Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Middle earners punished

1000 replies

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:18

I am feeling so disheartened and frustrated by how middle earners are constantly suffering at the hands of ridiculous government priorities. My husband and I have a greater household income than other families we know but have less cash in hand due to increased taxes coupled with the fact we receive zero benefits like child benefit or tax free childcare etc. ZERO. If they want middle earners to fund the country thought tax then at least support us with childcare costs. It’s a joke that two parents earning £99k each get childcare funding but parents with one £101k salary and one £25k salary receive nothing. I just need to speak to people who understand the burden of raising a family amidst the current financial climate and then the potential of further tax rises!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
LoveWine123 · 25/11/2025 22:03

autumngirl714 · 25/11/2025 21:42

Trust me, OP — being at the bottom of the pecking order is absolutely horrendous too.

I work, and I’m a single mum. And I really want to emphasise what that actually means: inconsistent and limited childcare, a one-adult household, and a one-income household. I’m on my own. There’s nobody to turn to in desperation and nobody to share the load when things get overwhelming.

My wage and the small top-up of Universal Credit don’t cover my outgoings. I live a very limited life because I simply can’t afford anything extra. No holidays, no treats for myself — every penny goes on bills, my children, and trying to keep my car going. I have nothing left at the end of the month and I’m constantly in the red.

The problem with UC aswell is that it creates a poverty loop. The more you earn, the less you get. Which yes, does make sense. But it also means I have to earn SIGNIFICANTLY more to get any real benifit (once you’ve also considered extra costs to be able to work more).

The idea that people on benefits are “rolling in it” is a complete myth, and the stigma around it is really unfair and inaccurate.

I’m sorry to hear about your situation and I do understand your frustrations, but please don’t assume that those of us on benefits are any better off.

I think the point OP is making (which you are also experiencing) is that the way things are set up people are not incentivised to earn more as they are effectively worse off. When you work more or try to progress in your job, taxes mean you lose more earnings. Not great any way you look at it.

Redlocks28 · 25/11/2025 22:03

Families here can afford to go on holiday every half term, have new cars, etc. Perhaps I’m looking forward to my children not being in nursery so we can afford that too!

Hmm, I'm a teacher and definitely can't afford to go on holiday every half term or have new cars. Your husband earning over £100k means you are not middle earners.

TheQuirkyMaker · 25/11/2025 22:03

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:32

I don’t think this topic is going to be understood by people who pay lower income tax and receive the childcare support that I’m talking about. We pay £2k a month in nursery fees. This is something we all understand when we have children. My post is about how frustrating it is seeing that we may be due further tax rises when currently our taxes pay for other parents to receive tax free childcare. I am a primary school teacher. They say we have a teacher retention crisis. I had to consider whether it was even worth going back to work after my children due to the cost of childcare.

So you as a family live on £120k. So £10k per month? And, shock, you are expected to pay tax? Cry me a river.

sheffexpat74 · 25/11/2025 22:03

TheNightingalesStarling · 25/11/2025 21:35

Teachers earn no where near the 100k needed for not paying Childcare.

Unless you mean a teacher married to a High earner?

2 top of scale teachers (without any extra responsibility) = 100K joint.

Bunny44 · 25/11/2025 22:03

GrandmasCat · 25/11/2025 21:25

And just today I realised I am a crap earner surounded by crap earners… I don’t think I know many people who are earning over £50k, let alone over £90k each, yet we all own houses and live without too many financial worries. Never thought that£90k would be considered middle earners.

you don’t need benefits, you just need to learn to live within your means. But agree that some government poicies are blatantly unfair for single people.

Edited

I think it depends where you live in the country. Basically people in the South and especially South East are fucked over.

Christmaspuddingsss · 25/11/2025 22:04

LifeBeginsToday · 25/11/2025 21:31

I have a degree in Economics, and there are so few families where two earn £90k, that those arguments are a moot point.

Are you Rachel?

Makingpeace · 25/11/2025 22:04

GrandmasCat · 25/11/2025 21:36

Live within your means, woman. I live in a very expensive area where a student bedroom is rented for over £1k a month yet I have a beautiful house and a very good life as I keep an eye on my finances and don’t spend my money in crap.

I think the only appropriate response here is "ok, boomer!"

TheSmallAssassin · 25/11/2025 22:04

We don't just believe it's high, it is high - only 4% of working people earn over £100k - the median wage in the UK is £38k, in London it's around £50k.

You obviously live in an area of high earners and are in the middle of them, but that doesn't make you middle earners. Most people can't afford to go away every half term!

Apricotafternoon · 25/11/2025 22:04

This 100% OP.
It should be done on household income not sole highest earner!

