Meet the Other Phone. Flexible and made to last.

Meet the Other Phone.
Flexible and made to last.

Buy now

Please or to access all these features

AIBU?

Share your dilemmas and get honest opinions from other Mumsnetters.

See all MNHQ comments on this thread

To wonder if all those gleeful about PIP cuts are going to welcome people with serious mental health conditions as colleagues and employees?

821 replies

Somethingthecatdraggedin7 · 19/03/2025 09:39

Given the amount of ableisism I see on MN I think the likelihood of people welcoming people with serious mental health conditions into their workplace is pretty low.
And yes, these people will very likely now be forced to try to work even though their condition makes it impossible. We are not just talking about some lazy twenty year old who expects to sit at home gaming due to his “anxiety” as many people seem to believe is the case. It will be people with significant impairments to social functioning.
Even if they get support to apply for jobs, and even if they then get the position (doubtful) how accommodating will colleagues or customers be if the person seems a bit odd, or gets adjustments workmates deem unfair?
This is going to be a total shit show.

OP posts:
Thread gallery
10
Jabtastic · 25/03/2025 12:36

JobhuntingDespair · 25/03/2025 12:27

How is it fair that someone who is more disabled by their mental health (for example) should receive less than someone with a physical disability they could work round? (Talking UC here, not PIP to pay for equipment etc. Although now UC will be linked to PIP entitlement.)

I have no skin in the game any more, but I know that when my MH was too bad to work I was more impacted than a friend of mine who's a wheelchair user (and doesn't work).

It's interesting that society views using a wheelchair almost as the archetypal disability, yet other conditions that are not obvious at first glance can be far more disabling in terms of work. People with physical disabilities who could work are in for a rude awakeing.

Many of us DO work.

Locutus2000 · 25/03/2025 12:37

I struggle to believe anyone describing disability benefits as a 'bonus' is here in good faith.

ruethewhirl · 25/03/2025 13:01

Wildflowers99 · 24/03/2025 22:44

Not if they’re well explained or backed by evidence, no. You saying ‘you all want us in workhouses!!’ is like me saying ‘you want to ruin the economy with benefits!!’.

Literally nobody wants those things. Until the posters who are against the reforms suggest a practical way in which we can pay a £5 billion PER YEAR increase, our opinions are moot and the changes have to happen.

Hysterically posting about workhouses changes nothing, it’s just designed to terminate the conversation using pure emotion. Even you did the problems would remain.

Right, that's it. I've had it with you telling me what I think and getting it wrong, making inflammatory and incorrect accusations, and flinging misogynistic insults around just because you cannot handle people disagreeing with you. So ironic that you are accusing others of hysteria and trying to shut down debate when you are the one who doesn't seem capable of coming at this topic calmly or responding constructively to counter-argument.

And don't bother with any comeback to this because I'm done engaging with you.

ruethewhirl · 25/03/2025 13:05

XenoBitch · 25/03/2025 00:52

Christ, no, I am done. Fed up with various people making out anyone with MH issues is swinging the lead, or if they post on MN... must be well enough to work.
Come live in my head. I dare you.
I am done. Seriously.

I'm not surprised you've had enough. This thread and others like it are positively dystopian and very depressing. I'm considering a break from MN until interest in this topic dies down a little because I'm so sick of the bigotry, and I'm sure I won't be the only one. It seems certain posters are determined to double down on their blinkered ATOS-style 'if I can't see it, it doesn't exist, off to work with you' one-size-fits-all opinions regardless how anyone tries to educate them.

I've also yet to see any answers to the question of how we are supposed to deal with employer bias against the disabled other than repeated vague bleatings of 'well, something has to be done'. It's almost as though these people - gasp! - actually don't have all the answers and yet somehow seem to consider themselves capable of telepathic, long-range diagnoses of complete strangers' fitness for work.

Some people on this thread and others should be ashamed of themselves, and it's especially depressing to see people who are dealing with disability themselves piling on. Talk about a race to the bottom.

KTheGrey · 25/03/2025 13:13

I think people with serious mental health problems not getting proper care which keeps the community safe is a different issue.

We have 9 million not working and we are a full year’s gdp in debt. I would not mind taxing the super rich, but the super rich tend to leave sharpish taking their tax with them, and it’s a bit rough for JKRowling to have to pay all the tax in the country.

