Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

A 1p / 2p raise to income tax should lawfully trigger a general election

474 replies

TesChique · 30/10/2025 06:27

There are vague promises in manifestos, and there are those which are explicit and should be binding except in exceptional circumstances (war etc)

If labour, or any party reneges on a core manifesto promise it should lawfully trigger a general election

They have lied to the public.

AIBU to think we need to see this change in law?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 30/10/2025 09:10

Linenpickle · 30/10/2025 06:35

I agree with you. You vote for people based on promises so if they duck up everything, oust them. Labour have been worse than truss, boris and Blair in one. Why should I pay more tax when they aren’t cutting costs.

Nonsense.

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 09:11

The sooner we are rid of them, the better

Any government that comes after will have to raise taxes. Taxes are only going to keep increasing & public services will keep declining.

BIossomtoes · 30/10/2025 09:11

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 09:09

Obviously he failed to mention that any government, including his, would have to raise them and that his £10 billion NI giveaway was unfunded.

obviously

Is there an echo in here?

FinancesSorted · 30/10/2025 09:11

Shame that Labour are no different. It has all been disappointing. But it’s not a reason to call a general election.

same old same old - it doesn’t matter who is in charge.

Reeves apologises for her mistake if it had been one of us we would have been bollocked and fined.

Chiseltip · 30/10/2025 09:12

Linenpickle · 30/10/2025 06:36

Business are bankrupt. People are squeezed. It can’t go on. We are a laughing stock of the world.

And raising taxes isn't the answer.

5 Billion on migrant hotels.

7 Billion on Aid

300 Billion on the NHS

60 Billion on the Armed Forces

And they want to tax us more to raise 40 Billion🤔

There are plenty of areas that could be cut to find that money.

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 09:12

Didimum · 30/10/2025 09:09

Can you explain that or is it just something you are repeating because you heard it on the tv.

Well, that’s patronising of you.

Brexit is both a leading and exacerbating cause of the UK’s economic problems because it’s made almost every other challenge worse. By cutting the country off from its biggest trading partner, it’s created new barriers for businesses, pushed up import costs and scared off investment that used to flow in when the UK was a gateway to the EU market. On top of that, the end of free movement led to worker shortages in everything from farming to hospitality, driving up costs and adding pressure to inflation. These effects have amplified all other global shocks – Covid, the energy crisis – because the UK lost the flexibility and resilience it once had. Brexit has made the UK uniquely vulnerable and almost impossible to recover, turning what might have been short-term bumps into deeper, longer-lasting economic strains.

DH and I both work in global trade, finance and economics, but sure – I got it off the TV 🙄

Edited

Can you say why France is facing issues?

Bushmillsbabe · 30/10/2025 09:13

BeardofHagrid · 30/10/2025 07:26

Starmer has been in since July 2024!! A substantial amount of time to create change. The 14 years thing has been done to death, I shudder every time I hear it. 🙄

Same. I didn't expect everything to be solved in 18 months, that would be impossible. But what I didn't expect was that things would get so much worse. My NHS team has recruitment freezes and a 5% cut in budget for first time in 10 years I have been there, and the primary I am governor for has had a 10 real term budget cut in past 18 months. The council my husband works for is on verge of bankruptcy for first time in many years. Inflation is high, mortgage rates are high, no financial growth. The way out of this mess is financial growth, reduced unemployment. Putting up taxes will have the opposite effect.
I can deal with having less money and better services, or even more money and slightly less good services. But labour have acheived the own goal of people having less money and poorer services

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 09:13

This just demonstrates the main problem with democracy - people vote en masse for fantasies and then get upset when reality bites, but instead of accepting reality, some people want a chance to vote for even more outrageous fantasies.

I think this is the crux of it.

Bumblebee72 · 30/10/2025 09:14

MojoMoon · 30/10/2025 09:10

Excellent public services but less of them?

Can you be more specific? Which public services would be stopped?

Social work?
Health?
Education?
Police?
Fire?
Food safety?
Building safety?
Planning?
Pharmaceutical safety and licensing?
Environmental health?
Inspections of abattoirs?
Customs and border control?

Fascinated to hear how this will work.

If you really want to know read their plan. But of course you don't want to know since there will be some self-interest about money coming form the state.

ReformUKOurContractwith_You.pdf

https://assets.nationbuilder.com/reformuk/pages/253/attachments/original/1718625371/Reform_UK_Our_Contract_with_You.pdf?1718625371

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 09:14

Can you say why France is facing issues?

Tbf if France put their pension age to 68 like us some of their problems will be alleviated.

safetyfreak · 30/10/2025 09:15

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 08:59

If there’s a non means tested OAP in 20 years time I’ll be amazed.

winter fuel won't exist & free prescriptions for over 60s, that will be increased.

I'd be surprised if we even get a pension at this rate, it certainly won't be as lucrative as it is now for this generation of pensioners.

It annoys me that working people are continuing to be squeezed when the out-of-control welfare system, illegal immigrants and pensions are left alone. It is SO wrong. A tax rise will be horrid for our household, as our budget is already tight.

It simply isn't fair.

