Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Working families £18k worse off than benefits claimants after budget

587 replies

shoelances · 30/11/2025 23:14

This is madness. Can the last taxpayer in the UK please close the door behind them.

www.msn.com/en-gb/money/other/households-on-handouts-to-be-18-000-better-off-than-families-on-modest-wages/ar-AA1RqxlQ

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
angelos02 · 02/12/2025 10:31

It is getting to the stage where there isn't much of a gap between working a minimum wage job and being on benefits. Can't afford a home or a holiday - well you can live like that by working or by being on benefits. No brainer really. There should be a huge gap - at least double.

january1244 · 02/12/2025 10:41

x2boys · 01/12/2025 12:34

I dont think many peoole are getting social housing in London.

20% of London housing stock is social housing - about 700k properties from what I could see on the latest figures.

MaturingCheeseball · 02/12/2025 11:54

I have two dns. One married, both of couple working, two dcs. The other single, not working, two dcs. And which one has the 3-bed house? Not the working couple, who are renting a small flat.

Frequency · 02/12/2025 11:58

angelos02 · 02/12/2025 10:31

It is getting to the stage where there isn't much of a gap between working a minimum wage job and being on benefits. Can't afford a home or a holiday - well you can live like that by working or by being on benefits. No brainer really. There should be a huge gap - at least double.

I agree, but given that benefits (excluding disability benefits) are set at the minimum level the government and its advising bodies believe is needed to cover very basic needs like food and shelter, we cannot do this by lowering benefits, not unless we want people starving to death or living on the streets.

We need to raise the minimum wage, which would also help spread the tax burden. Raising the NMW will also push up middle incomes because who's going to spend years training to be a nurse or teacher and gaining student debt when they can work in a shop for more money? This means those at the bottom and middle will be paying more tax and taking less from the system.

And I know businesses will fold, billionaires will have tantrums and move to Dubai, a tin of beans will cost £999, etc, except none of this happens in other countries with higher wages and standards of living, so what are they doing that is different and why can we not copy that?

x2boys · 02/12/2025 12:37

january1244 · 02/12/2025 10:41

20% of London housing stock is social housing - about 700k properties from what I could see on the latest figures.

And how many peoole are on waiting lists for decades for these properties?

JHound · 02/12/2025 12:38

While it is madness the blame is pointed at the wrong place.

The issue is corporate welfare and the fact the taxpayer is subsidising businesses to pay pitiful wages while chucking returns at senior management and shareholders.

JHound · 02/12/2025 12:40

I will say though it has been the case for years that in certain circumstances you are better off on bennies. My mom was told and knew for years she would be better off financially as a low paid single mom if she was on benefits. But she had a strong moral code and refused to do it.

Frequency · 02/12/2025 12:46

JHound · 02/12/2025 12:40

I will say though it has been the case for years that in certain circumstances you are better off on bennies. My mom was told and knew for years she would be better off financially as a low paid single mom if she was on benefits. But she had a strong moral code and refused to do it.

No one is better off on benefits. Even if you have 73 profoundly disabled children, get housing benefit for Buckingham Palace and get eleventy squillion pounds a day in disability and housing benefits, you are still better off working because most disability benefits are not means-tested.

EstherGreenwood63 · 02/12/2025 12:55

So. Many. Reform bots. It's not having the desired effect pal. 🤣

Benjithedog · 02/12/2025 13:00

EstherGreenwood63 · 02/12/2025 12:55

So. Many. Reform bots. It's not having the desired effect pal. 🤣

Rubbish. People are voicing their opinion. They don’t have to be Reformed supporters

AlexandraBee · 02/12/2025 13:07

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

AlexandraBee · 02/12/2025 13:09

Benjithedog · 02/12/2025 13:00

Rubbish. People are voicing their opinion. They don’t have to be Reformed supporters

I know. It’s laughable but people need to revert to name calling as there’s no educated sensible response. Sad really.

