Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think we can’t revive the country on the backs of the poor, the struggling, or the middle class?

210 replies

ForBreezySloth · 27/07/2025 20:44

Every time there’s an economic crisis, it seems like the burden always fall on the same groups - through tax hikes, cuts to services, and stagnant wages, while the wealthiest remain untouched. Surely a country can’t truly recover if the majority of its people are struggling just to get by? Yet time and time again, we’re told we all have to “tighten our belts” - except, conveniently, those at the top.

AIBU to think this approach isn’t sustainable or is it just the reality of how economies work?

OP posts:
Nchangeo · 28/07/2025 03:10

also the courage to distinguish between struggling professionals, the comfortably off, and the truly wealthy

What makes one move to the other? It is assets and ‘unearned’ wealth as you say. Saving, risk taking whether investing/ starting a business, asset accumulation etc. Why are we discouraging that.

That is just Gary economics. And he’s race to the bottom in disguised form. He’s not here to save you. He’s literally pulling the ladder up behind him.

IMO; The main problem with the economics in this country atm is low wages, stifled growth and entitlement by everyone that they should get free stuff. And I really mean everyone.

I honestly think it’s getting so bad that we need something so radical it just changes mindset entirely. Give everyone Universal income. Everyone. £500 a week or so.

After that. EVERYONE is taxed at x amount. No caps, no ledges, no brackets. No student loan tax. It’s going to be high. It’s going to be universal. And that is that. It’s going to be the same for capital gains disposals and for income.

Scrap VAT. Scrap stamp duty. Get businesses moving, get the housing market moving.

No one’s in poverty. Everyone is better off in work. Red tape is removed and growth is encouraged.

Sunflowersurprise · 28/07/2025 04:28

ForBreezySloth · 27/07/2025 22:43

I think conversations like this highlight how broken the current framing is. Wealthy shouldn’t just mean a salary number - it should include assets, investments, and how insulated someone is from economic shocks. Passive income like Sunak’s is exactly the kind of thing that needs reform.

I agree that squeezing middle earners through PAYE while letting capital gains slide by lightly taxed isn’t sustainable. That’s why I think we need smarter taxation - not just higher rates but closing loopholes, taxing unearned income properly, and making the system less reliant on a shrinking group of salaried workers. It’s not about punishing success - it’s about asking whether the balance is fair and who’s quietly carrying the weight.

i grew up in a poor household. The dream of financial security is what strove me to study hard and earn more. I earn a v high salary because I worked hard. I studied. Of course my hard earmed financial security should be shared around. What would incentivise others to work hard?

You seem to have no concept of economics and taxes OP. Any uber wealthy person either has or can get a passport of multiple countries. They live in a range of countries throughout the year. They currently choose to pay tax in the UK by living here most. They could change to pay taxes in another country merely by choosing to live a few less weeks in the UK and a few more weeks elsewhere. Trying to base a nations tax take on a few wealthy individuals is a disaster.

Sunflowersurprise · 28/07/2025 04:31

Nchangeo · 28/07/2025 03:10

also the courage to distinguish between struggling professionals, the comfortably off, and the truly wealthy

What makes one move to the other? It is assets and ‘unearned’ wealth as you say. Saving, risk taking whether investing/ starting a business, asset accumulation etc. Why are we discouraging that.

That is just Gary economics. And he’s race to the bottom in disguised form. He’s not here to save you. He’s literally pulling the ladder up behind him.

IMO; The main problem with the economics in this country atm is low wages, stifled growth and entitlement by everyone that they should get free stuff. And I really mean everyone.

I honestly think it’s getting so bad that we need something so radical it just changes mindset entirely. Give everyone Universal income. Everyone. £500 a week or so.

After that. EVERYONE is taxed at x amount. No caps, no ledges, no brackets. No student loan tax. It’s going to be high. It’s going to be universal. And that is that. It’s going to be the same for capital gains disposals and for income.

Scrap VAT. Scrap stamp duty. Get businesses moving, get the housing market moving.

