Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To think Starmer has shot himself in the foot.

289 replies

TheQuickRobin · 13/05/2025 20:17

This isn’t about my own opinion but political strategy.

So he does this Island of strangers thing wanting to appeal to Labour heartlands who have gone to Reform. But.

I just think Reform voters won’t believe him?

Tories hate him becaus he’s Labour.

Middle class Labour lefties will be put off by the message.

Who does he think he’s winning over?

Anyone on here had their opinion of him changed?

IABU - I thought he was a prat now I think he’s on my team

IANBU - EITHER I thought he was a prat, still think he’s a prat OR I liked him now think he’s a prat.

Very unscientific poll here!

OP posts:
TempestTost · 14/05/2025 01:04

I haven't voted, because I am not sure what the effect will be. And it will be hard to tease it out as well since there are so many factors in how people vote.

But I will say - he may be looking to what has happened to the Danish Social Democrats, who looked to be in real trouble with their open border type policies. After shifting to a much more restrictive position they regained a lot of their lost popularity.

Not everyone thinking of voting Reform is a disaffected conservative. Increasingly there are left of center people considering it, and the traditional wcr voters now supporting Reform were, don't forget, originally Labour voters.

So I wouldn't dismiss it as a strategy too quickly.

I will say - I am somewhat shocked that Starmer has managed to get this change in direction from his MPs but still is struggling with getting them to agree that men are not women.

needtoloseit · 14/05/2025 01:08

mumofoneAlonebutokay · 13/05/2025 21:40

Is he cutting pip? I'd read that pip would be fine but people on uc would have to get pip in order to get the disabled uc element?

I could be wrong, how horrible if so 😪

Yes they are cutting PIP, over 80% of standard rate claimants and nearly 20% of enhanced rate will lose it, it’s disgusting

spoonbillstretford · 14/05/2025 01:11

TheFastTraybake · 13/05/2025 21:22

He is cutting PIP though. People with quite serious physical disabilities are terrified.

They haven't actually done anything yet but make proposals which have to get through parliament.

TempestTost · 14/05/2025 01:13

I'd like to see Starmer/Labour draw a link between the issues (cost of living, birth rate and immigration), and I'd prefer that the rhetorical focus was on maintaining a society/economy that is viable in the long term, rather than othering immigrants (and, though he was somewhat balanced, I don't like the use of "Strangers" in his speech).

Yes, I do wonder if they have understood this link themselves, or simply won't speak about it because they think it would look bad.

I don't really see strangers as negative as such though. Strangers are not necessarily bad people, they are just people you don't know. And I think it's a good description of how many people feel now.

moto748e · 14/05/2025 01:14

Couldn't agree more with the OP. Starmer once again shows himself to be a bad politician, quite apart from anything else. Who does he imagine he pleases? Yes, a grown-up conversation needs to had about immigration, but please, the dog-whistles?

TempestTost · 14/05/2025 01:18

User32459 · 13/05/2025 23:08

Who even are the left anymore?

Labour used to be about the working class and the working class are at the end of their tether with uncontrolled mass immigration and all its consequences and are turning their backs on Labour in the droves and will vote for anyone who pledges to sort it out (Reform leading all polls).

Middle class lefties in their pretty villages or suburbia are immune to all this. Let them vote Green or Lib Dem.

The Left now are university educated, middle and upper middle class urban people.

Unfortunately for the LP there are not enough of them to comfortably win an election.

Stirabout · 14/05/2025 01:20

ChipsAhoye · 13/05/2025 22:53

I'm one of those people

I get daily living and mobility, both standard.

I have 11 points on my daily living award but made up from 2 and 3 points, so no 4 points to make me 'safe'

So under the new rules my next review i will lose my PIP (£450) my LWRCA if connected (£400) my son will lose his carers element as he looks after me (200) and i will lose £80 of my housing benefit for having a non dependant living with me (my carer son) as if you get PIP that doesn't get deducted.

