Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Salary sacrifice to be taxed

560 replies

SomethingInTheAirToday · 08/11/2025 19:02

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

not only are my generation not going to have a state pension or private healthcare, but we also can’t save into our own pensions because we need to fund the current generation.

this makes me so angry

Politics UK (@PolitlcsUK) on X

🚨 NEW: Rachel Reeves will use the Budget to impose a £2k-a-year limit on how much salary can go into a pension before paying National Insurance The move will raise £2bn and hit salary sacrifice schemes [@thetimes]

https://x.com/politlcsuk/status/1986914552093745592?s=46

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
randomchap · 08/11/2025 21:57

roses2 · 08/11/2025 20:59

Yes but if people are taxed on the pension money as they pay into it, more people will keep the money instead and either spend it or save into a bond. Why would people pay into a pension where their money is locked in until they are 70+ for no financial benefit.

so they can have a better retirement?

Genevieva · 08/11/2025 21:58

randomchap · 08/11/2025 21:57

so they can have a better retirement?

Which reduces the risk of people being a burden in the state in the future.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 21:58

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 21:50

Just because companies offer it, it doesn't mean people take it up. Every company I have worked at has offered it but most people I have spoken to about it don't know it exists.

Well everyone’s pension is set up that way at the companies I have worked for so everyone benefits from salary sacrifice (unless they don’t join the pension scheme).

FunnyRaven · 08/11/2025 21:59

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 21:57

It isn't a plan to cut tax relief.

ohhh ahaha maybe I should actually read it properly. My bad.

notatinydancer · 08/11/2025 22:00

speculaction

Genevieva · 08/11/2025 22:00

zzplea · 08/11/2025 21:22

Using salary sacrifice for pension payments avoids paying National Insurance on it. The biggest beneficiary is the employer as they pay less Employer NI contribution. The employee saves a bit too.

Are people confusing salary sacrifice with the income tax relief on pension contributions? There are no plans to scrap that.

Some employers put the NI contribution into the pension. It’s a way of encouraging people to be responsible and save for retirement.

Hons123 · 08/11/2025 22:01

Helpfullright · 08/11/2025 19:32

not to be rude but on 24k a year you aren’t paying for others. You need to be on nearly double this to be a net contributor

What do you mean, on double that? If a 48K pa person has 2 children in a state school, which is up to £18K pa per place in a state school, no way will they be a nett contributor - to cover the little darlings' places alone - it is £36K.

FunnyRaven · 08/11/2025 22:01

Blump2783 · 08/11/2025 21:57

It isn't a plan to cut tax relief.

sounds like it is to me…

Only the first £2,000 of pension contributions via salary sacrifice would avoid NI
Anything above £2,000 would still go into your pension, but you’d have to pay NI on it

lazyarse123 · 08/11/2025 22:03

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 21:46

You are right that they are on half of the living wage BUT most of them don’t have mortgages/rent, childcare and travel costs. For a two bed terrace in my area, a full time childcare place and a train pass to London, that would require £4.5k per month after tax for just those three items. That “living” wage does go very far…

I'm a pensioner. I downsized from a house that still had a mortgage on it. Sold it for a lot less than market value because I couldn't afford the associated costs to sell it on the open market. We paid the mortgage off, bought a park home with what was left and still have to pay ground rent and council tax etc. What the fuck do you suggest we do? Stop trying to make it a race to the bottom.
Our retirement park has about 55 homes and not one of us is living a life of luxury.
Fucking horrendous attitude.

nearlylovemyusername · 08/11/2025 22:07

zzplea · 08/11/2025 21:22

Using salary sacrifice for pension payments avoids paying National Insurance on it. The biggest beneficiary is the employer as they pay less Employer NI contribution. The employee saves a bit too.

Are people confusing salary sacrifice with the income tax relief on pension contributions? There are no plans to scrap that.

No confusion here.
This will still be a significant hit to higher earners, esp those trying to avoid 100k trap.

