Meet the Other Phone. Only the apps you allow.

Meet the Other Phone.
Only the apps you allow.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

To be upset that the police didn’t do anything? Dangerous dog

201 replies

Koulibiak · 29/03/2025 01:29

I can’t sleep and can’t stop thinking about what happened and what could have happened.

I had just stepped out to walk my dogs (both small, placid dogs - one is a toy breed and the other a beagle mix) this afternoon. We crossed path with a woman pushing a bike with a front trolley thing. I assumed the trolley was for a child (the type you see in Amsterdam), I didn’t have time to see that there was something inside. Suddenly a dog jumped out of the trolley and attacked my dogs, one after the other. The dog was a female Labrador, she went straight for my dogs’ necks and on top of their backs. My dogs yelped in pain, started going in different directions and tripped me.

It all happened so fast, as I fell on the pavement I thought the Labrador was going to kill us all.

Eventually the woman got her dog back, I asked her to stay while I called the police. I got my dogs back inside the house, checked that neither of them was bleeding, they are both fine.

The police arrived, the woman turned on the water works and started sobbing. I said the dog was dangerously out of control, and at the very least the woman should receive a FPN for not having her dog on a lead.

The police were so dismissive - they said they wouldn’t issue a FPN because the woman had not realised the dog wasn’t tethered in the trolley, so she had no intention of breaking the law. I pointed out that intent is not part of the offence, but they said the poor woman had a flat tire on her bike, she was very distraught, she was going to have to walk 25 minutes home (like it’s a massive ordeal?) and they “didn’t want to make her day even worse with a FPN”. They said the dog is not an XL bully or Rottweiler, so it is not a dangerous dog (obviously that’s not true).

There were so many little aggressions in the way the constables spoke to me, I actually reminded them that I was the victim and she was the perpetrator. Like they implied that my dog was also out of control (absolutely untrue), or that they have discretion and can do whatever they want. Also that they now have my details on file, like I was a suspect.

Honestly it’s made me feel so sad for all the women who try and report assaults, the mix of dismissiveness and superiority and “we don’t owe you an explanation” and “I can see there’s nothing we can say that will placate you”. Just because I was asking them to enforce the law and protect the public. It was also obvious they didn’t understand the DDA at all.

I did ask the woman why her dog wasn’t muzzled and whether she was prepared to live with her conscience if her dog killed a child or another dog. She replied “absolutely”.

I just keep reliving the few seconds when the dog leapt out at my dogs and I fell on the pavement, not knowing where the dog was or how to protect myself or my dogs… it’s like a nightmare on repeat. 🙁

OP posts:
faerietales · 29/03/2025 13:49

EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 29/03/2025 13:27

@@faerietales I suppose what CAN be done is that the local dog warden can be alerted that there is a situation with this animal. The owner might be easy to spot if they are always using a bike and a carrier? Therefore they can be “known” in the future and it helps others?

Dog wardens have incredibly limited powers - they are not going to be remotely interested in taking note of a dog-on-dog scuffle in which nobody was hurt (by the dogs) and in which no dogs were injured.

In an ideal world, maybe there would be some kind of database where these things are noted, but there isn't. As PP have tried to point out, dog-on-dog attacks are a civil matter - even in cases where dogs have been killed, nothing is actually done and the owner doesn't face any consequences.

Dog aggression is only (legally) an issue where humans are bitten. Someone tripping because they got caught up in their own dog leads won't even cross anyone's radar.

Whether that's morally right or not is a whole different issue, but the police (and the dog warden) can't act on morals, they have to follow the law, and they can't go round making notes about dog scuffles with no evidence of what happened.

EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 29/03/2025 13:58

@faerietales for some reason I can’t copy a small part of your post but I absolutely did not realise a dog can KILL someone else’s dog and there be no consequences! That’s TERRIBLE

faerietales · 29/03/2025 14:01

@EineReiseDurchDieZeit it happened here last year - a pack of off-lead lurchers killed someone's dog (I think a shih-tzu or similar) and the dog warden didn't even attend. The poor woman had to carry her dead dog home covered in blood - it was absolutely horrendous.

Maybe other parts of the country are different (and I hope they are!) but I honestly have no faith in the police, dog warden or RSPCA to deal with any kind of dog or animal related issues anymore.

