Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Violet Affleck and mask mandates

335 replies

aold · 24/09/2025 09:44

AIBU think that this shouldn’t be encouraged? Violet Affleck advocating for mask mandates. Daughter of Jennifer Garner and Ben Affleck. Speaking about the importance of masks. Says we should still be wearing them to curb the spread of Covid 19.
Shouldn’t a young privileged woman be enjoying her youth? Is there a reason for fit healthy people like her to still walk around in masks?

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/home/index.html

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/tvshowbiz/article-15127909/violet-affleck-mask-mandates-long-covid-ben-jennifer-garner.html

OP posts:
Theyreeatingthedogs · 24/09/2025 16:46

Turningworld · 24/09/2025 13:56

Mask mandates have always had exemptions for people who cannot wear masks or need others to take them off to communicate. There are also clear masks. I have a severe hearing impairment myself I still support mask mandates in hospitals.

How many people did you see wearing clear masks during the time they were mandated? Not many. My DP would tell people that they needed to take masks off for lipreading but they would refuse.

CameForAVacationStayedForTheRevolution · 24/09/2025 16:53

Needmorelego · 24/09/2025 14:31

I have no idea how university works (as i never went) and even less knowledge of the American university system so I can't really say if she is "qualified" enough to speak but I have seen occasions where university students give speeches or presentations before.
I doubt Violet Affleck is the first Yale student to speak at the UN or other similar organisations.

I'm sure she isn't - I seem to remember they also listened t o Greta Thunberg. It just seems a bit performative and tick boxing to me. When they could listen to actual scientists rather than emotional, rather un evidence based appeals. But maybe that's what they want? However what's the point - they have shown they're "listening" to a Gen Z spokesperson. But they're not going to take a blind bit of notice of her are they? So ultimately they have wasted her time to make them look good.

Turningworld · 24/09/2025 17:23

Theyreeatingthedogs · 24/09/2025 16:46

How many people did you see wearing clear masks during the time they were mandated? Not many. My DP would tell people that they needed to take masks off for lipreading but they would refuse.

Clear masks weren't available earlier on, there are a few different types available now. It's perfectly possible to make it work especially when the only place where mask mandates are even being suggested are in hospitals where hospital acquired infections are a huge problem, for everyone but in particular for people who are especially medically vulnerable and are at the moment unable to access healthcare safely. I know people who are having cancer treatment and dialysis and healthcare workers won't even wear masks when they are getting their treatment, and some even come in actively sick, which is disgraceful imo.

GPproblems · 24/09/2025 17:35

Well as I’m now on antibiotics because of selfish people who insist on going out while poorly, I am firmly in the camp of thinking masks should be mandated.

It’s pure selfishness.

DontCallMeLenYouLittleBollix · 24/09/2025 17:47

GPproblems · 24/09/2025 17:35

Well as I’m now on antibiotics because of selfish people who insist on going out while poorly, I am firmly in the camp of thinking masks should be mandated.

It’s pure selfishness.

How do you expect this to be enforced? There's a distinction between having a mask mandate and a population who would actually adhere to it.

Adherence was breaking down the last time there were mask mandates in the UK, and private businesses making it clear they weren't going to do the state's work in enforcing it, so it's never immediately obvious what people think has changed to make it actually feasible.

GPproblems · 24/09/2025 17:55

DontCallMeLenYouLittleBollix · 24/09/2025 17:47

How do you expect this to be enforced? There's a distinction between having a mask mandate and a population who would actually adhere to it.

Adherence was breaking down the last time there were mask mandates in the UK, and private businesses making it clear they weren't going to do the state's work in enforcing it, so it's never immediately obvious what people think has changed to make it actually feasible.

You keep asking me this and I’ve told you. You can admit you’re anti mask and selfish. It’s okay.

saynotofondant · 24/09/2025 17:56

AliceMaforethought · 24/09/2025 15:33

OFFS we aren't still in a pandemic!

I thought the stages were

epidemic (localised)
pandemic (global)
endemic (global but not spiking, just circulating)

Like the viruses of previous pandemics might still be kicking around but they’re weakened and don’t cause havoc any more.

This is just what I remember from the news during early pandemic time, hope iirc.

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 24/09/2025 17:56

GPproblems · 24/09/2025 17:55

You keep asking me this and I’ve told you. You can admit you’re anti mask and selfish. It’s okay.

Someone clearly struggles with the difference between fact and opinion.

RafaistheKingofClay · 24/09/2025 18:13

FuzzyWolf · 24/09/2025 13:23

"As Dr. Akiko Iwasaki says, at this point, the whole population is the control group, and after only five years, long COVID has surpassed asthma as the most common chronic illness in children in five years and under," she explained."

This is the same age group most impacted with speech and language delays as a direct result of people wearing masks.

That is unsurprising given we know that children whose mothers had Covid during pregnancy are more likely to have a developmental delay at 2yo than those who weren’t exposed to covid in utero. I think there were more problems with speech and language too.

Those test scores might not be salvageable while we’re still pretending Covid is a respiratory virus not a multi systemic one.

BeachLife2 · 24/09/2025 18:28

Setenv · 24/09/2025 16:40

We did something about it in the short term, and since then we've stopped, so we are now doing precisely zero to prevent the long-term consequences of repeated covid infections, in children or in anyone else. Zero.

We've put all our eggs in the basket of thinking kids having lots of covid infections won't have any long-term consequences. What if we're wrong? The research into the cognitive effects alone should be causing concern.

Ventilation in summer and HEPA filters in winter in classrooms could have been being worked on for the last five years and we'd now be in a much better position, even if progress was slow because of funds and even if the results weren't perfect. If clean air is good enough for the Houses of Parliament, why not for children?