BUT - remember everyone was happy when RR increased employers' NIC? no tax increases for working people they said. Look at job market now.

With this NI tax employers will be reviewing headcount even tighter and will def reduce their pension matching schemes.
Slow clap Labor, no one can bit their incompetence.

Thisiswhathings · 08/11/2025 22:08

lazyarse123 · 08/11/2025 21:52

As one of those troublesome pensioners can I ask what your suggestion is if the triple lock is done away with.
I got the princely increase of £34 every 4 weeks this year. I still have outgoings, for some reason the pensioner bashers think we don't have any expenses when we retire. Just like you op all my bills and food has gone up.
I do not live a life of luxury I just worked 50 fucking years for the privilege of not having to do it any more.

A smoothed earnings link similar to what they have Australia , because of the cost of the state pension triple lock is massively expensive.

MeouwKing · 08/11/2025 22:08

How can anyone live in luxury on 12k a year? Please, can you explain how a pensioner on 12k a year lives in luxury?

Negroany · 08/11/2025 22:09

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 20:16

Evidence please. I have worked for small and medium sized British companies and global Swiss and U.S. companies. All use salary sacrifice.

Do you actually know what salary sacrifice is?

I'm in HR, and since I work interim and freelance roles, I see a LOT of pension scenes. Very few use salary sacrifice. In fact, I have introduced it in two places.

Most final salary type schemes can't use it, so that takes most of the public sector out of this issue.

I've set up Nest-type schemes three times now, on the auto enrol system, and they don't use it.

Yes, your employer will take your pension from your salary, but that itself is not what salary sacrifice means.

As some posters have said, the employer saves the NI as well as the employee (I suspect more have started to look at it now NI has increased for employers). And some employers gift it back to the employee, into their pension, as once it is set up that way there is no real cost to the employer (there's a bit of admin because you do need some specific contract terms around it, and changes to payments etc are more restricted), or some gift half back and keep half.

If it's only after the first £2k a year, that also takes out a lot of lower earners from the issue.

And salary sacrifice cannot be used for anyone who is on or earns not much over minimum wage. That takes another raft of people put of this.

So, it's another of those things that will impact the employer more, and better paid employees (of which I am sort of one, but my employer scheme is not sal sac, though it was on my list to look into bringing in). The latter I can get behind. I'm starting to feel that employers are getting the brunt of things right now.

Negroany · 08/11/2025 22:13

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 21:58

Well everyone’s pension is set up that way at the companies I have worked for so everyone benefits from salary sacrifice (unless they don’t join the pension scheme).

No, everyone's pension is not set up that way. Under 40% are. Almost no public sector are.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:13

lazyarse123 · 08/11/2025 22:03

I'm a pensioner. I downsized from a house that still had a mortgage on it. Sold it for a lot less than market value because I couldn't afford the associated costs to sell it on the open market. We paid the mortgage off, bought a park home with what was left and still have to pay ground rent and council tax etc. What the fuck do you suggest we do? Stop trying to make it a race to the bottom.
Our retirement park has about 55 homes and not one of us is living a life of luxury.
Fucking horrendous attitude.

You were suggesting that you were worse off than people on the living wage. I pointed out that they often have mortgage/rent, childcare and travel costs. Do you genuinely believe that you are worse off than all people on the living wage? 80% of pensioners own their own homes, very few have childcare or daily commuting costs. That’s why the pension is at at a lower level. Clearly you are struggling and I don’t know what has happened in your life that has meant you have got into this position. But we cannot pay pensions the equivalent of a living wage when they don’t have the same outgoings as those on a living wage. There is no magic money tree.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:14

Negroany · 08/11/2025 22:13

No, everyone's pension is not set up that way. Under 40% are. Almost no public sector are.

Well that’s fine then isn’t it, as long as it doesn’t impact the public sector, it’s all OK. And you wonder why Labour are so unpopular…

ShesTheAlbatross · 08/11/2025 22:18

Hons123 · 08/11/2025 22:01

What do you mean, on double that? If a 48K pa person has 2 children in a state school, which is up to £18K pa per place in a state school, no way will they be a nett contributor - to cover the little darlings' places alone - it is £36K.

