Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Junior Doctors Unemployment in August

1000 replies

PurpleFairyLights · 17/05/2025 22:13

Name changed but long term poster. Have a child that is in this situation with 100k of student debt.

https://www.itv.com/news/granada/2025-05-07/bma-we-could-potentially-see-thousands-of-unemployed-doctors

Unbelievable this was allowed. Most countries protect their medical graduates.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
46
Needmoresleep · 31/05/2025 22:07

How is training accessible if many need more than one go round and there are no jobs in the interim.

Were you not on the previous thread, coming out with the same claptrap?

I came across this a week or so back by Dr Martin Scurr in the Mail. . Behind a paywall so I cut and pasted. There was another good article in the Times which I meant to keep, but need to look for. The key things may be that:

  • Chris Whitty is running a review into post grad training. Someone to write to?
  • it makes no different how we educate of training doctors if we don't employ them, but instead employ doctors who have been through quite different educational approaches, sometimes with very little patient contact.
  • the author is advocating soft skills rather than marks and assessments. Quite at odds with the current arms races of research etc to get onto training and the failure to take any note of actual performance on the wards. .

"Chris Whitty to little fanfare and even less news coverage, last week saw the conclusion of NHS England’s ‘call for evidence’ into its long-overdue review into postgraduate medical training (the five to 15 years after medical school when you become a GP or hospital specialist). We need to be honest; the current system to train doctors is failing patients and driving some of the brightest and most compassionate out of medicine.
Thirty years ago, when I was a medical student, training had changed little compared with 100 years before: we saw mostly treatable illness – infections, heart attacks, cancers and injuries – and conditions where it was easy to work out which specialist we should refer complicated cases to.
The best doctors knew the signs of each condition and remembered how to treat them.
The world is a very different place now, with technology from DNA analysis to MRI scanners revolutionising how we diagnose.
At the same time, expectations and complexity of patients, who live longer but with ill health, have increased exponentially.
A&E corridors aren’t just filled with easily identifiable and treatable conditions, but elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions and younger patients with complex combinations of physical and psychological symptoms. Meanwhile, training has become focused on producing medics rigid in their specialty, under-prepared for the reality of today’s patients.

Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England
This much-needed review of medical training – led by Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, and Stephen Powis, Medical Director of the NHS – is meant to fix that. While there is no date for the review to be published, the real rub is that it ignores undergraduate education – the foundations of doctor training – and says little about preventing illness in the first place.
The fact is, we need training less about memorising guidelines and biochemical pathways and more about navigating grey zones – how to make decisions and work as part of a multidisciplinary team.
The NHS needs empathetic clinicians helping patients come to the right decision for them rather than just telling them what to do.
But that needs specific training, too, as explaining risk is a complex skill many doctors need to be taught. We also need clinicians who know how to interpret clinical evidence, so the treatments and tests they undertake are the ones that are most effective.
They also need to be experts in ‘human factors’ – how to work safely using checklists, feeling they can speak up about problems and learning from errors.
But these crucial areas are often neglected for a system obsessed with assessments and exams, even though the real-world version of medicine – especially in A&E and GP surgeries – doesn’t come with mark schemes. It comes with uncertainty, competing priorities and decisions that need to be made about real patients, not ‘textbook’ ones.

How do you manage the overweight 28-year-old with back pain whose chronic pain is ultimately due to her lifestyle? How do you decide that the frail 84-year-old shouldn’t be treated for high cholesterol because the drugs may give them painful muscles and make them more prone to falls?
These patients don’t fit neatly into the speciality training we have, and are suffering as a result.
Importantly, we must train doctors in health promotion and illness prevention, stopping the horse from getting out of the stable, rather than just running ever faster after it as it bolts.
It means teaching doctors what patients do in their 30s onwards affects their health in their 60s.
It means teaching student doctors about nutrition, sleep training and how to reduce chronic inflammation and stress – all causes of our most prevalent diseases that could be preventable.
Currently, the training on these topics is inadequate. All doctors of the future need to be generalists at heart – people who understand physiology but also psychology and public health, and who have the confidence to say, ‘What this patient needs isn’t another tablet – it’s strength training, a better diet, supplements, involvement in a community project and someone to talk to.’
That’s what will truly make a difference. I hope that is what this review concludes – otherwise the current crisis in the NHS and the poor care that patients like the 78-year-old who broke her hip and who could die early because of it, will – scandalously – just continue."

