Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

… To be considering leaving the UK?

567 replies

globalnomad25 · 05/07/2025 13:17

We have been considering leaving, even if only for a few years. Many of our clients have already gone or are planning it, and some of our friends too.

I’m not sure where we’d go: UAE, Portugal, Jersey, Ireland, Canada, Australia? We don’t currently want to move to the US, even though that would probably make the most sense from a business/client point of view.

For those out there who have already left, how has it gone? Was it a horrible mistake or are you glad you did it?

For those also thinking about it, where would you go?

Kids are school-aged and smart and used to international travel as our work already takes us all over, although they’d miss their friends (as would we). We aren’t English so our family is already based all over the place, although we visit them frequently.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
5
Absolutely45 · 26/08/2025 08:20

Araminta1003 · 26/08/2025 07:55

The state has to realise that the real assets it could be losing with so many people having dual citizenships and rights to live overseas, is the future workers. Losing a rich late 40s is less of an issue then losing their 3-4 children, given the demographic challenges. Where I live in London, most people I know have the right to live and work in other countries. Add in the anti immigration rhetoric going on, it is quite a worrying state of affairs.
The resource scramble in Europe will be for young skilled & educated workers. We do not value our young enough either. Burdening them ever more with taxes is not a good idea.

Which is why i said we have bigger fish to fry!

Yes we need more skilled young people but as we have no FOM with Europe, we are no longer on their list!

The biggest tax on our young people is tuition fees, almost all European countries either charge nothing or very little.

IHT isn't a consideration for a skilled 20/30 something wanting to move here.

JHound · 26/08/2025 10:46

strawberrybubblegum · 25/08/2025 07:46

IHT in the UK is completely out of proportion - and you can see the consequences play out as wealthy non-Doms - who subsidise the rest of us - started leaving the UK in droves after Labour tried to make them pay IHT on worldwide assets - assets earned and held outside the UK. Totally outrageous cheeky-fuckery!

I think IHT should be abolished - as so many countries have already done. If it isn't abolished, then it should be reformed to be like Denmark - a much lower percentage, but applied to everyone above an admin-cost threshold (Denmark's us 15% for everything above £30k). That's at least fair, although it still encourages economically inefficient behaviour.

I don’t see why tax on worldwide assets is seen as worse than tax on worldwide income.

I am sure both are covered by double tax arrangements (and many simply won’t declare.)

Araminta1003 · 26/08/2025 10:55

I wonder whether we will start charging all British citizens tax like the US, worldwide. And how many people will hand their passport straight back as a result.

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 14:49

GreenIsMyFavoriteColour · 25/08/2025 18:56

The people who the Governement are chasing away are exactly the people other countries will take in the blink of an eye.

Yep, people who are tired of working hard but watching the govt take half and squander it. Now they want to increase taxes even more, increase energy bills while the energy companies give their shareholders millions, increase water costs while not addressing any infrastructure issues, increase costs of train tickets, bus tickets, etc etc. What is the point in such high taxes when the country is in shambles and nothing works? We have to be happy subsidizing lazy fuckers who just want to take from the system without ever paying in and be happy to do it? Fuck that. I am so glad we pulled out of our house purchase here, it feels like we are no longer tethering ourselves to a sinking ship and can finally breathe again.

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 15:41

Letgoofmyblank · 26/08/2025 06:03

IHT isn’t a tax on the person who created the money, but a tax on the recipient. The recipient did absolutely nothing to get the inherited money.

No, but the deceased already paid taxes on the money used to purchase the house, why should it be taxed twice? At the very least, increase the threshold. My inheritance in the US isn't taxed till the estate is worth 14 million for a single person and 27 million for a married couple, and even then it's not remotely as high of a percentage as it is here. While rich people hoarding money certainly doesn't do much to help the situation, UK is also one of the only countries that severely punishes the lower and middle class earners as well. I can certainly see why some people say, why bother, you certainly aren't rewarded for doing well or working hard here.

CanadaNotAMum · 26/08/2025 15:43

ByGreenHiker · 05/07/2025 13:34

Canada is ruinously expensive. Sales tax and tips on everything you buy even on top of an ice cream at a kiosk.

I always find it expensive when I travel to the UK compared to here in Canada. However, yes, sales tax varies by province and is not included in the sticker price. Also, not everything is taxed.

As for tips, it’s expected to tip in sit down restaurants, but it’s not the same as in the US as servers in Canada generally have the same minimum wage as non tipped workers. Tipping for counter service, such as ice cream, will often be prompted by the payment machine as it’s an option in the software and people are greedy and think that because the Americans do it, we should too. But it’s completely acceptable and common to select “no tip” for anything other than a sit down restaurant.

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 15:50

ANON20241 · 26/08/2025 03:40

I've never really understood the concept of IHT. In the UK, you are already over taxed throughout your lifetime, especially if you are a Higher rate tax payer. You contribute more than your fair share to society to support services you probably make very little use of. At some point these key tax contributors will evaluate whether what the UK offers is still worth staying. You can call them selfish - doesn't matter. Life is too short and hard enough as it is. Who wouldn't want the best for their family. We left the UK earlier this year and couldn't be happier. It's like a financial weight lifted off our shoulders.

Where did you go if you don't mind me asking?

Absolutely45 · 26/08/2025 15:50

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 15:41

No, but the deceased already paid taxes on the money used to purchase the house, why should it be taxed twice? At the very least, increase the threshold. My inheritance in the US isn't taxed till the estate is worth 14 million for a single person and 27 million for a married couple, and even then it's not remotely as high of a percentage as it is here. While rich people hoarding money certainly doesn't do much to help the situation, UK is also one of the only countries that severely punishes the lower and middle class earners as well. I can certainly see why some people say, why bother, you certainly aren't rewarded for doing well or working hard here.