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 09:15

Is there an echo in here?

perhaps in your head? Any more valuable contributions?

DisappearingGirl · 30/10/2025 09:16

Id consider myself a middle earner and I'd happily pay a bit more tax in order to have functioning NHS, social care and education systems.

Labour probably shouldn't have made that promise, but they're no worse than any other party in that respect. I do think raising taxes is the only way to ensure our public services actually work.

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 09:17

Id consider myself a middle earner and I'd happily pay a bit more tax in order to have functioning NHS, social care and education systems

A 2p increase will not result in a functional NHS and social care system, it's not enough money.

And as for education, the birth rates are having a huge impact on due to the current funding model.

Bumblebee72 · 30/10/2025 09:18

DisappearingGirl · 30/10/2025 09:16

Id consider myself a middle earner and I'd happily pay a bit more tax in order to have functioning NHS, social care and education systems.

Labour probably shouldn't have made that promise, but they're no worse than any other party in that respect. I do think raising taxes is the only way to ensure our public services actually work.

Go for it. I'd you'd happily pay more you can. Just make a voluntary contribution. If enough of the people who "say they would be happy" to do that do then the Government problems are solved.

You can make yourself happy today!

Bushmillsbabe · 30/10/2025 09:20

DrBlackbird · 30/10/2025 09:09

It will be just those on PAYE…

I’ll be relieved if it’s just income tax that’s the target. It’s pensions I’m seriously worried about.

Brown wrecked private pensions once before, I wouldn't be at all suprised if labour go for them again unfortunately.
And state pensions for most will become a thing of the past I expect.

DisappearingGirl · 30/10/2025 09:20

A 2p increase will not result in a functional NHS and social care system, it's not enough money.

It's surely better than nothing though?

venus7 · 30/10/2025 09:20

BeardofHagrid · 30/10/2025 07:26

Starmer has been in since July 2024!! A substantial amount of time to create change. The 14 years thing has been done to death, I shudder every time I hear it. 🙄

It hasn't been 'done to death'; it is mentioned to put current situation in context.
14 years of neglect is a long time.

MayaPinion · 30/10/2025 09:21

The rise in income tax is inevitable and is a direct consequence of Brexit and COVID. We always knew that - it was well documented and discussed at the time. I’m only surprised it hasn't happened sooner.

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 09:21

venus7 · 30/10/2025 09:20

It hasn't been 'done to death'; it is mentioned to put current situation in context.
14 years of neglect is a long time.

What are Labour doing bar hammering growth via taxes?

Meadowfinch · 30/10/2025 09:21

dressinggowns · 30/10/2025 09:11

The sooner we are rid of them, the better

Any government that comes after will have to raise taxes. Taxes are only going to keep increasing & public services will keep declining.

But I don't mind paying an extra penny in the pound tax if there is someone competent spending it to sort current issues.

Reeves is literally clueless. My 17yo son could do better. She's so incompetent she's embarrassing.

ruffler45 · 30/10/2025 09:22

Didimum · 30/10/2025 08:34

You’re living in the clouds if you think any party could ‘fix’ the economic challenges. Get a Time Machine back to 2019 perhaps. Brexit will always, always be the problem.

The problem is/was that the EU and the ECHR etc etc are extra levels of government/administration that this country and the world does not need.

We have enough already

venus7 · 30/10/2025 09:23

EasternStandard · 30/10/2025 09:21

What are Labour doing bar hammering growth via taxes?

I'll presume that's a rhetorical question....

Bushmillsbabe · 30/10/2025 09:24

Bumblebee72 · 30/10/2025 09:18

Go for it. I'd you'd happily pay more you can. Just make a voluntary contribution. If enough of the people who "say they would be happy" to do that do then the Government problems are solved.

You can make yourself happy today!

Many of us already do. For example our primary is propped up by voluntary donations from parents to fill the black hole in government education funding.

Which creates a very 2 tier system- the average yearly voluntary donation at the state secondary we are hoping DD1 is going to next year is around 1k per child. Some parents are giving much more. It's a grammar in an affluent area and parents can afford this much more easily than I'm other areas, where parents can't give much.

Chiseltip · 30/10/2025 09:25

MojoMoon · 30/10/2025 09:10

Excellent public services but less of them?

Can you be more specific? Which public services would be stopped?

Social work?
Health?
Education?
Police?
Fire?
Food safety?
Building safety?
Planning?
Pharmaceutical safety and licensing?
Environmental health?
Inspections of abattoirs?
Customs and border control?

Fascinated to hear how this will work.

Well, our armed forces are not capable of overseas deployment, and have no business doing so. First reasonable cut would be to the Army. Keep a small local defence force, nothing more. Get rid of the RAF, they are of no practical use and are not operationally significant anymore. Get rid of the Majority of the Royal Navy, they should be a small coastal defence force, thats all. We dont need aircraft carriers. Keep Trident as the ultimate deterrent.

That would free up about 40 Billion.

The NHS needs to be reduced significantly. The waste is verging on criminal. We could easily shave 20 Billion and keep the same level of services. But the whole concept needs to be reformed. We simply can't afford it anymore.

So that's 60 Billion for a start.