Meet the Other Phone. Child-safe in minutes.

Meet the Other Phone.
Child-safe in minutes.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Why do so many people get married at stately homes?

107 replies

diningiswest · 28/04/2025 16:50

They're expensive, almost always a pig to get to and everything looks the same (gilding, nice gardens, mostly marquee).

And - although I accept that this isn't what most people would think - we're paying our money to the upper classes to keep them lording it over us.

OP posts:
CheshireCat1 · 28/04/2025 19:59

Probably because they’re listed buildings and will always be there, unlike hotels or similar venues.

Genevieva · 28/04/2025 19:59

I think more people should consider the village hall option for a wedding reception. They are cheap as chips and have plenty of space for lots of guests.

Waitingfordoggo · 28/04/2025 20:05

@SabrinaThwaite- I was being sarky 😬 I should have made it more obvious!

Funny you should mention Posh and Becks…someone who came to my wedding (she was married to one of our friends at the time but no longer is) bitched to the person sitting next to her ‘Who do they think they are- Posh and Becks?’ because we were sitting on big chairs at the meal 😂 Obviously we didn’t request big posh chairs, that’s just what the hotel provided for us.

SleepingSerpent · 28/04/2025 20:07

Because they are gorge! Love a stately home wedding.

VenusClapTrap · 28/04/2025 20:08

I got married in a historic glasshouse big greenhouse. I was pretending to be a palm.

StrongLazyVague · 28/04/2025 20:09

Same reason as I got married in jeans with two witnesses -- because they feel like it? Clearly I was paying my £120 so the registrar could lord it over me and DH.

TheCoralMoose · 28/04/2025 20:19

The best wedding I want to was at a town hall.

The reception was at a large cantonese restaurant no speeches DJ or dancing just gorgeous food and Cremont to drink.
Everyone was relaxed and happy no faffing about or formal stiffness.
They didnt bother with wedding favours no one was bothered and enjoyed the meal.

BankHolidayBonanza · 28/04/2025 20:20

LittleBigHead · 28/04/2025 18:15

Er, no. You couldn't be more wrong! In my extended family we all tended to be married from our family home (grandfather's house), which I suppose could be a "stately" home - it's not really - just a private manor house. Church next door.

Personally, I don't like luxury resorts - they're mostly a bit naff. I prefer to borrow a friend's villa, or stay in local hostels when I'm travelling.

Edited

of course you do.

That's why you look down at people who don't have a family stately home, of course 😂

burnoutbabe · 28/04/2025 20:38

£30 each way for taxis to nearest train station at the last few I have been to. They are always a pain for non drivers.

SabrinaThwaite · 28/04/2025 20:48

Waitingfordoggo · 28/04/2025 20:05

@SabrinaThwaite- I was being sarky 😬 I should have made it more obvious!

Funny you should mention Posh and Becks…someone who came to my wedding (she was married to one of our friends at the time but no longer is) bitched to the person sitting next to her ‘Who do they think they are- Posh and Becks?’ because we were sitting on big chairs at the meal 😂 Obviously we didn’t request big posh chairs, that’s just what the hotel provided for us.

Sorry, I missed your sarkiness!

PatsFruitCake · 28/04/2025 20:55

I think a lot of the type of buildings you're thinking of are hotels rather than private homes.

I got married in a historic house which is now run as a hotel. The reasons we chose it were: the building was stunning and beautifully furnished with a vibe that was comfortable rather than stuffy, the staff were superb, it was in a convenient location, we were able to have ceremony and meal in one place, it had access to water and we were able to arrive by boat.

Icanhearabee · 28/04/2025 21:06

Why not? I got married in a pretty barn. Because I wanted to. Lots of people want to get married in a beautiful stately home. Because they want to. Without the revenue from events hire eg weddings, a lot of stately homes would fall into disrepair. How would that be a good thing?

Poppins2016 · 28/04/2025 21:22

They're expensive, almost always a pig to get to and everything looks the same

To be honest, this is broadly true of most weddings, regardless of venue... they're pretty formulaic.

