Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Starmer has shot himself in the foot.

289 replies

TheQuickRobin · 13/05/2025 20:17

This isn’t about my own opinion but political strategy.

So he does this Island of strangers thing wanting to appeal to Labour heartlands who have gone to Reform. But.

I just think Reform voters won’t believe him?

Tories hate him becaus he’s Labour.

Middle class Labour lefties will be put off by the message.

Who does he think he’s winning over?

Anyone on here had their opinion of him changed?

IABU - I thought he was a prat now I think he’s on my team

IANBU - EITHER I thought he was a prat, still think he’s a prat OR I liked him now think he’s a prat.

Very unscientific poll here!

OP posts:
TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 08:35

Stirabout · 14/05/2025 08:18

According to Labour.( and we don’t know otherwise yet as the specifics haven’t been announced ) those people who will be affected will be those who can work and don’t have a 4 rating based on the new criteria.
They won’t be those who are severely disabled and unable to work.

Edited

My husband with multiple and severe disabilities but not 4 points in any one category of daily living PIP would say otherwise. There is more chance of our dog being able to hold down a job than him (and he has tried, many times, husband not dog) but luckily Starmer will soon cure his lifelong and degenerative disabilities!

ThroughThickAndThin01 · 14/05/2025 08:36

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 13/05/2025 21:55

Yanbu, and I've written to my local Labour MP to say the same. They won't win over the right and they will totally alienate the left.

I don't know who's advising him but they have totally fucked up.

As a lifelong Conservative voter, Starmer has actually won me over and I never thought in a million years I would ever vote Labour. But here we are!

i can’t stand Reform and would vote tactically to prevent them getting in at the next election, but would now vote voluntarily for Starmer if tactics not needed.

I suppose therein lies the rub for Labour; if they can win over centrist voters like me then they are probably alienating their traditional left wing voters.

SipandClean · 14/05/2025 08:40

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 08:13

Care work is - despite what Mr Starmer or Ms Badenoch would have you believe - skilled work and about much more than "wiping backsides". Saying that denigrates those who work in care and those who receive it.

Point taken.

User135644 · 14/05/2025 08:43

SidekickSylvia · 13/05/2025 22:13

He seems to be more right wing than the last government, which I wasn't expecting.

The last government had open borders so that's not saying much.

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 14/05/2025 08:51

ThroughThickAndThin01 · 14/05/2025 08:36

As a lifelong Conservative voter, Starmer has actually won me over and I never thought in a million years I would ever vote Labour. But here we are!

i can’t stand Reform and would vote tactically to prevent them getting in at the next election, but would now vote voluntarily for Starmer if tactics not needed.

I suppose therein lies the rub for Labour; if they can win over centrist voters like me then they are probably alienating their traditional left wing voters.

Yes, I can see that it might win over traditional Tory voters who can't stomach the far right. I guess the question is, how many of those are there, and will they be enough?

SpryCat · 14/05/2025 08:55

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 08:10

Do you understand the purpose of foreign aid and the consequences of even a small cut?

The government needs to prioritise our Country’s interests at this time, we have children going without meals, pensioners not being able to keep warm in winter and disability payments that are going to be slashed so they wont be able to survive and crippling businesses etc. Our country is bucking under the strain of the Government taking off Peter to pay Paul, our taxes should be going into the U.K instead, our NHS, emergency services, Universities and unchecked people surging into our country getting all living expenses paid for before our country goes bankrupt. Any money left over obviously goes on foreign aid but if there isn’t anything left in the pot then we can’t provide for them.

WombatHouse · 14/05/2025 08:55

I used to be a member of the Labour Party and I've voted for them every single time for 30 odd years.

This year was the first time I voted for another party. Strategic vote.

Before this polling day, I decided to never vote again and was planning on spoiling my paper because, in my eyes, they're all the same hypocritical, out for themselves arses. I feel that there is no real democracy. It's the wealthy v ordinary person and probably always has been.

The only time I will ever vote now is to vote strategically against Reform. It is absolutely terrifying that the far right is getting so many votes.

Rivypike · 14/05/2025 08:59

MrsBennetsPoorNerves · 14/05/2025 08:51

Yes, I can see that it might win over traditional Tory voters who can't stomach the far right. I guess the question is, how many of those are there, and will they be enough?

