Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Constance Marten case — I feel the police have some responsibility too

881 replies

Siff · 15/07/2025 09:46

I know Constance Marten and her partner made dangerous and illegal choices, and I’m not excusing that — a baby died and that’s heartbreaking. But I can’t stop thinking about the way the case was handled and whether the police have some responsibility in how things unfolded.

As a mum of four who’s struggled mentally after birth, I keep thinking: if I had just given birth, was vulnerable, and felt like the whole world was hunting me down — would I have thought clearly? Probably not. The media coverage was intense, and the police were everywhere. The pressure must have been overwhelming.

I honestly believe the fear created by the police operation pushed them into making more and more desperate and risky decisions to stay hidden. It wasn’t just a search — it felt like a witch hunt. No safeguarding, no attempt to reach her as a vulnerable mother, just a hard push to capture and punish.

I think that approach had consequences. The police must take some responsibility for creating the kind of fear and pressure that led to this tragedy. The way they went about it likely made things worse — not better — for the baby.

It’s easy to say she was selfish or unstable, but mental health in the postnatal period is fragile. People don’t always think rationally when terrified. I just wish there had been more humanity in how it was all handled.
Anyone else feel the same?

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
LetsGoRoundAgainAgain · 17/07/2025 15:39

If they attend they certainly won't stand.

EmeraldShamrock000 · 17/07/2025 15:40

For such an apparently intelligent person, she was daft as a brush, thinking that she could pretend to be an Irish traveller with no identification, arrive at hospital, have a baby, get a house, just by putting on an accent.

I think she showed signs of insanity as a much younger person, the family shame stopped them getting her psychiatric help, shipping off to Africa to cure her, it proves intelligent people are very stupid, the consequences were deadly to so many people.

LetsGoRoundAgainAgain · 17/07/2025 15:46

I don't think she's daft I think she's insanely entitled and looks down on everybody else. She has a bizarre sense of superiority.

CultureAlienationBoredomandDespair · 17/07/2025 16:04

Yon can’t upload documents on here but if you look on Tattle and Websleuths both have the judgements from various family court hearings. It’s clear that SS worked with them extensively (CM in particular) and gave them many, many chances to be better parents but they were entitled and thought they knew better than anyone else.

Wizzywoo18 · 17/07/2025 17:09

It will be interesting to see if there are pre-sentencing psychiatric reports and whether the couple agree to talk. I suspect she won't co-operate but I wonder if their conduct during the cases will impact their sentencing too?

Apparently none of Marten's family attended the second court case and have not visited her in prison.

soupyspoon · 17/07/2025 17:40

Arran2024 · 16/07/2025 21:53

OK so why NFA? Marten and Wood were convicted of child cruelty among other things. Surely if you have your children removed for starving them, not changing nappies so they have to be cut off....I simply dont understand why they don't prosecuted. Is there just an understanding that the children are safe now, they didnt die so what's the point?

You'll have to ask that query of police forces, not other agencies. Most crimes that are reported are NFA. There isnt enough above the threshold to progress to CPS and even if there is at that stage the CPS may feel they havent got enough. I have worked with some parents who have prosecutions of child neglect but they arent the majority, most result in NFA

soupyspoon · 17/07/2025 17:44

Elleherd · 17/07/2025 13:45

Just to say when Gordon was released from his 20 week sentence, she still in the M&B placement and just left the baby for 17 hours to go see him.
Her behaviors overall resulted in a family courts six month supervision order of her and the baby.
She simply left Wales shortly afterwards to go live in London, where they got kicked out of a series of houses for not paying rent (she had money from her trust fund at the time) and so the supervision order fell by the wayside as they kept moving on. (The state those houses where left in tells it's own story of a need for CP)
There appears to have been no anti-natal care with the second child. (probably because SS would have picked up on the abandoned supervision order on the first baby.) A private midwife was called when she was in labor, but she'd already given birth by the time the midwife arrived. Gordon refused to tell the midwife his name, and got angry with her when he discovered she'd called an ambulance.

They turned up to contact with the children when they felt like it on and off but also were making all sorts of demands of the contact center, and refusing to come if the demands weren't met. There was a lot of grandstanding about how they felt things should work, their concepts of their rights, lots of entitlement, and lots of paranoia.
What there wasn't was a sense of how all this stuff might affect the children. They were cared about in some senses, but also pawns to be used to justify the parents sense of entitlement.
It is possible that towards the end of the situation, there was fear of pregnancy No 5, being noticed, but I'm also not sure of the timeline there, it isn't likely in the earlier not turning up episodes where they were actively making demands.
I suspect by then they'd decided it was a done deal and mentally moved on.

