Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Maternity pay

191 replies

NoMonNoFunx · 09/10/2025 22:05

What do you All do after 9 months when maternity Pay stops and you want to take the year.
am I being unreasonable to think we should get paid for the year.
I’ve always worked.

OP posts:
NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:12

Harassedevictee · 11/10/2025 10:06

@NoMonNoFunx they use KIT and SPLIT days by doing odd days which get full pay which usually they keep more of because they have not used up their tax free element.

I know you are still breastfeeding but could you do one day a week?

Hi
My contract doesn’t allow for kit days in this job unfortunately- I did avail of them with the other children x
Also, he won’t take a bottle at all, how do I even do one day 🤷‍♀️

OP posts:
SantaArt · 11/10/2025 10:14

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 09:58

Because they taken enough off me In My working life!!!!

You can’t have been working that long if you’re still young enough to be having children! And with 3 other children you’ve had plenty out the system already surely as well as lots of time off work where you weren’t having anything “taken from you”?
I’ve worked since I was 16 and I’m now mid 40s. Have never claimed a benefit in my life. Should I just stop work now and go on benefits because “they’ve taken enough off me in my working life” so I deserve something back? Or, if I want time off without being sick or on maternity leave should I just save/fund it myself?

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:21

ViaRia01 · 11/10/2025 10:01

I don’t understand the ‘we should get…’ why should we get one year’s pay? Why not 2 years’ pay or why not just 3 months’?

If the system has changed part way through your maternity leave and suddenly the last three months’ pay were no longer given, then I could see your AIBU but you have presumably known about the amount of pay available since before you went on leave so it is up to you to have decided whether to save for the full year or go back to work after 9 months or sooner.

Of course a year’s pay is over than 9 months’ pay, but then again 2 years’ pay is nice than 1 years’..: so where do we draw the line?

Ive always went back sooner, I pay my way in life, but my baby won’t take a bottle leaving me in dier straights here!

Trust me, there’s nothing more I want than to go back to work. I’d be back by now if he was taking a bottle!

To allow people time off work and only pay a period of that time when they rob my salary every year, is quite frankly quite shit!

That’s my opinion, it always will be for anyone on Mat leave. You are all entitled to your opinion and I respect your opinions.
Some of you get free childcare, 30 hours I think.
We don’t.
The government is a shambles!!

OP posts:
Annoyeddd · 11/10/2025 10:24

Unfortunately in many jobs those that are left have to take up the slack for maternity leave - the company cannot always afford to pay two people to do a job (the person on leave plus their cover same goes for sick leave) and I have come across who have returned to work but take the piss in that they "need" to express milk which takes up to three hours a day (really - been there done that got the milk stained tee shirt) or continually leave early.
As for paying in all your life come on you are probably only 30-35 so have been working for about ten years perhaps 15. There are many people around who have worked for forty years and not used anything from the state (education, health, benefits).
I would have loved to have had more time off with babies but it was nice to have the salary (although it was actually negative at times when there were two in nursery for a couple of months until funding kicked in) and adult company - children grow up and I could then resume my career at just a slightly lower level than it would have been.
Yes Mumsnet can be vicious but representative of what people IRL really think

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:25

SantaArt · 11/10/2025 10:14

You can’t have been working that long if you’re still young enough to be having children! And with 3 other children you’ve had plenty out the system already surely as well as lots of time off work where you weren’t having anything “taken from you”?
I’ve worked since I was 16 and I’m now mid 40s. Have never claimed a benefit in my life. Should I just stop work now and go on benefits because “they’ve taken enough off me in my working life” so I deserve something back? Or, if I want time off without being sick or on maternity leave should I just save/fund it myself?

🙄😆😆😆😆

your assumptions are so wrong 😂😂😂😂

my story couldn’t be more different.
Enough out of the system 🤭
can’t have been working that long 🧐😂😂😂

what a stupid reply based on silly assumptions

you know nothing dear!!