Edited

Not really, unless a house was bought shortly before death and cost 500k to 1m to buy, hardly likely.
In most cases, property would have been bought for a fraction of its current value, plus probate values are usually lower than market.

People can get 500k to 1m tax free, none of which cost them a penny, thats very generous really.

Its care costs that fuck up many inheritances, for most it can be a nr 100% tax - people should get a little more wound up about that.

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 16:02

Absolutely45 · 26/08/2025 15:50

Not really, unless a house was bought shortly before death and cost 500k to 1m to buy, hardly likely.
In most cases, property would have been bought for a fraction of its current value, plus probate values are usually lower than market.

People can get 500k to 1m tax free, none of which cost them a penny, thats very generous really.

Its care costs that fuck up many inheritances, for most it can be a nr 100% tax - people should get a little more wound up about that.

I'm pretty sure that the IHT is just calculated on the value of the property at the time of death and does not take into account when it was purchased but I could be wrong. Either way, it's theft.

strawberrybubblegum · 26/08/2025 18:07

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 16:02

I'm pretty sure that the IHT is just calculated on the value of the property at the time of death and does not take into account when it was purchased but I could be wrong. Either way, it's theft.

I think the pp is suggesting that since house prices increase, you and your children don't deserve to keep any difference between what you bought the house for and what it's worth now. It's 'unearned income', you see - so it isn't theft for the state to just take it instead. Unlike negative equity, of course - which is entirely your own problem.

Even though the price tag didn't make any difference as you lived in it... and that very same house price increase means your children likewise need to pay the higher price for the house they'll live in (so really, you're just leaving them the value of a house - exactly the same as someone whose family live in a cheaper area and don't pay inheritance tax)... and you and your children already pay higher stamp duty when you move because of that inflated price tag...

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 23:18

strawberrybubblegum · 26/08/2025 18:07

I think the pp is suggesting that since house prices increase, you and your children don't deserve to keep any difference between what you bought the house for and what it's worth now. It's 'unearned income', you see - so it isn't theft for the state to just take it instead. Unlike negative equity, of course - which is entirely your own problem.

Even though the price tag didn't make any difference as you lived in it... and that very same house price increase means your children likewise need to pay the higher price for the house they'll live in (so really, you're just leaving them the value of a house - exactly the same as someone whose family live in a cheaper area and don't pay inheritance tax)... and you and your children already pay higher stamp duty when you move because of that inflated price tag...

Right, so the person who worked and saved to buy the house or their children don't deserve the fruits of their labour but the state who squanders it away does? No thanks. Luckily we don't have iht to deal with, all of our assets will go to animal charities when we die, but I'm very thankful my actual inheritance is based in the US and someone other than the state will benefit from the money my parents worked so hard to save.

Absolutely45 · 27/08/2025 00:00

strawberrybubblegum · 26/08/2025 18:07

I think the pp is suggesting that since house prices increase, you and your children don't deserve to keep any difference between what you bought the house for and what it's worth now. It's 'unearned income', you see - so it isn't theft for the state to just take it instead. Unlike negative equity, of course - which is entirely your own problem.

Even though the price tag didn't make any difference as you lived in it... and that very same house price increase means your children likewise need to pay the higher price for the house they'll live in (so really, you're just leaving them the value of a house - exactly the same as someone whose family live in a cheaper area and don't pay inheritance tax)... and you and your children already pay higher stamp duty when you move because of that inflated price tag...

Its unearned income, dress i up how you like but thats the reality..... or you can pay CGT on the sale.....as per most of Europe.... take your poison?

Anyway, i'll be dead & past caring, my DD will still be very well off.

ANON20241 · 27/08/2025 01:05

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 15:50

Where did you go if you don't mind me asking?

Singapore.

NoKidsSendDogs · 27/08/2025 01:10

ANON20241 · 27/08/2025 01:05

Singapore.

Ah nice, we lived in Singapore for a while. After the UK I imagine singapore feels like stepping into the future!

Strawberrri · 27/08/2025 05:42

NoKidsSendDogs · 26/08/2025 14:49

Yep, people who are tired of working hard but watching the govt take half and squander it. Now they want to increase taxes even more, increase energy bills while the energy companies give their shareholders millions, increase water costs while not addressing any infrastructure issues, increase costs of train tickets, bus tickets, etc etc. What is the point in such high taxes when the country is in shambles and nothing works? We have to be happy subsidizing lazy fuckers who just want to take from the system without ever paying in and be happy to do it? Fuck that. I am so glad we pulled out of our house purchase here, it feels like we are no longer tethering ourselves to a sinking ship and can finally breathe again.

But to be fair these issues have been left to run by previous Govs fora decade +

strawberrybubblegum · 27/08/2025 07:22

Strawberrri · 27/08/2025 05:42

But to be fair these issues have been left to run by previous Govs fora decade +

The current government have over-reached, and made it really obvious that they're not running the UK for our benefit. The slowly-boiled frogs have started looking around and saying 'haang on a minute!'

Absolutely45 · 27/08/2025 07:28

strawberrybubblegum · 27/08/2025 07:22

The current government have over-reached, and made it really obvious that they're not running the UK for our benefit. The slowly-boiled frogs have started looking around and saying 'haang on a minute!'

Remind me again when a Govt last cared about the population? other than the 6months leading into an election.

This Govt is just another self serving example.

Tories had 14 years to sort out IHT, energy, housing and did SFA.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page