Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Labour are lifting the 2 child benefit cap

1000 replies

PuppyKeep · 30/09/2025 18:43

AIBU that this is a terrible decision?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
16
EchoedSilence · 30/09/2025 19:36

HelenHywater · 30/09/2025 19:35

should probably sterilise them.

They should give their children to a rich family.

clipboardz · 30/09/2025 19:36

@EasternStandard it's the interim bit that concerns me due to the lack of planning. There will be far fewer dc, there already is...

Lifting the cap will not boost birth rates.

Upstartled · 30/09/2025 19:37

HelenHywater · 30/09/2025 19:34

You do know of course the the 2 child limit had no effect on birth rate or benefit levels and only served to push more children into poverty. And of course that the lifelong effects of childhood poverty are potentially far more costly to the state than paying a few quid extra on Universal Credit.

It's a heinous, immoral poverty which doesn't even do what it set out to do.

Bollocks. Guess where the two child cap kicks in.

Labour are lifting the 2 child benefit cap
Toodleleetoodleeo · 30/09/2025 19:37

HelenHywater · 30/09/2025 19:34

You do know of course the the 2 child limit had no effect on birth rate or benefit levels and only served to push more children into poverty. And of course that the lifelong effects of childhood poverty are potentially far more costly to the state than paying a few quid extra on Universal Credit.

It's a heinous, immoral poverty which doesn't even do what it set out to do.

A quick Google will show you that birth rates have slightly dropped since the benefit cap came in,

Allthatshines1992 · 30/09/2025 19:37

clipboardz · 30/09/2025 19:30

Our declining birth rate is going to fuck the economy

It already has & this really want do anything to change it.

Immigration is filling the gap in the birth rates.

taxguru · 30/09/2025 19:37

clipboardz · 30/09/2025 18:53

No one is having dc for extra benefits

Hilarious that you genuinely think that!

MalinandGo · 30/09/2025 19:37

We seem to have wandered into the Daily Mail comment section. Good grief.

Arrrrrrragghhh · 30/09/2025 19:37

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:27

If anyone is incentivized to have more children for an extra £102 a month with housing, energy and consumables costs as they are, I’d LOVE to see it. I spend more than that a week on wraparound care.

Point me to one study that proves CB incentivizes pregnancy? And more pertinently one that proves it incentivizes pregnancy in this economy?

Theres more research to show people adjust their behaviour when negative financial impacts are predicted. So theres less children when theres less financial/ social benefit, less house moves when interest rates are predicted to rise etc.

HelenHywater · 30/09/2025 19:37

Gingernessy · 30/09/2025 19:31

Better hope the poor babies have a better work ethic than their parents.

You do know that the majority of parents who claim universal credit are working?

PraisebetoGod · 30/09/2025 19:38

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:31

Do I think ALL parents who are eligible for CB will smoke it away? Don’t be bloody daft!

It's UC which was previously tax credits. Not child benefit. You've lived a very privileged life of that i am sure. You've never grown up around the reality of families who rely on tax payers to fund their lifestyle and support their family. An increase in universal credits will mean the parents spend more money on themselves. The children will still live in poverty. You're the daft one.

FoxRedPuppy · 30/09/2025 19:38

I earn just over £60k as a single adult household (two dc) and I think I’m pretty well off. If the average salary is £30-35k then I earn almost double. I dunno if I’d say I’m rich, but I don’t have too many money worries.

PuppyKeep · 30/09/2025 19:38

Isthismykarma · 30/09/2025 19:28

I’m all for it.

As a side note, what happens if a first pregnancy is triplets? Are you only paid for two? My mind just wandered to it haha

No, it’s an exception already. You’ll get money for all 3.

OP posts:
MrsSkylerWhite · 30/09/2025 19:39

MidnightPatrol · 30/09/2025 18:49

I’m conflicted.

Children shouldn’t live in poverty. It’s not their fault they are in that situation. Studies show when not in poverty, their outcomes are better.

But… most households now are making difficult decisions around family size because of affordability.

So - i am not sure it’s right to give unlimited benefits to the family with seven kids who could never afford it, while the dual-working household with a mortgage have had to stick to one because they don’t feel they can sensibly afford another.

Sums up my feeling pretty much. Of course there are contraception fails and multiple births (I think an exception should be made for multiple births, don’t suppose many people desperately want twins or triplets 😁) but I imagine those categories don’t represent many families with more than two children.
Our daughter and her husband are considering whether they can realistically have a second child. Both educated, responsible people in well-paid employment, in receipt of no benefits. If they are having to think long and hard about practicalities and affordability, shouldn’t everyone do the same, particularly if they are to an extent reliant on state top ups?
Labour may well scrap the two child limit but who’s to say the next Government won’t scrap child benefit altogether? Looking at the possible candidate, I’d say that’s not as unlikely as it sounds.

