve poo, working unsociable hours, often in cold conditions.

My Dad remembers farming in the war and the Ministry of Agriculture. Back then, if you weren’t farming your farm well “The ministry” came and took it over. It happened to our neighbours. “The ministry” did modernize the farm and massively improve its outputs but it still didn’t yield as well as my grandfather who had grown up on the land and farmed it all its life.

Basic food is already incredibly cheap and really rather well resourced. One man per 1000 acres of arable. 6 men per 90 000 hens etc. actually. If the government ran it your costs would go up dramatically as the government defines a full time worker in grant applications as 30 hours per week. I don’t know any full time farm workers on 30 hrs per week!!!

Staybymw · 05/12/2025 11:06

FalseSpring · 05/12/2025 08:05

YABVU.

There are many reasons why not:

We don't grow tomatoes and rice in this country - they come from Europe and so since Brexit you can expect to pay higher prices.

Prior to Brexit we had market intervention in the form of the Common Agricultural Policy. We had cheap subsidised British and European food until Brexit and our Government took away the farmer's subsidies!

It's been done and abandoned as a disaster - I assume you are not old enough to remember the Milk Marketing Board (set up in 1930s and abolished in 1994). Prices actually reduced when it was scrapped as supermarkets bought foreign milk for less.

Wheat (bread and pasta) and other commodity prices (pork, sugar, coffee, etc) are set on a world market and change constantly depending on global events and weather - there is no way an elected Government is going to intervene in a free market.

Farmers are currently struggling to make any profit at all and you want to reduce prices further - that is very unreasonable! Staple food in this country is very cheap, often imported below the cost of UK production (New Zealand lamb for example).

You mention nationalisation of agriculture and the food industry. I suggest you do a study of how that went in communist Russia! To cut a long story short, it was a disaster and caused widespread food shortages and famine! Communism never works and this has been proved time and time again around the world - we really should teach this basic stuff at school! Free enterprise and competition is the proven best route to lower prices.

We don't grow enough food in this country to support our population so rely on imported products over which we have no control. As more and more farmland is taken out of production (building on green fields, solar farms, re-wilding and environmental schemes, tree planting for carbon credits, etc) we can expect more imported food and lower standards of production. The farmers are angry about the IHT rules as this is going to make the situation much worse than it is currently.

Again, no, not nationalisation but alongside what we already have

OP posts:
CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 11:11

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 11:01

I’m disabled. I can’t stand on my own two feet.

there are days I can’t prep my
own food - most days I struggle.

what would you suggest for me?

It's not helpful to try to kill a conversation by saying you are disabled, or your children are disabled. If the help you receive is not enough, then that is a different (and worthy) topic on its own.

The vast majority of people are able bodied. That's what this thread is about. Do you really think that all people should get the same level of benefits as a disabled person?

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 11:14

Staybymw · 05/12/2025 11:06

Again, no, not nationalisation but alongside what we already have

We don't need additional food. We are overproducing which leads to food waste. Even community pantries/fridges can't get rid of all the excess food.

What we need is those who can't cook/won't cook to start cooking.

Those that say they don't have the time - we all have the same 24 hours a day.

The feckless have plenty of spare time.

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 11:16

ThisMintSwan · 05/12/2025 11:00

Baked beans, kidney beans, botlotti beans, pinto beans, cannelleni beans, haricot beans, black eyed beans, black beans, green lentils, chickpeas. All under a £ at Tesco. No you don't have to eat lentils every day, but pulses are cheap, balanced and versatile - nothing wrong with eating them regularly.

That is still alot of money for a family. You need more than one tin for a family and just eating beans all the time is quite depressing.

5128gap · 05/12/2025 11:18

CraftyGin · 05/12/2025 11:11

It's not helpful to try to kill a conversation by saying you are disabled, or your children are disabled. If the help you receive is not enough, then that is a different (and worthy) topic on its own.

The vast majority of people are able bodied. That's what this thread is about. Do you really think that all people should get the same level of benefits as a disabled person?

Almost half of the UK population has a long term health condition. While not necessarily all causing significant impairment, this tends to become increasingly so as they age, and we have an aging population. Therefore, its not accurate to say 'the vast majority of people are able bodied'. The perspective of disabled people is very valid when discussing issues that affect the population as a whole as they are not the niche minority you believe.

Breakitinto3 · 05/12/2025 11:19

As an immigrant I am always quite baffled by claims that food is expensive and/or takes too much effort to cook.
Asda white potatoes are 2kg for abou 1.30, carrots for 69p for 1kg, broccoli 79p and even cheaper if one buys frozen. Rice and pasta are cheap. Pulses can be very cheap (soak them if buying dry). Meat is pricey, still not that much compared to other countries but still. That's asda which is not the cheapest. You can now buy sweet potatoes for under a pound per kilo in many places.
It's actually fairly easy to get veg and fruit on offers for very cheap.
Many easy and quick dishes can be made from basics or whatever is on offer.

What the issue is not that food is expensive, but that "exciting" food is more expensive.

Lemonandlimefizzywater · 05/12/2025 11:19

5128gap · 05/12/2025 11:18

Almost half of the UK population has a long term health condition. While not necessarily all causing significant impairment, this tends to become increasingly so as they age, and we have an aging population. Therefore, its not accurate to say 'the vast majority of people are able bodied'. The perspective of disabled people is very valid when discussing issues that affect the population as a whole as they are not the niche minority you believe.

Thank you.

the disabled. Elderly. Those with food allergies.

how will you mitigate the scheme for them?

surely that has to be considered, otherwise it will disadvantage that section of the population?

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 11:21

SnoopyandSweep · 05/12/2025 11:16

That is still alot of money for a family. You need more than one tin for a family and just eating beans all the time is quite depressing.

Sorry - I posted too soon. I do eat them regularly. Alot of people also cannot eat pulses regularly , due to dietary issues. I work with children with complex and multiple disabilities and some of these children cannot digest pulse properly. I myself have thyroid issues and have to limit the amount of pulses I eat due to the detrimental effect it can have on my condition. I do enjoy a bean chilli though!

Swipe left for the next trending thread