What seems to be overlooked is that we live in global end stage capitalism that depends on materialism and the trading of widgets.
If we all reduce consumption, it negatively impacts the economy. "Service" based commodities then try and fill the gap, but if you are on a low income, you're not supposed to / can't afford to engage with that.
Big tech and AI on the one hand offer "new opportunities" but is moving very fast, so planning one's career has a whiff of Russian roulette.
A huge chunk of the economy depends on data scraped from the Internet, and sold back and forth making it one of the most valuable commodities on the planet.
The paradoxical nature of it all is bewildering to say the least.
The accusations of just not understanding economics or being unwilling to work hard make me cross. There used to be a fairly standard formula for achieving a decent basic standard of living after the war and into the early 2000s. Now housing costs can take half or more of a basic wage, and everyone just shrugs and says "that's the market, get a second or third job if you want to improve your circumstances". And that's maybe fine if you are a single person, but those with families have to think of their children.
You see threads on here about children who had a "naice" or materially comfortable life, and in adulthood are struggling with family breakdown with their parents because they didn't feel prioritised or supported emotionally, yet apparently that's the acceptable price of "getting ahead".
And it's not just the economic situation that bothers me, it's the attitudes being cultivated online and politically. Everyone is primarily an economic unit, that is the whole sum of it. Then we have all the division and demonisation - any demographic can suddenly become the poster child for all the country's ills if they don'thave enoygh money to keep up, so it's no wonder some become disenfranchised and disillusioned and find it difficult to think positive, keep calm and carry on.