Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

40 year old man - spoilt by mummy

104 replies

Profpudding · 07/06/2025 12:47

If this was your son, what would you make of it?
Just spotted my younger 40-year-old brother on holiday with his mother.
Alone
He has six children and he couldn’t have taken one of them with him.
He would’ve only been paying for airfare, Parents cover everything else when they get there so we’re actually saying that it didn’t cross anybody’s mind. To invite the children.
I would also point out that these kids have probably never had a holiday in their life. They’ve been raised in absolute poverty due to his lack of contribution generally.
If that was my son, I’d be kicking him up the arse not buying him an ice cream
Oh, and he does work.

OP posts:
Emmz1510 · 08/06/2025 09:58

I totally get your resentment at this situation, especially if she is also your mother and perhaps deep down you feel unfavourably treated in comparison to him? Your post isn’t clear about whether she is also your mother so Im sorry if I’ve got this wrong.
He sounds like a feckless useless father but the holiday issue is kind of separate. Also we don’t know enough to really make a judgement. We don’t know what level of contact he has with the kids (if it’s little or none then taking them on holiday would hardly make much sense or be in their interests would it?), what contact they have with each other (so therefore how they would perceive him taking one kid and not the others), whether he’s a suitable person to be taking them on holiday and whether their mothers would be happy with it. Maybe the budget of whoever was paying didn’t stretch to including children. He works but holidays are expensive? If mother chose to fund it all that’s really her look out although I suspect there is a reason you’ve gone no contact. If that’s what’s happened here.
It would be better for you to let go of your bitterness and resentment and leave them all to their shitty devices.

HappyDayzAhead1 · 08/06/2025 11:53

BoundaryGirl3939 · 08/06/2025 09:08

It's not up to you to judge OP.

This type of thinking is what allows these feckless, selfish, pathetic men get away with it in the first place.

OF COURSE OP can judge, as can the rest of us. Might make these sperm donors sit up and think more if people showed their true disgust to them

GreenCandleWax · 08/06/2025 11:56

ZoggyStirdust · 07/06/2025 13:03

So just to be clear
he’s split with the mother of his kids, doesn’t contribute to them, and is now on holiday with his parents?

while the not contributing is not on, I don’t see anything wrong with going away with your parents when you’re unemployed and single.

Where do you get "unemployed" from. OP was clear in her post that "he does work". Did you not read this?

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 12:00

HappyDayzAhead1 · 08/06/2025 11:53

This type of thinking is what allows these feckless, selfish, pathetic men get away with it in the first place.

OF COURSE OP can judge, as can the rest of us. Might make these sperm donors sit up and think more if people showed their true disgust to them

Especially if it came from his own mother but, What can you do apparently?

OP posts:
GreenCandleWax · 08/06/2025 12:29

Createausername1970 · 07/06/2025 13:48

Not wanting to criticise other women, but if you are the third or fourth in a line, then it's also what the mother has knowingly signed up to. He had shown his true colours six times.

Your brother's choices are not reasonable but it generally takes two to make a baby and contraception is definitely something the female can take control over in this day and age.

"the female"? 😒

GreenCandleWax · 08/06/2025 12:33

countingthedays945 · 07/06/2025 19:59

Anyone who has 6 kids, unless they earn a shit load of money, is a waster in my book. It reeks of a lack of responsibility. Going on holiday with his mother is the least of his negative traits!

Who is paying for their upkeep? Is it the taxpayer? 😡

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 12:36

GreenCandleWax · 08/06/2025 12:33

Who is paying for their upkeep? Is it the taxpayer? 😡

Obviously

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 12:44

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 12:36

Obviously

That’s not obvious at all, their mothers could easily be working.

ZoggyStirdust · 08/06/2025 12:44

GreenCandleWax · 08/06/2025 11:56

Where do you get "unemployed" from. OP was clear in her post that "he does work". Did you not read this?

Misread. It happens. I apologise but there’s no need for you to point it out quite so aggressively…

makes no difference to my point. He’s fine to have a holiday, fine that it’s with his parents, fine that he’s not taken all (any of) his kids. Not fine he doesn’t contribute

GreenCandleWax · 08/06/2025 12:50

BoundaryGirl3939 · 08/06/2025 09:27

Maybe your mother feels he is vulnerable and lost in life. Parents tend to become focused on the weaker children. Perhaps they both have similar weaknesses and can identify with each other.

Issues like this used to annoy me years ago. My brother got away with murder. Now I realise that my brother is an anxious and underconfident mess who struggles to cope. I don't mind the extra leeway as right now he can't cope.

Not sure what the underlying issue with your brother is but I would let them at it, and just be glad I'm not him.

Let's hope that your brother who unfortunately cannot cope, did not or does not manage to "cope" with creating six pregnancies with different women. There's no excuse for that. Hoping your DB is not similar in his behaviour to OP's anti social irresponsible deadbeat B.