Wildflowers99 · 25/03/2025 13:26

ruethewhirl · 25/03/2025 13:01

Right, that's it. I've had it with you telling me what I think and getting it wrong, making inflammatory and incorrect accusations, and flinging misogynistic insults around just because you cannot handle people disagreeing with you. So ironic that you are accusing others of hysteria and trying to shut down debate when you are the one who doesn't seem capable of coming at this topic calmly or responding constructively to counter-argument.

And don't bother with any comeback to this because I'm done engaging with you.

bye then

Wildflowers99 · 25/03/2025 13:27

KTheGrey · 25/03/2025 13:13

I think people with serious mental health problems not getting proper care which keeps the community safe is a different issue.

We have 9 million not working and we are a full year’s gdp in debt. I would not mind taxing the super rich, but the super rich tend to leave sharpish taking their tax with them, and it’s a bit rough for JKRowling to have to pay all the tax in the country.

Yes the idea that we can (and should) be a country with 50% unemployment propped up by a few billionaires is laughable.

JobhuntingDespair · 25/03/2025 14:13

Jabtastic · 25/03/2025 12:36

Many of us DO work.

Yes of course. And you face additional barriers to be able to do so.

I was responding to a PP who seemed to think "invisible" conditions like mental ill health shouldn't qualify for support.

ThisOldThang · 25/03/2025 14:18

The levels of entitlement displayed in these threads is very worrying. Some people seem to feel that they're above any sort of questioning from anybody about anything.

How dare they be assessed for eligibility?
How dare anybody question the legitimacy of certain conditions?
How dare anybody disagree with their arguments?
How dare anybody suggest it's unaffordable for the country?

We're heading for national bankruptcy and things are going to have to change. There's simply no other option.

A lot of people are going to have to accept a much lower standard of living or they'll have to get a job. It's as simple as that.

KTheGrey · 25/03/2025 14:23

Very strange that people should think 9m is a reasonable number to have out of work.

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 25/03/2025 14:51

I shared an article on another thread but I think it bears repeating here - over 40% of employers surveyed by the epilepsy society said they wouldn't employ someone with epilepsy. How are disabled people supposed to get jobs when the government is doing nothing to make (either through incentives or sanctions) employers take on disabled staff?

AdaStewart · 25/03/2025 14:56

There are more people with MH conditions than not, it’s just that they don’t know this.

JenniferBooth · 25/03/2025 14:59

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 25/03/2025 14:51

I shared an article on another thread but I think it bears repeating here - over 40% of employers surveyed by the epilepsy society said they wouldn't employ someone with epilepsy. How are disabled people supposed to get jobs when the government is doing nothing to make (either through incentives or sanctions) employers take on disabled staff?

This is why a friend of mine concealed this condition when she went for a job at a supermarket. She prayed that she wouldnt have a fit while at work. She got the job Supermarket begins with the letter M

CentralLimit · 25/03/2025 15:32

CentralLimit · 25/03/2025 12:26

I have an interest in engaging with the figures.
This is what Wikipedia has to say about benefit fraud. Do you have a better resource (genuine question)? I've seen variations on these figures but everyone I've read seems broadly in agreement that tax shortfall is a much bigger issue than benefit overpayment.

I'm happy to believe that some individuals are exploiting the benefit system - of course there will be some; there are dishonest people in every strata of society. But I'm concerned about the focus on it, as I feel it's a distraction from much bigger, more urgent issues.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Benefit_fraud_in_the_United_Kingdom

No response @Wildflowers99 ?
I'm just taking you up on the factual discussion you say you want.

Overthebow · 25/03/2025 16:10

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 25/03/2025 14:51

I shared an article on another thread but I think it bears repeating here - over 40% of employers surveyed by the epilepsy society said they wouldn't employ someone with epilepsy. How are disabled people supposed to get jobs when the government is doing nothing to make (either through incentives or sanctions) employers take on disabled staff?

In the other hand this implies that almost 60% of those surveyed would employ people with epilepsy, which is encouraging. And epilepsy isn’t the only disability, other disabilities may be seen as easier to manage in the workplace by companies.

Wildflowers99 · 25/03/2025 16:17

CentralLimit · 25/03/2025 15:32

No response @Wildflowers99 ?
I'm just taking you up on the factual discussion you say you want.

Bloody hell 2 hours and you’re already sending chasers? Happy to engage but busy, back later

iwentjasonwaterfalls · 25/03/2025 18:41

Overthebow · 25/03/2025 16:10

In the other hand this implies that almost 60% of those surveyed would employ people with epilepsy, which is encouraging. And epilepsy isn’t the only disability, other disabilities may be seen as easier to manage in the workplace by companies.

