Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

School's punishment of all boys in year 6

605 replies

htdt · 16/05/2025 17:28

My son is in Year 6 and has done SATS this week, today was meant to be a fun day for them as they've finished all the papers.

But my son came back from school really upset as the teachers had separated the girls and boys and he says the girls got to do fun activities and given treats but the boys got told off and given a lesson on respect.

He's taken this badly and has said things like 'I must be bad because I'm a boy'.

It's such a shame because he's worked really hard and was otherwise enjoying SATS week, but now feels horrible about himself, the teachers who told them off and the girls getting rewarded when all the boys were punished.

I feel like I need to speak to the school next week and find out what's gone on and why. I also feel like making a complaint. But I'm not sure what they are going to do to make things better even if they did agree with me that it was not a great way to deal with some boy's bad behaviour and also very bad timing so should I just forget about it...?

OP posts:
Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:34

Bigfatsunandclouds · 17/05/2025 08:27

Are we sure it was a punishment and not just a lesson in respect? Did they actually tell them off or was this perceived telling off? I have heard many teachers talk about the rise of Andrew Tate and incel culture being pervasive in primary schools so if it was a lesson around that then I'd have less of a problem.

What treat did the girls get?

It’s a massive issue. And each incoming year group in secondaries is worse than the year before. In all areas of behaviour. Primaries aren’t addressing it all and by the time they get to secondary a lot of the behaviours are embedded. And a relentless them from parents of just not knowing.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:37

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:33

I would if my child wasn’t racist and had not taken part in racist behaviour, had been tested hard all week for the good of school data and had lost out on a reward.

No it isn’t a completely different issue.

It is a completely different issue. Quite literally set out in law.

FrippEnos · 17/05/2025 08:38

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:30

Feel free to come up with examples where there’s been a sudden power shift and girls have the power and are able to discriminate against a protected group.

Why does there need to be a "sudden power shift"?

When I was at school there was a group of girls that would go round tripping up boys in younger years, holding their legs open and kicking them in the balls.

This according to you should have resulted in all girls being punished. But what generally happened was the girls got away with it and anyone that tried to stop them were verbally abused by them and reported to the teachers who then punished them.

There were also several sports courts in the school that were taken over (and protected by teachers) for the girls to play sports any boy that asked to join in was abused and often put in detention by the teachers.

I have no doubt that these won't be good enough for you, but whatever.

jakesmommy · 17/05/2025 08:38

I think its really unfair to punish all of the boys for the actions of a few, Can't believe this sort of thing is happening still, it happened to me at school too, a group of the popular kids were messing about, the teacher frustrated and then punished the whole class by making stand us outside the class and telling us when we could go back into the class one by one, when she got to me I refused and said it was unfair she had did this to all of us, she made me stand outside or the rest of the lesson, that was 30 years ago.

Megifer · 17/05/2025 08:39

Scorchio84 · 17/05/2025 08:30

love when posters don't come back to apologize for their disparaging remarks

If that's aimed at me, then I apologise if you are one of those teachers and my remark felt personal to you.

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:39

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:34

It’s a massive issue. And each incoming year group in secondaries is worse than the year before. In all areas of behaviour. Primaries aren’t addressing it all and by the time they get to secondary a lot of the behaviours are embedded. And a relentless them from parents of just not knowing.

You do realise that the vast majority of primary kids don’t have phones until secondary and those who do are stuck on computer games so I’d love to know what you expect primary schools to do aside from the many other measures they are taking and work on with a whole host of areas that are added onto the curriculum.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:40

FrippEnos · 17/05/2025 08:38

Why does there need to be a "sudden power shift"?

When I was at school there was a group of girls that would go round tripping up boys in younger years, holding their legs open and kicking them in the balls.

This according to you should have resulted in all girls being punished. But what generally happened was the girls got away with it and anyone that tried to stop them were verbally abused by them and reported to the teachers who then punished them.

There were also several sports courts in the school that were taken over (and protected by teachers) for the girls to play sports any boy that asked to join in was abused and often put in detention by the teachers.

I have no doubt that these won't be good enough for you, but whatever.

That group of nasty girls should have been dealt with but no it’s not the same. I have no doubt they were pretty nasty to other girls too.
But it’s different because the power balance lies with the male sex.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:42

@R3s3t You do realise you’re wrong? The average child gets their first phone between 9&11. That’s primary age. And that 27% have witnessed pornography before age 11. Again primary age.

FrippEnos · 17/05/2025 08:42

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:40

That group of nasty girls should have been dealt with but no it’s not the same. I have no doubt they were pretty nasty to other girls too.
But it’s different because the power balance lies with the male sex.

And yet that doesn't mean that girls can't be sexist.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:44

FrippEnos · 17/05/2025 08:42

And yet that doesn't mean that girls can't be sexist.

It kind of does though. Because at the end of the day boys still have the power.

Scorchio84 · 17/05/2025 08:44

Megifer · 17/05/2025 08:39

If that's aimed at me, then I apologise if you are one of those teachers and my remark felt personal to you.

Megifer · Today 07:59

Lazy teachers love a bit of collective punishment rather than having to do work to sort the issue out.
that wasn't cool

Take him out of school for the day soon and do something nice with him as his treat. I take Tadhg out the odd time when it's sunny, like this last week,

but no need to apologize, are we cool?

