Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Fed up of reading threads asking how they can get out of paying care home fees.

891 replies

Nextdoortomeis · 01/04/2025 09:51

As per the title.
I'm sure lots of people would like the state to pay care home fees.
But we don't live in a fair world.
Both mum and mil paid nearly £70k in fees
yes I didn't want to pay but I also wanted them to get the best care in their later years.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Kandalama · 01/04/2025 14:48

ObelixtheGaul · 01/04/2025 14:36

The trouble is, all those saying about self-funding possibly don't realise how much money is involved. My parents have certainly put money aside. They own a modest bungalow in the North East and have investments, etc. The reality is, if they had to go into care, despite both having worked for decades to save for a relatively comfortable old age, that money including the sale of the bungalow is going to last about 4 years max. At which point, they'll be entitled to the social care, which apparently equates to them having sat on their arses all their lives and taking money from people who worked hard to provide for themselves.

My parents HAVE done all that. It still may not be enough. It's likely that unless your parents have a house worth over £500,000 and very high savings, they will end up being in a home for 'free' if they develop dementia, which people can live with for many years. My parents, like most people of their age were middle income earners, both working. It simply won't be enough for years of care, but that really isn't because they haven't worked and saved.

Agree
I think that’s why we need an insurance system akin to the one in Guernsey.
My aunt had Alzheimer’s for 12 years. She was in a home and the Insurance company paid all top ups over her state and workplace pension.
If she’d only had a state pension they would still cover the lot as that’s the guarantee.

If everyone and I do mean everyone paid into a similar system all their lives then everyone!! Is paying for their own care.
That’s much farer than some, as always, having to foot the bill for themselves and others. If it costs everyone should pay or no one.

A persons Savings are not the property of others to take or have decisions over.

JenniferBooth · 01/04/2025 14:49

Kandalama · 01/04/2025 14:38

For those who have no assets I can see this may be the thinking ( no suggestion re yourself of course)

However
You conveniently forget
The council technically steal money every month from the self funders to pay for those they fund.
That’s why the fees are so huge.
People are paying for random strangers in the room next to them, just because they’ve saved enough to look after themselves.

That’s the disgrace here.

Of note In terms of your phrase greedy
is everyone that goes on holiday or has a car or eats out considered greedy. Just because they have more money and others don’t.
Should we all pay for everyone to have everything so we are all equal in every way. That’s communism.

Well care workers wages should go up then So they can afford to pay for their own care later on

Willyoujustbequiet · 01/04/2025 14:49

nahthatsnotforme · 01/04/2025 14:43

We certainly do not

I'm not sure how.

Apart from there is not enough separation between bands.

pleasepackitin · 01/04/2025 14:50

I used to work in care homes, £1500 a week back about 6 years ago, I dread to think how much it is now !!

confusedaboutetiquette · 01/04/2025 14:51

rwalker · 01/04/2025 10:09

It’s quite simple
2 people have 100k
person A pisses it all against the wall state pay for there care

person B saves it has no benefit they have to pay for there own care and all subsidies persons A care

Not quite true. The person being funded will have no choice where s/he goes. The person doing the funding (as you would have it) has choice. My MiL and parents had choice and we inherited less. I’m still happy with that.

Kandalama · 01/04/2025 14:54

JenniferBooth · 01/04/2025 14:49

Well care workers wages should go up then So they can afford to pay for their own care later on

Everyone should pay or none at all but certainly no ones savings should be used to pay for others who don’t pay.
Or perhaps the insurance scheme would be better which I noted above.

Kandalama · 01/04/2025 14:56

Willyoujustbequiet · 01/04/2025 14:49

I'm not sure how.

Apart from there is not enough separation between bands.

Some areas pay so much more than others.
Partly down to the huge increase in adult social care
ie all people over 18 that need care.

Kandalama · 01/04/2025 14:58

confusedaboutetiquette · 01/04/2025 14:51

Not quite true. The person being funded will have no choice where s/he goes. The person doing the funding (as you would have it) has choice. My MiL and parents had choice and we inherited less. I’m still happy with that.

There’s very little choice.
Places are scarce
99% of homes are not all self funders, chandeliers and a la carte

People take what ever is available.

Grungrot · 01/04/2025 14:59

MellowPinkDeer · 01/04/2025 10:04

That’s cool, you can go to the crappy care home they will choose for you. I hope you enjoy that!

There are misconceptions about the difference in quality of care between council run care homes and privately run care homes. I think some people would be shocked to find out it’s not as it seems.

