Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Salary sacrifice to be taxed

560 replies

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:02

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

not only are my generation not going to have a state pension or private healthcare, but we also can’t save into our own pensions because we need to fund the current generation.

this makes me so angry

Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) on X

🚨 NEW: Rachel Reeves will use the Budget to impose a £2k-a-year limit on how much salary can go into a pension before paying National Insurance The move will raise £2bn and hit salary sacrifice schemes [@thetimes]

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
nomas · 08/11/2025 23:49

CelestialGazer · 08/11/2025 23:42

No, salary sacrifice only affects the NI element. Even those who pay into a pension without the benefit of a salary sacrifice scheme at the moment get full tax relief on their contributions. That won’t change. Hence why your point 2 is currently wrong, and will continue to be wrong if the proposal is implemented.

Edited

That’s not what the FT is saying.

https://www.ft.com/content/556ba05c-6a30-4d8c-834d-7125856215e4

Reeves plans £2bn Budget raid on UK retirement savings

Move would reduce tax benefits from salary sacrifice pension schemes as chancellor aims to fill fiscal hole

https://www.ft.com/content/556ba05c-6a30-4d8c-834d-7125856215e4

Plantatreetoday · 08/11/2025 23:49

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:30

Make it harder to get PIP.

It’s almost universally accepted now that it’s too easy to get PIP, especially after Covid since face to face interviews have stopped for many, so things like getting PIP for anxiety is easier.

My mum gets PIP, the process has changed massively.

Agree
Labour need to put forward the recommendations and findings of the Conservatives white paper again
I wouldn’t be surprised if tax rises are introduced in this budget
there will be such an outcry that getting PIP reassessed will be easier

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:50

Pandersmum · 08/11/2025 23:40

Surely Rachel Reeves couldn’t be so stupid as to further negatively impact private sector pensions without addressing the elephant in the room - the exceptionally generous tax payer funded public sector pensions.

Yep apparently we’re supposed to be happy to fund them because teachers are stressed or some such.

chaosmaker · 08/11/2025 23:58

Why don't they close tax loopholes, wouldn't that make the most for the country? Get rid of those with offshore accounts that don't benefit us.

CelestialGazer · 09/11/2025 00:06

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:49

I can’t read that because it’s paywalled, but my paper copy of The Times has a worked example consistent with my understanding. Removing income tax relief on pension contributions above 2k would save far more than is being touted, and realistically would remove the incentive for most people to save for a pension, which is a key policy objective of all governments to make people less reliant on the state pension.

PS I have many years experience in the pensions industry so do have a bit of relevant background.)

AprilLady · 09/11/2025 00:06

There seems to be a lot of confusion on this thread about what salary sacrifice actually is. To be clear - at the moment when you or your employer make contributions to any qualifying pension scheme, they get tax relief (for you or your employer). What happens with salary sacrifice is that instead of you paying contributions into the scheme you “sacrifice” some of your salary and the employer makes a pension contribution instead. Since your salary is lower, NI contributions are lower.

There has been a fair bit of speculation that this sort of salary sacrifice arrangement might be targeted in the budget. Not sure how they could actually do this though. And, as previous posters have said, it’s the NI savings that would be removed only.

Especially for basic rate tax payers, there is no suggestion that the current tax relief on pensions contributions is going to be taken away. There is always speculation that higher rate tax relief might go, and very high earners already have their pension tax relief limited to £10k per year.

sleepwouldbenice · 09/11/2025 00:07

I get bored of the comments about the tax payer funded state pension
i have worked in both the private and public sectors
wages in the public sector are lower, the pension benefit is higher. You can’t flip one without the other. It doesn’t matter who pays the bill it’s basic supply and demand
Those who whine that tax payers foot the bill would also whine if the public sector workers couldn’t be recruited as the remuneration ( including pension) wasn’t good enough
get a grip or do the job yourself

nietzscheanvibe · 09/11/2025 00:08

RuncibleSpoons · 08/11/2025 19:33

I have literally just started overpaying my pension to cut down on my tax. Marvellous.

So, @SomethingInTheAirToday , people do overpay into pensions to avoid paying tax.

sleepwouldbenice · 09/11/2025 00:10

Pandersmum · 08/11/2025 23:40

Surely Rachel Reeves couldn’t be so stupid as to further negatively impact private sector pensions without addressing the elephant in the room - the exceptionally generous tax payer funded public sector pensions.

Yawn. Spot the person who doesn’t understand basic economics

ClairDeLaLune · 09/11/2025 00:18

frozendaisy · 08/11/2025 19:05

Nope won't happen this is one reason doctors went on strike last time, limits on pension "pots" that they had no choice over.

Try again @SomethingInTheAirToday

It’s got nothing to do with the doctors’ pension protest. You try again.

middler · 09/11/2025 00:25

Is this people earning over 50K who want to put funds towards their pension to avoid paying taxes on that extra money?

I think that is awful that as soon as you earn a half way decent salary teh government want to take half of it. 50 K is hardly rich is it?

Negroany · 09/11/2025 00:27

ttcat37 · 08/11/2025 23:22

NI, whatever. It’s a stealth tax. I’m a lifelong Labour voter and I don’t think I’ll be voting labour next time.

Do you have a salary sacrifice scheme then? Most people don't. I don't and didn't with my last two employers either.

Negroany · 09/11/2025 00:27

middler · 09/11/2025 00:25

Is this people earning over 50K who want to put funds towards their pension to avoid paying taxes on that extra money?

I think that is awful that as soon as you earn a half way decent salary teh government want to take half of it. 50 K is hardly rich is it?

Edited

No. It's not that at all.

nomas · 09/11/2025 00:28

CelestialGazer · 09/11/2025 00:06

I can’t read that because it’s paywalled, but my paper copy of The Times has a worked example consistent with my understanding. Removing income tax relief on pension contributions above 2k would save far more than is being touted, and realistically would remove the incentive for most people to save for a pension, which is a key policy objective of all governments to make people less reliant on the state pension.

PS I have many years experience in the pensions industry so do have a bit of relevant background.)

From The Times:

Salary sacrifice arrangements, as The Times reported on Friday, could be capped to pension contributions of a maximum of £2,000 a year.

Consistent with the government’s confused logic of what constitutes a “working person”, this is most likely to affect those on medium to higher salaries. Someone on a salary of £30,000 a year is unlikely to be able to put £2,000 of their own money into a pension every year. By contrast, someone on £100,000 is much more likely to be able to sacrifice £2,000 or more to put into their pension.

Most likely, it is going to hit pension saving. With the removal of the incentive to defer consumption, people are more likely to favour taking the money in their pay packet now. Up and down the country, millions of workers struggling with the cost of living are also trying to put money aside for their retirement. By any measure, this news is going to make their lives worse.

Can you take a picture of the worked example in your paper copy?

Negroany · 09/11/2025 00:28

AprilLady · 09/11/2025 00:06

There seems to be a lot of confusion on this thread about what salary sacrifice actually is. To be clear - at the moment when you or your employer make contributions to any qualifying pension scheme, they get tax relief (for you or your employer). What happens with salary sacrifice is that instead of you paying contributions into the scheme you “sacrifice” some of your salary and the employer makes a pension contribution instead. Since your salary is lower, NI contributions are lower.

There has been a fair bit of speculation that this sort of salary sacrifice arrangement might be targeted in the budget. Not sure how they could actually do this though. And, as previous posters have said, it’s the NI savings that would be removed only.

Especially for basic rate tax payers, there is no suggestion that the current tax relief on pensions contributions is going to be taken away. There is always speculation that higher rate tax relief might go, and very high earners already have their pension tax relief limited to £10k per year.

Someone knows what it is all about, thank god!

I definitely don't think it will make much money for the govt.

nomas · 09/11/2025 00:33

sleepwouldbenice · 09/11/2025 00:07

I get bored of the comments about the tax payer funded state pension
i have worked in both the private and public sectors
wages in the public sector are lower, the pension benefit is higher. You can’t flip one without the other. It doesn’t matter who pays the bill it’s basic supply and demand
Those who whine that tax payers foot the bill would also whine if the public sector workers couldn’t be recruited as the remuneration ( including pension) wasn’t good enough
get a grip or do the job yourself

Edited

From The Times:

The one exception to this bad news on pension saving, as is so often the case with this government, is the public sector.

Public sector employees enjoy generous defined benefits schemes, where the bulk of the costs are borne by their employer. Typical employer contribution rates are about 25 per cent of pay, compared with about 6 per cent in the private sector.

Generally, public sector schemes only use salary sacrifice for additional voluntary contributions, where the contributions are optional and tend to be much lower and therefore less likely to breach the proposed £2,000 ceiling.

This is Labour robbing the private sector to pay the public sector. Disgusting.

nomas · 09/11/2025 00:33

sleepwouldbenice · 09/11/2025 00:07

I get bored of the comments about the tax payer funded state pension
i have worked in both the private and public sectors
wages in the public sector are lower, the pension benefit is higher. You can’t flip one without the other. It doesn’t matter who pays the bill it’s basic supply and demand
Those who whine that tax payers foot the bill would also whine if the public sector workers couldn’t be recruited as the remuneration ( including pension) wasn’t good enough
get a grip or do the job yourself

Edited

Double post, iPhones are awful.

Negroany · 09/11/2025 00:34

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 23:22

Over the last 20 years, the four employers that I have worked for have all run salary sacrifice pension schemes. Small and medium sized uk companies and Swiss and U.S. global companies. I appreciate that it may be different for people on minimum wage, but there is no person in my current team of 50 people that is on minimum wage. The only time I was given an option about a salary sacrifice pension was when a company that I worked for first introduced them. For every new company that I have joined, that’s how they have been set up.

Yes, sure.

But if even one person wanted to opt out, the employer has to enable that. So they have to have a "normal" scheme running as well, for auto enrolment reasons.

Obviously you work in a white collar position. Where I work, we have around 3,000 staff, of whom well over 2,500 are on minimum wage. And that's not that unusual. So if I did introduce sal sac it would be for management only.

One place I worked I capped sal sac at 25% of salary. You could pay more in, but it would not be a sal sac contribution. The reason for this was because before I joined someone had sal sac'd 80% of their salary for two months then gone on mat leave and the employer had to keep up those contributions for the whole year. Because that's the impact of salary sacrifice.

freakingscared · 09/11/2025 01:10

Plantatreetoday · 08/11/2025 23:49

Agree
Labour need to put forward the recommendations and findings of the Conservatives white paper again
I wouldn’t be surprised if tax rises are introduced in this budget
there will be such an outcry that getting PIP reassessed will be easier

I have no idea who has pip easily but my son is severely autistic , in his 20s non verbal needs help with everything , has no notion of danger can’t leave the house unattended even to go to the car etc . His application for pip was extremely hard , he had a in person interview , because I said he could open a yogurt pot they lied and said he could cook for himself , as an example of the lies c there where many . It was a massive stress and far from easy . Who are all this people getting high rate mobility this easily ?

Plantatreetoday · 09/11/2025 01:33

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:47

You really have no idea what pension @LBFseBrom had. It could be DB. You’re making an assumption.

Employer contributions became mandatory in 2018 for all people.
That is not an assumption, that is a fact
Today however prople who work do so with the full knowledge that they will have some sort of private pension also funded by their employer
There is no denying the fact that this is a huge benefit to future generations in their retirement years

222days · 09/11/2025 01:37

ShesTheAlbatross · 08/11/2025 21:39

Just because people disagree with you doesn’t mean they are all confused about the issue. OP’s link is very clear that it’s NI being talked about.

Some employers offer more generous employer pension contributions that are presumably in part paid for by the reduction in their employer NI. So employees may also find that that drops as well.

Precisely. It won’t be employers that pay for the element that will be charged to them: employees will pay for it as always, via lower salary rises, reduction in any employer pension contributions above the legal minimum level, and lower hiring by businesses so fewer jobs being available.

nomas · 09/11/2025 01:46

Plantatreetoday · 09/11/2025 01:33

Employer contributions became mandatory in 2018 for all people.
That is not an assumption, that is a fact
Today however prople who work do so with the full knowledge that they will have some sort of private pension also funded by their employer
There is no denying the fact that this is a huge benefit to future generations in their retirement years

I’m not taking about the law, I’m taking about your assumptions about @LBFseBrom ‘s pension.

It’s an indisputable fact that many boomers had better pensions, which are not feasible for much of today’s workforce.

222days · 09/11/2025 01:47

Also if they are going to apply NI to pension contributions via salary sacrifice then they’d damn well better also apply them to the employee contributions into the public sector DB schemes as well and hit all the doctors, nurses and teachers with the same tax charge as everyone else.

DdraigGoch · 09/11/2025 01:49

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:21

It’s not exactly avoiding tax, is it?

FWIW I’m on £24k a year and paying into my occupational pension because I have no other option. My pay that I bring in isn’t enough for me to also pay into a SIPP.

But yes, while the older generations get a triple protected pay rise each year, my generation should just be left to be in absolute ruins. That seems totally fair.

Salary sacrifice for income tax is deferring tax (differences in earnings pre and post retirement often mean that the individual does legitimately avoid some income tax if they csn use it to slip back under a threshold). However you don't pay NI once over state retirement age do this bit of taxation gets avoided entirely.

Personally I'd prefer that they merge NI into income tax to close a few loopholes.

How much are you paying into your occupational pension?

nomas · 09/11/2025 01:50

222days · 09/11/2025 01:47

Also if they are going to apply NI to pension contributions via salary sacrifice then they’d damn well better also apply them to the employee contributions into the public sector DB schemes as well and hit all the doctors, nurses and teachers with the same tax charge as everyone else.

Yep, but they won’t.

Who is there to even vote for anymore. Labour protect the non-working, Tories protect the rich and reform protect the racists.