Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Middle earners punished

1000 replies

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:18

I am feeling so disheartened and frustrated by how middle earners are constantly suffering at the hands of ridiculous government priorities. My husband and I have a greater household income than other families we know but have less cash in hand due to increased taxes coupled with the fact we receive zero benefits like child benefit or tax free childcare etc. ZERO. If they want middle earners to fund the country thought tax then at least support us with childcare costs. It’s a joke that two parents earning £99k each get childcare funding but parents with one £101k salary and one £25k salary receive nothing. I just need to speak to people who understand the burden of raising a family amidst the current financial climate and then the potential of further tax rises!

OP posts:
Thread gallery
9
Christmascarrotjumper · 26/11/2025 11:31

PigletJohn · 26/11/2025 11:27

"Look what you made me do!" eh?

?

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 11:32

OP you seem to be saying…
you are worse off than others because you earn more,
poor people can’t possibly understand your problem,
you’d like new cars and holidays every end of term like your neighbours.

Astonishingly crass. Im in your income bracket and I thank my lucky stars every day.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:33

Local authority spending:

22%child social care
39% adult social care
39% everything else.

PeonyPatch · 26/11/2025 11:34

Hellohelga · 26/11/2025 11:32

OP you seem to be saying…
you are worse off than others because you earn more,
poor people can’t possibly understand your problem,
you’d like new cars and holidays every end of term like your neighbours.

Astonishingly crass. Im in your income bracket and I thank my lucky stars every day.

Just because there are poorer people out there compared to the OP, doesn’t mean that the OP’s difficulties aren’t valid… Evetyone is struggling in this economy except the ultra rich and large corporations.

Lifesd · 26/11/2025 11:35

Eucalyptus321 · 25/11/2025 21:18

I am feeling so disheartened and frustrated by how middle earners are constantly suffering at the hands of ridiculous government priorities. My husband and I have a greater household income than other families we know but have less cash in hand due to increased taxes coupled with the fact we receive zero benefits like child benefit or tax free childcare etc. ZERO. If they want middle earners to fund the country thought tax then at least support us with childcare costs. It’s a joke that two parents earning £99k each get childcare funding but parents with one £101k salary and one £25k salary receive nothing. I just need to speak to people who understand the burden of raising a family amidst the current financial climate and then the potential of further tax rises!

It’s why we left the UK OP - Yanbu

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 11:35

Bumblebee72 · 26/11/2025 10:37

We all know the big issue is that welfare has increased by nearly 50bn in past 5 years. COVID has made too many people fat and lazy. Tough love is needed. It seems Reform is the only way this is going to happen.

Tough love? The government tried to reduce winter fuel payment for pensioners - up to £300 annual reduction - and people were up in arms. They tried to change the criteria for disability payments and people were up in arms. There’s no appetite for “tough love” - everyone wants what they want. The welfare safety net has become a hammock for people to rest in - always a reason why they particularly can’t work or work more.

Reform have no more ideas of how to solve this than anyone else does.

LookingforMaryPoppins · 26/11/2025 11:35

Christmaspuddingsss · 26/11/2025 10:44

A tiny percentage of the population chooses to pay school fees thus paying more tax and frankly those of us who don’t are sick of hearing about it. I personally am paying exactly the same proportion in tax as I did in December 2023.

Your tax situation is not relevant.

It's the politics of envy plain and simple.

Many children in private schools are in small schools where they get help if they are SEND. Their parents are / were struggling to afford it in the first place. Many parents are on modest incomes but made huge sacrifices to send their child to a school where their needs would be helped.

Those who are very wealthy won't notice much difference with VAT if they can afford £60K pa for Eton etc. and they will already be paying a lot of tax.

However, it's the parents lower down the earnings scale who suffer. And don't forget that those parents are paying TWICE for education- they don't get a tax break if they take their child out of the state system. They're paying for it whether they use it or not.

RR has accrued very little from this VAT on school fees. In addition, many parents have taken their children out of those schools and some have found it very hard to find a school with places available.

Edited

Totally agree!

VAT on school fees is wrong on so many levels. Education is not a luxury and should not be taxed.

I was state educated and genuinely believed that the education part was comparable to the independent sector, the benefit in independent school being the extra curricular. Sadly that's not always the case, not all children have access to a good state school and the state education system simply doesn't work for all.