OP posts:
NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:27

Annoyeddd · 11/10/2025 10:24

Unfortunately in many jobs those that are left have to take up the slack for maternity leave - the company cannot always afford to pay two people to do a job (the person on leave plus their cover same goes for sick leave) and I have come across who have returned to work but take the piss in that they "need" to express milk which takes up to three hours a day (really - been there done that got the milk stained tee shirt) or continually leave early.
As for paying in all your life come on you are probably only 30-35 so have been working for about ten years perhaps 15. There are many people around who have worked for forty years and not used anything from the state (education, health, benefits).
I would have loved to have had more time off with babies but it was nice to have the salary (although it was actually negative at times when there were two in nursery for a couple of months until funding kicked in) and adult company - children grow up and I could then resume my career at just a slightly lower level than it would have been.
Yes Mumsnet can be vicious but representative of what people IRL really think

I didn’t even dignify the other posters remark snot find a job that pays it. I wouldn’t expect an employer to pay it.
No have I ever gotten sick pay from an employer. Wouldn’t expect that either.

your symptoms are also incorrect!!

OP posts:
MissScarletInTheBallroom · 11/10/2025 10:27

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:27

I didn’t even dignify the other posters remark snot find a job that pays it. I wouldn’t expect an employer to pay it.
No have I ever gotten sick pay from an employer. Wouldn’t expect that either.

your symptoms are also incorrect!!

Edited

So you expect the taxpayer to pay for it?

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:28

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 11/10/2025 10:27

So you expect the taxpayer to pay for it?

Yes I do
that would be me !!

OP posts:
Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:29

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 09:58

Because they taken enough off me In My working life!!!!

They really haven’t. If you’ve had a few kids, then they really haven’t. Very few people are net contributors. You cost them a lot more than you will ever pay on.

We get enough maternity provisions.

JasperTheDoll · 11/10/2025 10:29

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 09:40

Pregnancies typically fall into two categories; planned and accidental.

The number of people who don’t want kids, can’t afford kids and haven’t discussed kids with their partner who are also not using any contraception isn’t really that high a number.

You and your partner never discussing children or contraception, but never using contraception and then being surprised that you got pregnant are the odd ones out.

Responsible adults plan for children, due to finances, space in the house, emotional availability, needs of current children.

Felt the need to resort to being nasty did you? All because I don't fall in line with you.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 11/10/2025 10:29

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:28

Yes I do
that would be me !!

You and everyone else. Most taxpayers haven't had four kids.

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:30

Ladies
let’s just agree to disagree

have a lovely Saturday 🫶🫶

OP posts:
NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:31

JasperTheDoll · 11/10/2025 10:29

Felt the need to resort to being nasty did you? All because I don't fall in line with you.

Nasty is all you get here!

OP posts:
NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:31

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:29

They really haven’t. If you’ve had a few kids, then they really haven’t. Very few people are net contributors. You cost them a lot more than you will ever pay on.

We get enough maternity provisions.

Incorrect assumptions again

OP posts:
Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:33

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:31

Incorrect assumptions again

If you’re a high enough earner to pay enough tax to be a net contributor then you wouldn’t be struggling for money on maternity leave. So you’re not a high enough earner to be a net contributor.

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:34

JasperTheDoll · 11/10/2025 10:29

Felt the need to resort to being nasty did you? All because I don't fall in line with you.

Because you’re advocating for unprotected sex with every man you go to bed with, and expect the government to make policy to fund all the unplanned babies from it… all because you’ve apparently never ever heard of any reliable adults planning for a child, preparing for they child and using contraception until they are ready for that child.

SantaArt · 11/10/2025 10:39

NoMonNoFunx · 11/10/2025 10:25

🙄😆😆😆😆

your assumptions are so wrong 😂😂😂😂

my story couldn’t be more different.
Enough out of the system 🤭
can’t have been working that long 🧐😂😂😂

what a stupid reply based on silly assumptions

you know nothing dear!!

So you’re 60+ with a young baby yes? Or, under 45 which is what I am assuming yes? (Unless of course you are one of the very rare cases of a pregnancy later than that)

I’m just under 45 myself, and have worked since I was 16. If I decided to not work anymore claiming I have had enough taken from me people would rightly tell me to stop being ridiculous. I haven’t even worked long enough to get enough NI credits for a full state pension in the future. If you have somehow worked far longer than that despite being a similar age or are actually 60+ with a baby then I will apologise.

Werp · 11/10/2025 10:42

Yes I agree, it would be better for families, babies and society for at least a year of one-to-one care by a parent to be supported. Ideally two.

