Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think rich people steal money all the time and that’s often why they’re rich?

647 replies

MyAmusedOpalCrab · 05/08/2025 16:48

We hear so much about “hard work” and “smart investments” but let’s be honest, so many rich people didn’t get wealthy by being ethical. From dodgy business practices to exploiting workers, tax dodging, insider deals and straight-up corruption, wealth often comes at someone else’s expense.

Governments bail out billionaires while ordinary people struggle to afford rent. CEOs cut wages and benefits while pocketing massive bonuses. Huge corporations find loopholes to avoid taxes while the rest of us get squeezed.

Obviously not every rich person is a thief but AIBU to think that a lot of them are? That the system is rigged in their favour and they keep getting richer by bending or outright breaking the rules?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
11
cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:08

Kendodd · 05/08/2025 22:51

It's not the top 1% (bottom end) that's the problem. Thinking it is misleading. Ordinary people such as senior doctors and head teachers reach this bracket doing important work that benefits society. Its the 0.01% that are the problem. These are the people who have all the money and they get it from hoarding profits and paying poverty wages to their staff who are doing the actually work that makes the money. The workers end up having to live off UC because the wage they're paid isn't enough to feed their kids, meanwhile the big bosses have so much money they holiday in fucking space.
I honestly think the only reason some of these billionaires don't keep actual slaves as their workers is because it's illegal.

I don’t think that’s the case. Top 20% maybe. Not top 1%.
I agree with your views on the super rich though.

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:10

FenderStrat · 05/08/2025 23:06

It's not about the money.

It's the attitude. One just annoys me more than the other.

Someone cheating a bit to get a bit above poverty - and spending it all so it goes round the economy again - annoys you more than some on who has more than they can ever spend cheating us all out of tax they owe and wouldn’t miss? Weird.

FenderStrat · 05/08/2025 23:11

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:10

Someone cheating a bit to get a bit above poverty - and spending it all so it goes round the economy again - annoys you more than some on who has more than they can ever spend cheating us all out of tax they owe and wouldn’t miss? Weird.

That's one where you saying it.
Or you could say lazy people taking what they don't deserve.

BassinBas · 05/08/2025 23:14

That dog-in-the-manger attitude from people like @FenderStrat is an absolute gift to the ones who are really milking the system.

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:14

FenderStrat · 05/08/2025 23:11

That's one where you saying it.
Or you could say lazy people taking what they don't deserve.

Even if that’s the case - it’s more the case for tax avoiding billionaires. They won’t miss the money. They didn’t earn it through work, it’s passive income. They won’t spend it, they’ll hoard it. If you don’t find those attitudes abhorrent it’s a bit odd.

FenderStrat · 05/08/2025 23:15

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:14

Even if that’s the case - it’s more the case for tax avoiding billionaires. They won’t miss the money. They didn’t earn it through work, it’s passive income. They won’t spend it, they’ll hoard it. If you don’t find those attitudes abhorrent it’s a bit odd.

Where did I say I didn't find it abhorrent?

Dingledongledell · 05/08/2025 23:18

Wowwee1234 · 05/08/2025 22:01

My friend works in tax advice to the ultra rich and said many pay less in tax than the lowest earners and many see any tax as an insult. It's disgraceful. And we are talking multi- multi millionaires who resent £10k in tax. So little they wouldn't even notice it. But they think thry are above tax, that tax is for the little people.

Yes they dodge taxes through legitimate tax allowances but also tax avoidance.

Btw, if you can't think of any examples how about Amazon, the Take That boys, Ebay.
realbusiness.co.uk/six-companies-that-avoid-paying-their-taxes

Big Multinationals base their intellectual property and group functions in low tax rate jurisdictions. It’s a perfectly acceptable thing to do. Wealthy individuals such as Rishi Sunaks wife pay a low rate of tax here as they are not uk domiciled and are therefore not subject to tax on their overseas income. That’s accepted. The wealthier you are the more likely you are to be a citizen of other countries. These are multinational individuals. They have no set international base.

The take that boys took part in some fairly iffy looking tax avoidance schemes based on film rights if I remember correctly. These avoidance schemes have been closed down but also that was years ago and you still you remember this, which is why practically no big company would touch any dodgy tax schemes these days. You will be caught and the PR will be dire.

