Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think this spineless government will give in to grabby train drivers

185 replies

LupaMoonhowl · 31/08/2025 09:32

I live in London and wasn’t aware of this till I saw in mentioned in passing on another thread.
It is utterly scandalous that they can hold the city to ransom like this! How can they cut off key transport for 5 days! And no doubt they’re confident that the spineless, incompetent and public sector/vote buying government and cynical chancer Kahn will give into what they demand.
Back to the 70s 😔😔
Tube and DLR strikes - September 2025
Strikes are planned on the Tube and DLR.

  • From Sunday 7 to Thursday 11 September 2025, Tube services will be severely disrupted, with little to no service expected
  • Any services that do run between Monday 8 and Friday 12 September will start later than usual with no service before 08:00
  • On Tuesday 8 and Thursday 11 September 2025, there will also be no service on the DLR
OP posts:
ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/08/2025 10:04

Absentmindedsmile · 31/08/2025 10:00

You think the drivers still drive the trains?

Yeah, my nephew is a train driver. He drives a train.

LupaMoonhowl · 31/08/2025 10:04

Absentmindedsmile · 31/08/2025 10:00

You think the drivers still drive the trains?

They just push buttons - start and stop - no actual ‘driving’ involved or skill required, or passenger interaction unlike bus drivers who do an actual, very stressful, job.
Job should be renamed ‘button-pusher’.

OP posts:
Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:04

SprayWhiteDung · 31/08/2025 09:48

Whichever way your sympathies lie, I think it should be borne in mind that trains driven by humans aren't likely to exist at all for very much longer.

They're well along the line with driverless cars, and even lorries, to be used across the entire massive, congested road network; so with transport that only moves along a certain pre-determined number of locked in rails, it's far, far easier to automate it.

The perpetual industrial action really is a bit like turkeys voting for Christmas.

This is true and is also why I don’t understand why we just don’t think good for them. They are in the last thrones of this being a job. Why not go for it before you’re automated out? Gives a generation a better life before it happens.

LittleBearPad · 31/08/2025 10:04

EmpressoftheMundane · 31/08/2025 09:53

They have a lot of leverage.

They have far less than they used to.

Lots of people on hearing there’s a strike will simply work from home.

The people who will suffer most are the low paid and other key workers who can’t work from home. Well done RMT. You get to screw over lots of other union members.

Gingernessy · 31/08/2025 10:04

itsgettingweird · 31/08/2025 09:51

A lot of those sectors are balloting or have/ are striking.

That in itself should be telling the electorate something.

People want public services, transport, education, care, health - but no one wants to pay these people a wage that shows they are as important as other sectors. Yet 5 years ago they were keyworkers keeping the country running.

Until public sector workers are respected as equals when it comes to employments (rather than them being vocational roles which also require a degree) these strikes will continue.

Equal to who the private sector?
If we agree that they should be paid the equivalent of the same role in the private sector then they should be given the same benefits too - 20 days holiday a year, ssp and smp only and a 3% employer contribution to their DC pension.
If the private sector SME's could dip into the tax pot everytime they run short of cash too then we'd all be on DB pensions with 25% employer contributions.

CeciliaDuckiePond · 31/08/2025 10:05

I don't trust driverless trains. Why haven't we got driverless cars yet? - because every time they trial one, it has an accident within hours! Driving a vehicle needs a human eye. I was reading about a serious rail accident being averted because a driver spotted that the points were set incorrectly - not part of his remit to look at the points, but a case of experience telling him something wasn't right. If he'd just let the train run on it would have gone into the side of another train.

SprayWhiteDung · 31/08/2025 10:05

itsgettingweird · 31/08/2025 09:58

I know they can’t negotiate individually. I’ve reread my reply and can’t see where I’ve said they can? Or responded to that?

I responded to the fact that those people strike because the pay is low/ inflation rises lower than inflation (and that is related to not being able to negotiate individually but that’s the same with all jobs that are paid in bands and generally public sector roles)

I'm a bit confused because you quoted my response to the suggestion that most people can negotiate their salaries individually; but I think we're essentially on the same page!

LittleBearPad · 31/08/2025 10:07

CeciliaDuckiePond · 31/08/2025 10:05

I don't trust driverless trains. Why haven't we got driverless cars yet? - because every time they trial one, it has an accident within hours! Driving a vehicle needs a human eye. I was reading about a serious rail accident being averted because a driver spotted that the points were set incorrectly - not part of his remit to look at the points, but a case of experience telling him something wasn't right. If he'd just let the train run on it would have gone into the side of another train.

There are driverless taxis operating in the US.

Bruisername · 31/08/2025 10:07

Agree with PP that the bus drivers deserve the pay rise! What a job

Bruisername · 31/08/2025 10:08

The dlr is driverless

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:08

Absentmindedsmile · 31/08/2025 10:02

You pay them, if you’re a British tax payer.

I mean, this is an obvious point right?

I elect a government to oversee and agree negotiations.

the financial decision making is based on extensive modelling none of us have access to and it’s up to their employers to work out what’s affordable and negotiate.

personally, if the country was wealthier than it currently is I couldn’t care less about paying for key workers salary increases.

EmpressoftheMundane · 31/08/2025 10:10

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:08

I mean, this is an obvious point right?

I elect a government to oversee and agree negotiations.

the financial decision making is based on extensive modelling none of us have access to and it’s up to their employers to work out what’s affordable and negotiate.

personally, if the country was wealthier than it currently is I couldn’t care less about paying for key workers salary increases.