No one’s in poverty. Everyone is better off in work. Red tape is removed and growth is encouraged.

Agree with some of this. You can’t scrappy VAT though. It’s a HUGE wedge of the tax take - 30%~ish.

I had a child diagnosed with a serious illness and someone said to me ‘you’ll be able to claim pip for that’. That is the attitude that is sinking this country. Thinking the government should pay you money for any sort of misfortune.

Sunflowersurprise · 28/07/2025 04:35

HostaCentral · 27/07/2025 22:49

We could go the Nordic model and tax everyone, including the poor, more........They have higher VAT and lower tax thresholds, more people pay higher rates if tax, but get better services.

Until we start doing this - making EVERYONE pay more tax - our public services will continue to lag behind other EU countries. They have better services as the lower earners pay considerably more tax there than they do here.

Sunflowersurprise · 28/07/2025 04:38

ForBreezySloth · 27/07/2025 22:55

Fair point on the GE, it’s true that tax hikes alone won’t solve deep systemic issues, especially if they’re poorly targeted. But the real question is what kind of growth are we prioritising? Growth that concentrates wealth or growth that strengthens the foundations, like healthcare, education and affordable housing?

Raising taxes on working people while allowing capital gains, large inheritances and mega-corporations to slip through lightly isn’t a recipe for sustainable progress, it’s imbalance. The issue isn’t just tax levels, it’s where we tax, who benefits and how we reinvest. I’m not against growth, I just don’t think it should come at the cost of a functioning society.

Capital gains are taxed less to compensate for the risk taken in making that investment. Growth won’t happen if we stifle investment. Look at the massive drop off in CGT tax since the government reduced the nil rate CGT allowance.

RegularHere · 28/07/2025 04:39

BallerinaRadio · 27/07/2025 20:54

We couldn't possibly tax the rich people any more no we don't want them to run away do we however would we cope without the rich people who make us all better off

🙄

You go first. Is life here made better by public services? I think so. The top 1% of income earners pay about 29% of income tax or about 10-15% of all tax take.

How would you choose to make up the gap? You need a 10-15% budget cut (austerity), or a 50% income tax hike on the rest of the taxpayers. Or some equivalent move. What are you choosing?

Sunflowersurprise · 28/07/2025 04:45

ForBreezySloth · 27/07/2025 23:23

I don’t disagree that a strong private sector is important - we do need productive businesses and innovation. But growth that relies on shrinking real wages, precarious work, and weakened public infrastructure is a short-term fix, not a long-term strategy.

On corporation tax and CGT: it’s not just about headline rates, it’s about loopholes, exemptions, and avoidance structures that allow the wealthiest and biggest firms to shift profits or reclassify income. Plenty of small/medium businesses pay proportionally more than multinationals. That’s the imbalance I’m getting at.

And sure, some might move but we shouldn’t be held hostage by that threat. If the price of a fairer society is that some ultra-wealthy individuals opt out, maybe we’re asking the wrong questions about loyalty, responsibility, and what kind of country we want to be.

Multinational companies aren’t evading any taxes. There are international tax laws in place that they are following that allow them to do what they are doing. It’s perfectly legal. Start clamping down on Google and Trump will double our tariffs overnight. It’s such a stupid move to think that these companies are the answer to our woes. There not. SMEs don’t seem to be either as 40% of them evaded tax last year. Not a great advertisement…

Sunflowersurprise · 28/07/2025 04:53

TempestTost · 27/07/2025 23:43

I am curious how this affects their economy more generally? Does it mean people have less to invest in things like business, or homes, for example?

No as housing etc reflect what people can afford. I have lived in Scandinavia and it’s an excellent tax system. Benefits are harder to get so people all work. Childcare is cheaper and deemed better for the child than staying at home (and who’s to argue with their happiness ratings?) and the society is totally invested in everyone working and paying tax. Everyone pulls together for the benefit of the community.

It’s interesting though in recent years to see how immigrants who have a different attitude to society, work and tax are leading to a lot of social unrest. Denmark’s socialist government has massively clamped down on immigration as a result. It’s not playing along with the immigration rules accepted by countries such as the UK, and the government is very popular as a result.