Over 40% of employers admitted to it. Makes you wonder how many others feel the same but wouldn't admit it. The article that statistic came from featured a number of people with epilepsy who were disciplined for epilepsy-related absences or even told "you can only have 3 seizures a year or it'll be a disciplinary".

Of course epilepsy isn't the only disability, but there are plenty of us with epilepsy who'd like to work and need workplaces to be understanding and accommodating.

Somethingthecatdraggedin7 · 25/03/2025 20:14

Goody2ShoesAndTheFilthyBeast · 19/03/2025 12:28

I can't believe so many people are just soaking up the blatant manipulation here and either cannot or will not see the obvious.

Get people to turn on the unemployed, blame them for the state of the country's finances.

Throw stories out there about people who don't want to work gaming The System.

Whip up the froth.

Start slipping in anti disabled sentiment.

Work to get people to see the disabled and the unemployed as the one group.

Expand the stories of unemployed people who don't want to work to include disabled people.

Add stories about people pretending to be disabled in order to not have to work.

Offer 'solutions' that sound great to the hard of thinking but that are, in reality, never going to work.

Encourage an attitude among those unaffected of I'm alright Jack with a side of My Taxes followed by an If They Really Wanted To Work They Would pudding to ensure that people stop caring about what is happening to the most vulnerable in society .

What next? Bring back the institutions? The deserving v the undeserving poor? The disabled enough v the not disabled enough?

The government could tackle huge wastage in the civil service and in the nhs, close tax loopholes that benefit the rich and the big businesses, stop pouring money into ridiculous shit, pack it in with the contracts to their pals, etc etc.

But no. They go after those with the least instead. (Coincidentally, those historically least likely to vote.)

It's kind of funny that everyone screams about Russian bots and manipulation and propaganda while you can sit here and read nothing but uk propaganda intended to manipulate the general population into blaming the most vulnerable for the state of the UK when in reality it's the choices and actions of the richest and most powerful that has led to this.

And people are fucking falling for it. Want to save 5 billion? Cancel the Thames crossing or make it wholly privately funded. It's cost millions already and work's not even started yet. Estimated total cost? 10 billion plus. Half of it public spending. There. 5 billion saved. You're welcome.

I never thought I'd see the day when Labour out-toried the tories.

Yes, yes and yes again.
I have been saying this for years. The lack of critical thinking in the face of media and government propaganda is quite breathtaking.
And we mock the Maga mob? It is all much of a muchness - the same selfish nastiness is in too many people both here and in the US.
This is why I prefer animals to people.

OP posts:
ThisOldThang · 25/03/2025 20:28

Yeah. Let's just not invest in public infrastructure so that those people that actually go to work to pay for your benefits have the shittest possible experience stuck in traffic for hours.

Remind me - why is the country in such a state?

ruethewhirl · 25/03/2025 21:48

ThisOldThang · 25/03/2025 11:53

I think the system will need to be completely redesigned to exclude invisible conditions, such as mental health, back pain, etc.

Those people will just have to survive on UC.

Your callousness is breathtaking, but it's surpassed by your arrogance.

ruethewhirl · 25/03/2025 21:53

ThisOldThang · 25/03/2025 11:53

I think the system will need to be completely redesigned to exclude invisible conditions, such as mental health, back pain, etc.

Those people will just have to survive on UC.

And also, what do you propose people with disabilities do within your magical little scheme if their overall household income puts them over the threshold for UC (e.g. because of a spouse's income) but is not actually sufficient to support the household if the disabled person is deemed not to be entitled to anything?

JenniferBooth · 25/03/2025 22:02

ThisOldThang · 25/03/2025 20:28

Yeah. Let's just not invest in public infrastructure so that those people that actually go to work to pay for your benefits have the shittest possible experience stuck in traffic for hours.

Remind me - why is the country in such a state?

Might help if some of the school run parents who live just metres away from the school walked instead of getting their cars out

ThisOldThang · 25/03/2025 22:04

ruethewhirl · 25/03/2025 21:53

And also, what do you propose people with disabilities do within your magical little scheme if their overall household income puts them over the threshold for UC (e.g. because of a spouse's income) but is not actually sufficient to support the household if the disabled person is deemed not to be entitled to anything?

The same thing every other family does?

ThisOldThang · 25/03/2025 22:06

JenniferBooth · 25/03/2025 22:02

Might help if some of the school run parents who live just metres away from the school walked instead of getting their cars out

Yes. I'm sure school run parents take a detour over the Thames before dropping the kids off metres from their starting point.

Swipe left for the next trending thread