Meet the Other Phone. Protection built in.

Meet the Other Phone.
Protection built in.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

Calling my unborn baby they/them

1000 replies

Irish24 · 28/03/2025 03:19

I am keeping the gender a surprise and the amount of people that are confused when I refer to the baby as they/them’ is starting to aggravate me. I don’t like referring to them as ‘it’ or just ‘baby’. They/them is a word and has been going around for centuries. It also is a singular pronoun and does not always mean multiple. My friends say they can’t get their head around it. I don’t understand. I know they/them is a controversial topic these days and more people are perhaps finding out the gender. I still don’t find it confusing at all and it never even occurred to me that it would be. Anyone else experienced this or am I being over dramatic here? It’s just tiresome having to constantly explain to people, I don’t know the gender so that’s why I’m calling the baby ‘them/they’

OP posts:
Thread gallery
7
JassyRadlett · 28/03/2025 09:50

Why on earth would you use the object pronoun in place of the subject pronoun? Or use incorrect verb conjugations for the singular they? You're being deliberately obtuse.

Try substituting actual correct grammar. So in response to the question, "when is the baby due", the response is:

"They're due on 10 June, unless they come early. They are kicking up a real storm today, they've clearly enjoyed the snack I had earlier! We have assembled their cot but they won't use it for a while, they will be in their Moses basket in our room until they are about six months old."

Which is far better than either of the two preceding versions. One was insane and one was intentionally ungrammatical and therefore difficult to engage with.

ErrolTheDragon · 28/03/2025 09:50

katepilar · 28/03/2025 09:44

It unfortunate that the English language does not have a neuter for living creatures as other languages do.

It is, for the second person as well as the third. I once had an invitation from my boss ‘would you like to come to dinner’ which was intended to include my other half but I assumed just me.

OlivePeer · 28/03/2025 09:51

TheGentleOpalMember · 28/03/2025 09:49

The opposite of that, in OP's own terms (she doesn't want to even use the word 'baby' at all) is
“We had a scan for them but the person doing the scan couldn’t get all the they’s measurements. We have to go back and hope they is in a different position to check thems spine length. They just couldn’t sit still.”

And again! Why do you you think the OP doesn't know how to use the word "their"?

MissDoubleU · 28/03/2025 09:51

TheGentleOpalMember · 28/03/2025 09:49

The opposite of that, in OP's own terms (she doesn't want to even use the word 'baby' at all) is
“We had a scan for them but the person doing the scan couldn’t get all the they’s measurements. We have to go back and hope they is in a different position to check thems spine length. They just couldn’t sit still.”

When did OP say they won’t refer the baby as the baby or anything except they/them? You can’t ram a pronoun in where it doesn’t make sense - but this is the correct pronoun in the circumstance, which is what the OP has been saying.

IHaveDefectedToTeamDog · 28/03/2025 09:51

TheGentleOpalMember · 28/03/2025 09:46

Better than saying "They is due on 10 June, unless they come early. They are kicking up a real storm today, them has clearly enjoyed the snack I had earlier! We have assembled thems cot but they won't use it for a while, they will be in them's Moses basket in our room until they is about six months old."

Which is what the OP is suggesting as they don't like using the word baby at all.

Eh?
But no one would say "They is" or "Them are" under any circumstances, unless they were a new EFL student or something.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 28/03/2025 09:51

TheGentleOpalMember · 28/03/2025 09:46

Better than saying "They is due on 10 June, unless they come early. They are kicking up a real storm today, them has clearly enjoyed the snack I had earlier! We have assembled thems cot but they won't use it for a while, they will be in them's Moses basket in our room until they is about six months old."

Which is what the OP is suggesting as they don't like using the word baby at all.

Just say you don't understand how grammar works and go.

Yazzi · 28/03/2025 09:52

Grammarnut · 28/03/2025 09:04

It's singular if you do not know the sex, not the gender. I.e. who's that person by the lake? They look like they're going to jump in - can't tell sex.