None of this is uncommon Im afraid. It may sound shocking but theres lots of this behaviour from parents. Not unusual.

HonoriaBulstrode · 17/07/2025 18:48

I have worked with some parents who have prosecutions of child neglect but they arent the majority, most result in NFA

Is it because in many cases the principal witnesses are the young children themselves, and it would only add to their trauma to make statements, even if they were able to?

soupyspoon · 17/07/2025 18:54

HonoriaBulstrode · 17/07/2025 18:48

I have worked with some parents who have prosecutions of child neglect but they arent the majority, most result in NFA

Is it because in many cases the principal witnesses are the young children themselves, and it would only add to their trauma to make statements, even if they were able to?

Yes partly, a lot of the evidence is what the social worker or teacher saw and while that is powerful enough, that is a witness/observer, not the victim.

Its very traumatic for children to talk about how they are parented, many are scared, many are loyal and many dont see that theres anything wrong.

AliasGrace47 · 17/07/2025 18:55

Jellycatspyjamas · 15/07/2025 10:10

It really isn’t, if anything children are left for far too long in situations that are intolerable. A lot of work is done with women to support their parenting but ultimately when domestic violence escalates, protecting the children through removal becomes the option of last resort.

In this case it’s alleged he threw her out of a window, at what point do you think a newborn should be protected in those circumstances.

Edited

I really feel a lot of these posts are acting like adult women have no agency. My own mother was abused, it's horrific. But the mother is still a grown human being w a rational mind. Infantilising women & acting like they have no choice does no one any good.

softlyfallsthesnow · 17/07/2025 18:57

@TallerSally
Excellent post

BeachPebbleWave · 17/07/2025 19:02

I think sentencing will be interesting. This pair did their utmost to frustrate proceedings. The Guardian article gives real insight into this and the judge has clearly led a fair trial in the most difficult circumstances (and managed his own frustration with the pair very well) - especially when CM tried to throw the whole thing.

I very much suspect he will be finely crafting his words over the summer and I wouldn't blame him in taking some pleasure in doing this.

I suspect they won’t turn up though.

AliasGrace47 · 17/07/2025 19:04

Siff · 15/07/2025 10:24

Embarrassing, I didn’t know about that CCTV image showing them wrapped up while the baby was in the buggy with no blanket. Honestly, that was shocking to see.

The reason I started posting was because this whole case provoked such strong feelings in me, imagining how I’d react if someone was trying to take my babies away. But obviously, I’m not them and can’t fully know what they were going through.

That's the issue here I think- you're a kind, normal mother trying to empathise w this cruel, evil Constance. She was not a normal person. It goes without saying that Mark Gordon is certainly not!

Ted27 · 17/07/2025 19:34

@Arran2024

My last foster child made some serious disclosures to me about things that happened several months prior to coming into care.
When the police came to speak to them, they refused to talk. It was too traumatic, also they were terrified that the children left in the home, wouldn't love them anymore if they were removed from the home. They were convinced that the parents didn't do these things to the siblings. He was definitely the scapegoat of the family.
Neither would the siblings talk to the police.
So although I had a highly traumatised young person, it was blatantly obvious that something bad had happened, no injuries, no bruises, no evidence so NFA

whynotwhatknot · 17/07/2025 20:40

how they havent ripped her apart in prison i dont know shes a baby killer

Elleherd · 17/07/2025 20:47

BabyCatFace · 17/07/2025 15:35

Ian Josephs? Wow. Where did you read that he was involved? That man is bordering on sociopathic and lives in his own reality too. You know he won't feel any remorse about helping them either - probably still believes they weren't at fault for Victoria dying.

Yes, most of them are. I know all about him, and some others connected to him and the Ireland North Cyprus exits . Once you get them together what starts as 'alternate mental realities' can become a very real thing, especially where money can be waved.

I believe it was CM who brought up Ian Josephs, his Forced Adoption website, his supposed intelligence and position, and the ease of 'hiring someone to take Victoria abroad' in her first trial.
Had she not been the subject of an intense very public police search, and made herself way to hot to handle and left everything way too late, that plan actually wouldn't be as ridiculous as she sounded in court, but the realities of that is a conversation difficult to have publicly in these times.

I originally read about her connection/s and that timeline in a 'minority paper' but this is a conformation from The Times:

Facing the threat of court proceedings, Marten contacted Ian Josephs, a retired British businessman based in Monaco, who runs a campaign helping parents threatened with what he describes as “forced adoption”.