NoisyViewer · 02/12/2025 13:14

an unpopular post but where my MIL lives is somewhat a benefit street. What I’m about to list I don’t have any real issue with (live as you wish) they have garden chairs on their front lawns where several families go sit & talk whilst playing loud music, having bbq’s ordering takeaways & drinking everyday in the summer. They now in and out each other houses in the winter where one lives next to an old lady who keeps asking them to turn the volume down. They can all drive etc. yet not one of them works & this is how they spend their days, something working people may do once a week if they can afford it. As I said I don’t care how they choose to live but I am irked they’re getting a payrise for it

Marshmallow4545 · 02/12/2025 13:14

AlexandraBee · 02/12/2025 13:09

I know. It’s laughable but people need to revert to name calling as there’s no educated sensible response. Sad really.

I think there is a lot of cognitive dissonance going on.

A lot of people want to be kind, nice people that look after the vulnerable in our society, however there is clearly a point where there are too many 'vulnerable" people for the rest of us to support without paying huge amounts into the system and seeing very little for it. This hurts ordinary working families and isn't nice and kind at all.

At that point, people begin to ask questions. Why exactly do we have so many people dependent on the welfare state? It is it right that you can be financially better off not working than working? Should we be rewarding parents for being irresponsible and bringing more and more kids into poverty? All valid questions and yet anyone asking them is accused of being misled by the right wing media or Reform. Actually though they are simply wondering if the system is balanced wrong and this needs to be addressed. Totally reasonable and sensible. If the answer is that actually the system is working fine then it should stand up to scrutiny without needing to resort to insults and belittling of those asking the questions.

Kirbert2 · 02/12/2025 13:15

JHound · 02/12/2025 12:40

I will say though it has been the case for years that in certain circumstances you are better off on bennies. My mom was told and knew for years she would be better off financially as a low paid single mom if she was on benefits. But she had a strong moral code and refused to do it.

In the past when it was tax credits but not now with universal credit. It's a reason why it was changed.

NoisyViewer · 02/12/2025 13:19

AlexandraBee · 02/12/2025 13:09

I know. It’s laughable but people need to revert to name calling as there’s no educated sensible response. Sad really.

Exactly they can’t articulate their point because it’s all based on emotions & not what right or factual, they also want to take the opposite view of the right. So if you don’t have the same emotional response you must be the opposite of what they are and lump you into a box labelled racist or the new one reform (which is utter ridiculous because Farage was on about scrapping the 2 cap child benefit, on this issue they’re more reform than the people against it).

NoisyViewer · 02/12/2025 13:26

Marshmallow4545 · 02/12/2025 13:14

I think there is a lot of cognitive dissonance going on.

A lot of people want to be kind, nice people that look after the vulnerable in our society, however there is clearly a point where there are too many 'vulnerable" people for the rest of us to support without paying huge amounts into the system and seeing very little for it. This hurts ordinary working families and isn't nice and kind at all.

At that point, people begin to ask questions. Why exactly do we have so many people dependent on the welfare state? It is it right that you can be financially better off not working than working? Should we be rewarding parents for being irresponsible and bringing more and more kids into poverty? All valid questions and yet anyone asking them is accused of being misled by the right wing media or Reform. Actually though they are simply wondering if the system is balanced wrong and this needs to be addressed. Totally reasonable and sensible. If the answer is that actually the system is working fine then it should stand up to scrutiny without needing to resort to insults and belittling of those asking the questions.

The truth is the people more against it are the people that live amongst & get up for work each day. They have eyes & ears, they know the difference between legitimate benefit claimants & the work shy.

UserFront242 · 02/12/2025 13:44

Bumblebee72 · 02/12/2025 07:55

That just proves the piss take. If the minimum is 18 and the average is 20, assuming a hand full of people actually do a proper weeks work, the vast majority do the absolute minimum to get the benefits.

The need to move 18 to 30.

