Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think this "wedding pianist" is unbelievably rude?

1000 replies

Bamsmam · 05/10/2025 19:49

We are getting married in April and have found a lovely venue which allows us to source music ourselves. I looked around options locally and they all charge a fortune for 5-6 hour packages which we don't really need - just someone to play a few tunes as guests arrive and during and after the ceremony, nice and quiet, nothing complicated.

A friend told me about a friend of hers who plays for weddings sometimes, not as a full time career because she does other music work too. So I got in touch with her, mentioned my friend's name, said what I wanted and asked for a quote. She came back to me with £220!! For a couple of hours piano playing! Surely this is money for old rope.

I wrote back and said I thought it was a little on the steep side and this is where the rudeness comes in. She actually messaged me back and said I should start taking lessons now myself and in ten years I'll be as good as her and can play for my next wedding! AIBU to think that this is extremely unprofessional and also a very unpleasant way to communicate with prospective customers?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Darner · 05/10/2025 23:44

I think the problem here OP, is that you’re a bit deluded about how much anything wedding related costs. My dad offered to pay for the pianist at my nephews wedding (about 2 hours for the duration of the mingling bit at the reception as well as the service). It was £550. My dad expected it to be about half that 😂

mtaylorfan · 05/10/2025 23:45

DP is a DJ who occasionally does weddings as a favour. He says he wouldn't charge less - even for friends - and wouldn't have to rehearse or anything.

OP should be tipping generously at £220.

Have a look at the Musicians' Union rates here: Ceremonial Organists Salary, Pay Rates & Hourly Rates | The MU

There's a base rate, a rate for rehearsals, and a rate if a video is being made.

Ceremonial Organists Salary, Pay Rates & Hourly Rates

Organists and Ceremonies minimum rates of pay.

https://musiciansunion.org.uk/working-performing/gigs-and-live-performances/live-engagement-rates-of-pay/organists-and-ceremonies-rates

Nothankyou2025 · 05/10/2025 23:47

ellyeth · 05/10/2025 23:41

I don't think £220 is unreasonable for a trained and experienced musician. After all, she has to get to and from the venue so more than two hours would be involved. Your comments were uncalled for and discourteous - and it was totally out of order to suggest a reduction in her fee. If you thought it was too expensive, you should have said you would think about it and let her know if you wanted her services.

I can understand why this lady was annoyed but I think, though I agree with her very frank comments, I think to voice those thoughts was unprofessional. I think she should have said her fee was a reasonable one, given the current market rate and her experience, and she was not willing to reduce it.

Professional musicians and photographers and the like are absolutely pig sick of entitled losers like the OP trying to scrounge them down using street haggling tactics. It is incredibly common (in every way) behaviour. The pianist reacted well, with humour, and sent the OP packing.

The pianist quite rightly responded to the breathtakingly rude OP denigrating her skills and got rid of the OP quickly and with no further interaction (beyond OP writing back foaming and frothing, which I just bet she did).

I am afraid that skilled professionals simply cannot be expected to tolerate breathtaking rudeness and entitlement without simply shutting it down, hard and as they are human beings being insulted by scroungers they cannot be expected to be angelic.

OP is very lucky indeed she didn't simply say "Fuck off you cheapskate and go and harass someone else" - now that would have been unprofessional, but understandable.

The pianist replied with humour. Good for her. I would definitely employ the pianist and her comment would not put me off at all.

JellyCoffeeBean · 05/10/2025 23:48

Bamsmam · 05/10/2025 20:09

I was thinking maybe £100, £150? Mate's rates ;)

It's not like she does this all the time and it's a lot of money for two hours work. More than I pay a plumber LOL, and they cost enough.

She’s not your mate though…

bumbaloo · 05/10/2025 23:50

OP you and @shugglesare living in cuckoo land.

She is a professional. Whether she commits all her time to this one role or not in irrelevant. Are you suggesting a part time dentist who uses the rest of their time doing something else should charge less than a full time dentist?

this sort of contract work always commands a higher hourly fee than a regular job because a regular job comes with security, sick pay, holiday pay and protection.

of course the hourly rate will be significantly higher for a professional doing a contract job.

are you seriously telling me you’d get a plumber to come over and spend two hours working for less? A lawyer or private doctor would be 2-4 x that amount.

her response was perfectly in line with your rude and dismissive attitude.

Calliopespa · 05/10/2025 23:50

JellyCoffeeBean · 05/10/2025 23:48

She’s not your mate though…

But she is the bride. Some brides seem to get the idea their wedding is the romantic high point of the age and everyone just wants to be part of it.

LBFseBrom · 05/10/2025 23:50

I think that is a very reasonable fee. What on earth did you expect to pay?

Wadadli · 05/10/2025 23:51

zipadeedodah · 05/10/2025 20:01

YABU I love her response.