Sheaw · 25/11/2025 22:04

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:53

We looked at doing this when his salary went over the threshold but after doing that we would still have less a month which we really needed at the time. A few of our friends do this though. It’s a good idea.

Keeping up with the Jones’ never ends well.

WinterHangingBasket · 25/11/2025 22:05

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:58

Yes I was reading about fiscal drag earlier.

Apologies to everyone that I used the the word middle when you believe it’s high. Where we live our life is quite “middle” so apologies that it wasn’t the correct term to use in a general/proper sense.

Families here can afford to go on holiday every half term, have new cars, etc. Perhaps I’m looking forward to my children not being in nursery so we can afford that too!

I am willing to bet that they cannot all afford it and certainly not every half term. You are noticing the proportion who go away on one of them. You also are not seeing how much of their lifestyle is being funded via credit cards, leased cars, inheritance, smaller mortgages than you etc.

Comparison is the thief of joy. Stop looking at what others are doing and make sure you are doing the best for your family within your not middle earning means!

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 22:05

TheQuirkyMaker · 25/11/2025 22:03

So you as a family live on £120k. So £10k per month? And, shock, you are expected to pay tax? Cry me a river.

Where did you get 10k a month from?!

OP posts:
Maureenwasacat · 25/11/2025 22:05

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:46

Gosh that is not what my post was about at all. I sympathise with your situation aswell and have friends who are in the same boat. We could name many lives that are worse off than mine. That wasn’t why I was posting and I hope that is clear. I merely wanted to share my frustration with others about the recent news of tax rises being possible again and the fact that the middle earners are funding a lot of the country. Probably because the top earners are all leaving.

They're not leaving, they're loopholing 🙄

Slightly better off punches down to worse off and the elite sit happily deflecting back to us normal people.

Fetaface · 25/11/2025 22:05

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:32

I don’t think this topic is going to be understood by people who pay lower income tax and receive the childcare support that I’m talking about. We pay £2k a month in nursery fees. This is something we all understand when we have children. My post is about how frustrating it is seeing that we may be due further tax rises when currently our taxes pay for other parents to receive tax free childcare. I am a primary school teacher. They say we have a teacher retention crisis. I had to consider whether it was even worth going back to work after my children due to the cost of childcare.

Well teachers earn more than 2k per month when full time plus that bill is shared by you and your husband so it is not for you to pay all the childcare is it?

BigLooser · 25/11/2025 22:06

autumngirl714 · 25/11/2025 21:42

Trust me, OP — being at the bottom of the pecking order is absolutely horrendous too.

I work, and I’m a single mum. And I really want to emphasise what that actually means: inconsistent and limited childcare, a one-adult household, and a one-income household. I’m on my own. There’s nobody to turn to in desperation and nobody to share the load when things get overwhelming.

My wage and the small top-up of Universal Credit don’t cover my outgoings. I live a very limited life because I simply can’t afford anything extra. No holidays, no treats for myself — every penny goes on bills, my children, and trying to keep my car going. I have nothing left at the end of the month and I’m constantly in the red.

The problem with UC aswell is that it creates a poverty loop. The more you earn, the less you get. Which yes, does make sense. But it also means I have to earn SIGNIFICANTLY more to get any real benifit (once you’ve also considered extra costs to be able to work more).

The idea that people on benefits are “rolling in it” is a complete myth, and the stigma around it is really unfair and inaccurate.

I’m sorry to hear about your situation and I do understand your frustrations, but please don’t assume that those of us on benefits are any better off.

The problem with UC aswell is that it creates a poverty loop. The more you earn, the less you get. Which yes, does make sense. But it also means I have to earn SIGNIFICANTLY more to get any real benifit (once you’ve also considered extra costs to be able to work more).

@autumngirl714 Well, you see, this is what the OP - and many, many others - have the problem with. That's where the things have gone very wrong and show no sign of turning around. Welfare should NOT create a situation where one can get more by working less. Because that's exactly what everybody would be trying to do. And that just should not be happening any more. One should be getting more by working more (if they are able physically).

Christmaspuddingsss · 25/11/2025 22:06

GrandmasCat · 25/11/2025 21:36

Live within your means, woman. I live in a very expensive area where a student bedroom is rented for over £1k a month yet I have a beautiful house and a very good life as I keep an eye on my finances and don’t spend my money in crap.

But when did you buy your beautiful house?
I bet is wasn't in the last 10 years and in the SE.

You're living under a rock if you are ignorant of the cost of a house in the SE.

The median salary is around £36K.

Two people on that would earn £72K Would get 3 x that as a mortgage that was do-able.

