Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

4 yrs for cutting down tree, no jail time for rape

464 replies

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 19:45

Why are 2 men being given custodial sentences for cutting down a tree when men convicted of rape regularly get suspended sentences.

Is an important tree more important than a random woman! Justice system seems to think so.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
12
SunnyViper · 15/07/2025 21:57

What bs. No one gets a suspended sentence for rape.

KaleQueen · 15/07/2025 21:57

@YouWillFindMeInTheGarden because you asked ‘what’s a soft prison?’

CorbyTrouserPress · 15/07/2025 21:58

TheCrenchinglyMcQuaffenBrothers · 15/07/2025 21:52

….

Scottish law is different to English law. I assumed we were discussing English law as the Sycamore Gap criminals were convicted in an English Court. Do you have an example of an adult convicted of rape in England getting a suspended sentence?

CinnamonBuns67 · 15/07/2025 21:58

Just because rapists don't get the sentences they should doesn't mean we shouldn't punish people who do "lesser" crimes.

I agree that justice system is ridiculous and there needs to be reform where rapists should be getting harsher punishments but I also think the people who cut their tree deserve their 4 years in prison. I personally think rapists/child molesters should get a life sentence.

Kemblick · 15/07/2025 22:00

TeenagersAngst · 15/07/2025 21:46

You and your husband should be more livid about your lack of critical thinking.

😂

Serencwtch · 15/07/2025 22:01

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 21:13

Three men handed suspended sentences for sexual offences against underage girl groomed over social media | Greater Manchester Police https://share.google/ayZH6FsBsT0FntpR3

There are no rape convictions in this case.

Agree that it is an insanely light sentence for appalling acts on very young children but there was no conviction for rape in this case.

Yes there are wider issues with the rate of conviction for rape but it is incorrect to state that they were found guilty or convicted of rape.

SL2924 · 15/07/2025 22:01

No sympathy for them. They deserved it. Some people just want to watch the world burn.

That’s not to say that there also shouldn’t be tougher sentences for rapists.

OonaStubbs · 15/07/2025 22:02

Prisons are far too soft. And there are free playstations. And prisoners do get a choice of food, and that is all free too. Law-abiders have to pay for food and games consoles whereas law-breakers get it all for free.

KaleQueen · 15/07/2025 22:03

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 21:34

Yes it is

That's essentially my point
.the level of disproportion is mind boggling.

What does it say about how society views the suffering of rape victims?

I don’t think it says anything.
I think it’s been long known that the justice system in this country is fucked up.
Today, it wasn’t. They got a prison sentence. It’ll be reduced. It’ll be in a category D. They pose no huge risk to people. But that sentence was needed for many reasons.
We could talk for decades about the unfairness of our justice system. Personally I’d like to see rapists cut in half with chainsaws. I’d happily watch.
But no matter how angry you feel about injustice in that area of the system (which o totally agree with) you can’t really compare this case.

Thingyfanding · 15/07/2025 22:03

Emotionalsupporthamster · 15/07/2025 21:41

By this logic no tree should ever be cut down, and by that measure of value that tree wouldn’t be any more special than a street sycamore that was planted 150 years ago. In fact it’d be less valuable. Nonsense.

my earlier point was that it’s subjective. Some would argue that trees are more important than humans. We produce CO2 where as trees absorb large quantities of it.
trees are essential to the existence of our planet and the ecosystem- humans are not. 4 years is the right sentence.
Trying to compare it to a rape case is just bonkers

MarxistMags · 15/07/2025 22:05

I can think of a lot of people more deserving of jail time than them.
I never knew anything about that blasted tree and couldn't care less about it.

OonaStubbs · 15/07/2025 22:06

Comparing the sycamore gap tree to "any old tree" is ridiculous. If someone deliberately damaged a painting of dogs playing snooker in a pub, they'd get fined. If they deliberately damaged the Mona Lisa they'd get a very harsh sentence, and rightfully so.

nam3c4ang3 · 15/07/2025 22:06

yeah - its wild isnt it. Im not from here but it absolutely astounds me how lenient the system is here - im my country we have the death penalty.

Grammarnut · 15/07/2025 22:07

Very true. If cutting down a tree gets 4 years (and I agree with this sentence - do not cut down beautiful trees) then a rapist should get life with parole.