Ian Josephs
Josephs recalled: “We would have spoken three or four times and I gave her advice on how to keep her children, to take them to Ireland or France where they do not have false adoptions.”

Separately:

"Josephs, 92, said: “She should not have returned voluntarily from Ireland. I said to her, ‘You are free to go back [to the UK] but don’t take the children with you’. But she took the chance, and lost them.”

I think I'm allowed to say I would be very surprised if his 'advice' was not rather more detailed. It's quite common currency.

Arran2024 · 17/07/2025 20:47

soupyspoon · 17/07/2025 17:40

You'll have to ask that query of police forces, not other agencies. Most crimes that are reported are NFA. There isnt enough above the threshold to progress to CPS and even if there is at that stage the CPS may feel they havent got enough. I have worked with some parents who have prosecutions of child neglect but they arent the majority, most result in NFA

My daughtercwas admitted to hospital 4 times before the age of 1 for losing weight. Each time she put on weight only to be discharged and lose weight again. She was being starved. This is documented, as is the stay in the residential centre. So they had proof. They also had older siblings who might have talked, but I have since spoken to them and they say they weren't asked.

Basically imo sws liked the birth parents and tried to keep them out of trouble.

BabyCatFace · 17/07/2025 21:17

Arran2024 · 17/07/2025 20:47

My daughtercwas admitted to hospital 4 times before the age of 1 for losing weight. Each time she put on weight only to be discharged and lose weight again. She was being starved. This is documented, as is the stay in the residential centre. So they had proof. They also had older siblings who might have talked, but I have since spoken to them and they say they weren't asked.

Basically imo sws liked the birth parents and tried to keep them out of trouble.

I'm sorry but your belief that social workers could have any influence on police or CPS decisions is deluded

CaptainFuture · 17/07/2025 21:23

Arran2024 · 17/07/2025 20:47

My daughtercwas admitted to hospital 4 times before the age of 1 for losing weight. Each time she put on weight only to be discharged and lose weight again. She was being starved. This is documented, as is the stay in the residential centre. So they had proof. They also had older siblings who might have talked, but I have since spoken to them and they say they weren't asked.

Basically imo sws liked the birth parents and tried to keep them out of trouble.

Who was starving her?

Elleherd · 17/07/2025 21:32

soupyspoon · 17/07/2025 17:44

None of this is uncommon Im afraid. It may sound shocking but theres lots of this behaviour from parents. Not unusual.

I'm afraid my own experiences mean I don't find it shocking or unusual, but sadly don't find rotten behaviors from those supposed to protect particularly shocking or unusual either.
Messed up and rotten people occupy all positions in life. We can do more these days to keep them out of some professions, but not parenthood until after they've proved their priorities.

StrawberryFlowers · 17/07/2025 21:36

CaptainFuture · 17/07/2025 21:23

Who was starving her?

I assume the bio parents

Arran2024 · 17/07/2025 21:49

CaptainFuture · 17/07/2025 21:23

Who was starving her?

Birth mother

EmeraldShamrock000 · 17/07/2025 23:46

It is disgraceful that abusive parents aren't prosecuted, abuse DC are up there with abused women, not worth the time.

As we share a common law, I can say that our countries are falling because there is no consequences for violence unless it results in murder, failure to increase prison space is probably the biggest factor.

At least you have domestic adoption, children in Ireland are forever fostered without parental consent. 🥲

LookingAtMyBhunas · 19/07/2025 12:13

OP I hope you're still reading these because I've just watched the BBC Big Cases documentary on this and you starting this thread has pissed me off all over again.

It's purely because the police worked their arses off with CCTV and media appeals that they were found when they were, someone recognised them from the media appeals and called 999.

Watch the part where they get arrested.

They both refuse to tell the police, who you can tell are doing all they can to keep it together as the clock is ticking to save her, and he demands FOOD. They give him some chicken and he demands MAYONNAISE ffs.

All while their babies decomposed body in lying in a lidl bag for life hundreds of miles away.

They know exactly where she is but never told the police, they had to find her themselves.
I hope the officers who found her had good support.

And I hope you've reflected and now realise that it is ONLY because the police put the pressure on that they were found when they were and hadn't fled the country and justice, and innocent Victoria could be given the tiny bit of dignity in the end she deserved and her own parents never afforded her.

Watch the BBC documentary.

Swipe left for the next trending thread