Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Angela Rayner tax fail

1000 replies

Iwishicouldflyhigh · 03/09/2025 12:56

But it’s ok because she was just badly advised.
I’ll remember that excuse next time I fill in my tax return.

But still confused about one can have 2 main homes?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 15:18

Meanwhile.

home office loses bid to delay Epping councils legal challenge.

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 15:21

Goldplatedhinges · 04/09/2025 15:12

She acted in a personal capacity when she bought the flat in Brighton - she could not access lawyers who work for the state - that would be an abuse of power. She had the same access to legal advice as we all have - not more!

She's the deputy prime minister with a salary of £169,000. Good accountants and lawyers are not out of reach for her. Whatever detail we learn from the standards' commissioner, she has shown poor judgement at the very least in not taking steps to ensure her finances are squeaky clean, especially given the previous media storm about the sale of the council house she bought under right to buy.

usernamealreadytaken · 04/09/2025 15:31

Goldplatedhinges · 04/09/2025 15:12

She acted in a personal capacity when she bought the flat in Brighton - she could not access lawyers who work for the state - that would be an abuse of power. She had the same access to legal advice as we all have - not more!

You're incorrect. The very fact that she's not only HNW but also a prominent PEP would mean that any financial or legal company dealing with her is covered by extra layers of regulation relating to KYC and anybody dealing with her would recognise that instantly.

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 15:34

I suppose a valid question is -

Would you trust a person who is unable to organise their tax affairs, with discharging their duties as DPM?

Remember, in the event Starmer was incapacitated, she could be acting PM.

A sobering thought, perhaps.

Alexandra2001 · 04/09/2025 15:55

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 14:51

Sorry, but I work with people in the areas of estate planning including trusts and law. You do not take short cuts or get sloppy in these areas, especially when you are high profile and/or when there is some complexity.

Its just not done.

We are a mix of political persuasions in the office,
and all of us find Rayners situation incredible.

Behind a pay wall but even the Telegraphs tax expert didn't know about what has caught out Rayner...perhaps you should work for them?

www.telegraph.co.uk/money/property/stamp-duty/tax-expert-didnt-know-about-rule-rayner-broke/?fbclid=IwY2xjawMmh0pleHRuA2FlbQIxMABicmlkETB5YWVralJBZ0tPaU9KOVFnAR6DJkHoE14Z1iPkThe5gyvHLCIsi-IpQnW9KE9HiiW5d9ay1PRV1maZuaUDzA_aem_kZJ8oP3i0TKWkEOSSxD3rw

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 15:58

This was discussed earlier, thanks.

Otherwise not keen on becoming a journo - it doesn’t pay enough, for one thing.

Perhaps the journo should act for Ange in future.

Alexandra2001 · 04/09/2025 15:58

hamstersarse · 04/09/2025 14:59

The fact she hasn’t resigned tells you everything you need to know about her morals

Shes admitted ‘an error’

To a person with any principles at all, whether the mistake was intentional or not, they would step back so as to not distract from ‘the good work of the party and government’

She hasn’t apologised, she hasn’t said exactly what’s she’s doing to rectify the ‘mistake’, she hasn’t resigned.

She has blamed someone else. She has tried to play the victim. She has used her disabled son.

She is not a good person.

All factually incorrect, as has been pointed out.

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:00

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 15:58

This was discussed earlier, thanks.

Otherwise not keen on becoming a journo - it doesn’t pay enough, for one thing.

Perhaps the journo should act for Ange in future.

The writer is a tax accountant, not a journalist.

Alexandra2001 · 04/09/2025 16:00

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 15:58

This was discussed earlier, thanks.

Otherwise not keen on becoming a journo - it doesn’t pay enough, for one thing.

Perhaps the journo should act for Ange in future.

Perhaps he already has?

He isn't a journalist, he is a tax expert, as is an ex and he says similar.

But your office all knew.....

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 16:02

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:00

The writer is a tax accountant, not a journalist.

Wrong.

Mike Warburton is a retired accountant and writes a weekly tax column for Telegraph Money.

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 16:03

Alexandra2001 · 04/09/2025 16:00

Perhaps he already has?

He isn't a journalist, he is a tax expert, as is an ex and he says similar.

But your office all knew.....

Edited

Wrong.

Mike Warburton is a retired accountant and writes a weekly tax column for Telegraph Money.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 04/09/2025 16:03

This is going to sound like a very small violin being played, but £169k, while a lot of money in isolation, isn’t really much in the world of HNW individuals who’d be happy to spend £10k or £20k on decent advice. At best £169k gets you, what, £8k a month post tax?