I think we would all agree with that. It would be great if the country were wealthier and we all had more across the board.

But it isn’t. We are in a very bad state. Train drivers grabbing more for themselves is at the expense of others.

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:11

LittleBearPad · 31/08/2025 10:07

There are driverless taxis operating in the US.

They operate in many countries. If I remember correctly the reason the don’t here is that driverless cars are illegal in the uk

Mikart · 31/08/2025 10:12

Its shit...there's the London Half Marathon on Sunday so this will stuff runners and onlookers.

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:13

EmpressoftheMundane · 31/08/2025 10:10

I think we would all agree with that. It would be great if the country were wealthier and we all had more across the board.

But it isn’t. We are in a very bad state. Train drivers grabbing more for themselves is at the expense of others.

Absolute tosh. I remember on this very forum 20 years ago posters hysterically calling train drivers grabby lazy incompetent for going on strike back then and we were positively ROLLING in cash in those days.

a sizeable part of the population have always hated public sector works pushing for salaries and working conditions, whether the tax payer can afford it or not.

LlynTegid · 31/08/2025 10:13

Bruisername · 31/08/2025 09:40

Are there any details of the working week and extreme shift patterns? Not doubting it but I’ve never seen the actual details so curious

i will just work from home but I feel for those on low incomes who will have to find a way in and those on zero hours contracts

My understanding is that night tube trains are not separate drivers but part of their roster pattern. There was not night tube 15 or 20 years ago, so a long term driver would not have had night work.

LambriniBobInIsleworthISeesYa · 31/08/2025 10:14

Up the workers. Freedom for Tooting. I hope that the train drivers get what they want… and I’m a Londoner.

Absentmindedsmile · 31/08/2025 10:14

ArseInTheCoOpWindow · 31/08/2025 10:04

Yeah, my nephew is a train driver. He drives a train.

Tube drivers aren’t really driving. The train can be driverless. The technology does all the work. He could lose his job tomorrow and the trains would still be working. But don’t worry he won’t, unions. Mainline trains still need drivers.

LlynTegid · 31/08/2025 10:14

London Underground is the responsibility of the London Mayor, so the answer is no to the OPs question.

I would be OK with night tube ending, given how much smaller the evening economy is becoming.

SprayWhiteDung · 31/08/2025 10:14

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:01

I never really get why people don’t think “good for them” don’t you want to earn as much money as you possibly can? The maximum return for your labour?

whether it’s financially reasonable is their employers problem, not yours.

I suppose, however noble or justified their action and demands are, once one sector fights for an across-the-board increase and gets it, then the next one does, and the next one.

The eventual result can be to re-level the playing field - which of course is not a bad thing - but you can potentially end up with nobody better off in the long run.

If they increased the minimum wage to £100/£10,000/£1m an hour, it would sound absolutely amazing - but the end result would be that prices, expectations and inflation would all just rise across the board to compensate.

SirBasil · 31/08/2025 10:14

whenever someone posts a tale of woe about how their employer is shafting them, i always say: join a union.

And this is a good example of why. If train drivers are so valuable to society, their salary needs to reflect that. If the train companies are so cheap that they won't employ enough drivers - that's on them, not on the drivers.

Absentmindedsmile · 31/08/2025 10:15

CeciliaDuckiePond · 31/08/2025 10:05

I don't trust driverless trains. Why haven't we got driverless cars yet? - because every time they trial one, it has an accident within hours! Driving a vehicle needs a human eye. I was reading about a serious rail accident being averted because a driver spotted that the points were set incorrectly - not part of his remit to look at the points, but a case of experience telling him something wasn't right. If he'd just let the train run on it would have gone into the side of another train.

DLR?

itsgettingweird · 31/08/2025 10:15

SprayWhiteDung · 31/08/2025 10:05

I'm a bit confused because you quoted my response to the suggestion that most people can negotiate their salaries individually; but I think we're essentially on the same page!

I think we are too!

SirBasil · 31/08/2025 10:17

SprayWhiteDung · 31/08/2025 09:55

A lot of those sectors are balloting or have/ are striking.

Yes, they are indeed. But they still can't individually negotiate their salaries, as PP seemed to be suggesting that most people apart from train drivers could.

It's not like a teacher or a nurse can go and butter up their boss, point out how good a worker they are and pull a few strings to bag a bigger salary just for themselves.

teachers, nurses, refuse workers, council workers.... have unions. And the unions negotiate the pay.

How do people not get this? ah yes, a steady campaign of anti-union rhetoric that (some) workers fell for.

ho hum

Bambamhoohoo · 31/08/2025 10:18

SprayWhiteDung · 31/08/2025 10:14

I suppose, however noble or justified their action and demands are, once one sector fights for an across-the-board increase and gets it, then the next one does, and the next one.

The eventual result can be to re-level the playing field - which of course is not a bad thing - but you can potentially end up with nobody better off in the long run.

If they increased the minimum wage to £100/£10,000/£1m an hour, it would sound absolutely amazing - but the end result would be that prices, expectations and inflation would all just rise across the board to compensate.

But that’s where their employer and where relevant the government’s responsibility lies.

The idea that they shouldn’t ask or demand because they might send the economy crazy is bonkers. That’s not their responsibility.

Swipe left for the next trending thread