Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Kate and William saw Harry and Meghan as a real threat to their image?

491 replies

BluntPinkNewt · 09/08/2025 11:32

From the moment Harry and Meghan got together, the media attention was huge. Meghan was glamorous, charismatic, and had a strong public presence - something the royal family hadn’t seen before from an outsider. For a while, it felt like they were the most exciting and modern part of the monarchy.

Kate and William have always been the “stable” and “traditional” royals but suddenly, Harry and Meghan were drawing attention in a way that might have made them seem more relatable and interesting in comparison. The shift in public perception (and maybe even palace dynamics) must have been unsettling.

Obviously things have played out the way they have but AIBU to think that, at least at the time, William and Kate felt genuinely threatened by how much attention and influence Harry and Meghan were gaining?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
kingtamponthefurred · 09/08/2025 12:54

Meghan was glamorous, charismatic, and had a strong public presence - something the royal family hadn’t seen before from an outsider.

Are you joking? All the glamour that family has ever had has come from 'outsiders'!

BluntPinkNewt · 09/08/2025 12:55

senua · 09/08/2025 12:49

AIBU to think that, at least at the time, William and Kate felt genuinely threatened by how much attention and influence Harry and Meghan were gaining?
This is way off base. Kate made it clear (way back, in the Noughties) that she wasn't going to be the media's fool; that she wasn't going to be another Lady Di. Remember when she broke off the relationship for a bit until ground rules were established? That's why she plays safe and steers away from fashion.

Meghan fell into the Lady Di Mark II trap.

I don’t disagree that Kate has always been cautious with the media but even with that strategy, someone else suddenly becoming the centre of attention could still have shifted the dynamics. It’s less about “falling into a trap” and more about how public perception can create pressure inside the Firm.

OP posts:
PotolKimchi · 09/08/2025 12:55

Am I fan of Kate M? Erm no. Also not a royalist.
But she’s very straightforward. She comes from wealth, went to private school, has a plummy accent, studied Art History, got lucky and married a Prince who will be King, is evidently a devoted mother, wears nice elegant not massively fashionable clothes. Is she trying to be a global fashion icon, philanthropist, inspirational speaker? Nope.
What you see is what you get with her…

Trendyname · 09/08/2025 12:56

SquashPenguin · 09/08/2025 12:52

I personally find William and Kate boring as sin. Regardless of what they thought about Megan I think they much preferred having Harry in tow as the kid brother, rather than forging his own path.

I find all 4 of them boring. I don't see anything entertaining about Megan and Harry.

OrangeAxolotyl · 09/08/2025 12:57

toiletpiper · 09/08/2025 12:51

@OrangeAxolotyl you don't need to keep responding to me justifying yourself. You do you!

Nor you! No need to either!
I am a reader. You do you!

toiletpiper · 09/08/2025 12:59

lol, at least use all those reading skills to come up with an original response 😆😆

Blueuggboots · 09/08/2025 12:59

Charismatic? Hardly.

BluntPinkNewt · 09/08/2025 13:00

kingtamponthefurred · 09/08/2025 12:54

Meghan was glamorous, charismatic, and had a strong public presence - something the royal family hadn’t seen before from an outsider.

Are you joking? All the glamour that family has ever had has come from 'outsiders'!

True but the kind of glamour Meghan brought was different in style and context. Past outsiders like Diana or Grace-Kelly type figures brought a more traditional, aristocratic glamour, whereas Meghan’s was rooted in modern celebrity culture and global media. That contrast is part of why it stood out at the time.

OP posts:
BunnyLake · 09/08/2025 13:01

No they didn’t see them as a threat. They would have been well aware of the extra publicity that surrounds shiny new people in the RF. they would also have been aware that Meghan’s charm was fake and would be seen through before long. They are also the future king and queen so it would be like the hereditary vice CEO feeling threatened by a new Area Manager who could never become CEO.

SirRaymondClench · 09/08/2025 13:02

I highly doubt Wills and Catherine were remotely threatened by Harry and Megs.
They were a new flavour for a while and it was exciting having a royal wedding but the scales fell from everyone's eyes pretty quickly.

They are the future monarchs and expected to be working alongside them.
Funny how it all turned out.

senua · 09/08/2025 13:02

more about how public perception can create pressure inside the Firm.
You don't get to be a centuries-old institution by panicking over short-term issues. They've always had to deal with public perception.

Tradescanti · 09/08/2025 13:02

If K and W were at all concerned about the great popularity of M and H at the beginning (a big if) it would be because they saw right through M very early on.

At the time of the engagement interview I said to my friends that M wouldn't last in the role or in this country, though I could never have foreseen quite how badly she and H would behave.

BunnyLake · 09/08/2025 13:03

kingtamponthefurred · 09/08/2025 12:54

Meghan was glamorous, charismatic, and had a strong public presence - something the royal family hadn’t seen before from an outsider.

Are you joking? All the glamour that family has ever had has come from 'outsiders'!

Er Princess Margaret?

SirRaymondClench · 09/08/2025 13:03

Unless you watched Suits (which I didn't) nobody, and I mean NOBODY knew who she was, so she was hardly giving much more than a cable actress.
Not remotely comparable to Grace Kelly or Diana.

