Meet the Other Phone. A phone that grows with your child.

Meet the Other Phone.
A phone that grows with your child.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Cycling Mikey doesn't deserve the hate he's getting

289 replies

ByDandyTurtle · 28/08/2025 20:35

He's not putting fumes in people's lungs from his car and sees people doing illegal activities that kill others or make our premiums go up.

OP posts:
ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 22:01

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:56

See the link upthread to how our brains react after being distracted by a phone. Of course it’s dangerous. Why is it illegal?

As a driving cyclist, no it’s not hard to understand - don’t use your phone. Why would you? What’s so urgent you can’t wait?

  1. It's illegal because no distinction is made between moving and not moving.
  2. I don't drive, as I said. I don't condone it. I've just said that it's not dangerous - and you, along with everyone else, have given absolutely no possible way it is.
ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 22:01

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 28/08/2025 21:48

That’s not true. He’s just another self-important ‘crusader’.

You’re saying none of the people he stops are breaking laws?

Mikkymik · 28/08/2025 22:01

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

21 in a 20 zone is also illegal. But unsafe? On a main road?

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 22:02

nomas · 28/08/2025 21:54

People have explained why it’s dangerous, you’re being obtuse.

No they haven't. They've said "when you start moving..." - which is, oddly, different from not moving.

the5thgoldengirl · 28/08/2025 22:02

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 22:03

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:48

Explain how it is then. Explain how it could possibly result in any injury to use your phone whilst in a car that is not at all moving and continues to not at all move. Every example so far has been "well, you start moving"... so, not stationery traffic then.

Things can be dangerous but not illegal and also be illegal but not dangerous. That's physically possible and anyone with a brain cell knows that.

People have explained it. Did you not see the posts and the links with the research about mobile phone use?

Im sure you, random person who can’t even read an OP properly, is right and they’re wrong though

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 22:03

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:58

Eh??

Aside from the fact you totally put words in OP’s mouth, how is this the same?

OP didn’t describe what CM does and you haven’t watched videos but have decided that he’s in the wrong and all those drivers going round blind bends on the wrong side of the road are the hard done by misunderstood victims?

Where have I said he's in the wrong?!?! This thread is full of utter fantasists! Stop making things up!

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 22:04

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 22:03

People have explained it. Did you not see the posts and the links with the research about mobile phone use?

Im sure you, random person who can’t even read an OP properly, is right and they’re wrong though

Honestly, I'm done with this thread. I'm out. I'll get banned if I say the only reasonable response to this level of total invention.

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 22:05

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:52

And that's just blatantly untrue.

For example, it's illegal to go to your car to grab your handbag if you're over the drink drive limit. It's not dangerous. It's illegal to nudge through a red light by six inches to let an ambulance through. It's not dangerous. It's illegal to sell a 17 year and 354 day old person 1ml of vodka. It's not dangerous.

Lots and lots of things are illegal but not dangerous.

I think you need to brush up on the law mate

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 22:05

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:52

And that's just blatantly untrue.

For example, it's illegal to go to your car to grab your handbag if you're over the drink drive limit. It's not dangerous. It's illegal to nudge through a red light by six inches to let an ambulance through. It's not dangerous. It's illegal to sell a 17 year and 354 day old person 1ml of vodka. It's not dangerous.

Lots and lots of things are illegal but not dangerous.

But using a mobile while an engine is on IS dangerous.

mrsm43s · 28/08/2025 22:05

This is just more evidence that I hate twatty, entitled men. Especially those that like to make themselves feel big on a majority female website.

Sosickofarrogance · 28/08/2025 22:06

ImGoingUpstairsToTakeOffMyHat · 28/08/2025 21:23

I didn’t say you were a driver? But if you think oeople who use their phones while driving are just missing the virtues of a refresher course then you have more faith in humanity than I do

Do you not think that it’s provocative to drive dangerously and break the law? Or should we all just keep our heads down and let lives be risked for the sake of not appearing to be a busybody?

Another PP inferred that road users irritated by his actions were likely drivers causing issues, hence my initial point in the reply. The refresher course would at least be something everyone was facing. Perhaps other measures need to be explored, but the point is that the DVLA at least has some authority.

It is indeed provocative to break the law, but capturing and submitting evidence is sufficient to begin police action. I have witnessed and immediately reported serious criminal behaviour, but I would not deliberately go looking for it.

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 22:08

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 22:04

Honestly, I'm done with this thread. I'm out. I'll get banned if I say the only reasonable response to this level of total invention.

I suggest you get a motorcycle, and see how you feel out there.

the5thgoldengirl · 28/08/2025 22:10

This reply has been withdrawn

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

hideawayforever · 28/08/2025 22:11

nomas · 28/08/2025 21:52

I’m guessing you are the type of driver Mikey encounters.

I thought this too, especially calling him the lowest of the low.