OneMorePiece · 31/05/2025 22:25

Needmoresleep · 31/05/2025 19:38

I am sure they are.

There is even a big row going on within the BMA between the Resident Doctor committee who want training, and the GP committee which is very IMG dominated (I have previously posted links of reports in The Pulse.)

I have also posted this:

https://bapiotrainingacademy.com/two-plus-two-programme/

A mismatch. Many we train don't stay. Many with training numbers don't want to work in less popular deaneries. So BAPIO 'helpfully' fills the gaps.

Nicer perhaps if young doctors in the UK could be given the same opportunities or have access to similar training programmes.

One thing is clear from the debate is that cries of racism are almost inevitable. And the Government is very sensitive to being called racist, even though many, both in medical schools or on this board, are not white.

Quoted directly from a BAPIO newsletter. :

'The UK has a moral obligation to support the health systems of source countries. This could include financial compensation for training costs, partnerships to strengthen healthcare infrastructure, and bilateral agreements to manage migration more ethically. Programs like the Tropical Health and Education Trust (THET) have shown promise but need to be scaled up.'

It just seems that they are getting as much out of the NHS as they can in what looks like an India first policy.

I don't understand why in addition to helping to place Indian IMGs sponsored by BAPIO in the NHS, there is also an expectation on the UK to do a lot of work out in India to compensate India for taking their workforce. How much of taxpayer's money and the NHS budget is spent keeping BAPIO satisfied? Also, isn't the UK helping India already? When they have an extra 70k plus Indian medical students graduating from Indian medical schools than they have postgraduate Indian training places, after placing many Indian IMGs in the NHS, training capacity in the NHS is reduced for UK doctors. It just seems to me that our NHS and politicians, perhaps too fearful of being called racist if they don't oblige, are ever ready to accommodate all recommendations and requests by this lobby group.

This lobby group is calling out the UK on the ethics of recruiting from India yet happy to charge wealthy IMGs tens of thousands of pounds to be fast tracked into the UK. What a bunch of hypocrites!

PurpleFairyLights · 31/05/2025 22:30

Needmoresleep · 31/05/2025 22:07

How is training accessible if many need more than one go round and there are no jobs in the interim.

Were you not on the previous thread, coming out with the same claptrap?

I came across this a week or so back by Dr Martin Scurr in the Mail. . Behind a paywall so I cut and pasted. There was another good article in the Times which I meant to keep, but need to look for. The key things may be that:

  • Chris Whitty is running a review into post grad training. Someone to write to?
  • it makes no different how we educate of training doctors if we don't employ them, but instead employ doctors who have been through quite different educational approaches, sometimes with very little patient contact.
  • the author is advocating soft skills rather than marks and assessments. Quite at odds with the current arms races of research etc to get onto training and the failure to take any note of actual performance on the wards. .

"Chris Whitty to little fanfare and even less news coverage, last week saw the conclusion of NHS England’s ‘call for evidence’ into its long-overdue review into postgraduate medical training (the five to 15 years after medical school when you become a GP or hospital specialist). We need to be honest; the current system to train doctors is failing patients and driving some of the brightest and most compassionate out of medicine.
Thirty years ago, when I was a medical student, training had changed little compared with 100 years before: we saw mostly treatable illness – infections, heart attacks, cancers and injuries – and conditions where it was easy to work out which specialist we should refer complicated cases to.
The best doctors knew the signs of each condition and remembered how to treat them.
The world is a very different place now, with technology from DNA analysis to MRI scanners revolutionising how we diagnose.
At the same time, expectations and complexity of patients, who live longer but with ill health, have increased exponentially.
A&E corridors aren’t just filled with easily identifiable and treatable conditions, but elderly patients with multiple chronic conditions and younger patients with complex combinations of physical and psychological symptoms. Meanwhile, training has become focused on producing medics rigid in their specialty, under-prepared for the reality of today’s patients.

Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England
This much-needed review of medical training – led by Chris Whitty, the Chief Medical Officer for England, and Stephen Powis, Medical Director of the NHS – is meant to fix that. While there is no date for the review to be published, the real rub is that it ignores undergraduate education – the foundations of doctor training – and says little about preventing illness in the first place.
The fact is, we need training less about memorising guidelines and biochemical pathways and more about navigating grey zones – how to make decisions and work as part of a multidisciplinary team.
The NHS needs empathetic clinicians helping patients come to the right decision for them rather than just telling them what to do.
But that needs specific training, too, as explaining risk is a complex skill many doctors need to be taught. We also need clinicians who know how to interpret clinical evidence, so the treatments and tests they undertake are the ones that are most effective.
They also need to be experts in ‘human factors’ – how to work safely using checklists, feeling they can speak up about problems and learning from errors.
But these crucial areas are often neglected for a system obsessed with assessments and exams, even though the real-world version of medicine – especially in A&E and GP surgeries – doesn’t come with mark schemes. It comes with uncertainty, competing priorities and decisions that need to be made about real patients, not ‘textbook’ ones.

How do you manage the overweight 28-year-old with back pain whose chronic pain is ultimately due to her lifestyle? How do you decide that the frail 84-year-old shouldn’t be treated for high cholesterol because the drugs may give them painful muscles and make them more prone to falls?
These patients don’t fit neatly into the speciality training we have, and are suffering as a result.
Importantly, we must train doctors in health promotion and illness prevention, stopping the horse from getting out of the stable, rather than just running ever faster after it as it bolts.
It means teaching doctors what patients do in their 30s onwards affects their health in their 60s.
It means teaching student doctors about nutrition, sleep training and how to reduce chronic inflammation and stress – all causes of our most prevalent diseases that could be preventable.
Currently, the training on these topics is inadequate. All doctors of the future need to be generalists at heart – people who understand physiology but also psychology and public health, and who have the confidence to say, ‘What this patient needs isn’t another tablet – it’s strength training, a better diet, supplements, involvement in a community project and someone to talk to.’
That’s what will truly make a difference. I hope that is what this review concludes – otherwise the current crisis in the NHS and the poor care that patients like the 78-year-old who broke her hip and who could die early because of it, will – scandalously – just continue."

Very interesting. I like and respect Chris Witty. He was on the wards during covid.

Very good point about why educate if not employing the doctors. Also regarding differences in training. Presumably the UK medical school curriculum was created to service our population so why are we transplanting a medical school curriculum from India etc? India's population is very different so their medical school curriculum will have a different focus.

Why can't all countries prioritise their own medical graduates and respect other countries prioritising their own graduates?

OP posts:
awishes · 31/05/2025 22:55

@wannabewitch well that's wish my son had started F1 at your hospital then as I can assure you everything I have said is true and happened! And now as he is CST1 he is regularly working 60plus hours a week, not rota'd hours. Why would I fib about it.
I have to listen to him every evening on his long cycle home debating if he should cook or revise because he's lost another 2 hours.
I wish it wasn't true but it is.

PurpleFairyLights · 31/05/2025 23:09

awishes · 31/05/2025 22:55

@wannabewitch well that's wish my son had started F1 at your hospital then as I can assure you everything I have said is true and happened! And now as he is CST1 he is regularly working 60plus hours a week, not rota'd hours. Why would I fib about it.
I have to listen to him every evening on his long cycle home debating if he should cook or revise because he's lost another 2 hours.
I wish it wasn't true but it is.

I think Wannabe is joking about being a doctor. The information is just so out of date and/or inaccurate. Also the hard, unpleasant tone towards our DC.

OP posts:
OneMorePiece · 31/05/2025 23:25

PurpleFairyLights · 31/05/2025 23:09

I think Wannabe is joking about being a doctor. The information is just so out of date and/or inaccurate. Also the hard, unpleasant tone towards our DC.

Edited

Didn't that bunch of comments come in from a couple of posters just as a few of you started discussing IMGs and the lobby group? Got you all off that topic. Happened before in other threads.

LeviOceanStar · 31/05/2025 23:46

I wonder if private eye would be interested in the lobby groups / courses / BMA angle? They are quite interested in waste and conflicts of interest and not seemingly too worried about being contraversial or unpopular.

Dr Phil Hammond does a regular column.

PurpleFairyLights · 31/05/2025 23:51

OneMorePiece · 31/05/2025 23:25

Didn't that bunch of comments come in from a couple of posters just as a few of you started discussing IMGs and the lobby group? Got you all off that topic. Happened before in other threads.

