Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Salary sacrifice to be taxed

560 replies

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:02

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

not only are my generation not going to have a state pension or private healthcare, but we also can’t save into our own pensions because we need to fund the current generation.

this makes me so angry

Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) on X

🚨 NEW: Rachel Reeves will use the Budget to impose a £2k-a-year limit on how much salary can go into a pension before paying National Insurance The move will raise £2bn and hit salary sacrifice schemes [@thetimes]

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
nearlylovemyusername · 08/11/2025 22:39

It's still more than 3.5 years left of this horror 😡

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:40

Thunderdcc · 08/11/2025 22:34

I think you are misunderstanding how businesses operate. They don't say oh look, the extra NIC last year is £250k less profit, hey ho. And now we can't save NIC on salary sacrifice, another £250k, ah well it is what it is.

They say we budgeted to make £X amount of profit this year, looks like we are going to have to make a few people redundant. No extra money for the Treasury.

I am not misunderstanding anything. The reduction in the benefit of salary sacrifice will impact both employers and employees. I haven’t said otherwise.

Thunderdcc · 08/11/2025 22:46

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:40

I am not misunderstanding anything. The reduction in the benefit of salary sacrifice will impact both employers and employees. I haven’t said otherwise.

You described it as a win win - but I'm not convinced it will actually net the Treasury as much as they think it will, because a lot of employers will just say okay no problem we can't afford to have X employees any more, some have to go.

I agree it doesn't make a huge difference to employees other than the faff of doing a tax return for higher rate tax payers (which carries an admin burden for HMRC). But employers already took a NIC increase last year, another one is not going to help the job market.

Cyclingmummy1 · 08/11/2025 22:48

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:37

May I remind you that there are almost no final salary or career average pensions available now for those in the private sector. They were ended under the last Labour government. Yes, public sector pensions have got worse, but private sector pensions have got a lot, lot worse.

I have to disagree. DH earns far more in the private sector than I do in the public sector. His employer matches his contributions up to a certain level which means he is receives the same monetary contribution as I do, has a larger take home salary now and will get the same pension as I will. Obviously, if you invest 3%, you won't.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:48

Thunderdcc · 08/11/2025 22:46

You described it as a win win - but I'm not convinced it will actually net the Treasury as much as they think it will, because a lot of employers will just say okay no problem we can't afford to have X employees any more, some have to go.

I agree it doesn't make a huge difference to employees other than the faff of doing a tax return for higher rate tax payers (which carries an admin burden for HMRC). But employers already took a NIC increase last year, another one is not going to help the job market.

You have misunderstood. I meant that the use of salary sacrifice was a win win for employers and employees, not its reduction.

nearlylovemyusername · 08/11/2025 22:49

Thunderdcc · 08/11/2025 22:46

You described it as a win win - but I'm not convinced it will actually net the Treasury as much as they think it will, because a lot of employers will just say okay no problem we can't afford to have X employees any more, some have to go.

I agree it doesn't make a huge difference to employees other than the faff of doing a tax return for higher rate tax payers (which carries an admin burden for HMRC). But employers already took a NIC increase last year, another one is not going to help the job market.

It's not going to help inflation either - the biggest hit will be to retail, the same as last year budget, they will most surely pass on the extra cost to consumers.
And the job market is dead already, it's going to be really bad next few years.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:53

Cyclingmummy1 · 08/11/2025 22:48

I have to disagree. DH earns far more in the private sector than I do in the public sector. His employer matches his contributions up to a certain level which means he is receives the same monetary contribution as I do, has a larger take home salary now and will get the same pension as I will. Obviously, if you invest 3%, you won't.

That’s one example. The statutory minimum for employer contributions is 3%. Many do not offer more than that. The average across all sectors is 4.8% for men and 4.6% for women. If private sector defined contribution pensions were so good, public sector employees would have no problem in changing to them…

Negroany · 08/11/2025 22:53

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:14

Well that’s fine then isn’t it, as long as it doesn’t impact the public sector, it’s all OK. And you wonder why Labour are so unpopular…

Well, that's quite a leap isn't it?

I was merely using it as an example of the fact many schemes are not sal sac. Loads of others are not, the majority in fact. Yours probably isn't.

But if you can't handle the truth, that's not my problem.

