Really strange one here.
Tonight my neighbour crashed his car into my wall. I know he was using his car because of the damage that’s been done. However when I confronted him and asked him about it he’s claiming it was his dog. The damage that’s been done is massive and I know it wasn’t a dog!!! It is mental that he’s even suggesting that it could have been a dog that did it because the hole is so big.
No idea whether he’s saying that to stop insurance claims or whatever but I just want to know either way if it was him or his dog that have the right to claim the money back! Surely even if it was a pet (IT WAS NOT) then he would have to pay for it!