Gingernessy · 30/09/2025 19:39

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:27

If anyone is incentivized to have more children for an extra £102 a month with housing, energy and consumables costs as they are, I’d LOVE to see it. I spend more than that a week on wraparound care.

Point me to one study that proves CB incentivizes pregnancy? And more pertinently one that proves it incentivizes pregnancy in this economy?

You're talking about child benefit which is not capped by child - this is about UC - which is worth an extra £292 a month per child not £102.

EchoedSilence · 30/09/2025 19:39

Without the low earners this country would grind to a halt.

Allthatshines1992 · 30/09/2025 19:39

EchoedSilence · 30/09/2025 19:36

They should give their children to a rich family.

Best place for most kids is with their Mother. Stupid people tend to produce stupid people. Bright people tend to produce bright people. Even if someone is stupid and they have children that's okay because there will always be some job which requires that stupid person to do it (don't want to give examples due to risk of offending anyone) but you know what I mean.

TiredofLDN · 30/09/2025 19:39

Gingernessy · 30/09/2025 19:31

Better hope the poor babies have a better work ethic than their parents.

I grew up in poverty. Really desperate poverty. Homeless at times as a child. My DM had terrible MH and was a single parent not keeping it together. Didn’t work (until many years later when she got better, went to college and got a job).

Benefits were the safety net that kept me out of care, enabled me to go to sixth form (EMA), and then on to university (I was the first in my family. Graduated from a RG uni with a starred first).

Im now a graduate and higher rate taxpayer. I’m also a single parent to one child, and have at times when he was very small had to claim UC top ups for childcare because my salary at that time couldn’t keep up with basic outgoings.

So yeah, I have a better work ethic than my mother, and a better life. I contribute more to the economy and society. And more importantly, my son has a better life than I did. He is securely housed. Goes to school every day. Has never seen domestic violence. Plays extra curricular sports. Has private tuition for his SEND needs. He will (pray god) go on to achieve yet more, and contribute yet more, than I do.

Benefits broke a cycle of poverty for my family. That’s why they make sense. Because for every kid that stays stuck- as some sadly will-, more will get out, just like I did. And then we all benefit.

ChardonnaysBeastlyCat · 30/09/2025 19:39

HelenHywater · 30/09/2025 19:37

You do know that the majority of parents who claim universal credit are working?

Mostly part time though, the magic 18 hours.

EasternStandard · 30/09/2025 19:40

MalinandGo · 30/09/2025 19:37

We seem to have wandered into the Daily Mail comment section. Good grief.

The DM comments are against generally. Even when Reform proposed it btl comments were against. It lost them a few polling points which they’ve since regained.

dottiehens · 30/09/2025 19:40

clipboardz · 30/09/2025 19:17

n the midst of a fertility crisis, which puts the whole welfare state (most immediately, the state pension) at risk of collapse, lifting the cap is an absolute no-brainer.

It won't encourage more dc, just reduce poverty for current ones which is a good thing. No country has reversed below replacement birth rates.

Those kids will go on welfare as their parents did.

ToodleP1P · 30/09/2025 19:40

Pumpkinallspice · 30/09/2025 19:26

Only statistically. If you have 3 kids and don't work or work 2 days a week in Tesco. Getting some extra money might mean you get more food and probably go a bit more overboard at Christmas, but it's unlikely to mean the children suddenly become well educated, aspirational and later on, contributing members of society.

These sort of people need support for relationships, budgeting, cooking, healthy eating, how to educate, stay off computer games and stop children becoming overweight. All the problems attached to poverty. I would far rather the money was spent addressing the family, parenting and health and education problems associated with poor families, rather than chucking a bit of extra money their way.

Also any money going in should be in voucher form so it can only be spent on healthy foods, uniforms, shoes etc.

Edited

Yes, lets extend the voucher idea. Pensioners should only get vouchers for bills and food, yes?

Gingernessy · 30/09/2025 19:40

smilingfanatic · 30/09/2025 19:21

I'd means-test pensions in much the same way as most of the other benefits are means-tested. Certain amount of savings/investments or money in property and you don't get it.

But how much?

EchoedSilence · 30/09/2025 19:40

Allthatshines1992 · 30/09/2025 19:39

Best place for most kids is with their Mother. Stupid people tend to produce stupid people. Bright people tend to produce bright people. Even if someone is stupid and they have children that's okay because there will always be some job which requires that stupid person to do it (don't want to give examples due to risk of offending anyone) but you know what I mean.

Edited

I was joking.

MyLimeGuide · 30/09/2025 19:40

Allthatshines1992 · 30/09/2025 19:35

So they should go without just because you had to?

Having children is a privilege, its self indulgent. Having 3 kids shouldn't be an absolute given for everyone (just because they are broody) or love babies or whatever. I agree everyone should be entitled to 1 regardless of money but more than 2, if you cant afford it, that's just plain greedy, neglectful and irresponsible.

Rooit · 30/09/2025 19:40

This reply has been deleted

Message deleted by MNHQ. Here's a link to our Talk Guidelines.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.