Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

AIBU to think children shouldn't be naked waist down at Legoland Safari splash?

148 replies

Applesandpears22 · 17/07/2025 17:02

Enjoying a lovely time at the splash safari at Legoland Windsor and people are letting their children go completely naked running around bending over etc, yes they're having fun but I think it's inappropriate here considering the amount of people around.... Maybe I'm a prude, but from a safety perspective, and for other children too,, I don't know, maybe it's not an issue but I don't like it and think the staff should have done something

OP posts:
ItsAMoooPoint · 17/07/2025 19:38

The naked children in these instances are often those who aren't yet fully potty trained, so I'm against it from that perspective 🙈

GlomOfNit · 17/07/2025 19:40

Thefaceofboe · 17/07/2025 19:35

Would you be happy knowing a pedophile was looking at your toddlers genitals? Just because they are a baby/toddler does not mean they don’t deserve respect and for their parents to advocate for them. Jesus Christ

Why take them out of the house* at all in that case? Without a blanket over their head? If a paedophile can't see naked genitals, they will get their rocks off on kids in swimsuits instead. If not that, then fully clothed, etc. You supervise your children fully and keep an eye out, but there has to be a balance between protecting them and allowing them to have a full and free life.

(* you know, of course, that statistically speaking, children are FAR more likely to be abused or violently assaulted in their own homes, than outside them by strangers, right? It's tragic and not intended to be a gotcha but I think - as ever - that many parents have their focus on the potential for a twisted stranger, when in fact most kids who are at risk, are at risk closer to home.)

cherriescherri · 17/07/2025 19:41

I can beat that, when we were there last week someone had their naked son in the gold mine sieving part.

Applesandpears22 · 17/07/2025 19:54

thischarmimgwoman · 17/07/2025 17:44

Absolutely inappropriate - give them some care and privacy and dignity FGS.

Yes, absolutely, this too. Consent matters at any age, and we teach our children that our parts are private....

OP posts:
Thefaceofboe · 17/07/2025 19:57

GlomOfNit · 17/07/2025 19:40

Why take them out of the house* at all in that case? Without a blanket over their head? If a paedophile can't see naked genitals, they will get their rocks off on kids in swimsuits instead. If not that, then fully clothed, etc. You supervise your children fully and keep an eye out, but there has to be a balance between protecting them and allowing them to have a full and free life.

(* you know, of course, that statistically speaking, children are FAR more likely to be abused or violently assaulted in their own homes, than outside them by strangers, right? It's tragic and not intended to be a gotcha but I think - as ever - that many parents have their focus on the potential for a twisted stranger, when in fact most kids who are at risk, are at risk closer to home.)

No this is a pathetic argument I can’t even be bothered writing a serious reply. SURELY you know there’s a difference? A child can have a full and free life without their genitals being flashed to strangers

redbusbeepbeep · 17/07/2025 20:01

GlomOfNit · 17/07/2025 19:40

Why take them out of the house* at all in that case? Without a blanket over their head? If a paedophile can't see naked genitals, they will get their rocks off on kids in swimsuits instead. If not that, then fully clothed, etc. You supervise your children fully and keep an eye out, but there has to be a balance between protecting them and allowing them to have a full and free life.

(* you know, of course, that statistically speaking, children are FAR more likely to be abused or violently assaulted in their own homes, than outside them by strangers, right? It's tragic and not intended to be a gotcha but I think - as ever - that many parents have their focus on the potential for a twisted stranger, when in fact most kids who are at risk, are at risk closer to home.)

Ok, statistically speaking most abuse happens at home, but why wouldn’t you want to minimise the risk of anyone being inappropriate towards your child? Children do not need to be naked in public and you should be ashamed for letting your child do so. End of story.

Applesandpears22 · 17/07/2025 20:01

lnks · 17/07/2025 17:08

So you are sexualising young children.

If I was, I wouldn't have posted this..

OP posts:
dottycat123 · 17/07/2025 20:10

Slightly different scenario but European beaches are always full of naked children and no one seems concerned.

forgivingfiggy · 17/07/2025 20:18

I just don’t see the need for children to be naked in this setting. Hygiene, health and safety, suncream requirements, dignity, setting norms, camera phones, paedophiles - all add up to ‘maybe best to put on swimwear’. What’s the benefit of nudity? I don’t get it.