Negroany · 08/11/2025 22:55

Thunderdcc · 08/11/2025 22:46

You described it as a win win - but I'm not convinced it will actually net the Treasury as much as they think it will, because a lot of employers will just say okay no problem we can't afford to have X employees any more, some have to go.

I agree it doesn't make a huge difference to employees other than the faff of doing a tax return for higher rate tax payers (which carries an admin burden for HMRC). But employers already took a NIC increase last year, another one is not going to help the job market.

It won't have any impact on your tax return, because you don't report NI on your tax return.

Livelovebehappy · 08/11/2025 22:56

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:21

It’s not exactly avoiding tax, is it?

FWIW I’m on £24k a year and paying into my occupational pension because I have no other option. My pay that I bring in isn’t enough for me to also pay into a SIPP.

But yes, while the older generations get a triple protected pay rise each year, my generation should just be left to be in absolute ruins. That seems totally fair.

But it is what it is. Always winners and losers in life. You could drive yourself insane by comparing decade on decade of how much better or worse off each generation has it. The state pension is a topic which needs to be addressed, however unpalatable it is going to be. I think possibly the younger generation are going to have to prepare themselves for the demise of the NHS too, or at least know that the government are going to have to park any sentimentality for the NHS and make some very difficult decisions, even if to partially privatise.

Negroany · 08/11/2025 22:57

ttcat37 · 08/11/2025 22:27

Public sector workers are having their taxes increased too. If you want one of these ‘amazing’ public sector pensions then perhaps try a public sector job with their shit hours, shit conditions and shit pay. Nope, didn’t think so

I don't think anyone is having their tax increased, are they?

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:58

Negroany · 08/11/2025 22:53

Well, that's quite a leap isn't it?

I was merely using it as an example of the fact many schemes are not sal sac. Loads of others are not, the majority in fact. Yours probably isn't.

But if you can't handle the truth, that's not my problem.

Well I never said that everyone’s pension was set up salary sacrifice. It was said that most people don’t opt into salary sacrifice. I pointed out that if your employer runs a salary sacrifice pension scheme, that’s what you get if you want a pension. There isn’t a choice as to whether you opt for salary sacrifice or not.

It was you that made the leap! It’s also really strange that you are so against salary sacrifice pensions. Millions of people are benefiting from them and they will help to ensure that they are not so reliant on the state in the longer term.

This thread is really weird.

Negroany · 08/11/2025 23:01

CantHaveTooMuchChocolate · 08/11/2025 22:23

But what’s the point then? You’d be far better off just saving to an isa, etc if there’s no tax break. No one’s going to pay into a pension if they have to pay tax on the way in, then on the way out too, and not be able to access it till they retire (suspect the lump sum will be removed too before I retire).

It's nothing to do with tax though. It's NI.

It doesn't affect the majority of workplace pensions, it doesn't affect SIPPS at all.

I do wonder whether how much she thinks she will save has been properly worked out. I'm not sure anyone in govt really understands pensions. I remember taking to Yvette Cooper about pensions years ago, I think she was shadow W&P secretary or something, and she didn't have a clue what I was talking about, and it was quite basic!

Plantatreetoday · 08/11/2025 23:06

nomas · 08/11/2025 21:33

This is so depressing. If this happens, I will feel like just contributing the bare minimum each month to my salary sacrifice now and relying on Pension Credit when I get to pension age.

Fucking Labour.

Any Income over £237/wk or £367 for a couple means you’re above the threshold for pension credit

So it’s highly unlikely if you pay even a small amount in you’ll get pension credit. Especially as employers since 2018 must now pay into your pension

Negroany · 08/11/2025 23:06

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:58

Well I never said that everyone’s pension was set up salary sacrifice. It was said that most people don’t opt into salary sacrifice. I pointed out that if your employer runs a salary sacrifice pension scheme, that’s what you get if you want a pension. There isn’t a choice as to whether you opt for salary sacrifice or not.

It was you that made the leap! It’s also really strange that you are so against salary sacrifice pensions. Millions of people are benefiting from them and they will help to ensure that they are not so reliant on the state in the longer term.

This thread is really weird.

There is 100% definitely a choice of opting into sal sac, 100%.

There has to be, that's the law. So, employers who run sal sac have to run non sal sac schemes as well. And salary sacrifice is a change of employee employment terms, which they have to be able to enter into willingly.