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 12:52

BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 12:44

That’s not obvious at all, their mothers could easily be working.

They aren’t.
Just because the mother’s only have two children with him each does not mean that was the end of their parenting journey.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 12:53

Maybe they’re not working but it’s far from obvious that they’re not. There are tens of thousands of single parents who work.

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 12:55

BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 12:53

Maybe they’re not working but it’s far from obvious that they’re not. There are tens of thousands of single parents who work.

Well, they’re not the subject of this discussion.

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 12:59

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 12:55

Well, they’re not the subject of this discussion.

But they could be. You’re just determined to paint the mothers of those children as feckless scroungers.

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 13:00

BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 12:59

But they could be. You’re just determined to paint the mothers of those children as feckless scroungers.

Honestly, I couldn’t care less whether they claim benefits or not. Far as I’m concerned, the father should be paying for them. He could afford the First Two if he couldn’t afford the subsequent 345 and six, then they shouldn’t have been born.
What the mothers do is have no interest to me. They are not my relatives.
It’s hardly not feckless though to have additional children with somebody that doesn’t see the first two or the first four no pay for any of them.

OP posts:
BeenzManeenz · 08/06/2025 13:49

This reads like you are bitter and jealous he got a free holiday. Its nothing to do with you, mind your own business.

If you're bothered about his kids being neglected then call social services. But that isn't really what this post is about, is it.

If my brother went on holiday with my parents I'd think nothing of it, I'd say have a lovely time, send me photos.

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 14:10

BeenzManeenz · 08/06/2025 13:49

This reads like you are bitter and jealous he got a free holiday. Its nothing to do with you, mind your own business.

If you're bothered about his kids being neglected then call social services. But that isn't really what this post is about, is it.

If my brother went on holiday with my parents I'd think nothing of it, I'd say have a lovely time, send me photos.

Ahhh the old bitter and jealous gaslighting

OP posts:
HopscotchBanana · 08/06/2025 14:23

Profpudding · 07/06/2025 13:14

Would Taking them on holiday, not make their lives easier give them a bit of joy ?
As a grandparent, would you be buying your 40-year-old an ice cream when you don’t see the other kids the actual children
I just find it all incredible

If he's not with the mum, presumably this is her contact time, so no he shouldn't be taking the children anywhere?

What their mum does in her free time is not the dad's concern and vice versa.

You hating your mum and your brother, and them having gone away together and the pictures winding you up, I would suggest is an entirely separate issue.

RampantIvy · 08/06/2025 15:12

HopscotchBanana · 08/06/2025 14:23

If he's not with the mum, presumably this is her contact time, so no he shouldn't be taking the children anywhere?

What their mum does in her free time is not the dad's concern and vice versa.

You hating your mum and your brother, and them having gone away together and the pictures winding you up, I would suggest is an entirely separate issue.

There are three mums in this case. The brother likes to spread his seed.

MissRaspberryRipples · 08/06/2025 16:55

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 12:36

Obviously

To be fair their mums could be working. It's not necessarily the case that they're all sat on full benefits..by your own admission you've not even met the two youngest kids their mum could've got herself a job-its not impossible. I'm a single parent myself and don't sit on benefits

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 17:03

MissRaspberryRipples · 08/06/2025 16:55

To be fair their mums could be working. It's not necessarily the case that they're all sat on full benefits..by your own admission you've not even met the two youngest kids their mum could've got herself a job-its not impossible. I'm a single parent myself and don't sit on benefits

To be fair what the mothers do or don’t do is absolutely irrelevant to this conversation.

The First Two for the time that I knew them were on benefits and, what else were they supposed to do given the circumstances?
That may have changed it may not again. It has absolutely nothing to do. With the issue hand

OP posts:
BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 17:25

To be fair what the mothers do or don’t do is absolutely irrelevant to this conversation.

It isn’t. You said they were “obviously” funded by the taxpayer. You can’t suddenly say it’s irrelevant when it suits you.

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 17:27

BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 17:25

To be fair what the mothers do or don’t do is absolutely irrelevant to this conversation.

It isn’t. You said they were “obviously” funded by the taxpayer. You can’t suddenly say it’s irrelevant when it suits you.

Yes, I can.
I replied specifically to one poster and answered their specific question.
That does not change the course of the whole conversation

OP posts:
HopscotchBanana · 08/06/2025 17:50

RampantIvy · 08/06/2025 15:12

There are three mums in this case. The brother likes to spread his seed.

Then it's "mums" not mum.

Makes little difference to the principle of non contact time.

BIossomtoes · 08/06/2025 17:51

Profpudding · 08/06/2025 17:27

Yes, I can.
I replied specifically to one poster and answered their specific question.
That does not change the course of the whole conversation

Not been on MN long,have you?