CorbyTrouserPress · 15/07/2025 22:07

MarxistMags · 15/07/2025 22:05

I can think of a lot of people more deserving of jail time than them.
I never knew anything about that blasted tree and couldn't care less about it.

So because you didn’t know about the tree they should get away with breaking the law? This makes no sense.

SALaw · 15/07/2025 22:07

@krustykittens the report and news story contain terrible findings but still don’t back up the OP’s comment on convicted rapists regularly receiving community service orders.

KaleQueen · 15/07/2025 22:07

@MarxistMags Well lots of people did so I feel sorry for your me me me attitude and lack of care for a thing of beauty. Says a lot about you.

Tiswa · 15/07/2025 22:09

The problem isn’t sentencing - the sentence here seems perfectly fine for the crime and the average sentence for rape is between 4 to 19 years

the issue in the justice system is the fact very few cases make prosecution and even fewer make sentencing - that is the issue

CorbyTrouserPress · 15/07/2025 22:11

nam3c4ang3 · 15/07/2025 22:06

yeah - its wild isnt it. Im not from here but it absolutely astounds me how lenient the system is here - im my country we have the death penalty.

As you’re not from England please don’t believe the OP’s claim that there is ‘no jail time for rape’ as this is categorically not true if convicted, although I do agree that sentencing for rape is still too lenient.

lessglittermoremud · 15/07/2025 22:13

ObelixtheGaul · 15/07/2025 19:58

YANBU. I was watching a truly awful episode of 24 hours in police custody last week. This man had thousands of images and videos of girls in their late teens/early twenties, video footage of him raping girls obviously not fully conscious. Victims had no idea what he did to them.

10 years he got because he pleaded guilty to one count of rape, one count of voyeurism and one count of public exposure. 10 years for a vile individual who groomed young women, got them to his flat, got them so drunk/drugged they couldn't consent. Footage included him dragging a young woman, unconscious, across a concrete floor. She was naked.

When someone gets 4 years for chopping down a tree, 10 years for all that individual did is doubly insulting, as if it wasn't insulting enough.

I saw that as well and couldn’t believe he got off with such a light sentence, he’ll be out in half that time.
I personally think they should have had to do community service, something forestry based and having to plant lots of lovely trees.
The tree was iconic but when you look at the sentences others receive for things like causing death by dangerous driving etc it does seem bonkers

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 22:13

Thingyfanding · 15/07/2025 21:37

missing the point - there wouldn’t be any women without trees

And you think that's why this sentence was higher? Because of the oxygen abilities of this tree?

How long are the sentences for the deforestation of the Brazilian rainforest? How long is each tree surgeon getting?

How long is the sentence for everyone who removes trees overhanging their property?

Your argument is odd

OP posts:
ToClimb · 15/07/2025 22:13

ExtraOnions · 15/07/2025 20:46

They have 4 years, but will be released probably half way through.

Rape is a minimum of 4 years .. in most cases longer, and these are minimum sentences, so no early releases.

People are conflating things

They will be released after a maximum 40% of their sentence. Possibly earlier on home detention curfew.

Barnbrack · 15/07/2025 22:16

OonaStubbs · 15/07/2025 22:06

Comparing the sycamore gap tree to "any old tree" is ridiculous. If someone deliberately damaged a painting of dogs playing snooker in a pub, they'd get fined. If they deliberately damaged the Mona Lisa they'd get a very harsh sentence, and rightfully so.

I wonder which would receive the harsher sentence, sexual violation of the painting theona Lisa or sexual violation of a living breathing woman

OP posts:
EarthwormJem · 15/07/2025 22:16

If you give a slap on the wrist and some community service to people who destroy national landmarks for a cheap thrill, we might as well say goodbye to the rest of them (not least in the age of dickheads doing social media stunts).

I'm fine with this sentence and surprised at the "its just a tree" posts, which just seem stupidly reductive.

TheCrenchinglyMcQuaffenBrothers · 15/07/2025 22:16

CorbyTrouserPress · 15/07/2025 21:58

Scottish law is different to English law. I assumed we were discussing English law as the Sycamore Gap criminals were convicted in an English Court. Do you have an example of an adult convicted of rape in England getting a suspended sentence?

…..

4 yrs for cutting down tree, no jail time for rape
Swipe left for the next trending thread