We moved our eldest to a small independent primary school in KS2 for a number of reasons. She genuinely thrived in the smaller environment and was then offered a place at a state grammar for secondary.

Long story short it transpired she is ASD, only diagnosed as a teenager. She herself acknowledges that she isn't remotely suited to state school, the environment is anxiety inducing and she subsequently hates school having previously loved it and been happy - she isn't alone, there are many children in the same position who don't even make it into school as a result. My daughter acknowledges that a special school wouldn't be good for her academically (not that she stands any chance of being offered a place) and independent school, a smaller environment where she would feel safe, is no longer an affordable option.

So, you have a situation where she has a place in an over subscribed state grammar school being paid for by the state. Whereas we would have moved her back into the independent sector, removing the cost to the state and enabling another child her place, instead that option isn't available. How anyone can think that's a good outcome is beyond me.

The money raised by VAT hasn't even been spent on improving state schools - and the number of pupils moving from independent to state is far higher than expected

The independent school my daughter attended has 8 in reception this year - this is less than half the usual number. The other local independent school has similarly depleted numbers.

Politics based upon envy is 100% about securing votes and stands no chance of achieving growth which is what is actually needed.

IsawwhatIsaw · 26/11/2025 11:38

The sell off of around 2 million council properties with vast discounts has cost billions. The estimated total value of houses sold off since 1980 is around 450 billion.
then add the selling off of utilities and privatization of services such as children’s care. It’s disastrous. The infrastructure is decimated. And Thatcher helped slash manufacturing in favour of the City and financial sector . We don’t make much here anymore.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:38

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 11:35

Tough love? The government tried to reduce winter fuel payment for pensioners - up to £300 annual reduction - and people were up in arms. They tried to change the criteria for disability payments and people were up in arms. There’s no appetite for “tough love” - everyone wants what they want. The welfare safety net has become a hammock for people to rest in - always a reason why they particularly can’t work or work more.

Reform have no more ideas of how to solve this than anyone else does.

Tough love is needed though. I think the electorate are sick of trundling along with piss poor public services because the government are too gutless to point out that certain things are totally and utterly unaffordable.

Zimunya · 26/11/2025 11:39

Slothisavirtue · 25/11/2025 21:36

Honestly, look at entitled to. I earn the same as you and was pretty shocked to discover that mums working PT and getting UC for 3 children had a higher net income than me.

And for that I work a 50 hour week in a super stressful public sector job while battling my own health issues.

It just feels like being repeatedly kicked

Edited

I think this is the point of all the frustration. I am not a high earner and not affected by this particular taxation, but in general I do feel it's somewhat unfair that I work hard and pay tax, as does DH, and we have one child, when there are families with far more children not working and getting money from the state (which gets it's money from me and others who pay tax). The socialist in me thoroughly approves of the benefits system, but there's also a part of me that wonders how we can expect anyone, especially our young adults, to be aspirational and work hard when they look at the consequences of doing so.

EasternStandard · 26/11/2025 11:39

PigletJohn · 26/11/2025 11:27

"Look what you made me do!" eh?

Relevance of this?

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:41

IsawwhatIsaw · 26/11/2025 11:38

The sell off of around 2 million council properties with vast discounts has cost billions. The estimated total value of houses sold off since 1980 is around 450 billion.
then add the selling off of utilities and privatization of services such as children’s care. It’s disastrous. The infrastructure is decimated. And Thatcher helped slash manufacturing in favour of the City and financial sector . We don’t make much here anymore.

And all of these sell offs (and things like the gradual reduction in defence spending over the years) paid for generous benefits and low taxes in the past. We now have nothing left to sell off, we need to increase defence spending and people have got used to being handed out endless benefits. It’s very hard to see how we can row back from this when Labour have no interest whatsoever in tough love.

ByWisePanda · 26/11/2025 11:41

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:13

People want a welfare state that supports those that pay in. If someone loses their job that they’ve worked in for years and years they deserve a heck of a lot more than the same rate as someone who’s done nothing all their lives.

I want children to be fed. Give their parents vouchers to buy food with instead of cash benefits and that will happen. You can understand that can’t you?

Who pays the rent is it the government or money given to them?