JasperTheDoll · 11/10/2025 10:45

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:34

Because you’re advocating for unprotected sex with every man you go to bed with, and expect the government to make policy to fund all the unplanned babies from it… all because you’ve apparently never ever heard of any reliable adults planning for a child, preparing for they child and using contraception until they are ready for that child.

Not once have I said I expect the government to pay for it. Have I said Maternity pay provision is poor? No I haven't. I also don't like your assumptions that I am a bit of a slag with multiple sexual partners. For your information, not that you need or deserve to know. I have been with my husband from the age of 15, we are now 48. He is the only sexual partner I have had so I am not advocating unprotected sex with multiple men. Both myself and my DH are also 'reliable' adults and you thinking we aren't is irrelevant. I'm off to enjoy the day with my (unplanned) family now, you have the day you deserve!

QuickPeachPoet · 11/10/2025 10:48

NoMonNoFunx · 09/10/2025 22:05

What do you All do after 9 months when maternity Pay stops and you want to take the year.
am I being unreasonable to think we should get paid for the year.
I’ve always worked.

You suck up having less money or you get back to work.
You are not entitled to a year off on full pay. Just because 'I want it' is not a good enough reason.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 11/10/2025 10:49

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:33

If you’re a high enough earner to pay enough tax to be a net contributor then you wouldn’t be struggling for money on maternity leave. So you’re not a high enough earner to be a net contributor.

And it would be very unusual for a woman who is a very high earner to have four young children.

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:53

JasperTheDoll · 11/10/2025 10:45

Not once have I said I expect the government to pay for it. Have I said Maternity pay provision is poor? No I haven't. I also don't like your assumptions that I am a bit of a slag with multiple sexual partners. For your information, not that you need or deserve to know. I have been with my husband from the age of 15, we are now 48. He is the only sexual partner I have had so I am not advocating unprotected sex with multiple men. Both myself and my DH are also 'reliable' adults and you thinking we aren't is irrelevant. I'm off to enjoy the day with my (unplanned) family now, you have the day you deserve!

If you’ve never had a discussion about number of children you both want, number of children you can afford or have the emotional availability for but you don’t use contraception then you’re irresponsible. It is not a lifestyle choice to advocate for. Lives are ruined by unplanned pregnancies (childrens and adults), so we should all be advocating for family planning and contraception use.
Thank goodness your kids will get sex education in school so they can learn about contraception.

JasperTheDoll · 11/10/2025 10:59

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:53

If you’ve never had a discussion about number of children you both want, number of children you can afford or have the emotional availability for but you don’t use contraception then you’re irresponsible. It is not a lifestyle choice to advocate for. Lives are ruined by unplanned pregnancies (childrens and adults), so we should all be advocating for family planning and contraception use.
Thank goodness your kids will get sex education in school so they can learn about contraception.

Just say you've had an unwanted pregnancy that ruined your life instead of projecting onto others. Not that I should have to share this information with you or anyone, we didn't use contraception for medical reasons which I don't need to disclose the nature of to you. My children's knowledge around contraception is none of your concern, but if it helps you sleep better at night, my 27 year old daughter is on the pill, and my 18 year old son uses condoms with his girlfriend. No need for the 6 year old to use anything yet.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 11/10/2025 11:00

Bobiverse · 11/10/2025 10:53

If you’ve never had a discussion about number of children you both want, number of children you can afford or have the emotional availability for but you don’t use contraception then you’re irresponsible. It is not a lifestyle choice to advocate for. Lives are ruined by unplanned pregnancies (childrens and adults), so we should all be advocating for family planning and contraception use.
Thank goodness your kids will get sex education in school so they can learn about contraception.

If @JasperTheDoll has been with her husband for over 30 years and has three children rather than 12, I assume they have used contraception for most of their relationship, so no idea what the whole wide-eyed "people plan their families?" schtick is all about.

JudgeBread · 11/10/2025 11:01

JasperTheDoll · 11/10/2025 08:40

Maybe you dont but I did and I know lots of others who have also done same and not planned pregnancies.

Being irresponsible with birth control is planning to have a baby. If you're regularly having unprotected sex you're actively trying for a child.

Christ we teach this to teenagers.