And the problem I expect she faced is a lot of smaller and cheaper law and tax firms won’t touch her because of the onerous requirements they’d face as a result of her position. So she’s left with the expensive firms by default. And I expect therefore didn’t actually take any proper advice.

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:06

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 16:02

Wrong.

Mike Warburton is a retired accountant and writes a weekly tax column for Telegraph Money.

Right.

He was a partner at Grant Thornton. That makes him an accountant, not a journalist.

Freysimo · 04/09/2025 16:08

Obeseandashamed · 04/09/2025 14:41

Dislike her but I don’t think she did anything wrong. She followed the advice she was given by professionals.

Is not so much that she may or may not have done something wrong, it's the hypocrisy. She was very quick to call out Tories for their tax issues, but now she's joined the gravy train. As the Housing Minister she should have known better, but let's not pretend there's anyone of any calibre in Starmer's government, except maybe Wes Streeting.

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:09

Tryingtokeepgoing · 04/09/2025 16:03

This is going to sound like a very small violin being played, but £169k, while a lot of money in isolation, isn’t really much in the world of HNW individuals who’d be happy to spend £10k or £20k on decent advice. At best £169k gets you, what, £8k a month post tax?

And the problem I expect she faced is a lot of smaller and cheaper law and tax firms won’t touch her because of the onerous requirements they’d face as a result of her position. So she’s left with the expensive firms by default. And I expect therefore didn’t actually take any proper advice.

I take the point about her salary not being stellar. It doesn't exonerate her though. She earns enough to hire decent advisers and her property portfolio is not at Jeremy Hunt levels.

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 16:10

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:06

Right.

He was a partner at Grant Thornton. That makes him an accountant, not a journalist.

past tense and was tax his area?

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:12

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 16:10

past tense and was tax his area?

It was. His Telegraph biog describes him as tax director. They let him write about tax because that's his expertise.

Thyra123 · 04/09/2025 16:13

Freysimo · 04/09/2025 16:08

Is not so much that she may or may not have done something wrong, it's the hypocrisy. She was very quick to call out Tories for their tax issues, but now she's joined the gravy train. As the Housing Minister she should have known better, but let's not pretend there's anyone of any calibre in Starmer's government, except maybe Wes Streeting.

Health Secretary Wes Streeting has taken £372k+ from donors linked to private healthcare since 2015 — including £167k in just the past 2 years. Major backers include hedge fund investors in healthcare stocks, NHS staff agencies, and private health advisers.

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 16:17

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:12

It was. His Telegraph biog describes him as tax director. They let him write about tax because that's his expertise.

not convinced he was that good if he failed to understand tax law.

Tryingtokeepgoing · 04/09/2025 16:20

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:09

I take the point about her salary not being stellar. It doesn't exonerate her though. She earns enough to hire decent advisers and her property portfolio is not at Jeremy Hunt levels.

No, but I think Jeremy Hunt understands enough to take the correct advice and is sensible enough to pay for it.

The accusation levied at him was he’d taken advantage of a ‘loophole’ (one of Angela’s other favourite soundbites, like tax dodging) to save SDLT. But the reality he just followed the SDLT 6+ rules as they were set out. It was not possible for him to pay more SDLT without making a false declaration.

Furthermore, as I recall, the reason the 6+ rule was in place was to encourage the supply of more rental property to the market, to improve the availability of rental properties for tenants. Though, subsequent Tory and Labour vilification of landlords hhas countered that and reduced the supply of rental property, driving up rents

SleepQuest33 · 04/09/2025 16:22

The fact is she probably didnt ask “what tax should I pay” but “how can I get away with not paying the tax”.

in my view this is very hypocritical of her. The trust in her is gone.

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:22

Searching4Alpha · 04/09/2025 16:17

not convinced he was that good if he failed to understand tax law.

He was good enough to become a partner in an established and well regarded firm of accountants. The point he is making in the article is that the tax system is in need of reform and that any of us could make a mistake. The reference to Angela Rayner is just because she's the news hook.

usernamealreadytaken · 04/09/2025 16:24

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:00

The writer is a tax accountant, not a journalist.

He's a retired accountant, now paid as a weekly writer for a newspaper; I’d probably class that as being a journalist.

EasternStandard · 04/09/2025 16:26

IdaGlossop · 04/09/2025 16:22

He was good enough to become a partner in an established and well regarded firm of accountants. The point he is making in the article is that the tax system is in need of reform and that any of us could make a mistake. The reference to Angela Rayner is just because she's the news hook.

She blamed bad advice. It’s unlikely that happened.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.