Willyoujustbequiet · 01/04/2025 14:59

Kandalama · 01/04/2025 14:56

Some areas pay so much more than others.
Partly down to the huge increase in adult social care
ie all people over 18 that need care.

Ah I see, regional variations. Yes, I live in a more expensive area.

pikkumyy77 · 01/04/2025 14:59

AllTheChaos · 01/04/2025 12:44

Because it’s really hard. I know, because we did for my grandma for more than a decade. It is physically and emotionally gruelling, you will be screamed at, punched, sobbed at, you will watch someone you love lose themselves. The hoists require two people to manage safely but you’ll end up doing it alone and wrecking your own physical health. Have you ever tried to change incontinence pads on a physically aggressive, fully grown adult, who can’t remember who you are and thinks you are trying to kill them? It’s impossible, and you will end up covered in faeces and cleaning up everywhere. You can’t do it and work in a paid job, or look after a family. You will be skint, in pain, exhausted, and could be doing it for decades. It’s not an easy thing at all.

I absolutely agree! But my point is that family members complaining that their parents home/money goes on paying for that care are absurdly handwaving away this issue. Good care costs money. In previous generations the labour of younger members of the family was sequestered to maintain elders whether there was family property or not. The state would step in and penalize children for not caring for elders (in good standing) and would penalize vagrants snd the poor with the workhouse. The current laws regarding inheritance arose out of larger political and cultural decisions about how individuals could amass and hold wealth. Ordinary people are able to amass and hold wealth for their lifetime and are expected to be self supporting to the best of their ability. Its not some kind of unfair cruelty that people should be expected to plan for their own eldercare needs.

Gasp0deTheW0nderD0g · 01/04/2025 14:59

OnARainyDay2012 · 01/04/2025 12:23

So many posters on here saying their good decisions have led to their financial position when in fact many have benefitted from huge increases in house prices which can be attributed to nothing more than good luck. Now people are impoverished by housing costs, and the older generation expects the younger ones to pay for their care as well. We need to redistribute the money to reduce economic inequality and I hope we see tax increases to do this, particularly CGT and a wealth tax.

100% agree, and I speak as one of the despised Baby Boomers who did have the sheer good luck to buy a house in London before it became like one of Willie Wonka's golden tickets!

Sleepinggreyhounds · 01/04/2025 15:00

I think one of the issues that people think is unfair is that in some homes when you pay for your own care you are usually paying over the odds and are subsidising others who are paid for by the state as the cap on what they will pay is lower than it actually costs. For instance in many homes if you run out of money you can stay but the costs are more or less the same (although you might change to a less palatial room) despite the fees paid by the government being much lower. This shortfall is made up by those who are paying their own fees.

MrsFaustus · 01/04/2025 15:01

I’ve gone on MN about this before. I think it is very unfair that the state will take you down to £23,000 before helping. As others have said, a modest home and assets won’t last long. It would be fairer to either have the insurance system or take a percentage of home/assets and then the state kicks in. Wonder what happened to the £86,000 max ‘oven ready’ policy…..

Needspaceforlego · 01/04/2025 15:01

Acommonreader · 01/04/2025 12:20

Yes I fully understand this - I’m a carer.
The elderly were cared for at home in the past but not for as long. Many other societies/ cultures still do this.
One problem is that we all live so long now- what’s the solution? The whole system needs a reform, government cannot care for all elderly people for possibly decades! We cannot afford it yet individuals are reluctant to pay for care themselves- people here are calling it extortion!
Maybe we need a new PAYE system where we all contribute specifically to our future care or agree to self fund?

And what do you do with those who are unsafe to be discharged from hospital, who have neither paid the PAYE insurance or the means to self fund?

What would be the difference between this PAYE insurance and NI?

It just sounds like another complex tax system.

I think if people need care they should get it, as part of Social Care or NHS.
But people should have a choice to go private. Bit like schools if your happy with the local care home great if you want an Eton level of care get your purse out.

IAmNeverThePerson · 01/04/2025 15:02

I think it you can pay for your carehome you should. I would however like more the the money to go to the carers rather than the owners ( never met a broke owner of a care franchise)

Kandalama · 01/04/2025 15:03

confusedaboutetiquette · 01/04/2025 14:51

Not quite true. The person being funded will have no choice where s/he goes. The person doing the funding (as you would have it) has choice. My MiL and parents had choice and we inherited less. I’m still happy with that.