Mrsbloggz · 29/03/2025 14:06

neilyoungismyhero · 29/03/2025 12:05

A large offlead dog attacked your small dogs who were being walked on a lead and somehow it's being viewed as your fault!

Posters on here are an absolute joke.

Very well said 👏🏻
I'm so sorry @Koulibiak it sounds awful and made even more awful by the very disappointing and insulting response of the police🤬👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

LookingAtMyBhunas · 29/03/2025 14:10

EineReiseDurchDieZeit · 29/03/2025 13:31

It’s an aggressive dog that wasn’t in the owners full control @LookingAtMyBhunas there’s no harm in telling the dog warden nor telling the police that you found them dismissive.

Read my previous post. I said the OP should complain if she wishes to.
Like a lot of people on this thread though it doesn't look like it meets the threshold for out of control, and police don't deal with dog on dog attacks.

StellaAndCrow · 29/03/2025 14:14

Yes, my friends small dog was killed by a labrador who just ran up to it on the beach and attacked it. No consequences.

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 29/03/2025 14:32

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 29/03/2025 11:18

A Labrador attacking a toy breed is not a “minor scuffle”.

It was just a scuffle or there would be injuries.

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 29/03/2025 14:35

Arseynal · 29/03/2025 11:23

My on lead (big) dog was attacked and seriously injured (requiring surgery) by a smallish off lead staffy cross. The other owner had a child about 4 and a toddler in a pushchair. I reported it to the police and dog warden and neither of them gaf despite the dog living with 2 pre schoolers. I reported it to social services in the end who also didn’t gaf.

Just because a dog has been involved in an incident with another dog does not mean that any children are at risk.

faerietales · 29/03/2025 14:37

Mrsbloggz · 29/03/2025 14:06

Very well said 👏🏻
I'm so sorry @Koulibiak it sounds awful and made even more awful by the very disappointing and insulting response of the police🤬👎🏻👎🏻👎🏻

Okay - what do you think the police should have done?

Bearing in mind the dog didn't bite OP or her dogs, and there are no witnesses or cameras to provide any evidence of what happened.

Should they just arrest the other owner based on OP's say-so?

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 29/03/2025 14:41

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 29/03/2025 14:32

It was just a scuffle or there would be injuries.

Scuffle implies minor fight, ie two sided. The aggression in this case was entirely one sided, therefore it was an attack.

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 29/03/2025 14:44

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 29/03/2025 14:41

Scuffle implies minor fight, ie two sided. The aggression in this case was entirely one sided, therefore it was an attack.

Give over.

faerietales · 29/03/2025 14:47

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 29/03/2025 14:41

Scuffle implies minor fight, ie two sided. The aggression in this case was entirely one sided, therefore it was an attack.

Dog-on-dog aggression is a civil issue, not a legal one - and nobody is going to take the slightest bit of interest in three dogs who had a fight in which none of them sustained any injuries.

Should it have happened? No, of course not, but legally speaking this is a non-issue, sadly.

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 29/03/2025 15:15

faerietales · 29/03/2025 14:47

Dog-on-dog aggression is a civil issue, not a legal one - and nobody is going to take the slightest bit of interest in three dogs who had a fight in which none of them sustained any injuries.

Should it have happened? No, of course not, but legally speaking this is a non-issue, sadly.

I wasn’t talking about the law. I’m just frustrated with so many people claiming that it’s not a big deal. I see too many owners of bigger dogs allowing them to terrorise smaller dogs. If their big dog was bowled over by a dog three times the size of them they’d have an issue, but since their dog is never going to encounter a dog with such a massive size advantage over them it’s not a problem for them.

Newname71 · 29/03/2025 15:25

Potsofpetals · 29/03/2025 02:26

I have a large English mastiff who wouldn’t hurt a fly. I have to walk him at 3am because I am sick to death of him being attacked by yappy rats on leads. I am yet to see a well behaved toy breed. All dogs can be dangerous. If my well mannered dog snapped at your dog because he got sick of being nipped at it would be his fault.