Off topic I know, but surely when working out whether or not someone is a net contributor over their lifetime, you factor in their own schooling, not their children’s?

Alpacajigsaw · 08/11/2025 22:21

You just sound bitter and moany

What exactly do you want or expect to happen?

Pensioners aren’t to blame for government mismanagement. They worked too to fund the pensioners of their day.

CantHaveTooMuchChocolate · 08/11/2025 22:23

nietzscheanvibe · 08/11/2025 19:17

Surely you will still be able to pay extra into your pension? You simply won't be able to do it as a means of avoiding tax? 🤷

But what’s the point then? You’d be far better off just saving to an isa, etc if there’s no tax break. No one’s going to pay into a pension if they have to pay tax on the way in, then on the way out too, and not be able to access it till they retire (suspect the lump sum will be removed too before I retire).

lazyarse123 · 08/11/2025 22:25

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:13

You were suggesting that you were worse off than people on the living wage. I pointed out that they often have mortgage/rent, childcare and travel costs. Do you genuinely believe that you are worse off than all people on the living wage? 80% of pensioners own their own homes, very few have childcare or daily commuting costs. That’s why the pension is at at a lower level. Clearly you are struggling and I don’t know what has happened in your life that has meant you have got into this position. But we cannot pay pensions the equivalent of a living wage when they don’t have the same outgoings as those on a living wage. There is no magic money tree.

Edited

I haven't asked for the living wage. I am just sick of being blamed for all society's ills. Do you want us all to die so we aren't a drain on society anymore.
I don't expect to be better off than someone working but I don't want vilifying for wanting a worry free retirement.

ttcat37 · 08/11/2025 22:27

HermioneWeasley · 08/11/2025 20:02

Private sector workers having their tax increased to fund defined benefit public sector pensions. A level of pension provision that private sector workers can only dream of. Absolutely disgusting.

Public sector workers are having their taxes increased too. If you want one of these ‘amazing’ public sector pensions then perhaps try a public sector job with their shit hours, shit conditions and shit pay. Nope, didn’t think so

Cyclingmummy1 · 08/11/2025 22:27

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:14

Well that’s fine then isn’t it, as long as it doesn’t impact the public sector, it’s all OK. And you wonder why Labour are so unpopular…

That's the public sector whose contribution rates have increased by 50% since the turn of the century whilst the benefits have decreased. You're right, no impact at all.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:31

lazyarse123 · 08/11/2025 22:25

I haven't asked for the living wage. I am just sick of being blamed for all society's ills. Do you want us all to die so we aren't a drain on society anymore.
I don't expect to be better off than someone working but I don't want vilifying for wanting a worry free retirement.

Edited

Where on earth did I say that? It was commented that the state pension was half of the living wage, I explained the reason for that.

Thunderdcc · 08/11/2025 22:34

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 20:24

Where did I say that they used it to benefit their staff?! Does your employer not offer salary sacrifice? I’m wondering why you have such a problem with it because it’s a win win as far as I am concerned.

I think you are misunderstanding how businesses operate. They don't say oh look, the extra NIC last year is £250k less profit, hey ho. And now we can't save NIC on salary sacrifice, another £250k, ah well it is what it is.

They say we budgeted to make £X amount of profit this year, looks like we are going to have to make a few people redundant. No extra money for the Treasury.

Boohoo76 · 08/11/2025 22:37

Cyclingmummy1 · 08/11/2025 22:27

That's the public sector whose contribution rates have increased by 50% since the turn of the century whilst the benefits have decreased. You're right, no impact at all.

May I remind you that there are almost no final salary or career average pensions available now for those in the private sector. They were ended under the last Labour government. Yes, public sector pensions have got worse, but private sector pensions have got a lot, lot worse.