You can choose to interpet questioning or incredulity at some peoples unwillingness to accept simple facts as piss taking, but I don't see any signs that that's the intention. The lengths that some believers are willing to go to to deny science are baffling. The first thread was more mainstream and balanced I think, on that I woudl agree.
You are doing a bit of a bait and switch by trying to equate it to love for your husband or child or dog though. Because if the believers did leave it as love for god and the teachings, as I and many have repeatedly said, that makes sense and while we don't feel the need, if it works for you then great
A better analogy would be if you had said you are so lucky that the stork had delivered you such a lovely child, and were then challenged by non believers saying 'hang on, that's not how babies are created'.
No one is questioning the love people have for their god - it's attributing things that are palpably nothing to do with god with god that is the issue!