So my household will be £1130 worse off.
My son will have to work but I don't know how I will cope being alone.
I don't understand how it will work at all.

And its causing so much stress it all being so unknown

I feel like if they announced this they should have told us the whole plan because ive spent weeks in a state not knowing what my future holds.

Whilst I agree announcing something like this and leaving people in limbo is cruel I can understand why they wouldn’t announce and enact it straight away.

The early announcement is letting people know and allowing people to plan ahead.
Not knowing what the more stringent assessment is doesn’t help claimants but it will afford a potentially more accurate assessment come the time.

the idea is to get numbers down and ‘make work pay’ in line with Labours Election slogan.

Stirabout · 14/05/2025 01:24

needtoloseit · 14/05/2025 01:08

Yes they are cutting PIP, over 80% of standard rate claimants and nearly 20% of enhanced rate will lose it, it’s disgusting

They are still deciding on what the more stringent assessment criteria will be
How can anyone possibly assess the potential numbers affected.

WhenICalledYouLastNightFromTesco · 14/05/2025 01:38

I voted Labour to get the Conservatives out. I didn't realise I was voting in another 'Conservative' government. I'm wondering whether to vote Conservative in the next election because I can't stand the thought of Reform. I'm politically homeless.

gannett · 14/05/2025 05:54

Yes, this is the mistake "centrist" liberals make time and again. They mimic the language of the hard right and they think it's a shrewd strategy to cut them off. But they don't do it as well (or as genuinely) as the actual hard right. Starmer's Poundshop Farage bit isn't going to win over anyone who wants to vote for the actual Farage.

And they've always taken their actual progressive voters for granted on the basis that we have nowhere to actually go. That may still be true - the Greens are the only hope - but there are long-term consequences. It worked for Blair in 2005 but the actual electoral turnout collapsed, and I think that deep sense of political alienation seeded where we are now.

gannett · 14/05/2025 05:56

And in the meantime mimicking the rhetoric of the far right just legitimises them and normalises their basic premise (that immigration is inherently a problem).

TreesToday · 14/05/2025 06:01

I’m glad he’s tackled legal migration but strongly disagree with the messaging. Very much agree with PPs this has a demographic element that’s never mentioned. ‘Island of strangers’ is a lousy sentiment.

Tulipsontoast · 14/05/2025 06:40

He’s being an absolute plank.

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 06:40

Livelovebehappy · 14/05/2025 00:35

The cuts aren’t aimed at people with serious physical disabilities though. They’ll be absolutely fine. His target is the people who are very much the lower end of relying on PIP. I think we can all agree that the system needs to be reviewed.

Not true. They're firmly aimed at people with physical disabilities who need help with a range of activities including washing themselves below the waist and preparing meals. I've read countless case studies of people including wheelchair users who say they'll have to give up work when they lose their PIP because they won't be able to afford the support required to do their jobs (including getting ready in the morning). The government is, at the same time, curtailing access to work, the scheme which provides in-work support, while pretending that cuts to in work benefits will enable disabled people to..... Work.
Nobody is guaranteed to be "absolutely fine" in this government's game of deserving v undeserving disability.

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 06:43

spoonbillstretford · 14/05/2025 01:11

They haven't actually done anything yet but make proposals which have to get through parliament.

Yes, proposals which aren't being consulted on and which MPs are being forced to vote on before any impact assessment is available. Starmer has a huge majority and a habit of removing the whip from those who disagree with him. I genuinely hope these cuts don't go through because the effect on disabled and carer poverty is unthinkable. But I wouldn't put money on a U-turn.

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 06:45

mumofoneAlonebutokay · 13/05/2025 21:40

Is he cutting pip? I'd read that pip would be fine but people on uc would have to get pip in order to get the disabled uc element?

I could be wrong, how horrible if so 😪

The government is planning to make it much more difficult to successfully apply for PIP with the aim of drastically cutting the numbers who are eligible.

safetyfreak · 14/05/2025 06:51

I agree with what they are doing to reduce legal immigration however, the speech was too harsh and will upset the lefties.