JudgeJ · 09/08/2025 13:03

BluntPinkNewt · 09/08/2025 11:44

From her first public appearances - Invictus Games, the engagement interview, and her early royal engagements, she brought a different energy and style that got a lot of media attention. Whether people liked her or not, she clearly made an impact.

I recall seeing the engagement interview and being amazed at how she made it all about her. If one's marrying into any family isn't it usual to take it slowly at first rather than side-lining the partner as she did? Whether she liked it or not at that moment Harry was the senior person in the relationship but her constant pawing, touching and talking over him made her ambitions quite clear. I rather liked her before then, I'd never heard of her or Suits but she seemed to be the ideal person for Harry and in the future the four of them, W, K, H and M could take the RF forward together. Clearly W and K will be the main pair as King and Queen but H and M's role in supporting them and developing their own distinct roles would have been ideal.

BluntPinkNewt · 09/08/2025 13:05

Blueuggboots · 09/08/2025 12:59

Charismatic? Hardly.

Charisma’s subjective - plenty of people found her engaging and magnetic early on, even if others didn’t. The intense media attention and public fascination at the time suggest she made a strong impression, whether positive or negative.

OP posts:
Ukisgaslit · 09/08/2025 13:05

I haven’t read the full thread but some royalist responses here are just hilarious
You claim W and K are unbothered ?
Nothing says ‘unbothered ‘ like having your assistant follow - what was it ? - about 1,400 Meghan related accounts !
Nothing says ‘unbothered’ like buying bot farms to boost your PR social media ‘responses’ - see the multiple identical posts defending Williams lazy ass when he falls to turn up yet again

But that’s all a side show . I want rid of the Windsors or at least to stop the billions they take year on year .
They clearly all hate each other - look at the tit for tat leaks all summmer long . William and Kate in their 7th holiday on a borrowed ( from whom?) yacht . Then a leak about Charles and his temper Then a leak about Camilla on another yacht .

One thing Harry was right about - they all use the media to bitch about each other .
And for this we pay half a billion a year ?
Plus the millions William and Charles pocket from the NHS and charities - oops that’s the Duchys isn’t it and this better not ask any questions about their unpaid tax peasant - that’s Sir to you !

Trendyname · 09/08/2025 13:06

BluntPinkNewt · 09/08/2025 11:44

From her first public appearances - Invictus Games, the engagement interview, and her early royal engagements, she brought a different energy and style that got a lot of media attention. Whether people liked her or not, she clearly made an impact.

Style? Both Kate and Megan's clothing and style get attention in media.

Megan is not charismatic at all. She has nothing else to talk than herself. To be honest, Kate has shown a consistent interest in chikdrwn's early years. Harry used to be charismatic when he started invictus game or when he did an event with W &k and talked about mental health issues.
Now he has nothing else to talk than his grievance with his family.
Have you seen Megan's video with Mindy Kalling? She just talks about herself. I find people who talk too.much about themselves incredibly boring.

toiletpiper · 09/08/2025 13:06

One thing Harry was right about - they all use the media to bitch about each other .

They clearly do this, but why? Just to get in the press? Such a dysfunctional family, maybe that's what so many find appealing!

SirRaymondClench · 09/08/2025 13:07

Starting to think that OP is Meghan on a salvage mission

BunnyLake · 09/08/2025 13:07

BluntPinkNewt · 09/08/2025 11:44

From her first public appearances - Invictus Games, the engagement interview, and her early royal engagements, she brought a different energy and style that got a lot of media attention. Whether people liked her or not, she clearly made an impact.

You or I would also would have had global attention if we’d been marrying Harry. It was never about Meghan personally, it was just tailored to her, like it would have been for you or me.

PivotPivotmakingmargaritas · 09/08/2025 13:07

I think yes and no …. Why can’t it be both ….

I think at the beginning W & K were probably a bit worried about like the new shiny colleague that comes in with the fresh ideas and you think dammit why didn’t I think of that…. But after a few months the shine disappears and you realise they are human

Also I think they thought yes …. We can take a break and someone else take the heat for a bit while we be with our kids

I think the whole scenario is sad H & M could have been an asset and they could have played supporting roles to w & k … which let’s face it living in a castle with security and no need to worry about bills while someone else is in the hot seat sounds like heaven …. There is a reason there is a saying don’t bite the hand that feeds you

FondantFancyAnyone · 09/08/2025 13:08

Meghan was glamorous, charismatic, and had a strong public presence - something the royal family hadn’t seen before from an outsider. For a while, it felt like they were the most exciting and modern part of the monarchy.
Not to me. My first impression of Meghan was how totally unsuitable for Harry she was.
She's pretty but came across as fake.

PuppiesProzacProsecco · 09/08/2025 13:08

Lol at Meghan having a "strong" public presence. She was a minor C list celeb at best. And she's the opposite of charismatic. Repellent I think might be the word.

toiletpiper · 09/08/2025 13:09

Kate has shown a consistent interest in chikdrwn's early years.

Seriously?! I don't mind Kate but the childcare stuff is a lot of fluff.