I agree and she sounds so arrogant in the statement.
And I can’t allow any more doubt to be cast on the validity of those memories, or the joy they have given so many.
It’s like she thinks now she’s put out this dubious statement that all talk should magically stop.
Before I go any further, it’s important to say, the Observer were offered the opportunity, by my lawyers, to discuss in detail the allegations made against me to correct their inaccurate account and to be guided on the truth, on the basis that the discussion would not be made public. However, they chose not to take it, preferring to pursue their highly misleading narrative.
She was going to guide them to the truth? Is that a euphemism for trying to charm tnem into accepting her nonsense?