Neurodiversitydoctor · 28/07/2025 05:02

ForBreezySloth · 27/07/2025 22:19

You’re right that fairness is one of those slippery concepts that people interpret differently depending on where they sit in the system. For me, fairness isn’t just about percentages on a payslip but about outcomes and resilience: who ends up financially secure, who can access decent services without stress and who bears the brunt when things go wrong. It’s true that higher earners contribute a lot in income tax but we rarely talk about how wealth (not just earnings) is taxed far less heavily. Capital gains, property portfolios, inherited assets, those are often where inequality calcified.

The point isn’t to say that someone like you, paying a huge bill just to buy a family home, isn’t already contributing. It’s to ask why billionaires and large corporate interests so often avoid proportionate contribution entirely and why political choices keep squeezing people like you instead of addressing that structural imbalance.

So yes, fairness needs a definition. Mine would be: those with the broadest shoulders contribute not just more but in ways that reflect real economic power, not just wage income. And public services should deliver enough values that contributors at every level feel supported, not short-changed.

Contributors are those earning over £55,000

Extravirginolive · 28/07/2025 05:02

I've decided to emigrate. The conversation is always about how to tax more when really the state is far too big.

I'm happy to pay tax in the country I'm going to but not here, it's economic chaos here.

RegularHere · 28/07/2025 05:03

@ForBreezySloth

No one is denying that high earners contribute a lot in raw numbers but fairness in taxation isn’t just about absolute figures, it’s also about how wealth is structured and who bears the brunt when times are tough.

Amazing as it may seem, UK tax is unusually progressive compared to OECD peers, with the burden falling in middle earners being unusually low.

I’d suggest the answer has to be to prioritise growth, and encouraging more high-income people to come here. Which means being careful about top tax rates and the political messaging.

But more than that, we need to move the main political conversation off who bears the burden of tax and cuts, onto how to get the economy growing after 20 years of stagnation. The tax debate is the sticking-plaster. The hard work is to fix the fundamentals to grow the pie.

bingewatchingnetflix · 28/07/2025 05:03

Recently went to NY, Statue of Liberty;

“Give me your tired, your poor, Your huddled masses yearning to breathe free, The wretched refuse of your teeming shore”

They built a very rich country on tired huddled masses, yet unfortunately, here- there seems to be a policy that immigrants aren’t allowed to work?

Please forgive my ignorance if this is incorrect.

Our GDP is low, so our economy is not growing…
millionaires and billionaires, entrepreneurs etc are leaving in their droves..

maybe we are all sick of paying for those with a bad back or those who are lazy.. those who won’t earn a penny for their whole lives..

MikeRafone · 28/07/2025 05:20

BallerinaRadio · 27/07/2025 20:54

We couldn't possibly tax the rich people any more no we don't want them to run away do we however would we cope without the rich people who make us all better off

🙄

Yet HMRC is criticised for not knowing how much the 156 billionaires are paying in tax

do you know something they don’t?

NestEmptying · 28/07/2025 05:37

If you include council tax as well then the working poor are taxed more than the rich.
On percentage of income, the poorest working people pay 48% of their income and the richest 10% pay 39% of theirs. How is that fair?

Nina1013 · 28/07/2025 05:37

ForBreezySloth · 27/07/2025 20:59

I’m not suggesting we ban rich people - just that wealthier individuals and corporations could shoulder more of the burden, especially during crises. Yes, they may pay higher absolute tax but they’re also less affected by cuts to services, stagnant wages, and rising costs. Meanwhile, those with the least are expected to “tighten their belts” while already stretched thin. The point is about fairness and sustainability, not abolishing wealth - though thanks for the leap.

They’d start to leave and take their taxes with them. I never ever thought I’d contemplate leaving the U.K. but even I am (slightly) considering it.

Money gives you freedom, and that includes the freedom to move elsewhere.

mellongoose · 28/07/2025 05:46

They way to give the vast majority of people more money in their pocket is to generate growth.

