No, you misunderstand. Women’s work has everything to do with it. It’s part of the system of gender that oppresses women and girls (and boys too) and clothing is part of that system. Why do you think so many of these women are falling over themselves to scold OP for considering putting her son in ‘girls clothes’? All they had to do was see the ‘girls’ label on the item and off they go. It might be subconscious rather than an actual choice to uphold stereotypes but that’s even sadder because it means they’ve absorbed those gender stereotypes without realising.
And no, it’s not because the shorts are ‘babyish’, the pearl clutching is because they say ‘girls’ and the OP’s child is a boy. Boys mustn’t be ‘s*ssies’, boys mustn’t be like girls, they must be masculine, macho, not walk around in gingham shorts or pink cardigans. Indeed, pink cardigans, you imply, should be saved for wearing in the home only - wtaf? 😂 My son wore the pink cardigan outside and no-one teased him.
And the Lego and not so gendered clothes from my childhood did work. But, perhaps they worked too well? All these years and women still aren’t equal. This step backwards to gender stereotypes suspiciously coincided to the time when equality seemed in sight.
Girls can wear ‘boys clothes’, boys can wear ‘girls clothes’. Girls can play with ‘boys toys’, boys can play with ‘girls toys’ (ooh, and I’ve just remembered that my son had a Barbie doll too. He asked me to buy it for him so I did. What I didnt do is tell him it was a girls’ toy 🙄). Women can do ‘men’s work’, men can do ‘women’s work’. Women can be tough and brave, men can be gentle and caring.
Why does this need saying in 2025?