Have a break xx

Nanny0gg · 28/03/2025 09:52

Irish24 · 28/03/2025 03:19

I am keeping the gender a surprise and the amount of people that are confused when I refer to the baby as they/them’ is starting to aggravate me. I don’t like referring to them as ‘it’ or just ‘baby’. They/them is a word and has been going around for centuries. It also is a singular pronoun and does not always mean multiple. My friends say they can’t get their head around it. I don’t understand. I know they/them is a controversial topic these days and more people are perhaps finding out the gender. I still don’t find it confusing at all and it never even occurred to me that it would be. Anyone else experienced this or am I being over dramatic here? It’s just tiresome having to constantly explain to people, I don’t know the gender so that’s why I’m calling the baby ‘them/they’

You are keeping the SEX as a surprise (which is perfectly reasonable)

But can we stop being scared of that word?

The SEX of your baby will be observed at birth (hope the scans were right, I know someone where they got it wrong!) and then you can surprise everyone which I am sure you are looking forward to.

I really can't see what's wrong with saying 'the baby' though...

Natsku · 28/03/2025 09:52

katepilar · 28/03/2025 09:44

It unfortunate that the English language does not have a neuter for living creatures as other languages do.

Can always use it, though some people don't like it. Pretty sure that's what I substituted for 'the baby' as sentences continued.

BillStickersWillBeProsocuted · 28/03/2025 09:52

TheGentleOpalMember · 28/03/2025 09:46

Better than saying "They is due on 10 June, unless they come early. They are kicking up a real storm today, them has clearly enjoyed the snack I had earlier! We have assembled thems cot but they won't use it for a while, they will be in them's Moses basket in our room until they is about six months old."

Which is what the OP is suggesting as they don't like using the word baby at all.

they is = they are or they're
them has = they have
thems = their

Why are you trying to pretend words like "their" and "are" don't exist to make your point?!

Whoarethoseguys · 28/03/2025 09:52

medlobath · 28/03/2025 09:35

OK.So we are taking all the meaning of the English language from some academics in 1375. No more new words, no change of meaning in 650 years . OK. Good to know.
"They and them " has been a plural in almost everyones minds for centuries. You want to change that relying on some academic from 600 years ago "Yeah thee". What an odd thing to pretend about. BTW the only one I can find is Oxford ( captured)

Edited

But it hasn't. They/them has always been used if you don't know the sex of the person you are referring to.
"Someone stole my car I hope they are pleased with themselves"

Natsku · 28/03/2025 09:54

ErrolTheDragon · 28/03/2025 09:50

It is, for the second person as well as the third. I once had an invitation from my boss ‘would you like to come to dinner’ which was intended to include my other half but I assumed just me.

Oh yes, English would definitely benefit from second person plural, would prevent a lot of misunderstandings.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 28/03/2025 09:55

Whoarethoseguys · 28/03/2025 09:52

But it hasn't. They/them has always been used if you don't know the sex of the person you are referring to.
"Someone stole my car I hope they are pleased with themselves"

No, no - the anti-they brigade MUST lengthen their sentences unnecessarily, just to prove how un-woke they are.

"Someone has stolen my car. I hope HE OR SHE is happy with HIS OR HERSELF".

Extra non-woke points for going to extremes. "A person who is either male or female AS WE ALL ARE has stolen my car, I hope the MALE MAN or the FEMALE WOMAN is happy with HIS MALE SELF or HER FEMALE SELF".

ladymammalade · 28/03/2025 09:55

They or them suggests multiple, sorry. Most people would say “the baby/baby/it”

BillStickersWillBeProsocuted · 28/03/2025 09:55

TheGentleOpalMember · 28/03/2025 09:47

Yet nowhere does the person I quoted used the word "are".

True but they also didn't use "is" in a sentance where "are" would have been both grammitcally correct and normal sounding

MumCanIHaveASnackPlease · 28/03/2025 09:57

I’ve just been in Tesco and saw plenty of “it’s a boy” and “it’s a girl” cards and I’m just wondering if the posters on here have written a letter to complain that they must now stock “it’s a male” and “it’s a female” cards. I mean how lovely and warm and fuzzy to receive one of those….