Oh yes I think that happened a few days back as well. I think someone commented that they may be someone interested im keeping the status quo.

I suspect there may be a few interested parties watching this thread.

OP posts:
PurpleFairyLights · 31/05/2025 23:56

LeviOceanStar · 31/05/2025 23:46

I wonder if private eye would be interested in the lobby groups / courses / BMA angle? They are quite interested in waste and conflicts of interest and not seemingly too worried about being contraversial or unpopular.

Dr Phil Hammond does a regular column.

That is a good idea.

Will add to the list.

If any journalists want more information there are a few of us that could explain doctor training in more detail as it can be confusing.

OP posts:
Needmoresleep · 01/06/2025 07:48

My two previous threads:

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5267503-aibu-to-be-furious-that-there-are-no-jobs-for-young-doctors

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5275818-aibu-to-be-angry-that-government-policy-means-young-doctors-nurses-and-other-hcps-cannot-find-jobs

There have been others probably starting about 18 months ago when problems started to bite. If you look at the bottom of the page they are listed.

My thread was sparked when a group of us whose DC had all applied to medical school at the same time realised that none of our DC expected to be able to find work or training. I was aware that DD had quickly moved from loving her job, and even buying a house, saying she wanted to stay for the foreseeable future, to being very negative and talking about giving up medicine. I thought it was her, but we then realised the system was denying our DC a career path and that they were each handling it in their own way.

(The house is proof she is in a remote place. You can find four bed properties near her current hospital for £60,000! Should she have to move it is a way of having somewhere to come back to rather than, like so many doctors starting on the property ladder in her mid 30s - another cost of the current approach.)

Our DC are different. went to different types of schools, in different parts of the country, different ambitions, and with different ethnic backgrounds. Yet they were all struggling.

This thread is also different. There are, finally, a lot fewer calls of racism. I think the poster whose DC had studied in Eastern Europe finally realised that their DC, who may or may not have been a MN style genius, was likely to face the same issues. I think BAPIO, or our current friend, are also realising that awareness is growing and that suggestion that UK trained doctors are cannot turn up to work on time, lazy and in other ways not ready to take responsibility simply serves to irritate.

Some of the criticism I have heard of BAPIO (and I bend the ear of everyone I come across - Friday was the husband of a friend who is a connected Whitehall lobbyist and who threw out a few ideas and promised to think some more) is coming from South Asians (I speak an Asian language and attend events related to that country). My impression is that it is seen as a boys club, representing interests including commercial interests, of specific boys. Others, including NHS staff of South and SE Asian origin, are unhappy about the strength of this group and the lack of sensitivity towards what might be described as the host population. They have worked hard for the NHS and have integrated well with their colleagues and their community. Their children are British. The last thing they want as they are on the verge of retirement in the Britain that they see as home is a group promoting difference and disadvantaging their children and the children of their friends.

They also understand, because they went through the same themselves, the value of British training and the choices then available to international doctors. Close to 30 years ago when I first returned from Asia, I was invited to the house of an Asian doctor friend who had returned to the UK at the same time as me, specifically invited to support research led by a former boss of hers. Everyone else was a doctor, all nearing consultancy level and the conversation was about next steps. Commit to the UK, return home or take a very well paid job in the growing Singaporean private health market. Even back then the NHS was crumbling and the UK cost of living was high, though the value of the more open British society was also appreciated. The NHS is now even more difficult and salaries have fallen in real term, and my friend reports that colleagues who decided to stay face a second round of decision making when their children go off to University. They thought they would stick it out, but a decade of the sort of salary that a Consultant with good experience in a London teaching hospital can command in Dubai or Singapore is tempting. Indeed I know a very senior and well regarded British born and trained doctor who took the Dubai dirham as a final post retirement job.

(FWIW my friend is very shocked at what is happening to my DD. Not least because we have a mutual friend in Asia whose DC are the same age as mine and whose mother has used her expertise, money and contacts to guide them through the system. Private medical school with in Asia with hospitals in Europe etc. Struck lucky during Covid when her DC was graduated early and retained, and now GP training, where the mother's knowledge and support means he had all the CV enhancements in terms of research, competitions and higher level academic programmes. It had been a bit of a joke. A determined Asian mother and perhaps not the most promising raw material. Despite his mothers contacts he was not able to get into one of the University medical schools in his own country. In fairness he has stuck at it, but for various reasons and even if he were British, I don't think many in our friendship group would prefer him over DD or indeed over the good F2s they work with. And very unlikely he will stay once his training is over. Clean and remunerative private medicine is more his thing.)