We have a Staffy, he’s a big dope of a dog. He’s been attacked 3 times (by a greyhound, a Labrador and a Jack Russell) and just hides behinds us. Our next door neighbours have a Shitzu that’s really aggressive and tries to jump the wall to get to our dog yet our dog is the one that people are wary of 🤷‍♀️

faerietales · 29/03/2025 15:29

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 29/03/2025 15:15

I wasn’t talking about the law. I’m just frustrated with so many people claiming that it’s not a big deal. I see too many owners of bigger dogs allowing them to terrorise smaller dogs. If their big dog was bowled over by a dog three times the size of them they’d have an issue, but since their dog is never going to encounter a dog with such a massive size advantage over them it’s not a problem for them.

I agree with you, it's shit.

But OP's post was all about the lack of police response and the reality is, there won't be one in a situation like this. No evidence, no witnesses and no injuries - there's nothing to be done, sadly.

Morally it's a whole different issue and dog owners really ought to be held accountable in situations like this. Hopefully the owner of the Labrador has learnt a valuable lesson.

ThreePointOneFourOneFiveNine · 29/03/2025 15:33

faerietales · 29/03/2025 15:29

I agree with you, it's shit.

But OP's post was all about the lack of police response and the reality is, there won't be one in a situation like this. No evidence, no witnesses and no injuries - there's nothing to be done, sadly.

Morally it's a whole different issue and dog owners really ought to be held accountable in situations like this. Hopefully the owner of the Labrador has learnt a valuable lesson.

I doubt the lab owner has learned anything sadly. We can but hope.

I wasn’t really responding to the OP, just the countless posters who were minimising the situation and implying that it was a two way encounter when it clearly wasn’t.

ThymeScent · 29/03/2025 15:50

Raise a complaint against the police. Their action were unacceptable. You were the victim.

Whoarethoseguys · 29/03/2025 15:54

ByTicklishLimeBalonz · 29/03/2025 01:37

Strictly speaking from a legal view that breed of dog is not a dangerous dog, now yes you could say the dogs actions seemed like x,

The breed might not be a dangerous breed but the individual dog is

faerietales · 29/03/2025 15:59

ThymeScent · 29/03/2025 15:50

Raise a complaint against the police. Their action were unacceptable. You were the victim.

The police will do absolutely nothing.

ThymeScent · 29/03/2025 16:04

Raise a complaint AGAINST the police, not with the police

faerietales · 29/03/2025 16:23

ThymeScent · 29/03/2025 16:04

Raise a complaint AGAINST the police, not with the police

About what?

Arseynal · 29/03/2025 16:26

VeterinaryCareAssistant · 29/03/2025 14:35

Just because a dog has been involved in an incident with another dog does not mean that any children are at risk.

If two preschoolers, one of them disabled, are living with a dog that has almost killed a bigger than a preschooler dog while their mother keeps saying “he’s soft and anything” on repeat and that dog was off lead in a busy public area despite having only been “given” to the family a week earlier then the children are vulnerable by virtue of age, disability, and having a mother who can’t adequately assess risk. I had to carry my dog away from the scene with the help of a stranger and could look back several minutes later and still see the dog was dangerously out of control. There was no interaction between the 2 dogs before the incident - their dog came from behind and gripped my dog from underneath before we even knew he was there - it wasn’t an “incident”, it was a near fatal attack. I can assess risk and at no point did I claim any incident between 2 dogs automatically put children at risk but those children were at risk from that dog.

OneTC · 29/03/2025 16:30

The most surprising thing about this story is that the police attended. We can't even get them to come for violent assaults or burglary

Icantbelieveitsnotnutter · 29/03/2025 17:36

I've met a few aggressive labs recently, trying to attack my Spaniel. If these lazy arse entitled owners don't keep them under control they're also going to end up on the dangerous dogs list. I love all dogs but can't stand crappy owners!

Floatlikeafeather2 · 29/03/2025 17:44

LookingAtMyBhunas · 29/03/2025 13:23

The incident will already be logged because officers attended?

By all means complain OP, but dog on dog attacks are a civil matter so the only offence there could be would be DOOC, which if you're saying they were in the trolley thing and had leads I can see what the officers mean.

The dog that did the attacking jumped out of the trolley and did not have a lead. The ones being attacked did, and it's usually that way round.

Swipe left for the next trending thread