Careertimenow · 28/03/2025 09:57

Irish24 · 28/03/2025 08:06

I don’t know the gender as I’ve said at least 10 times on this thread. Therefore it’s hardly attention seeking when you don’t know the facts. Also if I did know and decided not to say to anyone then that is my choice to do so whether people like it or not. It’s not attention seeking

Are you waiting for the baby to figure out what gender it would like to be?
You keep saying gender rather than sex. Sex is definite gender you can change. When you have the baby it might be gender fluid and be a girl on Monday and then a boy on Wednesday.
Your wording is what is confusing people.

longapple · 28/03/2025 09:59

what's the confusion?
"I'm not sure when the baby is going to be born, I'm sure they'll make an appearance when they're ready"
using 'they' is a completely valid use of language?

thepariscrimefiles · 28/03/2025 10:00

TheGentleOpalMember · 28/03/2025 09:41

I see it more as "baby is kicking"
vs
"they is kicking" or "them is kicking"

You genuinely think that OP says 'them is kicking'?

You are being totally ridiculous.

MerlinsBeard1 · 28/03/2025 10:00

Somebody was bored at 3am.

HaddyAbrams · 28/03/2025 10:01

Crackanut · 28/03/2025 08:51

I don't think I've ever read something so absolutely ridiculous as this in all my time on Mumsnet.

They want a 'big reveal' moment. That's the other part of the problem. So they arent just telling people what they are having at 20 weeks in normal conversation which is the norm now

I never found out the sex of my children until they were born. How on earth is that now seen to be attention seeking? The "big reveal"??? Fuuuuucking hell 😂

I'm wondering why my text message of "it's a boy, we've called him James" after giving birth was any more attention seeking than the one my friend sent at 20 weeks saying "just had a scan, it's a boy" Confused

Anyway. 20 years ago I used a mixture of they/ they/ baby/ he or she for my unborn babies. (2 singular babies, not twins) as did most other people who hadn't found out what they were having. I hate "it" for a person. Awful term.

IHaveDefectedToTeamDog · 28/03/2025 10:01

Natsku · 28/03/2025 09:54

Oh yes, English would definitely benefit from second person plural, would prevent a lot of misunderstandings.

Haha, well we Scots (and some others) like "Yous" and the Americsn have their "Y'all" !

JassyRadlett · 28/03/2025 10:01

5128gap · 28/03/2025 09:50

What is a bit stupid imo is the lengths people will go to to pretend that 'they' has always been used interchangeably with he or she; when anyone who has been present in the world, communicating in English, knows full well that while 'they' singular is grammatically correct, it would be very rarely used in preference to the sex based singular pronoun, where the persons sex is known.Who would say "Chris and Sam are separating. They want to stay in the marital home" when it makes it impossible to ascertain whether Chris, Sam or both want to stay there? Anyone who thinks the OP is referring to multiple babies by her use of 'they' is making a reasonable assumption based on how we usually express ourselves, which is by selecting from the grammatically correct options the one that most clearly conveys our meaning.

No one's actually said that, though. The usage has been around for centuries but has fallen in and out of "acceptability". The 1926 Dictionary of Modern English Usage described the usage as having an "old fashioned sound"; its current use has had widespread acceptance since at least the 1990s.

It's worth noting that "it" was never the preferred alternative - it was "he". When that stopped being acceptable to many, the usage of "they" was widely substituted in preference to "it".

In the 1950s, you might have said "someone has left his umbrella behind."

For many decades now, most people would say, with equal grammatical correctness, "someone has left their umbrella behind."

"Someone has left his or her umbrella behind" is also correct but very formal; "someone has left its umbrella behind" not so much.

MissDoubleU · 28/03/2025 10:02

OP please announce your child’s birth with a loving statement declaring “THEM BE BABY”

medlobath · 28/03/2025 10:02

BillStickersWillBeProsocuted · 28/03/2025 09:37

"When sorrows come, they come not single spies, but in battalions!"

but don't be too impressed, I just googled it! 😂

Ummm, isn't that definitely plural "spies", "battalions" but I did my Lit degree too long ago to start an argument this late at night ( Aus).

Please create an account

To comment on this thread you need to create a Mumsnet account.

This thread is not accepting new messages.