Edited

Because HEPA filters and ventilation systems in every classroom in the country would cost a fortune, and the money is far better spent elsewhere.

Cara707 · 24/09/2025 18:29

I imagine she does have severe anxiety issues and deserves sympathy rather than judgement.

RafaistheKingofClay · 24/09/2025 18:35

Dinkyshrinks · 24/09/2025 14:15

Minor point, but aren’t we still in a pandemic?

Shhh!

RafaistheKingofClay · 24/09/2025 18:48

BeachLife2 · 24/09/2025 18:28

Because HEPA filters and ventilation systems in every classroom in the country would cost a fortune, and the money is far better spent elsewhere.

Pretty sure this was costed up and it didn’t cost a fortune. I’d would put money on it costing less in the long term than the economic and welfare costs of having higher levels of covid circulating for most of the year.

19lottie82 · 24/09/2025 18:51

I mean it’s a bit wild to me, but at least she’s not a female Brooklyn Beckham.

Dinkyshrinks · 24/09/2025 19:02

RafaistheKingofClay · 24/09/2025 18:48

Pretty sure this was costed up and it didn’t cost a fortune. I’d would put money on it costing less in the long term than the economic and welfare costs of having higher levels of covid circulating for most of the year.

Finland noted the high ROI of doing this.

The current situation is also unaffordable.

DontCallMeLenYouLittleBollix · 24/09/2025 19:03

GPproblems · 24/09/2025 17:55

You keep asking me this and I’ve told you. You can admit you’re anti mask and selfish. It’s okay.

Hardly. You gave one low detail and transport specific reply, which was entirely unconvincing, I asked further questions and you said you didn't care. Which means you have yet to demonstrate that this is anything other than pissing in the wind because, once again, having mask mandates does not make people go along with them.

Fwiw, I adhered to mask laws for the entire time that they were in force. It's not me you need to worry about. And you're going to need to address the issue of exemptions and how you'd stop the bullying of the exempt before you can credibly refer to anyone as selfish.

Setenv · 24/09/2025 19:14

BeachLife2 · 24/09/2025 18:28

Because HEPA filters and ventilation systems in every classroom in the country would cost a fortune, and the money is far better spent elsewhere.

The most basic ventilation system is a window! Air purifiers are not very expensive either.

And as a pp said, if you take into account the costs of repeated illness, then the equation looks different.

The problem is partly that it's in no government's interest to do anything other than to downplay covid, because if they don't downplay it then we might start making demands for more to be done. The last thing we should we be doing is taking that at face value, though, however much we hated 2020 and 2021. There are things we could be doing as individuals and at a local community level that no one will try to do so long as the official line (which only protects government and business from their obligations) is that there's no need to.

RafaistheKingofClay · 24/09/2025 19:17

I’m intrigued to see how our vaccine only approach is going to play out with no vaccines this year.

Turningworld · 24/09/2025 23:01

BeachLife2 · 24/09/2025 18:28

Because HEPA filters and ventilation systems in every classroom in the country would cost a fortune, and the money is far better spent elsewhere.

They're not that expensive and they would save a lot of money in reduced sickness days and reduced use of the NHS.

Hulabalu · 24/09/2025 23:09

Needmorelego · 24/09/2025 09:59

What a strange thread.
In some countries (ie Japan) people wearing masks when they have a cold or whatever has been the norm way before COVID ever came along.

Yes it’s just a common courtesy there that I’d like to see extended in Uk & all countries.
I don’t think violets campaign is extreme at all. Just a thoughtful caring young woman who sees the common sense in sick people wearing a mask if they feel unwell instead of selfishly breathing their germs over everyone else - some who are vulnerable, some who get unlucky

Hulabalu · 24/09/2025 23:10

Turningworld · 24/09/2025 23:01

They're not that expensive and they would save a lot of money in reduced sickness days and reduced use of the NHS.

This!

SaratogaFilly · 24/09/2025 23:11

Finteq · 24/09/2025 09:49

I think she has mental health issues.

Of course she can wear a mask but she shouldn't be trying to force everyone else to wear one.

This!

hadjustaboutenough · 24/09/2025 23:54

I would prefer it if people didn't spread their germs when they know they're sick. I try to keep my germs to myself, but that's usually easy, since I'm able to wfh and don't generally have a pressing need to go out when I'm ill. If I did have to go out, I probably wouldn't wear a mask, though, because it's hard enough to breathe with a mask on when I'm not already ill.

More to the point, I don't see how any government can mandate that people wear masks when they're sick, unless the law is that you have to wear a mask anytime you're in public (and that's just insane). How would anyone know for certain that someone was not 'masking up' while ill? Would you report them somehow? Who would enforce it? It's just not feasible, even if you accept that it's the government's business (which is isn't).

OwlBeThere · 25/09/2025 00:26

Needmorelego · 24/09/2025 10:18

It's intelligence that gets you in - not money.
You could be from the richest family in the world but if you don't have the intelligence you don't get in.

Are you on crack? Money talks, it’s a tale as old as time.

DinaGoth · 25/09/2025 01:33

Needmorelego · 24/09/2025 14:31

I have no idea how university works (as i never went) and even less knowledge of the American university system so I can't really say if she is "qualified" enough to speak but I have seen occasions where university students give speeches or presentations before.
I doubt Violet Affleck is the first Yale student to speak at the UN or other similar organisations.

OK, so earlier when you insisted that Yale admissions were based on "intelligence" not money, that was just...guesswork? Vibes?

They're not, btw. Parental gifts are a big thing in US private universities (along with legacies, extracurriculars, sporting achievements etc). A child of the ultra-rich attending Yale definitely does not require extreme academic ability.

Swipe left for the next trending thread