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:44

If you want to talk about laws-disability, sexuality and race are all protected by law. Bullying annd mean girl behaviour which is rife and can damage the education of others is very much punishable. Plenty of scope for girls to be collectively punished the same as boys- regardless of innocence or not.

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:45

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:44

It kind of does though. Because at the end of the day boys still have the power.

Not all boys

Scorchio84 · 17/05/2025 08:48

I feel like I'm in a parallel universe here @Megifer we had our own slight disagreement & all this time there was 11 pages of rows 😆

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:48

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:42

@R3s3t You do realise you’re wrong? The average child gets their first phone between 9&11. That’s primary age. And that 27% have witnessed pornography before age 11. Again primary age.

Edited

No I’m not. Phones start to come in gradually during years 5/6 ready for high school. Kids are at primary school for 7 years and spend the majority of the time without phones. Yes they’re on far too many screens and there are issues but a lot is kid orientated and not phones. It all kicks off in year 7 when they’re suddenly handed phones to take to high school. So enough already with blaming primary schools for all the ills of the world.

WildflowerConstellations · 17/05/2025 08:48

theprincessthepea · 17/05/2025 00:13

It’s surprising how young they still are at that age. And sometimes they experience emotions this simply. I don’t know if you have pre pubescent children but they act like mini teens whilst still holding onto element of child-likeness - and if yours is close to you then they will feel comfortable enough to express emotions or feelings such as the ones the OPs son has expressed.

I think it is wrong what the teacher has done and I also think that right now boys are getting such bad press that they must be thinking “I can’t do anything right as a boy” - I have a son and daughter and I fear for them both for different reasons, but I’m tired of this “all boys are bad” narrative - we really don’t need to drill this into young boys - they are not all bad just because a handful of them are.

If the teacher knew which boys were being sexist, or mean to the girls then she should have narrowed them down and punished them. Full class punishment is lazy in my opinion and I would complain.

I really don't think that teaching boys about respectful relationships with girls has to be about boys being bad.

They're not bad. But they are being raised in a culture where there some very bad role models out there, and unfortunately some very sexist men. So it's really important that they have positive guidance.

They need to be supported to become confident and secure young men. Knowing how to interact with girls is part of that. Boys and girls having respectful relationships with each other will only be a good thing for both of them in the long run. Unfortunately this is not something all boys will see at home.

FrippEnos · 17/05/2025 08:49

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:44

It kind of does though. Because at the end of the day boys still have the power.

Really

All a girl has to do in school is put on the water works and any power that the boys have is gone.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:49

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:45

Not all boys

Ah you’re one of those.

Well the good news is your clueless about how social media impacts young people, when this starts, the impacts of peer group interaction and you think because mummy modelled inclusion they won’t be sexist so that all means yours are likely to not be not all boys.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:49

FrippEnos · 17/05/2025 08:49

Really

All a girl has to do in school is put on the water works and any power that the boys have is gone.

Wow.

Orangesinthebag · 17/05/2025 08:50

FrippEnos · 17/05/2025 08:49

Really

All a girl has to do in school is put on the water works and any power that the boys have is gone.

What a hideously reductive and misogynist comment.

Megifer · 17/05/2025 08:51

Scorchio84 · 17/05/2025 08:44

Megifer · Today 07:59

Lazy teachers love a bit of collective punishment rather than having to do work to sort the issue out.
that wasn't cool

Take him out of school for the day soon and do something nice with him as his treat. I take Tadhg out the odd time when it's sunny, like this last week,

but no need to apologize, are we cool?

Yea we're cool I've got no beef with you whatsoever.

I'm entitled to my opinion though which I stand by, but like I say I apologise (as you seemed to want, so bit odd you're saying no need to apologise) if it felt a bit personal for you.

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:51

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:49

Ah you’re one of those.

Well the good news is your clueless about how social media impacts young people, when this starts, the impacts of peer group interaction and you think because mummy modelled inclusion they won’t be sexist so that all means yours are likely to not be not all boys.

“ oh you’re one of those”

Oh you mean somebody who disagrees with you. Do give over. Saying every single boy is sexist by default is frankly ridiculous and you’re just making yourself look silly.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:52

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:48

No I’m not. Phones start to come in gradually during years 5/6 ready for high school. Kids are at primary school for 7 years and spend the majority of the time without phones. Yes they’re on far too many screens and there are issues but a lot is kid orientated and not phones. It all kicks off in year 7 when they’re suddenly handed phones to take to high school. So enough already with blaming primary schools for all the ills of the world.

Er no. The majority of kids get them between 9&11. Before they start secondary. Once they’re at secondary it’s too late. The work needs to be done with kids and parents before they get their phones. Not after. Secondary schools are doing their best but when kids are getting phones at 10, well we cannot time travel.

Riaanna · 17/05/2025 08:52

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:51

“ oh you’re one of those”

Oh you mean somebody who disagrees with you. Do give over. Saying every single boy is sexist by default is frankly ridiculous and you’re just making yourself look silly.

I have absolutely no time for anyone spouting the not all men nonsense.

R3s3t · 17/05/2025 08:53

Orangesinthebag · 17/05/2025 08:50

What a hideously reductive and misogynist comment.

And the writing off of all boys as inherently misogynistic and deserving of punishment isn’t hideous?