Thatsjusthowitisyeah · 17/07/2025 20:44

Mikii · 17/07/2025 19:32

I think one big difference is the cameras now. Back then it was a lot less common for people to be taking photos. You only had a roll of film. A bloke sat on the back snapping away at kids would have looked odd. Plus he would have needed to put the camera film in to be developed somewhere. A film entirely of naked children would still have looked suspicious.

But these days EVERYONE has a phone camera. You can take photos slyly by pretending to be texting or talking selfies. Everyone seems to permanently have a phone in their hand so it’s not unusual. Plus everyone else is looking at their own phone and not what strange people around them are doing.

This!

Baby26 · 17/07/2025 20:46

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 17/07/2025 19:34

Surely at that age they're still at risk of having a poo accident?

An accidental poo after age 3? 2 and under yeah.. but most 3 year olds and up are potty trained and don't just poo randomly!

MissScarletInTheBallroom · 17/07/2025 20:52

Baby26 · 17/07/2025 20:46

An accidental poo after age 3? 2 and under yeah.. but most 3 year olds and up are potty trained and don't just poo randomly!

Edited

Yeah well just when I thought we could probably ditch the swimming pants for my almost 4 year old, he had a poo accident at the pool. Whilst standing on the side, not actually in the water, thank god.

He hadn't had a poo accident for almost a year prior to that. But he eats a fuck load of fruit and veg, and there's something about swimming that just seems to relax his bowels. So now I try to make him squeeze one out just before we get in, and he inevitably gets that panicked look on his face and tells me he needs to do a poo NOW just as we are getting out. And inevitably does an absolute monster.

So we won't be ditching the swim pants (which are invisible under his trunks) for a while yet.

244milesnorth · 17/07/2025 20:57

mysecretshame · 17/07/2025 17:34

These threads are always very divisive.
I would avoid allowing (my) young children to be naked anywhere that people had phones (with cameras)

Which would be anywhere including your own garden

Zellycat · 17/07/2025 23:15

Baby26 · 17/07/2025 20:46

An accidental poo after age 3? 2 and under yeah.. but most 3 year olds and up are potty trained and don't just poo randomly!

Edited

According to other threads …. No one potty trains and kids & in reception, yr 1, yr 2 still in nappies …

same scabby parents …. Can’t be bothered swimmers or pants … nor potty training.

gotellsomeone · 18/07/2025 05:21

Baby26 · 17/07/2025 20:46

An accidental poo after age 3? 2 and under yeah.. but most 3 year olds and up are potty trained and don't just poo randomly!

Edited

You would think but mumsnet is full of posters saying their child is starting school and still having accidents
I suspect they would be the same parents who let them run around naked in public

JMSA · 18/07/2025 07:02

lnks · 17/07/2025 17:08

So you are sexualising young children.

How bloody ridiculous.

JMSA · 18/07/2025 07:03

OP, YANBU.

DiscoBob · 18/07/2025 12:38

Busyquaver1 · 17/07/2025 18:00

You do realise Females can also be perverts don't you?

Yeah but I'd say it's less likely. Men with kids can be perverts too. So yeah, I should've just said 'naked kids could attract perverts of both sexes'.

lalalalalady · 18/07/2025 12:44

I’m with you op. I wouldn’t let my children do this at any age and would also be concerned about predators watching. It’s inappropriate to be exposed from the waist down in front of a bunch of strangers.

Isitreallysohard · 18/07/2025 12:46

I think it's fine at the beach, but shouldn't they be wearing swim nappies in a pool??

Rosesanddaffs · 18/07/2025 12:47

Providing they haven’t developed/hit puberty, then I think it’s fine xx

Clockface222 · 18/07/2025 12:49

In my opinion, if there is any danger of photos/videos being taken and ending up somewhere online it is just not worth the risk.

gotellsomeone · 18/07/2025 12:50

Rosesanddaffs · 18/07/2025 12:47

Providing they haven’t developed/hit puberty, then I think it’s fine xx

The whole definition of pedophiles is that they are attracted to children who haven’t developed/hit puberty.

KilkennyCats · 18/07/2025 13:29

Rosesanddaffs · 18/07/2025 12:47

Providing they haven’t developed/hit puberty, then I think it’s fine xx

You just don’t get it, do you?

Superfrog3 · 18/07/2025 13:30

Having worked with both people who have been abused and pedophiles, not on my nelly! My kids have always been taught private parts are private, plus everyone is walking round with cameras and filming/ vlogging constantly at legoland and places like that. Protecting your children is your responsibility! I cant stand it, i also hate it at beaches and swimming pools just pack a swim suit.

Swipe left for the next trending thread