FrippEnos · 28/08/2025 22:14

ByDandyTurtle · 28/08/2025 20:44

If people didnt commit illegal acts then he wouldn't have anyone to wind up?

He doesn't have to "wind people up" he chooses too.

And seems to take a perverse joy in it.

And if the others like him are anything to go by, the video will be carefully edited to only show the worst of drivers.

HungarianBoat · 28/08/2025 22:21

He's a good guy and overall doing a positive service for the UK.

XenoBitch · 28/08/2025 22:22

This reply has been deleted

This message has been withdrawn at the poster's request

Yeah, sorry. They will be far too invested in their phone in traffic as their RiGhT

HungarianBoat · 28/08/2025 22:23

I don't use my phone when driving. I follow the highway code. I give cyclists ample space. If I saw Mikey irl I'd say hello and tell him what a lovely chap he is

Longtimelurkerfinallyposts · 28/08/2025 22:28

Nursingadvice · 28/08/2025 20:47

But That’s not all he does? He literally spends his days looking for trouble. Waits in places to catch people doing a variety of things and then starts arguments with them.
He threw his bike in front of someone’s car. He is not ok.

He didn't 'throw his bike in front of someone's car' though.
He pushed his bike into the carriageway in order to advise a driver that they were driving illegally, ignoring two No Entry signs that had been set up while major gas works were being done. The driver was an over-entitled aggressive shit, who deliberately accelerated at Mikey, in contravention of the Highway Code (which says that drivers have a duty of care towards more vulnerable road users, and should NOT drive into them on purpose, believe it or not), and having crashed into his bike, drove off without stopping (again, breaking the law).
Watch at

- YouTube

Enjoy the videos and music that you love, upload original content and share it all with friends, family and the world on YouTube.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q9q_q7cNWbE

HungarianBoat · 28/08/2025 22:33

ConfusedSloth · 28/08/2025 21:27

Forgive my ignorance but, if the traffic isn't moving, why does it matter if a driver sees you filtering?

Because afterwards traffic moves. Think pls.

JackGrealishsCalves · 28/08/2025 22:40

Him and Jeremy Vine with their twatcams are awful.
Vine especially, deliberately puts himself into situations for his Twitter gotcha moment.
Cycling twitty Micky is a dick. Didn't he recently whack his bike into the side of someone's car? Hope they sue him, driver was just driving along and he literally threw his bike at the car

Nursingadvice · 28/08/2025 22:53

Longtimelurkerfinallyposts · 28/08/2025 22:28

He didn't 'throw his bike in front of someone's car' though.
He pushed his bike into the carriageway in order to advise a driver that they were driving illegally, ignoring two No Entry signs that had been set up while major gas works were being done. The driver was an over-entitled aggressive shit, who deliberately accelerated at Mikey, in contravention of the Highway Code (which says that drivers have a duty of care towards more vulnerable road users, and should NOT drive into them on purpose, believe it or not), and having crashed into his bike, drove off without stopping (again, breaking the law).
Watch at

Hi Mikey 😂

Longtimelurkerfinallyposts · 28/08/2025 22:56

DenizenOfAisleOfShame · 28/08/2025 21:46

This bloke’s just another vigilante. He may be a middle-class-approved cycling vigilante. But he’s doing the same thing as Ring doorbell camera zealots putting their stupid videos on Facebook warning of suspicious men in the neighbourhood, or online ‘paedo hunters’.

Leave detection and enforcement to the police.

If we continue 'leaving it' to the police, nothing will get done about (a) bike theft and (b) dangerous/illegal driving and parking.

I'm glad people like Mikey are on the case, as the police are useless.
Where I live we have huge problems caused by drivers parking on pavements (which is supposed to be illegal here now) and double-parking on busy roads rather than bothering to go a few metres further along from the shops where there's space by the kerb.

This makes it harder for pedestrians to navigate the world safely, especially those with pushchairs and walking aids, blind people, children, the elderly etc. It's (in my experience) mostly relatively young, able-bodied (lazy and inconsiderate) drivers who park like this. And just this evening, there was a police car parked on the pavement along from my house (literally 2 metres from an empty off-road parking space).

The police do very little to prevent bike theft, or tackle the sale of stolen bikes by thieves. Even when they recover stolen bikes, they don't go to much effort to return them to the original owners.

Personally, I believe that all drivers (especially those who will be driving in relation to their work, or having any kind of road safety role, like the police) should have to attend basic cycle training in order to get a driving licence. This would mean that this training would end up becoming compulsary for the vast majority of adult cyclists (most of whom have a driving licence); at the moment it isn't.

It would lead to all road users having a better understanding of each other's behaviour/choices, as well as a bit more empathy for each other (there's plenty of evidence to prove these impacts).

Sosickofarrogance · 28/08/2025 22:56

Nursingadvice · 28/08/2025 22:53

Hi Mikey 😂

There are noticeable speech patterns of certain posters on this thread, particularly those vehemently defending Mikey.

Swipe left for the next trending thread