Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - you have blood on your hands

737 replies

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:14

Am I being unreasonable to say that Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor - the Duke of York and member of the Royal Family has blood on his hands following the tragic suicide of Virginia Giuffre?

Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has faced zero consequences for his role in Virginia Giuffre‘s sexual abuse and trafficking because he’s rich and his powerful mummy paid off the victim and the British police failed to pursue charges against him. To be clear, while the age of consent in the UK is 17 years old this does not apply to trafficking victims and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor has never faced criminal charges.

He probably thinks he’s got away with it now she’s gone.

www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-14649791/Virginia-Giuffre-suicide-perth-mansion.html

OP posts:
HoskinsChoice · 26/04/2025 14:00

I'm not sure you understand the specific circumstances here. She herself has said she was free to leave whenever she wanted, (which she did when she met her husband). She also claims she was paid £10k to have sex with him. She was groomed to think it was OK to accept money to sleep with high profile people. She gave her consent in return for money. The crime here is the grooming of a vulnerable person, there is no indication she didn't give consent.

tothelefttotheleft · 26/04/2025 14:05

”I can well believe Andrew to be arrogant, entitled, not very bright, a poor judge of character, too easily flattered but I do not believe he would have sex with anyone without consent. No-one in his position, with years of being in the public eye, and of the gutter press, would be that stupid.”

@Meadowfinch

Lots of people like him have raped women. They think their fame etc make them untouchable.

CuriousKangaroo · 26/04/2025 14:06

Mondayblues2 · 26/04/2025 13:00

Virginia had consensual sex with him and made a huge fuss about it many years later. I am sorry she has died, but she made her own choices

She was trafficked. Trafficking vitiates consent.

JustSawJohnny · 26/04/2025 14:06

He's a piece of shit.

I really feel for her kids and family. They've watched her go through decades of pain all for it to end so awfully.

Christ, I hate him. That he has the brass neck to roll his useless ass out for state events is an embarrassment to us all.

Karma needs to do better at coming for rich, white men.

Fuck him and all of the toady royalists who excuse his behaviour.

LBFseBrom · 26/04/2025 14:09

You are unreasonable and I certainly don't think he will now feel he has 'got away with it', on the contrary it will stir the business up again.

He may or may not have slept with Virginia Giuffre, we don't know, however so did many others and she was paid an awful lot of money many years later. She married and had children.

It is tragic that she took her own life but there must have been reasons for that; she was estranged from her children.

It's possible her husband knows quite a lot, no doubt the gutter press will do their utmost to prize information out of him. So far he's been pretty quiet.

Zonder · 26/04/2025 14:14

I suppose it depends on whether or not a person believes that VG was telling the truth about PA. I believe that she was and that she spent the evening with him, but I have no idea if he knew she was trafficked which is what her civil case was based on

@2dogsandabudgie I think that's why it should have been allowed to continue, so that this could be investigated and concluded.

JudgeJ · 26/04/2025 14:15

CuriousKangaroo · 26/04/2025 13:13

Only 2.7% (approx) reports of rape result in charge, let alone conviction. Tell me, do you think that the other 97.3% of women and girls who reported rape are lying?

Not at all but there needs to be proof, that's the law. How do you suggest the law should deal with allegations? Assume that a woman is always telling the truth?

whippy1981 · 26/04/2025 14:22

JudgeJ · 26/04/2025 14:15

Not at all but there needs to be proof, that's the law. How do you suggest the law should deal with allegations? Assume that a woman is always telling the truth?

Most do have proof but the quota prevents them from getting to court.

No3392 · 26/04/2025 14:26

Lifestooshort71 · 26/04/2025 07:30

Looney tunes out in force on this one. He's a thick entitled sleazeball, agreed, but not charged or convicted of any offence. Don't bother with a slanging match as I won't be reading it.

Not being charged means nothing at all. Rape is basically legal in this country with only 3% even getting to court.

CowTown · 26/04/2025 14:28

HoskinsChoice · 26/04/2025 14:00

I'm not sure you understand the specific circumstances here. She herself has said she was free to leave whenever she wanted, (which she did when she met her husband). She also claims she was paid £10k to have sex with him. She was groomed to think it was OK to accept money to sleep with high profile people. She gave her consent in return for money. The crime here is the grooming of a vulnerable person, there is no indication she didn't give consent.

She actually had to runaway from Epstein to be with her husband.

Trafficked slaves often still get paid…

No3392 · 26/04/2025 14:28

This thread is a cesspit.

She was sexually trafficked at 17 years old. A child in the eyes of the law.

Gods, so many apologists.

LadyMary50 · 26/04/2025 14:28

The age of consent in America where he first met her is 18yrs..

GreenApplesRedApplesYellowApples · 26/04/2025 14:29

Ponoka7 · 26/04/2025 09:34

She dated (or rather had liasons with) Prince Andrew and went to Epstein's parties, she claimed that she was also used, but also denied that the girls didn't fully consent. So she's had to stick by that.

I see.

Well LVH can say whatever she wants privately, and she can say whatever she wants publicly too, it's a free country.

But it comes across as incredibly crass, haughty, and removed from reality. I think if she felt pushed into making a seemingly supportive statement to show she was onside with PA, there were lesser cruel ways of saying it. Many on this thread support him whilst still acknowledging that what has happened is unfortunate. That said, I can imagine the social pressures on one are hard at that level of society and maybe I myself would be desperately denying that PA was anything but a true gent if I had had the misfortune to date him.