I would say the very lefty open borders types aren’t that numerous but terminally online so vocally conspicuous. Left wing parties really haven’t won many elections in the last 50 years, if ever, hence the drubbing Corbyn got. Do people really think 900k extra people entering the country every year is sustainable ?

User135644 · 14/05/2025 09:00

It beggars belief that people still have their fingers in their ears over immigration. The country has destroyed itself.

Even with this new policy immigration will still be about 500k net (and ever increasing boat migrants of undocumented or unvetted young men ). That's a big city every year.

User135644 · 14/05/2025 09:01

Rivypike · 14/05/2025 08:59

I would say the very lefty open borders types aren’t that numerous but terminally online so vocally conspicuous. Left wing parties really haven’t won many elections in the last 50 years, if ever, hence the drubbing Corbyn got. Do people really think 900k extra people entering the country every year is sustainable ?

Every single election or referendum people vote for less immigration only to get more of it.

A massive betrayal has been carried out on the British people.

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 09:04

SpryCat · 14/05/2025 08:55

The government needs to prioritise our Country’s interests at this time, we have children going without meals, pensioners not being able to keep warm in winter and disability payments that are going to be slashed so they wont be able to survive and crippling businesses etc. Our country is bucking under the strain of the Government taking off Peter to pay Paul, our taxes should be going into the U.K instead, our NHS, emergency services, Universities and unchecked people surging into our country getting all living expenses paid for before our country goes bankrupt. Any money left over obviously goes on foreign aid but if there isn’t anything left in the pot then we can’t provide for them.

Foreign aid isn't altruistic, it's vital in terms of international relations. Removing even a tiny percentage of it not only causes death and disease globally but reduces our standing on the world stage. And we really don't need that right now, with Trump, Brexit and general global instability.

Rivypike · 14/05/2025 09:06

EasternStandard · 14/05/2025 07:30

The pp mentioned one thing the huge cost of borrowing which has gone up. Also the NI policies which are causing business confidence to plummet.

How come Cameron didn’t borrow to invest when rates were low ? Instead he plunged the country into austerity. If we’re blaming someone for the state of the country it’s him. Sadly some cannot brook any criticism of the Conservatives.

EasternStandard · 14/05/2025 09:21

Rivypike · 14/05/2025 09:06

How come Cameron didn’t borrow to invest when rates were low ? Instead he plunged the country into austerity. If we’re blaming someone for the state of the country it’s him. Sadly some cannot brook any criticism of the Conservatives.

That’s going back a bit. If you are really pro Labour high borrowing costs won’t go down well but it doesn’t make them go away.

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 09:30

Rivypike · 14/05/2025 09:06

How come Cameron didn’t borrow to invest when rates were low ? Instead he plunged the country into austerity. If we’re blaming someone for the state of the country it’s him. Sadly some cannot brook any criticism of the Conservatives.

Because it was ideological. The previous Tory government wanted to get rid of the remnants of the post war settlement. One nation Conservatism went out of the window replaced by Thatcherite ideology. We could have been in the best economic situation ever in 2010 and they would have done the same. If the cuts then really were to raise money, we would have been better off voting in the London Zoo party which would have undoubtedly done a better job.

Whatafustercluck · 14/05/2025 09:32

HRTQueen · 13/05/2025 21:32

He is not trying to out Reform Reform

He is listening to vast majority of voters the number one issue isn’t the NHS, isn’t the housing crises, isn’t the war in Gaza or Ukraine, isn’t concerns with Trumps chaos,

Labour have finally acknowledged that it’s immigration (as it is in the most western countries) immigration time and time again is coming up as a concern the left can no longer bury their heads in the sand about

Starmer just doesn’t particularly have political appeal. Put someone who can spin it better (like Blair could or Andy Burnham can) and you will have voters return

thats not to say Reform will lose their appeal over night or the Tories won’t pull it together before the next election (though I think it’s more likely to be the one after)

The biggest issue for voters in the general election was the cost of living, followed by healthcare, then the economy, then immigration at 4th. There's no doubt that immigration is a major concern for a high number of people, which Reform have played to their advantage. But if you look at the things Labour has tackled since coming to power, they pretty much prioritise these top four issues (and now security too).