It’s not too long ago that tax avoidance by large companies was rife. There really isn’t the appetite for it these days whatsoever.

hehehesorry · 05/08/2025 23:18

Have you ever lived around poor people? They're just as bad, most will take anything they can from you. It's a mainly human problem and desperate people are worse imo, even down to parking spots people are territorial and will take whatever they can. Atleast people with more money earn it whether it's fair or not, the fact that in this country you can live on a cleaning or food delivery wage yet people still complain is ridiculous when you think of how other countries are.

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:20

Dingledongledell · 05/08/2025 23:18

Big Multinationals base their intellectual property and group functions in low tax rate jurisdictions. It’s a perfectly acceptable thing to do. Wealthy individuals such as Rishi Sunaks wife pay a low rate of tax here as they are not uk domiciled and are therefore not subject to tax on their overseas income. That’s accepted. The wealthier you are the more likely you are to be a citizen of other countries. These are multinational individuals. They have no set international base.

The take that boys took part in some fairly iffy looking tax avoidance schemes based on film rights if I remember correctly. These avoidance schemes have been closed down but also that was years ago and you still you remember this, which is why practically no big company would touch any dodgy tax schemes these days. You will be caught and the PR will be dire.

It’s not too long ago that tax avoidance by large companies was rife. There really isn’t the appetite for it these days whatsoever.

An acceptable th8ng to do? No. Legal - yes. Acceptable, no.

Juststop2025 · 05/08/2025 23:20

You're envious because you are in one of the most tax heavy countries in the world, and no matter how hard you work you cannot get ahead. Your burden is heavy and your future is uncertain.

Some rich people cheat and steal, many worked incredibly hard or were just lucky or a combination of both.

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:21

hehehesorry · 05/08/2025 23:18

Have you ever lived around poor people? They're just as bad, most will take anything they can from you. It's a mainly human problem and desperate people are worse imo, even down to parking spots people are territorial and will take whatever they can. Atleast people with more money earn it whether it's fair or not, the fact that in this country you can live on a cleaning or food delivery wage yet people still complain is ridiculous when you think of how other countries are.

But a poor person taking a little more doesn’t damage society. They pass it around again because they have nothing. Billionaires take and hoard and damage us all.

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:22

Juststop2025 · 05/08/2025 23:20

You're envious because you are in one of the most tax heavy countries in the world, and no matter how hard you work you cannot get ahead. Your burden is heavy and your future is uncertain.

Some rich people cheat and steal, many worked incredibly hard or were just lucky or a combination of both.

The tax burden on working people is higher than it would be if billionaires paid their fair whack. Look back even to the 70s and 80s. The differential in wealth between business owners and workers was much smaller.

Barbadossunset · 05/08/2025 23:26

I mean, shit, there are huge swathes of England you can't even walk across, because some fucker owns it all.

@BassinBas where are these huge swathes?

BassinBas · 05/08/2025 23:28

@Juststop2025 who's envious? I don't think the super rich are better than me so I don't envy them. I envy people who eg have some mad talent, like music or writing or football, I look at them wistfully and wonder how it would feel to have a mind/body capable of such.

The super rich, I don't see anything to be envious of. I just think it's not a good use of wealth to have such a small portion of people hoard it and not do anything with it. It's inefficient.

Dingledongledell · 05/08/2025 23:35

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:20

An acceptable th8ng to do? No. Legal - yes. Acceptable, no.

It’s accepted by HMRC as legitimate. Companies have to prove the services are actually supplied by Google in Ireland to their UK branches. Contracts are drawn up and the value the intra group transfers must be based on some form of legitimate methodology.

And Google etc are ultimately US companies and Trump will ramp up the UKs tariffs in the blink of an eye if we try anything too radical. These are exactly the sort of things he builds into his made up formula for calculating tariffs.

Dingledongledell · 05/08/2025 23:37

BassinBas · 05/08/2025 23:28

@Juststop2025 who's envious? I don't think the super rich are better than me so I don't envy them. I envy people who eg have some mad talent, like music or writing or football, I look at them wistfully and wonder how it would feel to have a mind/body capable of such.

The super rich, I don't see anything to be envious of. I just think it's not a good use of wealth to have such a small portion of people hoard it and not do anything with it. It's inefficient.

You must be pretty well off not to envy wealthy individuals. It’s natural to do so to some extent. Do you have no financial struggles in your life? Do you have a trust fund?

