Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Not answering straight away

103 replies

nikkkii · 11/07/2025 20:34

I had a message this morning asking if my daughter would like a sleepover at a friends house tomorrow.
I was at work and didn’t get to answer it until this evening.
I have accepted the invitation but been told they have made other plans now as I didn’t reply.
AIBU to think this is unfair?

OP posts:
Pyramyth · 12/07/2025 08:31

I think it is fair enough as it was a sleepover invitation not something bigger but I certainly have days at work where I don't take a break apart from to go to the loo and I can't necessarily access my phone. If I take a ten minute break to eat, which is very normal, I might look at my phone to check my husband hasn't texted but won't read every What's App as I sometimes have loads.

LlynTegid · 12/07/2025 08:35

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 02:09

Some people just cannot comprehend that a lot of people are at work all day, in jobs where they just don't have chance to see their phones - and often there may not actually be a signal.

Yes, you're supposed to have breaks - but these can often be very oversubscribed with essential stuff you have to do and/or difficult to even take in practice.

And it's not just a 10-second "Yes, please" message, as there will be lots of follow-up timings, arrangements and general chat. It can easily end up taking half an hour that you simply do not have available; and the kind of person who can't understand people being at work with limited phone access will be the same kind of person who would assume you'd suddenly given them the cold shoulder and would take great offence if you did reply back and forth for half an hour but then stop because you had to be back in work.

Some people maybe have very little going on in their lives, and so six hours or more without a response may seem like an absolute age and complete snub to them; but to somebody who is busy at work, it's not that long at all.

You also get the people who will email a company at 4:55pm on a Friday and then be absolutely horrified and disgusted that they don't reply until 9:05am on the Monday!1

Edited

I can think of organisations you behave as if every family has someone at home all day- BT/Openreach for example.

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 08:45

Travelfairy · 12/07/2025 02:53

I have friends like this and often wait for hours even days for a reply. Reading this thread i will absolutely just make other plans!!

Taking days to reply is really not acceptable.

Adhdsucks · 12/07/2025 08:49

Unless you are a surgeon in an hours long operation, a pilot without a co-pilot flying a plane or something similar I think you could have replied. You chose to reply later assuming that would be ok and it wasn’t. Shit happens.

MsDDxx · 12/07/2025 08:50

Pennyforyourthoughtsplease · 12/07/2025 02:52

I missed this, what do you use auto reply for, is it like "too busy, can't answer"? In which case surely not responding speaks for itself?

Anything you like! Yes, just to say Thanks for the message. I’ll respond asap kind of thing.

I also don’t have the blue ticks etc. I hate others knowing that I’ve read their message etc. it makes me feel harrassed. 😂

ldgso · 12/07/2025 08:52

I can see how it would feel a bit shit, but unfortunately they can’t hold off all of their plans in case you message back hours later.

I can see why they made other arrangements sorry.

Pennyforyourthoughtsplease · 12/07/2025 08:56

MsDDxx · 12/07/2025 08:50

Anything you like! Yes, just to say Thanks for the message. I’ll respond asap kind of thing.

I also don’t have the blue ticks etc. I hate others knowing that I’ve read their message etc. it makes me feel harrassed. 😂

I see, although I think it's a sad indicator of society if people need an auto response when they text someone 😕 "Read" ticks are also intrinsically bad, lead to so many assumptions 😬

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 08:57

savagedaughter · 12/07/2025 02:38

Nope, everyone understands this perfectly. She doesn't work in a sweat shop with no breaks, she very definitely did stop to go to the loo, have a drink of water and have something to eat and very definitely could have taken the 20 seconds to type "Yes please will text after work :)"

It's fine that she chose not prioritise responding, and it's fine that the other person moved on.

So if the friend is wanting to get the plans made NOW, do you think they will be happy with that - having to wait hours until you're able to message after work, rather than being able to finalise all the details now?

I know people who would actually take more offence at that - the very fact that you've managed to find a moment to send a cursory reply once would be 'proof' to them that you clearly are able to freely respond to messages at work.

330ml · 12/07/2025 09:04

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 08:45

Taking days to reply is really not acceptable.

Par for the course with my DH. He can go days without looking at his phone.

If people want an answer quickly, they ring him or message me.

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 09:08

savagedaughter · 12/07/2025 06:35

By brilliant you apparently mean completely incorrect from start to finish.

Perhaps not quite from start to finish, there are indeed probably people who email at 4.55 and complain that they didn't get a response Monday morning at 9.05, but that is not a relevant comparison and had nothing in common with this situation.

Literally everyone - and I do mean absolutely everyone who has read this thread - recognises that people can be busy all day at work, and most of us have also been in that position. It's not, in any way, a surprising revelation.

For privacy reasons, I am not allowed my phone at work, it's in a locker which I can access on breaks.

So when I am on one of my breaks (which everyone including the OP gets no matter what their job) I check my phone and if there are important messages I respond taking a few seconds to say I am at work and will check in later.

Just like the OP I, and everybody else who has read this thread, prioritise who I respond to based on my own needs and abilities at that time.

The OP did not prioritise the text and decided not to take a few seconds to say "Sounds great, will contact you after work". And that's fine.

The other person then moved on, so that is also fine.