Their PIP, pension and NI for employers policies have not been popular, but KS has always said he'd put country before party so I don't think I'm hugely surprised by his decisions - though as a Labour voter it hasn't sat comfortably with me at all. The government's SEN reforms will be the factor that I judge them on, at a personal impact level. Other than that, I'll wait until the end of their parliamentary term to see whether the country is in a better or worse state than when they were elected.

EasternStandard · 14/05/2025 09:34

Coolasfeck · 14/05/2025 08:32

Why is the chase always on to capture Reform voters? They make up less than 20% of the electorate at best. The winning strategy is to play to the centre and have policies which appeal a bit to the left and a bit to the right of this.

We have the 2 majority parties chasing a small demographic of voters. As soon as one of them realise they’ve forgotten 80% of the potential electorate which includes the middle class workers paying a large chunk of the tax, and start making bold policies that will capture even half of that number, Reform will implode and Farage will have to think up his next vehicle for self promotion. The other major party will be dead for at least a decade.

If the LibDems can get their shit together and get some press coverage they can really make a play that they are different and have policies which will propel us out of stagnation so people start actively feeling their lives are improving.

Labour are banking on their core voters having nowhere else to go, as did the Tory’s. As soon as there’s a sensible place to go, they will go. The sensible Labour and Conservatives should defect to LibDems or create a new party.

I think they’re panicking as polling is up to around 30% and that’s when FPTP starts to benefit Reform rather than do what it did at last GE.

You have a point though maybe the two main parties should sit it out instead of the cycle of blaming the last lot.

BIossomtoes · 14/05/2025 09:35

the number one issue isn’t the NHS, isn’t the housing crises, isn’t the war in Gaza or Ukraine, isn’t concerns with Trumps chaos,

Yet only nine months ago the two top issues were the NHS and cost of living with immigration third. What’s changed?

matresense · 14/05/2025 09:37

Honestly, I like KS more because of this and I’d never vote reform in a million years. I’m politically homeless. I voted Labour as a young woman in the new Labour days, voted Lib Dem in the coalition years and in 2015 in an attempt to keep them in the coalition. I voted Remain (what I really wanted was a future vote on further political integration and a level of reform of the UK system so that we actually used the rules available to us within the EU, which enabled us to send anyone workless home after 3 months, to reform our system to introduce contribution and residence elements for benefits, to ensure that we required appropriate qualifications for occupations where necessary in the same way other EU countries did to protect their own qualified people, and to stop benefits fraud that led to benefit monies being paid to Poland and Romania but no one offered me that option and I thought the status quo was ok if not amazing). I voted for Theresa May over Jeremy Corbyn (and I thought her “dementia tax” was and still is the fairest way to fund social care - no one else will touch this now), but spoiled my ballot rather than vote for Bojo (clearly unsuitable for power) or the alternatives (lib dems fully immersed in gender, wanting to rejoin the EU on any terms and saying they didn’t want a coalition with either party but wanted to win outright seemed to me to be a vote for total fantasy). I also spoiled my ballot last time around as I just didn’t feel like anyone had won my vote, the Lib Dems were still in fantasyland and a still a bit of a middle class protest vote that tells lots of people what they want to hear (yes, carers are great, publicity stunts are funny, but where are the hard choices?), Mr Davy’s explanation as to his stint as minister for the Post Office was pretty unconvincing to me and Labour wouldn’t win in my consituency anyway.

I feel as if I have always voted in a pretty centrist (sometimes centre left, sometimes centre right) way. I actually think that the liberal groupthink of the last 10-15 years has moved the centre ground and it has moved me to the right, rather than me moving much myself. I feel pretty disillusioned and frustrated.

I want a party who is capable of telling the truth and making hard choices. The “strangers” stuff isn’t really to my taste, but neither do I think it is full on Enoch Powell - there’s a truth in it, which is that we haven’t expected enough on integration and contribution within our immigration system and we’ve had open borders for the last couple of years despite people voting against it, so people are feeling as is there is a detriment and lack of cohesion to society which is what was meant.