Baggingarea · 26/04/2025 14:31

Cant defame the dead so expect a lot of negative stories leaked from the palace and Andrew is worming his way back into the core royals.

GreenApplesRedApplesYellowApples · 26/04/2025 14:37

AnAlpacaForChristmasPleaseSanta · 26/04/2025 09:46

@GreenApplesRedApplesYellowApples I had to Google it to make sure I hadn't imagined it but by god it's worse than I remembered.

All the money and titles in the world certainly doesn't buy compassion or basic human decency. And these people are meant to be the "better" class.

Victoria reposted the photograph, accompanied by the song The Final Countdown and with the word "KARMA" across the image.

"If Virginia Giuffre really does have days to live, then a complete confession is needed," she wrote.

"I don't believe it though. The FBI are on her right now and arrest warrants are incoming: she's conveniently dying to evade jail."

Victoria did not offer evidence the Federal Bureau of Investigation was investigating Virginia.

"She has a lot to answer for," Victoria, who dated Andrew in 1999, went on.

"I call this divine judgement by God. People say karma has a way of catching up, don't they? What goes around comes around."

Disgusting. 'Better class' yeah right. She's a very ambassador for her class.

Puzzledandpissedoff · 26/04/2025 14:40

I would expect that the 12 million or so pay off would be conditioned by a non disclosure order, most likely a lifetime one

Well the trade envoy details have been sealed for Andrew's lifetime, so why not?

Typical RF ... deflect, spin, lie, and if that's not enough cover the whole thing up

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/04/2025 14:45

I think she had a hell of a lot more on her plate than Prince Andrew. I think that's an ignorant and simplistic stance to take. It has never been proven one way or the other if he slept with her or not, and she must have slept with a fuckton of men other than him anyway. Where is the opprobrium towards them? Why have they all got away with it scot free while he has carried the can?

There was clearly something difficult going on in her personal life too.

And she became very wealthy thanks to him as well.

I have no time for Andrew but you cannot fairly lay this at his door!

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/04/2025 14:47

CanYouTurnItDown · 26/04/2025 07:32

I didn’t realise that she had ended her life, she was clearly a very troubled woman and had struggled for many years. Her poor family must be devastated.

Maybe they’re the ones that need the support right now rather than the lizard / leeches / royals

"Lizard"??? What a deeply foolish insult!

MagdaLenor · 26/04/2025 14:49

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/04/2025 14:47

"Lizard"??? What a deeply foolish insult!

I think it's the David Icke conspiracy theory, isn't it. Some people believe it 🙄

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/04/2025 14:49

skippy67 · 26/04/2025 07:37

He hasn't lost anything. Wasn't he front and centre when the Royals did their Easter church appearance this year? His mum stumped up millions to make the case go away. Which of course is perfectly normal...

It is normal actually. That's the nature of legal settlements.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/04/2025 14:51

Muffinmam · 26/04/2025 07:41

It is disinformation to say Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor committed no crime because the age of consent is 16 when it’s not 16 at all when the person is being trafficked for sex. It was a crime. He never faced charges for that crime.

It takes one person to spread misinformation and then a hundred people with low IQ’s repeat it thinking it’s true because they read it somewhere. That’s how disinformation works.

Pot kettle.

PolitePoster · 26/04/2025 14:53

HoskinsChoice · 26/04/2025 08:06

You're essentially glorifying in the death of a woman in order to put the boot into the royal family. That's pretty sick.

This woman was a victim of abuse way, way before she ever met Epstein. She had a horrific childhood which involved abuse, living on the streets and being passed from foster home to foster home. When Epstein and Maxwell got hold of her, she was lured into prostitution and potentially slept with hundreds of men for money and a high end lifestyle of luxury houses, international travel and private jets.

There is zero evidence that she slept with Andrew and of course there is zero evidence that she didn't. We will never know. What we do know is that Andrew was not even close to being the leader or instigator of anything that happened in her childhood or young adult life. He was possibly a very, very tiny cog in an enormous wheel.

Please don't use this woman's tragic life to push your anti-royal views. It's disgusting to use this to suit your agenda. 'That ginger woman' tells us everything we need to know about you. Go and do something nice and get over your prejudices and discrimination.

This ⬆️

Gymnopedie · 26/04/2025 14:54

We don't know whether Andrew had sex with her. He seems creepy and maybe he did. As it was never proved in court it's down to personal belief. But I don't think all this can be laid solely at his door. He was the high profile one she chose to sue. But Epstein is the bigger villain, along with Maxwell. Epstein was the one who trafficked her. And there were many other wealthy powerful men who were part of the abuse.

I'm not defending Andrew, he was friends with Epstein and must have known what he was. That was stupid to the point of negligence. But Virginia's trauma isn't only from Andrew. It goes much further. And I think sometimes these threads can read as though if it wasn't for Andrew she'd have been fine.

mainecooncatonahottinroof · 26/04/2025 15:04

thepariscrimefiles · 26/04/2025 08:10

He hasn't been charged with an offence because he paid £12 million for her silence. Obviously, that's just what an innocent man would do.

You clearly have no understanding of how legal settlements come about!

MightAsWellBeGretel · 26/04/2025 15:05

YABU to write in a style that makes The Sun sound sedate and level headed.

Swipe left for the next trending thread