So actually, this post is pointless, and the reply you quoted was incorrect and based on faulty assumptions.

It's perfectly possible to disagree with other people's points without tearing them down like a dog with a bone, you know.

You must surely realise that not everybody in the world is exactly the same as you, with exactly the same circumstances at all times?

I don't know if you intended to come across as quite so arrogant, but slapping down somebody's comments as 'completely incorrect from start to finish' - just because your own personal experiences don't correspond - is really very narrow-minded.

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 09:12

330ml · 12/07/2025 09:04

Par for the course with my DH. He can go days without looking at his phone.

If people want an answer quickly, they ring him or message me.

Fair enough if that's how he prefers to do things; but I then think the balance of sympathy if he misses out on something as a result would then shift sharply - as long as he accepts that.

MasterBeth · 12/07/2025 09:16

Not "unfair", just part of normal back-and-forth of life.

"Ah, never mind. Maybe next time."

GospelOakCloak · 12/07/2025 09:26

I think so OP - I mean even around 2018 I never took my phone to work

LillyPJ · 12/07/2025 09:31

Cucy · 12/07/2025 07:40

How was it a time sensitive invitation? It was for the following day.

Its fine for them to withdraw their invitation but the polite thing would have been to send a second message apologising saying something else has come up.

They knew OP was busy as she didn’t reply.
Many people cannot reply on a break or are somewhere where they cannot check their phones all day.

If they're somewhere where they can't check their phones, how would it help to send a second message saying they'd arranged something else?

OnlyOneAdda · 12/07/2025 09:38

Could the other person see you'd read & not replied? Or are you a brain surgeon / prison office / reception teacher etc who is totally non-contactable during the day and they would know?

Do you have form for this? Could be a deliberately pass agg response.

When DDs were younger there was a mother of one of their group of friends who was like this. Would take days to respond to messages that were usually doing her favours - offering to drop or collect the whole group for an upcoming event etc. She was never the one that did the lifts or hosted the kids. Was a superior, entitled cow that thought she was very important and had a very high flying job (she wasn't and she didn't). Absolutely in the context of her job could have taken 2mins to respond. Used to p* us all off.

Would agree with others that the post & run without responding to the many questions here hasn't done you any favours both generally and in gaining sympathy for this particular issue.

Katherine9 · 12/07/2025 09:56

Pyramyth · 12/07/2025 08:31

I think it is fair enough as it was a sleepover invitation not something bigger but I certainly have days at work where I don't take a break apart from to go to the loo and I can't necessarily access my phone. If I take a ten minute break to eat, which is very normal, I might look at my phone to check my husband hasn't texted but won't read every What's App as I sometimes have loads.

My guess is when you do get to access your phone and reply to messages, you'd apologise for the delay! Not post here about others being unfair!

Swiftie1878 · 12/07/2025 09:59

Seems the OP doesn’t respond to anything in a timely fashion. 😂

Tennislives · 12/07/2025 10:00

They were trying to make plans, you couldn't confirm quickly, within one hour, so they moved on to make other plans.
Very reasonable of them.
I would do exactly the same.
I tend to put a time limit on such things so everyone knows where they stand.

Malvaceae · 12/07/2025 11:56

The OP is too busy to respond to us. Perhaps she will be back in a week or so to tell us it was unfair that we stopped posting after a few days of silence.

ilovesooty · 12/07/2025 12:29

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 09:08

It's perfectly possible to disagree with other people's points without tearing them down like a dog with a bone, you know.

You must surely realise that not everybody in the world is exactly the same as you, with exactly the same circumstances at all times?

I don't know if you intended to come across as quite so arrogant, but slapping down somebody's comments as 'completely incorrect from start to finish' - just because your own personal experiences don't correspond - is really very narrow-minded.

Well said.

ItDoesntHaveToBeASnowman · 12/07/2025 14:20

SprayWhiteDung · 12/07/2025 08:45

Taking days to reply is really not acceptable.

Really not acceptable. No one owes you a response.

ItDoesntHaveToBeASnowman · 12/07/2025 14:20

i loathe this expectation that we are switched on and plugged in and immediately available.

TeeBee · 12/07/2025 14:41

You snooze, you lose.

Malvaceae · 12/07/2025 15:38

ItDoesntHaveToBeASnowman · 12/07/2025 14:20

i loathe this expectation that we are switched on and plugged in and immediately available.

Right, fair enough.

But, how about the expectation that other people have to wait indefinitely and maybe alter their plans because you haven’t responded to their invitation? Do you really think that you are entitled to have everyone wait for you to get around to responding? Even if that means they can’t plan their social life in the meantime?

ItDoesntHaveToBeASnowman · 12/07/2025 21:17

Malvaceae · 12/07/2025 15:38

Right, fair enough.

But, how about the expectation that other people have to wait indefinitely and maybe alter their plans because you haven’t responded to their invitation? Do you really think that you are entitled to have everyone wait for you to get around to responding? Even if that means they can’t plan their social life in the meantime?

I don’t think there is anything wrong at all with people changing their plans if they don’t receive a timely response. It is utterly fair enough. I don’t expect people to sit around waiting for me.

But I also don’t feel obliged to respond to every single message I get within the senders timescale. Just because you have chosen to message me, does not oblige me to drop everything and respond. I’m not available.