I am actually okay with what Labour has done so far, it seems they are getting blamed for the Tories mess and are not been given a fair chance to change the country.

Grimtastic · 14/05/2025 06:57

I’m not sure Left vs Right explains U.K. politics anymore. I live in a suburb and I know many university educated people / people in professional roles etc. I also appear to have one of those faces where people are happy to chat away to me!

From my (many) discussions most people said they voted for Reform a handful voted Green at the locals. All the Reform voters were initially sheepish. But when they know you won’t ostracise them they are very happy to discuss. Immigration, safety and reducing numbers is key. Most want mass deportations Rapes of women are a huge concern. Terrorism is another. They can see their kids being priced out of the housing market. They can see rising crime and have read European reports on crime and Nationality. And Nationality and economic contribution..Bombs in Sweden (30 plus in Jan). And they can see not all people who move here want to integrate. Some are here to commit rape and crime. Shoplifting is rife. Two tier policing and criminal justice. But also they are watching the same issues unfold in Europe and the predictable ‘Far Right’ label is now found to be comical. But the level of knowledge, stats, facts etc is impressive. They clearly did their research.

When your PM pops to a garden party while girls are fighting for their lives and he calls concerned people Far Right it was clear he was a wrong un. And people watched and listened and are disgusted by his actions.

So I don’t think it’s Left vs Right as many of these people are pro benefits for the disabled. Many ‘right wing’ are against elderly fuel allowance cuts. Most recognise farmers are asset rich and cash poor. But they recognise we cannot afford a welfare state that supports immigrants who don’t work. And while paying for Net Zero. And hotels for economic migrants and benefits for legal migrants who don’t work. And foreign aid. Some are silently boycotting takeaways and uber as they worry about the black economy and what that funds. Barbers shops springing up with council approval. Others are silently writing to MPs. Something has to give we cannot afford it all. I know this is anecdotal but I can see the change in the last 6-12 months and I speak to a vast amount of people.

I believe Starmer was prioritising supporting immigration and foreign aid and Net Zero over the disabled and elderly and our own food security. He’s being pushed to change his stance on immigration. I’m not sure he will succeed, it’s likely just to be another ‘smash the gangs’ headline. All talk and no action.

In my lovely leafy 4 bed detached middle class street I know all my neighbours. I can run alone each morning. But I’m not naive enough to know this is not the case for a large percentage of the population. People don’t feel safe, because crime is rising. I no longer choose to visit London or Birmingham, I avoid it. I’m sure some tourists feel the same. It’s not pleasant anymore so I spend my money elsewhere and save myself the stress of being mugged, harrassed etc. I can’t be the only one and I believe money from tourism will dry up unless the gov get a grip it.

We don’t even know if Iran or Russia are sending in terrorists? Yet we let undocumented illegal immigrants leave the hotels and wander around the local communities! Some seem to prefer to import men with no ID rather than risk being called a racist (my none British friends think we are bonkers). Thousands of young men arriving each week who presumably still expect/demand/want sex in a country where rapists are rarely jailed - can’t see an issue there…

LlynTegid · 14/05/2025 06:58

WhenICalledYouLastNightFromTesco · 14/05/2025 01:38

I voted Labour to get the Conservatives out. I didn't realise I was voting in another 'Conservative' government. I'm wondering whether to vote Conservative in the next election because I can't stand the thought of Reform. I'm politically homeless.

Many people are politically homeless. Most people who supported either the Tories under Cameron or Labour under pre-Blair governments.

As for Keir Starmer, his government will be judged on the economy, how much taxes are, and the level of net migration.

cantForget · 14/05/2025 06:58

Rivypike · 13/05/2025 23:21

The country really didn’t vote for ‘Labour’ values tbh. Like it or not Farage and the Tories would win an election if they merged. Reform came second in many constituencies which tells me that people rightly or wrongly want right wing policies. They’re happy to accept losing the NHS, seeing benefits cut as long as immigration gets reduced/sorted out. And to say he had so much support is ludicrous, what percentage of the vote did he win ? Typical MN echo chamber, living in nice leafy suburbs and haven’t got a clue how left behind parts of the country are.
He’s been lambasted from day one, despite actually doing some decent stuff. He’s attacked from the right and from salty vocal Corbynites who’ve never got over Jezza losing. There’s positive legislation in the pipeline but it’s never good enough and folk are too lazy to do any research.