The last thread ended as a real bunfight caused by determined thread diverters. I received some useful and informed PMs, one of which confirmed that BAPIO were present. We should take heart from the more subdued reaction this time. MN itself is a useful way of spreading the word. But we can each, in our own way keep chipping away. (MPs, contacts.) Awareness is growing. There are more articles and more statistics. Stermer has already warned the NHS that it needs to wean itself off reliance on imported labour. Things will change, because they can't carry on as they are. But for the sake of our own DC we need to speed the process up.

AIBU to be furious that there are no jobs for young doctors | Mumsnet

Yes, you read it right! At the end of their two foundation years (F1 & F2), young UK trained doctors are struggling to find work. They don’t wa...

https://www.mumsnet.com/talk/am_i_being_unreasonable/5267503-aibu-to-be-furious-that-there-are-no-jobs-for-young-doctors

PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 12:44

@needmoresleep thanks for this post. Very interesting and concerning too.

I agree that momentum is building. It has now been on LBC. The presenter did not have a clue this was happening and was shocked. There was absolute disbelief about the situation.

This must be treated as an emergency. Government has been caught asleep at the wheel and we have found ourselves in a situation where those that are influencing NHS doctor workforce planning are causing problems with resilience and do not care about the greater good of this country.

Why is the UK workforce being flooded by IMGs so nearly 50% of our doctors were not trained in the UK? The NHS is not a training college for IMGs. IMGs have a role in the NHS but only when UK graduates take priority.

I am going to put in a series of Freedom of Information requests this week as their are so many concerns but the picture is getting clearer by the day.

OP posts:
OneMorePiece · 01/06/2025 13:35

Quoted BAPIO from an article in the Indian press. It is linked below. Threatening nil workers if they don't get their way. Our politicians should not be bossed about by lobby groups!

"We will be writing to the Home Secretary urgently to seek clarification; we hope that this does not include doctors and nurses because if it does, we can assure the Home Office that the number of doctors and nurses coming to the UK from India will be nil," said Dr Ramesh Mehta, founder of the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO), the UK's largest representative body for nearly 80,000 doctors and 55,000 nurses of Indian origin.

"But even if the changes apply only to care workers, it is extremely unfair if they are not allowed to bring their family. For anyone to provide a satisfactory and good quality care service, they can't be separated from their own family," he said.

https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2023/Dec/05/uk-cautioned-against-unfair-visa-crackdown-on-indian-professionals-students-2638862.html

UK cautioned against 'unfair' visa crackdown on Indian professionals, students

UK cautioned against 'unfair' visa crackdown on Indian professionals, students

LONDON: Groups representing skilled professionals and students from India on Tuesday expressed concerns over a lack of clarity around the UK government's latest

https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2023/Dec/05/uk-cautioned-against-unfair-visa-crackdown-on-indian-professionals-students-2638862.html

PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 13:47

OneMorePiece · 01/06/2025 13:35

Quoted BAPIO from an article in the Indian press. It is linked below. Threatening nil workers if they don't get their way. Our politicians should not be bossed about by lobby groups!

"We will be writing to the Home Secretary urgently to seek clarification; we hope that this does not include doctors and nurses because if it does, we can assure the Home Office that the number of doctors and nurses coming to the UK from India will be nil," said Dr Ramesh Mehta, founder of the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin (BAPIO), the UK's largest representative body for nearly 80,000 doctors and 55,000 nurses of Indian origin.

"But even if the changes apply only to care workers, it is extremely unfair if they are not allowed to bring their family. For anyone to provide a satisfactory and good quality care service, they can't be separated from their own family," he said.

https://www.newindianexpress.com/world/2023/Dec/05/uk-cautioned-against-unfair-visa-crackdown-on-indian-professionals-students-2638862.html

Thanks for that. I am shocked they appear to have so much power.

OP posts:
OneMorePiece · 01/06/2025 14:01

PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 13:47

Thanks for that. I am shocked they appear to have so much power.