In the SE you could just about buy a 2-bed flat for £200K.

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 22:08

TheSmallAssassin · 25/11/2025 22:04

We don't just believe it's high, it is high - only 4% of working people earn over £100k - the median wage in the UK is £38k, in London it's around £50k.

You obviously live in an area of high earners and are in the middle of them, but that doesn't make you middle earners. Most people can't afford to go away every half term!

Yes we grew up here and it is one of the most expensive places to live in the UK I believe.

Thank you to everyone for your advice about not comparing. I think this is something I definitely need to remind myself of regularly. We are a young family and I feel like my husband and I work so much - my post was merely to speak to other people who feel the same frustrations as me so I had someone to talk to about it.

OP posts:
OonaStubbs · 25/11/2025 22:08

"Middle Earners" will still be a lot better off than "Low Earners" even with these increased taxes.

Benjithedog · 25/11/2025 22:08

Bagsintheboot · 25/11/2025 21:50

You're not being "punished". Stop with the needless emotive language and victim complex.

It's just how the system is. You might think it's rubbish, you might think it's unfair, and you might be right.

But you're not being "punished" FFS.

Being punished is exactly how the op is feeling and really this is what’s happening. The government encourages you to save for your retirement so you do and they come along and try to rinse what they can out of it. And this is coming from someone who does not earn anywhere near a hundred grand. To keep squeezing the same people over and over again is like squeezing a lemon. Pretty soon there is no more juice.

HowlongdoIwait · 25/11/2025 22:08

Strawberries86 · 25/11/2025 21:30

I’m a single parent earning 65k before tax. I don’t feel well off, my children share a bedroom, we have a caravan holiday. I know it’s all relative and there are many earning less but how am I the person getting squeezed again? Every pay rise is below inflation so it’s effectively a pay cut year on year unless I keep climbing the ladder. I’m running a household on one income, I have a massively stressful and pressured job for that income.

Im not asking anyone to cry me a river but I’d have thought grafting my arse off to get a 65k salary would have meant some financial freedom and enjoyment.

I could have written this myself. £65k is a good salary but it's hard going on your own especially in the South East. Sadly I dont think I'll ever own my own home and I'm not sure I have any more promotions left in me!

Slothisavirtue · 25/11/2025 22:09

BigLooser · 25/11/2025 22:06

The problem with UC aswell is that it creates a poverty loop. The more you earn, the less you get. Which yes, does make sense. But it also means I have to earn SIGNIFICANTLY more to get any real benifit (once you’ve also considered extra costs to be able to work more).

@autumngirl714 Well, you see, this is what the OP - and many, many others - have the problem with. That's where the things have gone very wrong and show no sign of turning around. Welfare should NOT create a situation where one can get more by working less. Because that's exactly what everybody would be trying to do. And that just should not be happening any more. One should be getting more by working more (if they are able physically).

Exactly, I had several part time people in my team in my old job. They had nice cushy office jobs. Quite some way above minimum wage. None of them would increase their hours above 16 /week because then they would lose their benefits. Their kids were all late primary or secondary school age!

I worked more than twice as much as them, in a job with much more responsibility, for essentially the same net income

Christmaspuddingsss · 25/11/2025 22:09

Fetaface · 25/11/2025 22:05

Well teachers earn more than 2k per month when full time plus that bill is shared by you and your husband so it is not for you to pay all the childcare is it?

The point is, free nursery places of 30 hours a week is not available if one parent earns over £100K even if the other parent earns £10K.

I know of people who ask for £99K and the rest as pension contributions because high earners get no free childcare or CB, even if they live in the SE where houses are crazy prices.

It's crazy because it limits ambition and their tax goes to people who can be very nicely off on £25K NET on benefits and get all the free stuff too.

SalmonOnFinnCrisp · 25/11/2025 22:09
can i get an amen church GIF

Preach!

Jellycatspyjamas · 25/11/2025 22:10

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:46

Gosh that is not what my post was about at all. I sympathise with your situation aswell and have friends who are in the same boat. We could name many lives that are worse off than mine. That wasn’t why I was posting and I hope that is clear. I merely wanted to share my frustration with others about the recent news of tax rises being possible again and the fact that the middle earners are funding a lot of the country. Probably because the top earners are all leaving.

Earning £100k cannot by any measure be described as a middle earner, it may not go too far in some parts of the UK but it’s a very strong salary.

TheNightingalesStarling · 25/11/2025 22:10

I don't know how people afford to be teachers, nurses etc in London. Which probably has to explain why here in Yorkshire there isn't teacher shortages... teachers can afford not just to live but to live comfortably so less stressful.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.