Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

New abortion laws

351 replies

Cheesetoastie537 · 17/06/2025 07:41

TW

I'm pro choice but the new potential abortion law changes feel a bit extreme to me. If I've understood right, if a woman was even in late stage of pregnancy (even say 35 weeks) could self abort the pregnancy and not face any charges for the death of a viable baby. I thought the 24 week mark was there for that reason. I know a woman still can't get a medically assisted abortion after 24 weeks (unless certain circumstances) but surely they'll just go home and do it now because theres nothing preventing them. No one should be in that situation surely. But if it was a case that a late pregnancy is now not wanted but a medically assisted abortion is not available and the woman knows they can do it themselves with no charges, wouldn't that just increase self done abortions?

If anything, shouldn't the law just change so that medical abortion at any stage is allowed then to at least make it safe for woman rather than them attempting a self abortion.

I'm not sure if the change in law opens up more issues than it fixes. And in part I feel that there's no protection for late pregnancies that the baby would have survived and now there's no legal charges for their life.

I've never really thought too much about abortion otherthan pro choice and felt the UK had a good middle ground.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
6
LameBorzoi · 18/06/2025 23:11

Thatsalineallright · 18/06/2025 10:59

If a baby/fetus is dependent on the mother's body for survival, then I agree that it should be the woman's choice to have an abortion or not.

But if the baby can survive outside the mother's body, then there is a choice: killing the baby or allowing it to be born early - with potential health implications for the baby, but still alive and with a chance to thrive. Many premature babies live long, happy lives.

If you're saying it's better to kill a baby/fetus rather than risk potential health complications, that is a scary view. Close to eugenics I would say. Should preterm babies be allowed to die because trying to save them means they might have health problems later on?

It's not just "health complications". Being very preterm can leave you unable to see, talk, or move.

New posts on this thread. Refresh page
Swipe left for the next trending thread