Edited

I personally know of many people who don’t usually vote as didn’t see the point who went and voted because they were desperate for change and were worried about what the Conservatives might do to vulnerable groups. Here we are though and their fears are being realised by a Labour government and people
didn’t see that coming - what they are doing with disability benefits is nothing short of cruel .

Toootss · 14/05/2025 06:59

I seem to be living in a parallel universe.
Costs of the NHS and/ or social sercives and benefit payments are going to be beyond our income - the cost of interest on money borrowed by governments to cover all this ''generosity'' are higher than the country earns - we are in deep deficit. And have huge interest payments we cannot afford.

But when a Gov comes in and says it might do stuff to reduce our unaffordable debts - everyone whinges and says the incumbent party are awful and we need to get in someone else - someone else who will borrow more and increase our debts so that it guarantees our children and grandchildren are truly skint their whole lives just paying the debts, let alone anything else to improve their lives.

Unbelievable - and we wonder why (no we wonder who to blame) for the shit pile we are in at the moment - hi folks, - it's all thanks to you and your demands for more and more and more

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 07:00

SalfordQuays · 13/05/2025 22:50

The bottom line is that Starmer has to get immigration figures down, otherwise Reform will win the next general election. It’s as simple as that.

Unlikely. Reform may well have hit its peak soon, also it's unprecedented for such a new "party" (company) to become a major political force in a few short years to the extent it forms government. Also Farage doesn't want the responsibility of being PM, he wants to cause shock and awe on the sidelines.

More likely we'll get a hung parliament or some horribly queasy coalition that will fall apart very quickly and our political stability will be dust.

A less dogmatic and intransigent Starmer would seriously look at electoral reform right now to ward off the threat of far right dominance. Little chance of that happening though.

IveGotAnUnusuallyLargePelvisISwear · 14/05/2025 07:01

Rivypike · 13/05/2025 23:24

Lol you need to visit Oldham or Rochdale. I’m a lefty but even I can see that there are issues regards immigration and ignoring it will only lead to Farage.

I did say that immigration needs to be controlled in some way. It’s right there in my post.

However, non British born doctors and midwives have delivered my babies and taken care of them, this last birth was a tough one and they saved this baby’s life. All of my family have been taken care of by non British born medics their whole lives. An excellent non British born GP noticed my husband’s test results pointed towards MS and sent him for more tests which were largely carried out by nurses who were not born here.

eta I don’t need to visit Rochdale or Oldham to “view immigrants”. I live in a very multicultural area already and wouldn’t have it any other way.

Sporadica · 14/05/2025 07:05

Small point, but I hate all the "an island..." rhetoric because it feels like it needlessly excludes, separates, and possibly alienates Northern Ireland.

I don't love or particularly trust Starmer or the current version of UK Labour, but overall I still dislike and distrust the government that preceded him appreciably more.

TheFastTraybake · 14/05/2025 07:06

CranfordScones · 13/05/2025 22:57

The problem was cast on day one. Starmer has a massive majority on a very small vote share. In other words his support is very broad but also very shallow. Very few people voted for this government, they were voting against the Tories and Labour were the best option at the time in most constituencies. Policy considerations came a distant second in most voters' minds. So he still has a lot of work to do in order to win over voters.

Controlling immigration (difficult) and keeping the economy on track (not Labour's strong suit) will be key factors. It's possible that he could still become Mr. Popular, but he's never going to be Mr. Populist. Make of that what you will...

He's very much a populist, posing an exaggerated threat (island of strangers, benefit "cheats) and placing himself as the one of can rescue the "working person" from that threat.