Agree @rwalker

just like the pp who noted her mum saving and paying for care whilst her MIL spent it all and didn’t bother saving so got it all for free!
That would really p… me off.

That’s the UK way. Another completely unfair system.

There are ways around it though. So always worthwhile having a Mumsnet thread to share advice 😃

JenniferBooth · 01/04/2025 15:04

And people wonder they struggle to find care workers. Its not considered to be a job of value and if they know they are going to be resented for being poorer later on why the fuck WOULD ppl choose to do this for a job. I wouldnt.
40,000 of them quit due to not wanting the Covid vaccine. More will think fuck it Im not doing a thankless job for shit pay to be looked down on later on when i need care

Kandalama · 01/04/2025 15:05

pikkumyy77 · 01/04/2025 14:59

I absolutely agree! But my point is that family members complaining that their parents home/money goes on paying for that care are absurdly handwaving away this issue. Good care costs money. In previous generations the labour of younger members of the family was sequestered to maintain elders whether there was family property or not. The state would step in and penalize children for not caring for elders (in good standing) and would penalize vagrants snd the poor with the workhouse. The current laws regarding inheritance arose out of larger political and cultural decisions about how individuals could amass and hold wealth. Ordinary people are able to amass and hold wealth for their lifetime and are expected to be self supporting to the best of their ability. Its not some kind of unfair cruelty that people should be expected to plan for their own eldercare needs.

But should they also have to pay for others that don’t?

everyone is conveniently ignoring this fact

SirRaymondClench · 01/04/2025 15:07

Given that most care homes charge £1k a week for shit care from minimum wage staff whilst care home owners rake it in at a massive profit YABU.

My Uncle worked all his life for his home and it went paying for horrendous care and shit food and for people who had never worked a day in their life to live in the same place. He paid for them all the way through his life and in their old age as well as himself and the care home owners profited massively while he was abused by care home staff who stole from him. It was £1200 a week for this.

What you're arguing for is care home owners to profit because literally nobody else does well from the arrangement (unless you sit on your arse all your life or you own a care home).
If you got decent food and decent care that would be one thing but as recent headlines have shown, you don't.

LittleBigHead · 01/04/2025 15:08

Totally agree with you @Nextdoortomeis

I recently moved house for a job. I quite liked the house I owned in the town I've left, and it's got lots of important and significant memories for me.

So I think the government (ie taxpayers) should pay for me to buy a house where I've moved to, because of - oh all the memories of the family home. And to save it for my children's inheritance.

It's ridiculous isn't it?

It's just the same when going into a retirement or care home: you can't live in your old home, so sell it to pay for the place you need to live in.

SpringHasSprungg · 01/04/2025 15:10

SirRaymondClench · 01/04/2025 15:07

Given that most care homes charge £1k a week for shit care from minimum wage staff whilst care home owners rake it in at a massive profit YABU.

My Uncle worked all his life for his home and it went paying for horrendous care and shit food and for people who had never worked a day in their life to live in the same place. He paid for them all the way through his life and in their old age as well as himself and the care home owners profited massively while he was abused by care home staff who stole from him. It was £1200 a week for this.

What you're arguing for is care home owners to profit because literally nobody else does well from the arrangement (unless you sit on your arse all your life or you own a care home).
If you got decent food and decent care that would be one thing but as recent headlines have shown, you don't.

Edited

Care homes don’t make as much profit as you’d expect.

SirRaymondClench · 01/04/2025 15:11

SpringHasSprungg · 01/04/2025 15:10

Care homes don’t make as much profit as you’d expect.

What exactly do they spend it on?
It's not staff wages or food that's for sure.

SoSoLong · 01/04/2025 15:12

pikkumyy77 · 01/04/2025 12:31

Why can’t the family care for their elderly relatives? That is the way it was done for millennia. That is the compact between generations that no one has time for anymore.

My maternal grandparents died at home in their late 70s. Their children cared for them, no issues. My paternal grandmother lived to 102, my mother was the only surviving close relative and she was 80 at the time. Caring for her broke my mother, physically and mentally. It would have been much better for grandma to go into a home.

My mother is 83 now and doesn't require care yet, but if she will in the next few years, I won't be able to provide it myself. I work ft (20 years to go still) and I've got children to take care of.

Mischance · 01/04/2025 15:15

The whole system needs radical reform.

I wait with baited breath for a government who is prepared to take on that mammoth political hot potato!

Swipe left for the next trending thread