Some of those people will have disabilities that mean they can't work full time. Or childcare/caring duties. Also zero contracts means the hours someone does can fluctuate wildly from week to week.

Part time is all some people can manage. I think it is wrong to tar them all with the same brush and say they are all just lazy and don't want their benefits affected.

UserFront242 · 02/12/2025 13:49

GentleOlive · 02/12/2025 06:54

Working token 16 hours to claim maximum benefits is not work. It’s gaming the system.

There is no other way to spin this. We have 19 million working age on benefits, 5 million of whom don’t work at all and those that do, many are only working token hours.

The ‘we need more people’ argument is basically just saying ‘we need more people so these people can stay on benefits’.

So, no we don’t need more people. We need these people to work full time and not be on benefits. Even if you exclude the genuinely unable to work, which is far smaller than the number who claim to not be able to work.

There are not enough jobs. Even if every single job vacancy was filled, you would still have millions of people not working and claiming benefits. You would also still have millions of people working and claiming benefits.

Benjithedog · 02/12/2025 13:51

Marshmallow4545 · 02/12/2025 13:14

I think there is a lot of cognitive dissonance going on.

A lot of people want to be kind, nice people that look after the vulnerable in our society, however there is clearly a point where there are too many 'vulnerable" people for the rest of us to support without paying huge amounts into the system and seeing very little for it. This hurts ordinary working families and isn't nice and kind at all.

At that point, people begin to ask questions. Why exactly do we have so many people dependent on the welfare state? It is it right that you can be financially better off not working than working? Should we be rewarding parents for being irresponsible and bringing more and more kids into poverty? All valid questions and yet anyone asking them is accused of being misled by the right wing media or Reform. Actually though they are simply wondering if the system is balanced wrong and this needs to be addressed. Totally reasonable and sensible. If the answer is that actually the system is working fine then it should stand up to scrutiny without needing to resort to insults and belittling of those asking the questions.

Perfectly described

UserFront242 · 02/12/2025 13:55

NoisyViewer · 02/12/2025 13:26

The truth is the people more against it are the people that live amongst & get up for work each day. They have eyes & ears, they know the difference between legitimate benefit claimants & the work shy.

Then they should apply for jobs at the DWP.

Benjithedog · 02/12/2025 13:57

UserFront242 · 02/12/2025 13:44

Some of those people will have disabilities that mean they can't work full time. Or childcare/caring duties. Also zero contracts means the hours someone does can fluctuate wildly from week to week.

Part time is all some people can manage. I think it is wrong to tar them all with the same brush and say they are all just lazy and don't want their benefits affected.

Some do have justified disabilities and those who do and work part time should be applauded. However we all know there are a proportion of people who are not disabled but still work part time and claim benefits therefore being paid by the taxpayer to stay home. I think the country has reached a watershed moment regarding the welfare state and the ever increasing and unaffordable demands on it and the biggest irony of all is that Labour have brought it to this point and it will be their very undoing.

GentleOlive · 02/12/2025 14:00

UserFront242 · 02/12/2025 13:49

There are not enough jobs. Even if every single job vacancy was filled, you would still have millions of people not working and claiming benefits. You would also still have millions of people working and claiming benefits.

There were enough jobs to bring in nearly 5 million immigrants into the country in the last 5 years.

Why can’t those living off other people’s hard work in this country get to work?

FestiveYoni · 02/12/2025 14:05

There are so many impacts we won't see until later next year eg pubs struggling on then more and more closing.
Other small business closing ...

Someone gave a detailed example of how a cafe that produces a vital local service and is staffed by people with disabilities will be affected
It's awful all around.

Benjithedog · 02/12/2025 14:08

UserFront242 · 02/12/2025 13:49

There are not enough jobs. Even if every single job vacancy was filled, you would still have millions of people not working and claiming benefits. You would also still have millions of people working and claiming benefits.

There are jobs, people just don’t want to do them