Your not just paying her for 2 hours of her time, you're paying her for 2 hours PLUS 20 years of practice at honing her skill so that she can play at weddings.

How much are you spending on your dress (just for a few hours)

Nailed it!!

Wadadli · 05/10/2025 23:53

Bamsmam · 05/10/2025 20:09

I was thinking maybe £100, £150? Mate's rates ;)

It's not like she does this all the time and it's a lot of money for two hours work. More than I pay a plumber LOL, and they cost enough.

She wasn’t YOUR mate! Her response was not rude and you deserved having your arse handed to you on a platter

NoSoapJustUseShowerGel · 05/10/2025 23:54

You’re paying for a finely honed skill, plus time and expense to travel to and from the venue. Yabvvvu.

As for “But she's not a professional "wedding pianist"! Is my point! She does other things too!”
she actually IS a professional wedding pianist if people pay her to play at weddings! Musicians often have portfolio careers, where they earn a living through various different channels as none on their own is enough to make a living and/or they like the variety.

Harassedevictee · 05/10/2025 23:55

@Bamsmam I am late to this thread so have only read your posts.
The £220 is not for two hours work, it includes the time spent practicing before the wedding. It also includes her time to travel to and from the venue and the cost of petrol etc.

Would you really expect her to turn up and sight read the music not having practiced beforehand? There is also the time talking with you about which music you want playing for each part of the ceremony.

CrazyGoatLady · 05/10/2025 23:57

SMH. If you think a professional pianist is just taking money for old rope, you are free not to engage one. Sounds like you can't afford one anyway, so it's all worked out for the best!

valentinka31 · 06/10/2025 00:01

What's wrong with you? What did you expect to pay? 20 quid and feel you'd been generous?

valentinka31 · 06/10/2025 00:02

get some piped spotify going on your phone

WearyAuldWumman · 06/10/2025 00:05

12 yrs ago, I knew a group of three musicians who would do an hour for 50 quid plus drinks...but they weren't professional musicians and were just doing it for fun and to supplement their pension.

Back in '94, we got mate's rates for our wedding reception for a professional trio. It cost £300 or £100 an hour. (Plus refreshments.) That would be the equivalent of £215 an hour today.

It's actually less difficult if you're playing as part of an ensemble - if you eff up, you're covered. If you're solo, it's all on you.

placemats · 06/10/2025 00:05

valentinka31 · 06/10/2025 00:02

get some piped spotify going on your phone

If the wedding is in a public venue, you would have to pay for the the music license.

Wadadli · 06/10/2025 00:07

Buffypaws · 05/10/2025 22:46

Team pianist. Just chiming in to add that in fact newly qualified solicitors (who are usually pretty useless and always under senior supervision) can earn up to 180k a year in London now

You beat me to it!

Grammarnut · 06/10/2025 00:07

Just a thought. You want nothing complicated. Do you know how complicated the play list you might want is to play? I mean are you Simon and Garfunkel of Bach cantatas?

WearyAuldWumman · 06/10/2025 00:07

Harassedevictee · 05/10/2025 23:55

@Bamsmam I am late to this thread so have only read your posts.
The £220 is not for two hours work, it includes the time spent practicing before the wedding. It also includes her time to travel to and from the venue and the cost of petrol etc.

Would you really expect her to turn up and sight read the music not having practiced beforehand? There is also the time talking with you about which music you want playing for each part of the ceremony.

This.

I played for free at a 90th birthday party for my cousin's father-in-law. I had to rehearse for a week to get ready for it and I played for less than an hour.

Francestein · 06/10/2025 00:08

Thing is, you DO charge your employer for your training and experience. That is why different jobs come with different salaries.
My suggestion is for you to link a Spotify playlist to speakers.
i used to sing at weddings and people absolutely paid for my education, experience, travel time and talent. They also paid for practice sessions with accompanists as I refused to “fly blind” and show up unprepared. Just because you think someone’s time and talent is only worth a certain amount, doesn’t mean that this is reality. It’s as insulting as being asked to be paid with “exposure”.

JellyCoffeeBean · 06/10/2025 00:09

Calliopespa · 05/10/2025 23:50

But she is the bride. Some brides seem to get the idea their wedding is the romantic high point of the age and everyone just wants to be part of it.

Edited

😂true!

Charredtea · 06/10/2025 00:10

How embarrassing for you and your poor friend who recommended her. If I were you I’d apologise and say that you had a touch of the wedding fever and briefly lost your shit and are now mortified

Mumof2amazingasdkiddos · 06/10/2025 00:10

Bamsmam · 05/10/2025 20:09

I was thinking maybe £100, £150? Mate's rates ;)

It's not like she does this all the time and it's a lot of money for two hours work. More than I pay a plumber LOL, and they cost enough.

Ok i stopped reading here! Mates rates? She's not your mate! Yes her response was a bit rude but clearly in response to your rudeness first!

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.
Swipe left for the next trending thread