Edited

Article from December 2023 while the Conservatives were in power. No, the article appears to have been a response to changes James Cleverly brought in.

Obviously we can't be sure but I imagine they must be trying to put similar pressures on Wes Streeting and the current government.

With being an IMG lobby, perhaps they put an IMG (India first) interests first approach on workforce planning. I am surprised how they seem tone deaf to the numbers of UK MGs unemployed while their lucrative businesses promote expensive courses to new IMGs. How much has it cost the taxpayer to implement every recommendation they have demanded of the NHS?

PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 15:15

Will be requesting proof reading and other suggestions to send document to.

What do you think about not bothering to send to BMA and GMC,?

OP posts:
PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 15:16

Can anyone help me start a petition to highlight UK graduates plight?

OP posts:
mumsneedwine · 01/06/2025 15:24

This is awful. Same take home pay as 20 years ago, and money is worth so much less now.

Junior Doctors Unemployment in August
PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 16:08

mumsneedwine · 01/06/2025 15:24

This is awful. Same take home pay as 20 years ago, and money is worth so much less now.

Shocking

OP posts:
PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 16:46

Could someone with experience of creating a Twitter storm (X) DM me? Thanks

OP posts:
awishes · 01/06/2025 16:49

mumsneedwine · 01/06/2025 15:24

This is awful. Same take home pay as 20 years ago, and money is worth so much less now.

No student loan deduction either, my DC's maintenance loan and tuition is over £130k.

PurpleFairyLights · 01/06/2025 16:59

awishes · 01/06/2025 16:49

No student loan deduction either, my DC's maintenance loan and tuition is over £130k.

My DC has been a doctor for 4 years. Lives in a shared house with no prospect of buying own home. The debt is crippling.

OP posts:
KnickerFolder · 01/06/2025 18:49

KnickerFolder · 31/05/2025 18:52

Yes, BAPIO, the British Association of Physicians of Indian Origin took the UK government to court when immigration rules changed to favour EU and UK applicants for training contracts. TBF, they had a point that those doctors who were encouraged to apply for roles in the UK and were already working here should have been allowed to remain.

BAPIO run the scheme for IMGs that a PP posted.

They also took the The Royal College of General Practitioners and GMC to court (and lost) accusing them of discrimination because IMGs were 16 times more likely to fail the clinical skills assessment than white UK candidates.

I am going to correct that. I am not entirely sure how BAPIO is linked to the BAPIO Training Academy that runs the training programme that was linked to, other than the president and founder of BAPIO is the Chairman and a shareholder of the BAPIO Training Academy. It is a UK limited company.

OneMorePiece · 01/06/2025 19:35

KnickerFolder · 01/06/2025 18:49

I am going to correct that. I am not entirely sure how BAPIO is linked to the BAPIO Training Academy that runs the training programme that was linked to, other than the president and founder of BAPIO is the Chairman and a shareholder of the BAPIO Training Academy. It is a UK limited company.

BAPIO Training Academy is a training arm of BAPIO. BTA is a lucrative business running courses, some charged at over £30k to place new IMGs in NHS posts. Fast tracking, licensing exam (PLAB) exemptions etc. They have obtained a licence to sponsor IMGs from the GMC, making the whole process smoother for IMGs.

Interestingly, the BMA Council Chair from 2017 -2022, Dr Chaand Nagpaul is on the advisory board of the BAPIO Training Academy.

Also if you go on the BAPIO website, in the main picture, the jolly looking lady laughing while they pose for the picture is Dr Navina Evans who is the Chief Workforce Training and Education Officer in the NHS. Not sure if she still is though.

Placing all these IMGs in various roles in the NHS and getting recommendations implemented possibly a breeze for BAPIO. Somehow the workforce planners seemed to have overlooked the cohort of doctors facing unemployment.

KnickerFolder · 01/06/2025 20:49

BAPIO is a not for profit organisation registered with the Charity Commission.

The BAPIO Training Academy Limited is a private limited company with 6 shareholders.

mumsneedwine · 01/06/2025 20:56

50% of medical students looking to not be doctors

https://academic.oup.com/pmj/advance-article/doi/10.1093/postmj/qgaf071/8136441

And BAPIO is an over arching organisation to get doctors to the UK from India. Seems to have lots of friends in very high NHS places.

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.