Immigration is a series of hard choices and should be based on pragmatism and competence. I don’t think they should have made immigration harder for high earners and people making a strong contribution, but otherwise it’s a step in the right direction.

I don’t need my politicians to make me feel more virtuous and better about myself. I don’t care if they change their mind based on evidence. I need them to make a pragmatic decision as to what is best for our country in the long term and be competent running the country.

Livelovebehappy · 14/05/2025 09:38

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 07:52

No it's not. Voters for far right parties need to take responsibility for their choices like anyone else and stop pretending that someone giving a fairly shrewd character assessment of Farage is forcing them to vote for a "party" that uses proven racist rhetoric. Not liking being called a racist doesn't give immunity against actually being racist or voting for a quasi fascist party.

And yet we have anti semitic people alive and kicking in the Labour Party. It was open and rampant once upon a time in the party but now muted because clearly not tolerated as it used to be. Make no bones about it, there are many anti semitic people still thriving in Labour, it's just that they hide it well.

TheNuthatch · 14/05/2025 09:40

BIossomtoes · 14/05/2025 09:35

the number one issue isn’t the NHS, isn’t the housing crises, isn’t the war in Gaza or Ukraine, isn’t concerns with Trumps chaos,

Yet only nine months ago the two top issues were the NHS and cost of living with immigration third. What’s changed?

Farage has very successfully managed to pin the blame for everything on immigration. It may only be 3rd or even 4th priority for many, but high immigration does impact NHS and housing etc.

Coolasfeck · 14/05/2025 09:41

User135644 · 14/05/2025 09:00

It beggars belief that people still have their fingers in their ears over immigration. The country has destroyed itself.

Even with this new policy immigration will still be about 500k net (and ever increasing boat migrants of undocumented or unvetted young men ). That's a big city every year.

I think very few people disagree with the need for immigration reform. What many people including myself disagree with is how Starmer sold it. The rhetoric used is dangerous and places individual immigrants and those perceived to be immigrants in the firing line.

There was an opportunity to say Labour will rebalance the economy, reduce net migration, reactivate some of the economically inactive Brits to fill the gaps without the sensationalist Daily Express headline rhetoric. It sounded more like Trumps America than Britain.

This is not a road any of us should want to go down. How will he announce benefit reform? Will it be a big statement accusing benefit claimants of being a ‘drain’, call Britain an ‘island of scroungers’ and set them up for attack when its previous policy decisions not the individual benefit claimants responsible.

TheQuickRobin · 14/05/2025 09:42

Justanotherlurker · 13/05/2025 21:23

Well it was in the white paper so he is sticking to principles, and everyone who voted Labour obviously agreed with it, unless you're suggesting they didn't understand what they where voting for or easily lead?

But, to the point of your question, basically Starmer has to tackle immigration how the public wants on his terms otherwise Reform or worse starts to bubble up, there is a reason why Merkel, Cameron etc al have come out and said multiculturalism has failed and why the real far right (not mn standard) are rising across Europe.

The people who are concerned about the language or can extrapolate through contorted logic an echo to rivers of blood are stuck in the early noughtys where a simple accusation of racism would kill the conversation.

I say this a second gen immigrant, one that doesn't think 'but who will pick the fruit' is a convincing argument as I am not happy pretending I want a servitude class wrapped up into a progressive framework

my point wasn’t the principle actually, it was his language more so. I don’t think anyone in this country is in favour of unbridled immigration, left or right.

OP posts:
EasternStandard · 14/05/2025 09:43

TheNuthatch · 14/05/2025 09:40

Farage has very successfully managed to pin the blame for everything on immigration. It may only be 3rd or even 4th priority for many, but high immigration does impact NHS and housing etc.

Labour’s policies too have prompted the rise. The rhetoric and higher numbers crossing works well for Reform. The former now switched of course to island of strangers stuff.

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 09:45

Livelovebehappy · 14/05/2025 09:38

And yet we have anti semitic people alive and kicking in the Labour Party. It was open and rampant once upon a time in the party but now muted because clearly not tolerated as it used to be. Make no bones about it, there are many anti semitic people still thriving in Labour, it's just that they hide it well.

Proof?

Upstartled · 14/05/2025 09:45

What happened to Smash the Gangs anyway, have they given up on that?