Controversially, we also need a dramatic reset in the housing market. I wish property was bought as a home, not an investment. It would devalue property (so totally unworkable) but housing costs would drop significantly for everyone.

helphelpimbeingrepressed · 28/07/2025 06:30

What actually needs to happen but never will, is proper property taxes. Either a land value tax or a tax of a percentage of the property value paid yearly. Even changes to inheritance tax would help so that the rate decreases to say 10% but it applies to every estate would disincentivise people from trying to avoid it and raise more money.

None of this will happen because too few people will vote for it. The only tax changes which would be voted in are increases in income tax or wealth tax for other people which won’t raise much money.

bingewatchingnetflix · 28/07/2025 06:34

mellongoose · 28/07/2025 05:46

They way to give the vast majority of people more money in their pocket is to generate growth.

Controversially, we also need a dramatic reset in the housing market. I wish property was bought as a home, not an investment. It would devalue property (so totally unworkable) but housing costs would drop significantly for everyone.

Yes.. that’s a perfect way to growth..
let’s just bankrupt the country now.. reset those house prices .. start again.. maybe they should give homes away to the most ‘worthy’
I think a lot of people have forgotten we don’t live in a Commune and nor should our life experience be dictated by the lowest common denominator of GDP….

KateMiskin · 28/07/2025 06:43

Immigrants to the UK aren't allowed to work? That's the first I have heard of this.🙄

I meant to quote the ppl who claimed immigrants don't work, but quote didn't work. However if posters don't even know the difference between highly skilled immigrants and asylum seekers, and think anyone who looks foreign can't possibly be a net contributor, Reform is definitely in.

MikeRafone · 28/07/2025 06:46

bingewatchingnetflix · 28/07/2025 06:34

Yes.. that’s a perfect way to growth..
let’s just bankrupt the country now.. reset those house prices .. start again.. maybe they should give homes away to the most ‘worthy’
I think a lot of people have forgotten we don’t live in a Commune and nor should our life experience be dictated by the lowest common denominator of GDP….

Y building more council and social housing, this reduces private rental cost, thus stagnating housing prices. If less % of your household income is used for rent - you subsequently have more to spend, which does help the economy

private landlords are apparently selling up anyway and cooperations are buying of plan to rent

footiego · 28/07/2025 07:06

If less % of your household income is used for rent - you subsequently have more to spend, which does help the economy

Why don't more people grasp this point, so much money is spent on housing when it could be put into other parts of the economy.

Aspanielstolemysanity · 28/07/2025 07:06

SchoolDilemma17 · 27/07/2025 21:03

so basically in this country you get punished for working hard and earning a good salary. I know plenty of well educated people with good salaries who are leaving now or have left because of changes to income tax from foreign investments, VAT on private schools, punitive tax if you earn over 100k. These people employ cleaners, PTs, tutors, tennis coaches, nannies, eat out a lot, use taxis more than tubes, give to charity, have private health insurance. You think we don’t need them in the country? They contribute more than half the benefits claimants.

I have lots of colleagues in the charity sector who have lost many of their major donors now. Nobody is better off because wealthy people leave.

Edited

It's such a lie that wealthier people work harder .
The more senior I have become the less hard I have had to work, and the more autonomy and flexibility I have had.

My hardest job was my minimum wage job I did straight after school

footiego · 28/07/2025 07:12

Amazing as it may seem, UK tax is unusually progressive compared to OECD peers, with the burden falling in middle earners being unusually low.

And the reason they can't increase it is housing costs. It's also why a PAYE worker on 100k feels hard done by because so much gets spent on housing costs & the services they pay for are eroding so other countries do look more attractive.

But more than that, we need to move the main political conversation off who bears the burden of tax and cuts, onto how to get the economy growing after 20 years of stagnation. The tax debate is the sticking-plaster. The hard work is to fix the fundamentals to grow the pie.

This, we need something radical to fix it but I am not sure how you get people to buy into it. Currently we are just on a doom loop.

Swipe left for the next trending thread