JHound · 05/08/2025 23:38

YABMU

JHound · 05/08/2025 23:39

cardibach · 05/08/2025 16:50

Really? Because it’s a tiny amount compared to tax fraud.

Link?

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:52

Dingledongledell · 05/08/2025 23:35

It’s accepted by HMRC as legitimate. Companies have to prove the services are actually supplied by Google in Ireland to their UK branches. Contracts are drawn up and the value the intra group transfers must be based on some form of legitimate methodology.

And Google etc are ultimately US companies and Trump will ramp up the UKs tariffs in the blink of an eye if we try anything too radical. These are exactly the sort of things he builds into his made up formula for calculating tariffs.

As I said. Legal. Doesn’t make it right. Doesn’t make it the best thing for the economy. It’s another example of the rich and powerful writing laws to please themselves.

cardibach · 05/08/2025 23:52

JHound · 05/08/2025 23:39

Link?

Already provided.

BassinBas · 05/08/2025 23:58

@Barbadossunset a lot of the 59k square miles of England and Wales is owned, fenced off and often unregistered and untracked. 2% is urban built on. Obviously you can walk on paths around that. You can walk on the 2% owned by conservation charities too. For the rest, including the crown, aristocracy (30/47%) and foreign interests (18%!) your only way through is footpaths. There are supposed to be 140,000 miles of them but 14,000 are blocked or unusable and 10,000 are missing entirely. And you can't step off the path. If there's no path, you can't step at all. Try walking in a straight line from your home. See how far you get until you come across someone asking if they can help you.

mondaytosunday · 06/08/2025 00:05

Nope. I know one dodgy guy (he’s been in prison for tax evasion) but I wouldn’t call him wealthy by any stretch, though he’s comfortable. I do know a fair few well off people and they did get there (bar a few who inherited their wealth) by working hard at professions that remunerate well - plenty of people work very hard but not at careers that will reward them well. But not one of them cheats/steals/or even bends a few rules. In fact most are scrupulous about their finances and monitor things closely. That may be no small part of growing their wealth too.

WaryCrow · 06/08/2025 00:05

Of course they do. But because they are rich and have power it’s called things like ‘privatization’ and creating trickle down economics.

It’s the economic history of Britain since at least Enclosure. It used to be well known that law in the Regency and Victorian period was essentially there to protect the assets of the rich. It was overturned gradually with the various fights for the return of rights through the Victorian period which gathered huge pace after the First World War, eventually resulting in the post war settlement and welfare state. That enabled social mobility and a flattening of society that hadn’t been seen since pre-Enclosure times. But as soon as it seemed to start getting serious results, neoliberalism and globalism both started.

There are loads of known stories of individuals and organisations at the centre of the world today that got where they were by exploitation and shady deals - IBM, Microsoft. At least Carnegie, following an earlier pattern of Victorian entrepreneurs (all very exploitative), gave wealth back, with no conditions or strings attached. That kind of elite philanthropy has gone - if Carnegie had followed Bill Gates’ model, all of our old public libraries would only have been able to order books from Carnegie’s own publishing company.

BassinBas · 06/08/2025 00:06

@Dingledongledell I just think "envy" is an inaccurate word in this context. How can you envy mere wealth, in the abstract? In and of itself it's meaningless. When I look at people I wish I was more akin to, they are people with a particular gift, flair or talent. Surely that's true of most of us. Wealth accumulation is not especially fascinating or awe inspiring.

Swirlythingy2025 · 06/08/2025 00:09

MyAmusedOpalCrab · 05/08/2025 16:48

We hear so much about “hard work” and “smart investments” but let’s be honest, so many rich people didn’t get wealthy by being ethical. From dodgy business practices to exploiting workers, tax dodging, insider deals and straight-up corruption, wealth often comes at someone else’s expense.

Governments bail out billionaires while ordinary people struggle to afford rent. CEOs cut wages and benefits while pocketing massive bonuses. Huge corporations find loopholes to avoid taxes while the rest of us get squeezed.

Obviously not every rich person is a thief but AIBU to think that a lot of them are? That the system is rigged in their favour and they keep getting richer by bending or outright breaking the rules?

after watching the show billions, and reading real life cases basically you need to rig the outcome as much as possible to make profits etc

Swipe left for the next trending thread