I have run sal sac schemes and had the odd person opt out (there are some circs where it could make you worse off, but that's quite technical, and some people don't like it because they like their whole salary to show on their payslip if they're about to apply for a mortgage, for example). And people on min wage cannot be on sal sac, they have to be on a standard scheme, because it's illegal to take an employees salary below min wage.

But, as I said, it's quite technical and few people seem to understand what it is (and assume it just means any pension where the contribution is taken from salary - which it doesn't).

LabourOfLoathing · 08/11/2025 23:08

Don’t like high taxes? Dont vote Labour.

Negroany · 08/11/2025 23:10

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:58

Well I never said that everyone’s pension was set up salary sacrifice. It was said that most people don’t opt into salary sacrifice. I pointed out that if your employer runs a salary sacrifice pension scheme, that’s what you get if you want a pension. There isn’t a choice as to whether you opt for salary sacrifice or not.

It was you that made the leap! It’s also really strange that you are so against salary sacrifice pensions. Millions of people are benefiting from them and they will help to ensure that they are not so reliant on the state in the longer term.

This thread is really weird.

I'm not "against" them! I have introduced them at several employers, hence I actually know what they ARE.

It's on my list to look into at my current employer but as the vast majority of our staff are on min wage, there would not be the employer saving to justify it (and if this change happens it definitely won't be worth it).

Neither my current nor my previous two employers did them, by the way. Previous was public sector, not FS pension, and one before was an international bank.

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:12

Plantatreetoday · 08/11/2025 23:06

Any Income over £237/wk or £367 for a couple means you’re above the threshold for pension credit

So it’s highly unlikely if you pay even a small amount in you’ll get pension credit. Especially as employers since 2018 must now pay into your pension

So many people will just put the bare minimum into their pension to stay under £237pm week threshold.

This just means I’ll overpay on my mortgage and abandon any extra pension salary sacrifice.

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:12

Plantatreetoday · 08/11/2025 23:06

Any Income over £237/wk or £367 for a couple means you’re above the threshold for pension credit

So it’s highly unlikely if you pay even a small amount in you’ll get pension credit. Especially as employers since 2018 must now pay into your pension

Double post, iPhones are shit.

Dissimilitude · 08/11/2025 23:12

This stings. I salary sacrifice a lot because I had almost zero pension provision until my mid-thirties and I am trying to make up for lost time in the few high earning years my career will likely afford me (ie my 40s).

No doubt I’ll be hammered with an income tax rise too, can’t wait. Love this government. My favourite.

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:12

And then we’ll still get taxed on our pensions.

So it’s double taxation, tax on salary and then tax on pensions with no salary sacrifice savings.

Fucking Labour.

NorthXNorthWest · 08/11/2025 23:13

Northerndoglover · 08/11/2025 20:08

Public sector workers are having their tax increased too.

It always baffles me about private sector workers moaning about the “gold plated” public sector pensions. If they are that great then come and be a nurse in A&E where waiting times are through the roof or teach in a class of 35 Year 2s.

Thought not.

It's not really a gotcha.

Many people can't change career because they wouldn't be able to afford the student loan. Many nurses train early just like other students, before they have commitments.

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:17

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 21:57

It isn't a plan to cut tax relief.

That’s exactly what it is.

nomas · 08/11/2025 23:19

HermioneWeasley · 08/11/2025 20:02

Private sector workers having their tax increased to fund defined benefit public sector pensions. A level of pension provision that private sector workers can only dream of. Absolutely disgusting.

Ugh. Fucking Labour..

Plantatreetoday · 08/11/2025 23:19

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:13

You were suggesting that you were worse off than people on the living wage. I pointed out that they often have mortgage/rent, childcare and travel costs. Do you genuinely believe that you are worse off than all people on the living wage? 80% of pensioners own their own homes, very few have childcare or daily commuting costs. That’s why the pension is at at a lower level. Clearly you are struggling and I don’t know what has happened in your life that has meant you have got into this position. But we cannot pay pensions the equivalent of a living wage when they don’t have the same outgoings as those on a living wage. There is no magic money tree.

Edited

Yet low paid workers can have some of their their rent paid so the difference regarding property owners is irrelevant here

A full time min wage worker earns over £22k and many now can work from home so travel costs have reduced remarkably in recent years

A pensioner can no longer work and has to live £12k. Their costs to support their living are higher than a younger healthy person.

There really is little point in comparing the financial needs of two completely different demographics