Nothankyov · 26/11/2025 11:41

@Eucalyptus321 - I completely understand what you are saying! We were in the same bracket as you. By the time we decided to have children we were already outside the bracket where you can get child benefit. So you feel like you put a lot in society but don’t get as much in return and each budget you worry how is this going to affect your family. It’s not easy.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:42

ByWisePanda · 26/11/2025 11:41

Who pays the rent is it the government or money given to them?

Government.

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 11:43

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:38

Tough love is needed though. I think the electorate are sick of trundling along with piss poor public services because the government are too gutless to point out that certain things are totally and utterly unaffordable.

It was the electorate who were screaming about winter fuel and disability benefits. The electorate are sick of paying tax, the electorate also don’t want to be personally affected by any welfare cuts - both things can be true at the same time.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:45

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 11:43

It was the electorate who were screaming about winter fuel and disability benefits. The electorate are sick of paying tax, the electorate also don’t want to be personally affected by any welfare cuts - both things can be true at the same time.

It was the rebel MPs moaning about winter fuel payments. These rebel MPs really don’t seem to have a clue. Most pensioners aren’t selfish idiots and realise if you’re on over £20k pension a year with no housing costs you don’t need an extra £300 to pay for heating. Clearly.

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 11:51

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:45

It was the rebel MPs moaning about winter fuel payments. These rebel MPs really don’t seem to have a clue. Most pensioners aren’t selfish idiots and realise if you’re on over £20k pension a year with no housing costs you don’t need an extra £300 to pay for heating. Clearly.

Edited

It was the media and the public. Nothing to do with back bench MPs. It was only last year, we all remember it.

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:55

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 11:51

It was the media and the public. Nothing to do with back bench MPs. It was only last year, we all remember it.

See it wasn’t the actual pensioners though. It was the media hubbub. The tories. The Daily Mail. A research body actually queried ‘boomers’ about this and the majority understood that it was unaffordable and paid for by their children and grandchildren who were unable to afford it and it was intergenerationally unfair.

Which shows why this country’s politics are sunk. Sensible ideas cannot pass through parliament without lobby groups overthrowing them.

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 11:55

And those rebel MPs were responding to representation from their constituents. And in here people were going crazy at the thought of loosing winter fuel allowance. As soon as any proposed cut impacts the individual instead of some vague group people kick back.

Winter fuel allowance = pensioners will due
Change in disability criteria = disabled people will die, everyone hates us and no one ever games the system
Earn too much for child benefit = appalling, leaving children in poverty etc etc

Everyone wants something and no one wants to pay for it.

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 11:57

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:55

See it wasn’t the actual pensioners though. It was the media hubbub. The tories. The Daily Mail. A research body actually queried ‘boomers’ about this and the majority understood that it was unaffordable and paid for by their children and grandchildren who were unable to afford it and it was intergenerationally unfair.

Which shows why this country’s politics are sunk. Sensible ideas cannot pass through parliament without lobby groups overthrowing them.

We obviously move in different circles - pensioners I know we’re talking about freezing in their homes, heating or eating, betrayed by Labour.

BIossomtoes · 26/11/2025 11:57

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:27

I disagree. If the local authorities hadn’t sold off children’s homes then there would be no market for the private providers. This situation arose because the government let it.

That’s what I said. Doesn’t change them being avaricious.

ByWisePanda · 26/11/2025 12:00

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:42

Government.

I think that's what America has in place. They get food stamps and their rent paid. The budget will be on shortly brace yourselves.

Benjithedog · 26/11/2025 12:02

That is not what she’s said at all

Jellycatspyjamas · 26/11/2025 12:03

Beddiem · 26/11/2025 11:41

And all of these sell offs (and things like the gradual reduction in defence spending over the years) paid for generous benefits and low taxes in the past. We now have nothing left to sell off, we need to increase defence spending and people have got used to being handed out endless benefits. It’s very hard to see how we can row back from this when Labour have no interest whatsoever in tough love.

I don’t disagree with you btw, I think there’s a need for a reset. When higher numbers of young people are moving from school to long term disability benefits, 45% of which are for mental health, something has gone badly wrong.

I’m not against means testing disability benefits and winter fuel allowance, depending on how it was applied. We can’t afford people to be out of work, and we can’t afford to subsidise employers through benefit top ups.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread