Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Salary sacrifice to be taxed

560 replies

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:02

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

not only are my generation not going to have a state pension or private healthcare, but we also can’t save into our own pensions because we need to fund the current generation.

this makes me so angry

Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) on X

🚨 NEW: Rachel Reeves will use the Budget to impose a £2k-a-year limit on how much salary can go into a pension before paying National Insurance The move will raise £2bn and hit salary sacrifice schemes [@thetimes]

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Hellohelga · 08/11/2025 19:51

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:28

What’s the point anymore?

you work forty hours a week minimum, have no time in the week to do anything, no money spare to do anything at the weekend, slave away living in shitty rentals and being promised home ownership, for what? To pay for other people to get the things you never will

You sound depressed

Woodlend · 08/11/2025 19:52

AlastheDaffodils · 08/11/2025 19:39

Eh? I appreciate the anger but your facts are wrong

  1. Pension contributions are free of income tax and there is no proposal to change that
  2. Pension contributions are free of national insurance. There is a proposal to remove this benefit for salary sacrifice schemes
  3. Pension contributions are indeed taxed on withdrawal, except for your 25% tax free lump sum. There is no national insurance on pension withdrawals. For many people their marginal income tax rate in retirement will be lower than their marginal tax rate while working.
Edited

Indeed. This is the whole point of pensions. The government is incentivising you to save for the future by not taxing you on this income now, and instead taxing you on this income later in retirement. The current situation isn’t a tax dodge. You’ll just be taxed on it later in life.

I cannot see anything that penalises defined contribution pensions going down at all well when dc pension savers have shot pensions and high tax to bail the government out of their ludicrous defined benefit promises they made to public sector workers.

The deficit is but a drop in the ocean compared to the underfunded public sector pensions shit show coming down the tracks!

Hellohelga · 08/11/2025 19:54

NoWordForFluffy · 08/11/2025 19:50

Naaaah. This is Labour floating stuff. It's what they do.

Do you have any evidence or is it just your opinion? X is full of false speculations about the budget.

ShesTheAlbatross · 08/11/2025 19:56

Happyher · 08/11/2025 19:42

Every time some measure to increase revenue to the government is mooted there’s always a pile on about why it’s unfair. Everyone expects things to get better straightaway but nobody seems willing to pay for it

It’s not about unfairness. The gov needs people to pay into pensions, because the state pension is going to have to be significantly changed (reduced, means tested, but definitely changed) at some point. They need people to have private pensions. That’s why there are benefits to paying into a pension eg for tax free childcare & free nursery hours it’s your post pension income that counts - that’s not a loophole, it’s an incentive.
If this change discourages people from putting that bit extra into their pension (even if that’s not sensible on their part) then it’s a fuck up.

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 19:58

Most people don't use salary sacrifice to pay their pension contributions so it will make no difference to most people.

I see this as a better way to increase revenue for the government to now as it won't impact what is in people's pockets.

Stopping NI benefits on salary sacrifice won't make much difference to the amount going into a pension. A basic rate taxpayer will still benefit from 20% tax relief. They will just lose the 8% NI saving, so 8 quid on a £100 contribution. A higher and additional rate taxpayer will still get 40/45% tax relief and will only lose 2% of their contribution, so even less of a contribution hit and still benefitting from the massive tax relief.

There are many businesses out there that also benefit from the NI saving (some are generous and pay the employer NI saving into an employee's pension but most don't), so the government will also benefit from extra employer NI.

To the OP, on 24k, if you have been auto enrolled and you aren't using salary sacrifice it will make no difference to you. If you are using salary sacrifice then it will make very little difference.

BerryTwister · 08/11/2025 20:00

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:42

But the point still stands.

what’s the point in trying to work up and do well for yourself when you’re never going to achieve anything because the pensioners want to live in luxury?

@SomethingInTheAirToday are you aware that pensioners have no control over government policy? Why are you directing your anger at them?

ShesTheAlbatross · 08/11/2025 20:00

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 19:58

Most people don't use salary sacrifice to pay their pension contributions so it will make no difference to most people.

I see this as a better way to increase revenue for the government to now as it won't impact what is in people's pockets.

Stopping NI benefits on salary sacrifice won't make much difference to the amount going into a pension. A basic rate taxpayer will still benefit from 20% tax relief. They will just lose the 8% NI saving, so 8 quid on a £100 contribution. A higher and additional rate taxpayer will still get 40/45% tax relief and will only lose 2% of their contribution, so even less of a contribution hit and still benefitting from the massive tax relief.

There are many businesses out there that also benefit from the NI saving (some are generous and pay the employer NI saving into an employee's pension but most don't), so the government will also benefit from extra employer NI.

To the OP, on 24k, if you have been auto enrolled and you aren't using salary sacrifice it will make no difference to you. If you are using salary sacrifice then it will make very little difference.

So it also affects lower earners more (8% for them, 2% for higher earners).

PropertyD · 08/11/2025 20:01

I remember Sunak saying before the GE. Mark my words they will be after your pension, increase your taxes, tax your cars - it’s in Labour’s DNA.

HermioneWeasley · 08/11/2025 20:02

Private sector workers having their tax increased to fund defined benefit public sector pensions. A level of pension provision that private sector workers can only dream of. Absolutely disgusting.

27pilates · 08/11/2025 20:03

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:42

But the point still stands.

what’s the point in trying to work up and do well for yourself when you’re never going to achieve anything because the pensioners want to live in luxury?

Are you referring to the state pension of £11,973 at age 68 , if so, hardly a “living in luxury”. Furthermore the UK state pension is one of the worst in Europe.
You need to work on securing a better paid job OP. When you’ve paid upwards of £200k in National Insurance alone, over a 35 year working life and taken very little back from the state, let’s see if your views differ then. 🙄

randomchap · 08/11/2025 20:04

roses2 · 08/11/2025 19:51

I’d be surprised if this happens as it would mean there would be zero incentive whatsoever for people to pay into private pensions which would be an even bigger disaster - I really hope the government aren’t that myopic.

No incentive for paying into a private pension.

I could be wrong but don't they give you income in retirement?

Sunholidays · 08/11/2025 20:06

27pilates · 08/11/2025 20:03

Are you referring to the state pension of £11,973 at age 68 , if so, hardly a “living in luxury”. Furthermore the UK state pension is one of the worst in Europe.
You need to work on securing a better paid job OP. When you’ve paid upwards of £200k in National Insurance alone, over a 35 year working life and taken very little back from the state, let’s see if your views differ then. 🙄

This is exactly why the government should incentivise private pensions, not tax them. Because the state pension in the UK is one of the lowest in Europe.

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 20:06

ShesTheAlbatross · 08/11/2025 20:00

So it also affects lower earners more (8% for them, 2% for higher earners).

Yep, which is rubbish. Just like the 4% NI cuts the tories introduced towards the end of the last government. I am now 120 pounds a month better off because of it as a higher rate taxpayer but someone on 25k would have been a lost less better off. With the cost of living issues this policy annoyed me so much and then labour didn't even roll it back, something that would have been simple to do as it hadn't been in place long. Just made the wealth disparity bigger. I know some higher rate taxpayers will still be struggling financially, especially those in the SE but I would have preferred a different, more even policy to get more money in people's pockets

Northerndoglover · 08/11/2025 20:08

HermioneWeasley · 08/11/2025 20:02

Private sector workers having their tax increased to fund defined benefit public sector pensions. A level of pension provision that private sector workers can only dream of. Absolutely disgusting.

Public sector workers are having their tax increased too.

It always baffles me about private sector workers moaning about the “gold plated” public sector pensions. If they are that great then come and be a nurse in A&E where waiting times are through the roof or teach in a class of 35 Year 2s.

Thought not.

MaidOfSteel · 08/11/2025 20:11

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:02

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

not only are my generation not going to have a state pension or private healthcare, but we also can’t save into our own pensions because we need to fund the current generation.

this makes me so angry

Stop with the ageism. Who do you think was funding the NHS while your mother was carrying you? Who was funding the child benefit she received? Who was funding your education? Do you think you’re the fist ever generation to fund the previous ones?

OverlyFragrant · 08/11/2025 20:13

The triple lock needs to go.
There is no way the country can afford this if this is how the government intends on filling its gargantuan black hole in the books.

TeenagersAngst · 08/11/2025 20:14

randomchap · 08/11/2025 19:27

Wow, a random twitter account has said something. It must be true.

Let's get all angry about it

Deeply patronising. Labour is spreading these stories deliberately to test public opinion. I’m sure you know that.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 20:14

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 19:58

Most people don't use salary sacrifice to pay their pension contributions so it will make no difference to most people.

I see this as a better way to increase revenue for the government to now as it won't impact what is in people's pockets.

Stopping NI benefits on salary sacrifice won't make much difference to the amount going into a pension. A basic rate taxpayer will still benefit from 20% tax relief. They will just lose the 8% NI saving, so 8 quid on a £100 contribution. A higher and additional rate taxpayer will still get 40/45% tax relief and will only lose 2% of their contribution, so even less of a contribution hit and still benefitting from the massive tax relief.

There are many businesses out there that also benefit from the NI saving (some are generous and pay the employer NI saving into an employee's pension but most don't), so the government will also benefit from extra employer NI.

To the OP, on 24k, if you have been auto enrolled and you aren't using salary sacrifice it will make no difference to you. If you are using salary sacrifice then it will make very little difference.

Every company that I have worked for over the past 20 years has used salary sacrifice for pensions. Where is your evidence that most people don’t use salary sacrifice?

ShesTheAlbatross · 08/11/2025 20:15

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 20:14

Every company that I have worked for over the past 20 years has used salary sacrifice for pensions. Where is your evidence that most people don’t use salary sacrifice?

It is 30% of private sector employees I believe. And fewer in the private sector.

TeenagersAngst · 08/11/2025 20:15

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:42

But the point still stands.

what’s the point in trying to work up and do well for yourself when you’re never going to achieve anything because the pensioners want to live in luxury?

Even left wing commentators are saying how desperate it makes Reeves look when she starts raiding pension pots.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 20:16

ShesTheAlbatross · 08/11/2025 20:15

It is 30% of private sector employees I believe. And fewer in the private sector.

Evidence please. I have worked for small and medium sized British companies and global Swiss and U.S. companies. All use salary sacrifice.

User312312 · 08/11/2025 20:17

A lot of private sector workers have employer contributions of 3 percent so extra contributions are vital to get a decent pension.

public sector workers typically have 20-28 percent employer contributions, so their additional voluntary contributions through salary sacrifice are lower.

TeenagersAngst · 08/11/2025 20:18

AlastheDaffodils · 08/11/2025 19:39

Eh? I appreciate the anger but your facts are wrong

  1. Pension contributions are free of income tax and there is no proposal to change that
  2. Pension contributions are free of national insurance. There is a proposal to remove this benefit for salary sacrifice schemes
  3. Pension contributions are indeed taxed on withdrawal, except for your 25% tax free lump sum. There is no national insurance on pension withdrawals. For many people their marginal income tax rate in retirement will be lower than their marginal tax rate while working.
Edited

My pension contributions are free of income tax but not national insurance.