For those suggesting that people are pretending to live at the relevant stately home, surely the same could be said re a barn/farm/hotel/etc? Realistically, everyone knows that the space is simply hired for the day because it's a lovely place to have a celebration.

latetothefisting · 28/04/2025 22:48

Genevieva · 28/04/2025 19:59

I think more people should consider the village hall option for a wedding reception. They are cheap as chips and have plenty of space for lots of guests.

what if people don't want 'cheap as chips' for one of the most important days of their lives, though? happily ever after in a grotty hall smelling of 10am's keep fit sweat...

And who runs around like a headless chicken decorating, sets up, goes to get the food and drink in the short time between the last class using it and the start of the wedding - the bridal party, who want to spend that time getting dressed and ready? and who cleans up after? what do you do if you need to pick up the food by 9 in order to get back home, changed, showered, dressed and to the church by 12 but it's 30 degrees in the village hall without any aircon - is the food still safe to eat after being out for 6 hours? are the drinks all warm and gross?
the village hall by me has literally 1 toilet - how does that work with 200 guests?

Not to mention the fact that you can't get married in a village hall, so by the time you've paid for the registry office, transport for all your guests to the hall, DJ, buffet, drinks, glasses, plates, cutlery, decorations, fridges to keep things cold, etc it's really not that cheap.

If people want to go for a cheap as chips wedding of course they can but there's nothing wrong with wanting to do something a bit special to mark a special occasion!

BankHolidayBonanza · 28/04/2025 22:54

It's a ridiculous thread anyway. It's pretty obvious WHY people chose them.

InMyOpenOnion · 29/04/2025 05:29

Genevieva · 28/04/2025 19:59

I think more people should consider the village hall option for a wedding reception. They are cheap as chips and have plenty of space for lots of guests.

Nah, the village hall is for kids' birthday parties, the boy scouts jumble sale and the am dram panto. It might be cheap as chips but there's a reason for that.

MinnieMountain · 29/04/2025 05:40

We got married in a castle, then had the reception in a town hall. We decorated the hall the evening before. It worked for us as the town hall bit meant people could stay over in the town.

BlondiePortz · 29/04/2025 05:43

Cheaper then the dreaded 'destination wedding' or as some would call it 'how can I possibly make a wedding as difficult as possible for people to get too'

MightAsWellBeGretel · 29/04/2025 05:46

Photos, of course. Isn't everything about the photos these days?

Cyclingforcake · 29/04/2025 05:46

Actually when I priced up the village hall option and having to buy/hire all the bits separately it worked out about the same as the hotel/stately home package. And certainly a lot less effort.

MightAsWellBeGretel · 29/04/2025 05:47

InMyOpenOnion · 29/04/2025 05:29

Nah, the village hall is for kids' birthday parties, the boy scouts jumble sale and the am dram panto. It might be cheap as chips but there's a reason for that.

And what does marriage have to do with a stately home?

Noneed77 · 29/04/2025 05:51

Weddings are outdated nonsense. Unfortunately IHT rule changes means that many people from 2027 onwards will need to be married to avoid huge tax bills. I wish they’d allow you to just fill in a form online and be done with it. I can’t be bothered with any of the fuss, even a registry office one feels painful. They should let you do everything online. I just want to get it done and not even tell anyone.

Atarin · 29/04/2025 06:20

Considering how many people spend their weekend at National Trust properties, I would imagine is simply that people like those style buildings. It’s not really that deep.

I live brutalist buildings and got married at the Barbican. Does that meant I’m as romantic as a lump of concrete? That I want to pretend to be living on a 60s concrete council estate? Or I just liked the architecture?

GiroJim100 · 29/04/2025 06:24

They’re beautiful settings for a wedding and people may not want any kind of religious aspect to the ceremony. I’m struggling to see the problem here.

InMyOpenOnion · 29/04/2025 07:25

MightAsWellBeGretel · 29/04/2025 05:47

And what does marriage have to do with a stately home?

Nothing, it's just nicer than your local hall where you've been to a hundred kids' parties and watched your neighbours in an awful performance of Dick Whittington.